►
From YouTube: Toronto and East York Community Council - April 24, 2019
Description
Toronto and East York Community Council, meeting 5, April 24, 2019
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=15402
Meeting Navigation:
0:14:59 - Call to order
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
If
people
could
I'm
sorry,
we
need
to
start
to
convene
the
meeting
Brad.
Can
you
just
yeah
good
morning
everyone
and
welcome
to
meeting
number
five
of
the
Toronto
East
York
Community
Council
I'm,
going
to
begin
by
gratefully
acknowledging
the
the
Toronto
East
York
Community
Council
meets
on
the
traditional
territory
of
many
nations,
including
the
Mississauga's
of
the
credit
Dioner
snob
ik,
the
Chippewa,
the
Hoda
nashoni
and
the
wind
at
people's
and
is
now
home
to
many
diverse
First,
Nations,
Inuit
and
métis
people's.
We
also
acknowledge
that
Toronto
is
covered
by
treaty.
A
B
A
A
Item
5.2
eight
one:
five,
zero
done,
Avenue
part
of
a
larger
parcel,
including
130
160
and
162
Don
Avenue
zoning
bylaw
amendment
application.
Preliminary
report
I'll
move
approval
of
the
recommendations,
all
favor
opposed
carried
item;
5.2
9
10
through
30
Dawes
Road
zoning
bylaw
amendment
application.
Preliminary
report,
councillor
Bradford,
like.
E
A
C
A
I
think
all
of
us
should
always
be
in
awe
of
councillor
Wong
Tam's
practice
on
these
matters.
So
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
item
te
five
point:
three:
two:
nine
five:
four
through
nine
five,
eight
Broadway
Avenue
and
72
Chester
Hill
Road
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
amendment
applications
not
seeing
councillor
Fletcher,
so
I'm
going
to
hold
that
in
the
chairs
name
until
she
was
with
us
item
te
5.3
378
through
90
Queens,
Park
zoning
amendment
application,
preliminary
report,
councillor
Layton,
yes,.
C
A
A
C
A
E
A
Hold
that
for
council,
let
me
just
read
the
title
of
one:
nine:
three,
two:
two:
zero
one:
Church
Street
zoning
amendment
application
preliminary
report,
we're
gonna
hold
that
in
councillor,
Wong,
Tam's,
name,
item
te,
five
point:
three:
six:
nine,
eight
five
Woodbine
Avenue
and
two
zero;
seven,
eight,
two,
eight
six,
two
one:
zero,
two
one:
two
and
two
one:
zero:
six
Danforth
Avenue
official
plan
and
zoning
amendment
applications.
Preliminary
report,
councillor
Bradford,
thank.
C
C
E
A
A
A
A
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
item
te
five
point:
five:
three
installation
removal
of
on
street
accessible
parking
spaces;
March,
29,
2019,
sorry
delegated
to
anyone-
have
any
amendments
to
that.
No
I'll
just
move
it
all.
Those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te
five
point:
five
for
accessible
loading
zone,
Co,
Hill,
Drive,.
A
I'm
gonna
move
the
staff
recommendations.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
item
te
five
point:
five:
five
accessible
loading
zone,
Jennings
Avenue,
I'm,
gonna,
move
to
staff
recommendations;
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
item
te,
5.56,
accessible
loading
zone,
st.
Clair,
Avenue
West,
councillor
Matt.
Oh
the
recommendation,
moving
staff
recommendations,
all
those
in
favor
opposed,
carries.
A
A
A
G
A
A
A
Item
te,
five
point:
six
five
parking
amendments
Carla
and
your
counselor
Fletcher.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te;
five
point:
six:
six
parking
amendments,
Floyd
Avenue,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te;
five
point:
six:
seven
parking
amendments,
Hampton,
Avenue,
Council
election;
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
item
te
five
point:
six
eight
always
stop
control;
Northcliffe,
Boulevard
and
Key
West
Avenue
councillor;
math
live
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te;
five
point:
six:
nine
traffic
control
signals;
Lumsden,
Avenue
and
Cedarvale
Avenue
cast
of
Bradford
its.
A
G
A
Item
te
5.7
to
residential
on
street
parking,
permit
results
of
community
consultation
and
potential
implementation
plan
members.
A
number
of
you
have
approached
me
on
this
item,
and
what
I'm
going
to
suggest
is
that
we
defer
it
for
two
cycles,
partly
because
of
the
change
in
community
council
boundaries
and
all
of
our
newly
aligned
wards.
This
is
going
to
take
a
little
bit
more
work
before
we
consider
it
so
I
have
a
motion
to
defer
it
for
two
cycles.
You
go
please
what.
H
A
G
G
A
G
A
The
opposite
problem:
half
the
people
I
represent
we're
not
consulted,
but
are
now
part
of
Toronto
East
York
Community
Council.
So
there
as
I
said,
there
are
a
number
of
complicating
and
confounding
factors
with
this
report
because
of
the
actions
of
a
premier
who
doesn't
have
any
regard
for
the
citizens
of
Toronto
and
that's
why
we're
deferring
it
for
two
months
so
that
we
can
straighten
at
these
questions
all
right.
H
Yeah
I'm
speaking
to
the
deferral,
I'll
support
it,
but
reluctantly,
because
this
has
gone
on
for
an
awfully
long
time.
We
were
hoping
that
this
would
come
back
before
the
end
of
the
last
council,
our
term
and
it
didn't.
And
now
it's
back
and
we
have
these
complicating
factors
with
with
different
wards
that
weren't
there,
some
people
that
are
leaving
like
in
your
situation,
I
do
understand
it
to
be
the
Toronto
in
East
York
community
council
boundaries.
H
So
we
have
to
be
other
provisions
for
people
that
might
want
to
be
part
of
it
or
not
want
to
be
part
of
it
that
are
outside
and
I
was
very
concerned.
I
am
concerned
in
general
that
across
many
departments
that
things
have
not
yet
been
aligned
to
our
new
wards,
so
I
am
supporting
this
because
that
has
to
happen
and
the
Parks
Department
hasn't
been
aligned
to
our
new
wards.
H
These
streets,
weren't,
aligned
to
our
new
wards
and
I,
have
trouble
understanding
why,
since
the
election
was
on
October
22nd
and
the
new
wards
were
set
in
place
on
September
the
14th,
how
every
department
has
it
now
aligned
with
brand-new
wards?
That
is
surprising
to
me,
so
I
think
that,
as
long
as
we're
not
coming
back
to
say,
we
have
to
start
at
zero
mr.
chair
and
that
you're
having
these
consultations
with
new
areas
that
weren't
part
of
Toronto
in
East
York.
My
position
would
be
that
they
weren't
in
the
original.
H
Then
perhaps
they
don't
have
to
go
forward
if
they
don't
wish
to
I
do
have
issues,
perhaps
councillor
bred,
for
it
also
has
them
around
the
East
York
Hospital,
the
Michael
Guerin
redevelopment,
where
there's
really
problems
with
parking
and
a
great
number
of
the
streets
around
the
hospital.
Don't
have
permanent
parking.
H
So
this
actually
sets
that
back
I'm
going
to
be
asking
for
some
more
streets
to
get
added
on,
even
in
the
interim
now,
because
we
just
have
to
be
able
to
have
people
park
on
the
street
since
the
parking
lots
that
they
would
normally
use
at
Michael.
Guerin
hospital
are
now
full
of
construction
vehicles,
so
I'm
disappointed,
I.
Think
that's
what
I'm
trying
to
say.
H
A
G
Thirty-Five
people
attended,
I
I,
don't
I,
do
not
even
see
a
mandate
to
move
forward
with
such
a
dramatic
change
that
affects
people's
day-to-day
in
99
lives,
with
such
a
little
substantive
consultation
in
that
respect,
it
wasn't
the
fault
of
staff,
Manhattan
and
I.
Don't
think
that
the
average
member
of
the
public
is
aware
of
this
discussion
from
those
who
have
spoken
with
them
and
for
those
who
are
affected
where
they
are
clearly
saying
to
me
and
I.
G
You
know
I
hope
that
this
deferral
really
is
about
figuring
out
figuring
out
how
to
do
whatever
we
do
well,
but
not
just
to
figure
out
how
to
sort
of
turn
this
mess
into
something
better,
because
I,
just
I,
don't
based
on
the
report
in
front
of
us.
This
doesn't
seem
like
a
reasonable
thing
to
proceed
with,
based
on
what
we
have.
Thank
you.
A
C
A
C
A
C
A
A
A
So
before
we
introduce
81
to
87
I'd
like
to
return
to
five
point,
three:
two:
that's
councillor
Fletcher's,
it's
nine
five:
four
through
nine
five,
eight
Broadview
Avenue
and
72
Chester
Hill
Road
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
amendment
applications
preliminary
review,
councillor
Fletcher;
yes,
oh
I'm!
Sorry
there
is
a
deputing
fairy.
Yes,
there
is
it's
written
it
yeah,
okay,
so
I'm!
Thank
you.
My
apologies
will
hold
that
for
a
deputation
Thank
You
councillor,
Fletcher,
okay,.
A
A
G
G
So
I'm
very
happy
to
join
my
colleague,
councillor
Laden
in
moving
this,
this
new
business
item-
and
this
is
a
request
to
transportation
services
based
on
a
working
group
process
done
by
both
staff,
with
the
support
of
local
councillors,
offices
and
really
driven
by
local
residents.
Rapiers
groups,
parent
councils,
local
concern
residents
who
have
experienced
Avenue
Road
being
treated
like
a
highway
everyday.
G
Typically,
drivers
are
going
60,
70,
kilometers
an
hour
on
a
Pandi
road
up
and
down,
and
residents
have
not
just
said
something
has
to
be
done,
but
there
they've
said
we
want
to
be
part
of
arriving
at
a
really
reasonable
and
positive
decision
about
what
can
be
done.
So
these
recommendations
are
coming
out
of
that
process.
It's
been
very
democratic.
G
Nothing
should
be
done
that
will
encourage
incursion
of
traffic
into
the
neighborhoods.
That
is
another
safety
matter
that
we
don't
want
to
exacerbate,
but
we
do
want
to
make
sure
that
I've,
a
new
road
is
safer
and
by
the
way
in
the
future,
I'll
just
add
on
to
this
I.
Don't
think
you
would
mind
what
I've
been
discussing
with
staff
and
I.
G
Imagine
others
have
too
is
that
Avenue
Road
should
have
a
real
rethink
in
the
future,
whether
it
be
redesigned
better
uses
that
have
been
discussions
around
even
looking
at
narrowing
it
in
ways
where
you,
where
we
can
even
use
it
for
a
BRT
one
day,
for
example,
to
provide
relief
to
the
overcrowded
subway
line,
but
right
now
we're
looking
at
thoughtful,
immediate
things
that
we
can
do
to
make
Avenue
Road
safer.
Thank
you.
A
C
A
A
H
A
H
A
H
A
A
Favor
opposed
carry
item
te
5.2,
naming
of
an
existing
public
Lane
founded
by
Harvard
Street
palmerston
Boulevard,
Ulster
Street
and
Euclid
Avenue
Council
late
again,
I'd
like
to
approve.
Oh
sorry,
I
have
to
call
for
deputations.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
should
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
that
council.
A
A
C
A
Eight
seven
one,
eight,
nine,
nine
College
Street
zoning
amendment,
application
and
rental
housing
depth
demolition
applications.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
none
councillor
Bradford.
Do
you
have
any
advice
for
us?
That's
counselor,
bylaws
work.
F
A
A
Item
te,
five
point:
six,
one:
seven,
zero
Spadina
Avenue
and
three
five
and
seven
Cameron
Street
rental,
housing,
demolition,
application
and
section
37
matters
final
report:
are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
none
Oh
council
eight?
This
is
five
point.
Six
and
councilor
Krusty's
were
five
point.
A
F
A
H
A
All
right
members,
if
you
have
had
a
chance
to
review,
take
it
you're
on
councillor
Fletcher's
amendments
and
the
item.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
item
te;
five
point:
nine
one
Front
Street
West
in
one-for-one,
Bay,
Street
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
amendment
applications,
refusal
report
on.
C
A
point
of
order,
caps
or
perks
might
I
make
the
following
suggestion.
Given
there
are
deput
insan
this
file
and
it
tests
or
crises
in
councillor
crises
board
that
we
move
through
the
items,
the
rest
of
the
ten
a.m.
items
that
have
deput
ends
and
return
to
that
10:00
a.m.
10:00
a.m.
item
after
so
here
is
the
benefit
of
being
in
the
room
when
the
depth
in
speak.
I
do
have
direction.
So
if
we
need
to
not
go
to
that
I'm
happy
to
perhaps
after
the
other
10:00
a.m.
p.m.
C
A
Let's,
let's
do
one
thing:
okay,
I'm
gotcha
on
item
T,
5.9,
there's
a
proposal
to
I
hold
it
off
until
counselor
Creston
can
return.
He
had
told
me
that
he
was
likely
to
be
back
at
10:30,
maybe
a
little
longer
than
that,
so
it
won't
be
a
significant
delay
on
that
on
favor
pose
carried
okay,
so
we'll
move
to
te
5.10,
which
is
5,
9,
8
and
5
9
6
are
rushed
and
Road
zoning
bylaw
amendment
application
request
for
directions
report.
We
do
have
a
decorative
you
tint
Ezra,
BRABUS
Ezra.
A
C
C
A
A
A
Arlene,
are
you
gonna
be
using
your
laptop
for
an
overhead
or
just
to
read
from
okay?
That
reminds
me:
I
should
alert
people
if
you're
making
a
deputation
and
you
have
a
laptop
and
you
want
it
projected
on
the
screen.
Please
well,
in
advance
of
your
item.
Go
over
to
the
AV
abuse
booth.
This
incredibly
talented
gentleman
will
get
you
all
sorted
out.
Okay,
so
I
leaned
the
way
it
works.
You
have
five
minutes
to
make
a
deputation.
B
B
Okay,
I
actually
thought
someone
would
be
giving
the
brief
history
of
this
matter.
So
if
it's
okay
I
will,
my
name
is
Arlene
wolf
and
I'm,
an
owner
of
the
two
and
a
half
story,
grey
painted
detached
house
at
28,
Belmont
Street
I've
lived
there
and
owned
the
house
since
January
2014,
the
picture
in
the
material
is
incorrect.
It
shows
I
believe
the
original
brick
and
my
house
was
painted
brick
I,
don't
know
when,
but
sometime
before,
I
moved
in
this
matter
listing
on
the
heritage.
B
Registrar
came
up
sometime
in
March
when
most
of
the
people
whose
houses
were
involved
were
either
away.
It
was
served.
No
notice
was
served
by
courier
because
the
Heritage
Board
wanted
to
give
us
five
days.
Notice,
I've
looked
into
it
and
basically
they
don't
have
to
give
us
any
notice
whatsoever,
but
they
did
go
to
the
expense
of
sending
notice
bike
by
courier.
There
is
presently
a
study.
The
Belmont
Hillsboro
study,
which
was
commenced
in
2015
and
I.
Believe
there's
only
been
one
meeting
in
connection
with
that
study.
B
I
attended
that
meeting
and
the
process
set
out
there
provides
for
consultation
and
sets
up
the
number
of
meetings
and
it's
very
residents
involved.
The
listing
here
is
not
resident
involved
at
all
and
there's
no
consultation.
It
was
not
commenced
at
the
the
impetus
of
any
of
the
residents
on
the
street.
B
The
person
who's
speaking
after
me
isn't,
but
if
the
historian
on
the
street
and
she
applied
to
have
her
house
listed
and
one
other
person
whose
house
is
being
listed
applied,
none
of
the
other
houses
and
I
believe
it's
12,
they're
impacted
and
we're
all
I
think
various
letters
have
been
filed,
we're
all
against
the
listing
for
various
reasons
which
have
her
increased
insurance.
Increased
costs
I've
offered
to
give
an
undertaking
to
the
city,
because
my
insurance
is
gonna
increase
by
about
30
percent.
B
If
my
house
is
listed,
apparently
the
listing
only
gives
you
only
given
the
city
the
requirement
that
90
days
notice
has
to
be
given
of
demolition.
I've
said:
I
have
no
intention
of
demolishing
my
house.
I
have
no
intention
of
doing
anything
to
it.
I
do
have
as
an
aside
a
brick
problem.
It's
starting
to
deteriorate
because
the
house
was
built
in
1885
because
of
that
I'm
probably
going
to
have
to
do
some
exterior
work,
but
in
the
material
at
the
Heritage
Board
filed.
B
It
only
shows
that
the
the
thing
that
makes
my
house
xtour
called
arc
large
and
architecturally
interesting,
is
the
stone
around
the
windows.
Everything
else
in
my
house
has
been
changed
on
the
exterior
well
before
I
moved
in
I'd
like
to
point
out
to
you
that
the
existence
of
the
study,
rather
than
the
just
the
listing,
provides
for
the
whole
area,
Hillsboro
and
Belmont
to
be
designated
historical.
The
designation
of
these
14
houses
means
that
the
whole
block
there's
three
actually
series
of
townhouses
and
then
there's
a
few
detached
houses.
B
The
first
block
of
townhouses
was
drastically
renovated
in
1962-63
by
a
renowned
architect.
At
that
time,
several
of
the
houses
were
designated.
The
rest
of
the
street
was
not
designated,
as
people
have
moved
in
they've
asked
if
they
wanted
it.
They've
asked
for
their
house
to
be
designated,
and
it
has
most
of
the
other.
People
are
relying
on
the
historical
on
the
Belmont
historical
study.
Now
that
study
is
very
important
because
it
provides
for
consultation
and
it
provides
for
the
whole
area.
B
It's
my
understanding
that
the
Heritage
Board
cannot
designate
whole
streets
as
historical
and
what's
happening
here
is
and
I've
asked
them
several
outstanding
issues
that
I
put
to
the
board
that
have
not
been
answered.
One
of
them
is:
why
is
the
townhouse
the
row
house
next
to
me
not
being
designated,
and
why
are
the
three
houses
to
the
west
of
me
not
being
designated
and
I've
been
told
they're?
Basically,
they
can't
designate
the
whole
street.
B
So
in
brief,
I
would
like
this
matter,
deferred
one
so
that
they
could
be
changes
done
at
the
Heritage
Board
level,
and
the
picture
of
my
house
changed
so
that
it's
the
correct
picture.
I,
don't
think
it's
right
that
you
have
an
older
picture
in
when
my
house
has
already
had
a
lot
of
his
exterior
work
on
it.
Arleen.
B
A
A
J
You,
my
name,
is
Sheila
Latham
and
I
live
with
my
husband
David
at
42
Belmont
Street.
We
support
the
recommendations
of
heritage
preservation,
services
and
the
Toronto
Preservation
Board
to
add
14
houses
on
Belmont
Street
to
the
Heritage
Register,
a
broad
perspective
and
long
term
vision
is
especially
important
because,
as
we
all
know,
the
ownership
of
houses
changes.
J
We
are
fortunate
for
all
the
owners
on
Belmont
that
have
preserved
the
heritage,
attributes
of
the
streetscape
that
we
know
we
value
today.
In
our
own
way.
We
have
become
guardians
of
our
city's
heritage.
However,
even
since
1999
we
have
lost
several
historic
houses
at
the
west
end
of
our
street,
including
two
of
the
oldest
houses.
J
A
K
C
K
And
through
the
chair,
the
provincial
government,
the
Ministry
of
Tourism
culture
and
sport
has,
for
the
for
several
years,
had
information
on
insurance
and
heritage
that
relates
to
designated
properties
specifically
and
with
the
Insurance
Bureau
of
Canada,
saying
that
it
should
not
in
any
way
increase
the
premiums
for
insurance.
However,
I
should
say
that
it
is
a
an
industry-wide
concern
about
how
agents
or
representing
or
understanding
it
so
it
is.
It
is
a
broader
understanding
or
issue
that
needs
to
be
addressed.
K
K
C
K
So,
with
with
the
reason
or
the
the
background
for
us
on
this
particular
initiative
was
stemming
from
a
Heritage
Conservation
District.
That
council
asked
us
to
deal
with
we've
since
that
authorization
and
in
2016
we've
looked
at
it
again
to
try
and
prioritize
and
in
the
meanwhile,
we
look
to
having
it
this
interim
protection
of
listing,
because
there
have
been
several
committee
of
adjustment
applications
for
demolition.
K
I
can't
tell
you
the
statistics,
but
it
has
occurred
over
the
past
four
years,
but
so
it's
just
it's
just
a
pattern
or
a
trend
and
for
us
I
think
the
the
issue
is
that
we
need
to
be
able
to
be
informed,
as
opposed
to
rushing
for
responding
to
a
demolition.
So
it
gives
clarity
and
good
information
in
advance
to
a
property
in
order.
So.
C
You
actually
you
answered
my
next
question
about
how
this
evolved,
but
but
the
question
I
was
asking
was
very
specific
to
the
depth.
The
depth
in
had
suggested
that
they
would
enter
into
some
kind
of
legal
undertaking
with
the
city
not
to
demolish
their
home
without
notification,
and
when
we
asked
staff
offline,
yes
was
just
not
something
that
we
did
and
so
I'm
just.
What
can
you
give
any
clarity?
Sure.
K
C
K
Yes,
in
doing
as
part
of
not
only
looking
at
one
individual
property
when
we're
looking
at
heritage
evaluation,
especially
in
this
context
of
row
houses,
we
look
to
the
the
full
collection
and,
as
noted
in
the
staff
report
and
the
properties
at
three-thirty,
32,
34
and
54
did
not
meet
the
provincial
criteria
of
regulation
906,
which
indicates
whether
or
not
there
is
determination
of
cultural
heritage
value.
So
we
did
do
that.
We
don't
publish
the
analysis
of
when
it
doesn't
meet.
K
C
Move
the
staff
recommendations.
We
had
deferred
this
from
the
last
meeting
to
give
an
opportunity
for
some
local
residents
who
had
not
been
really
consulted
as
much
as
they
could
have
been
because
of
the
nature
of
this
process.
This
started
a
long
time
ago.
There
was
a
lot
of
changing.
There
was
a
lot
of
turnover
of
property,
and
so
some
of
the
original
owners
or
some
owners
now
weren't
the
original
owners
where,
when
the
process
was,
was
begun,
so
I
understood
and
sympathize
for
the
the
the
the
the
lack
of
of
consultation
on
the
matter.
C
I
I'm
satisfied,
though,
that
our
staff
have
had
the
opportunity
to
communicate
to
the
residents
and
an
address
and
answer
some
of
their
questions
and
concerns
that
they
can
and
the
reality
is
and
and
I
feel
having
been
at
the
deliberation
for
the
the
heritage
preservation.
But
on
this
that
these
these
properties
on
Belmont
are
indeed
the
protection.
If
you've
ever
driven
down,
Belmont
you'll
know
it's
it's,
they
prefer
you
to
walk,
but
there's
there's
there's
a
different.
C
It's
a
different
feeling
when
you're
walking
down
the
street,
they
the
character
of
the
buildings
and
and
and
to
the
entire
that
entire
row
is
unmistakable,
that
there
is
a
distinct
character
to
the
to
the
buildings
into
that
Street
as
a
whole.
I
realize
that
this
is
a
slightly
unconventional
way
of
listing
properties,
because
we're
doing
so
by
a
batch
listing
rather
than
a
Heritage
Conservation
District.
But
the
reality
is
we're
not
going
to
get
the
Heritage
Conservation
District
anytime
in
the
near
future,
and
as
staff
have
explained,
these
properties
are
under
regular
threat.
C
We
had
one
at
the
on
at
the
committee
of
adjustment
just
just
weeks
ago,
where
the
residents
were
standing
up
to
to
fight
a
very
drastic
change
to
the
character
of
this,
of
that
one
property
end
of
the
whole
street
when
you're
looking
at
a
townhouse.
What
that
might
do,
and
the
chain
reaction
that
that
might
have
and
so
I
think
the
staff
I
think
the
residents
for
their
for
their
interest
and
their
persistence
on
the
file.
C
At
one
point,
I
suggested
when
the
for
sale
sign
went
up
for
sale,
sign
went
up
while
the
item,
while
the
property
was
at
the
committee
of
adjustment,
saying
there
are
alternate
plans,
not
saying
that
they
hadn't
been
approved,
but
but
there
were
alternate
plans
and
I
hadn't
I'd
encourage
the
neighbors
to
put
up
sign,
saying
we
do
not
appeal.
We
do
not
approve
of
those
alternate
plans,
I
don't
think
they
did.
C
It
would,
but
it
would
have
been
creative
and
I
think
a
good
way
of
making
a
point
to
any
prospective
buyers
that
you're
buying
into
two
to
a
piece
of
Toronto's
history
and
a
piece
of
Toronto
heritage
and
well
III.
Think
that
all
the
the
residents,
even
if
they
oppose
the
the
listing
I,
believe
that
they
they
in
fact
a
support
and
want
to
live
in
in
in
the
neighborhood
with
the
existing
character.
It's
just.
We
may
disagree
on
the
path
to
get
there
and
to
protect
it,
and
often
that's
the
case.
C
Even
in
this
chamber.
We
agree
on
the
final
position
that
we
want
to,
but
we,
where
we
disagree,
is
on
what
directions
we
should
take
and
so
I
hope
the
community
will
go
back
and
having
settled
this
matter
at
at
City
Hall
and
let's
get
back
into
the
business
of
building
really
great
strong
community.
So
I'll
move
the
staff
recommendations
and
thank
the
local
previous
local
councillor
who
started
the
process
before.
A
G
First
of
all,
support
the
the
local
councillor
and
the
former
local
councillors.
Efforts
to
support
recommendations
to
preserve
in
this
context,
architectural
heritage,
but
both
our
cultural
and
architectural
heritage
is
important
to
Toronto
story
and
we've
done
I
think
over
generations,
a
very
poor
job
at
protecting
our
story.
G
You
all
may
remember
a
I
think
was
like
two
or
three
years
ago
there
was
a
building,
a
bank
old
Bank
of
Montreal
building
north
of
Yonge
and
Eglinton.
It
was
in
councillor
carmichael,
grebs
Ward.
At
the
time
and
residents
in
Lydon
Park
were
shocked
when
this
building
was
demolished
and
they
were
furious
at
the
city,
because
the
city
said
legally,
they
had
to
provide
a
demolition
permit.
They
were
furious
at
heritage
preservation
staff
for
not
doing
something.
The
reality
was,
nobody
had
actually
bothered
to
a
request
that
it
be
listed.
G
What
listing
means-
and
this
is
to
the
audience
of
those
who
fear
it-
it
doesn't
mean
it's
it's
preserved
and
stone
in
a
way
that
there
isn't
any
opportunity
for
thoughtful
consideration
about
any
reasonable
changes
in
the
future.
It
doesn't
mean
that
it
is.
It
is
sterilized
in
some
way
it
means
that,
rather
than
just
being
demolished
because
they
have
a
right
to
demolish
it,
it
means
that
we
have
an
opportunity
for
60
days
to
consider
whether
or
not
there
should
be
preservation.
That's
reasonable.
G
It's
responsible
and
I
just
want
to,
along
with
commending
the
local
councillor
and
the
former
local
councillor,
I
want
to
commend
our
heritage
planning
staff,
because
they're
actually
doing
exactly
what
we
keep
asking
them
to
do.
We
say
here
are
only
a
few
resources
to
be
able
to
preserve
the
whole,
the
whole
city,
and
we
want
you
to
be
proactive
and
we
want
you
to
do
your
job
and
that's
exactly
what
they're
doing
and
I
really
respect
the
work
that
they're
doing
and
thank
you
very
much
any.
E
And
just
very
quickly,
and
also
to
thank
the
deputy
ins
for
all
your
I
mean
I,
recognize
that
this
has
been
a
longtime
community
endeavor.
It
dates
back
over
ten
years
and
and
before
then,
even
though
there
has
been
a
request
to
put
together
the
Hillsborough,
Belmont,
HCD
I
know
that
be
given
the
volume
of
hcd
requirements
and
worked
as
before
city
staff
and
how
they
categorized,
which
one
goes.
First
Belmont
and
Hillsborough
was
always
going
to
be
somewhere
in
the
middle
of
the
pack
in
the
end
of
the
pack.
E
So
this
particular
body
of
work
that's
taken
place
with
the
batch
listing
is
exactly
I
would
say
where
we
need
to
go
with
a
lot
more
neighborhoods
that
are
this
sort
of
under
the
threat
of
CFA
applications
as
well
as
rezoning
and
the
village
of
Yorkville
in
the
northern
edge
of
it
is
one
of
the
most
beautiful
and
iconic
neighborhoods
in
the
city.
I
miss
it
very
much,
but
I
also
think
that
it's
it's
been
in
very
good
hands
of
political
leadership,
of
trying
to
steward
it
along
and
also,
of
course.
E
More
importantly,
the
residents
have
been
the
biggest
champions
of
trying
to
galvanize
public
interest,
galvanized
public
support,
to
say
there
is
something
very
special
about
this,
get
this
little
patch
in
Toronto,
and
it's
not
just
for
the
area
resident,
but
it's
for
everybody
and
if
we
can
all
just
work
together
to
get
to
an
outcome
and
I
believe
that
that
good
outcome
came
today.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
your
participation
and
also
the
staff
for
your
hard
work.
It's
not
easy
to
sort
of
list.
14
properties
at
once.
E
C
Just
on
a
point
of
personal
privilege
to
your
comment
earlier,
councilor
perks
did
the
prophets
and
hecklers
to
your
press
conference
council
Cressy.
Well,
yeah
Lauren.
The
CBC
is
reporting
that
there
was
a
heckler
from
councilor
right
from
from
Minister
Elliot's
office.
Is
that
is
that
accurate,
oh
yeah,
a
privilege,
Oh.
A
That's
called
a
message
box
members
a
few
moments
ago.
We
skipped
over
item
te
5.4
because
the
local
councillor
was
out
of
the
room.
This
is
naming
of
an
existing
public
Lane
west
of
Yonge
Street
extending
north
from
Wellesley
Street
West.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
none
councillor
wong-tam?
Yes,.
E
Thank
you
very
much,
I'd
like
to
move
the
staff
recommendation
and
to
formally
name
this
particular
stretch
called
Bistro
Lane
and
there's
been
a
series
of
historical
and
iconic
restaurants
that
have
always
sort
of
sat
at
that
at
that
particular
corner
and
I.
Think
that
the
residents
Association
from
the
bay
clover
hip
area
and
the
CWA
they.
This
really
meant
a
lot
to
them
and
they've
worked
on,
of
course,
every
single
naming
in
in
the
old
war
27
and
now
the
new
or
13.
So,
thank
you
very
much.
A
Anyone
else
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carry.
This
takes
them
to
takes
us
to
item
te
5.1
to
inclusion
on
the
Heritage
registry
register.
Sorry
an
intention
to
designate
under
part
four
section:
29
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
28:30
Langley
Avenue.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
H
L
A
Councillor
cressie
you're
back
amongst
us,
we
had
some
deputations
listed
for
an
item
in
your
award
and
we
thought
it
would
be
best
if
you
were
here
to
hear
them.
So
what
I'd
like
to
propose
members
is
that
we
go
to
te
5.9,
which
is
one
front:
Street
West
and
one
four
one
Bay
Street
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
amendment
applications.
A
M
Of
committee,
my
name
is
art,
phillips,
director
of
development
with
Larco
investments,
and
I'm
here
today
to
ask
for
a
deferral
on
the
action
that's
being
proposed
by
staff
for
the
past
two
years.
We
have
worked
with
the
community
in
consulting
with
them,
as
well
as
with
the
BA,
the
current
councillor
and
the
previous
two
councillors
on
this
application.
We
stated
at
last
on
April
the
1st,
which
was
a
another
community
consultation
meeting
called
by
the
city
pertaining
to
this
application.
M
We
stated
publicly
that
we
intended
to
amend
our
application.
It
is
our
desire
not
to
go
to
el
pat,
but
rather
to
continue
to
work
with
staff
and
also,
more
importantly,
in
our
opinion,
to
work
with
the
community
in
developing
a
project
which
everybody
will
take
ownership.
It's
our
desire
to
have
an
application
come
forward
that
has
strongly
supported
by
staff.
We
recognize
that
the
staff
we're
required
to
write
their
refusal
report
based
on
the
submission
as
made
and
as
stated
it
is
our
intent
to
make
an
amendment.
M
We
need
a
minimum
of
six
months.
We
believe,
in
order
to
do
a
redesign
to
properly
facilitate
and
to
deal
with
the
community
what
we
did
at
the
start
of
this
process
before
we
even
beginning
design,
we
met
with
the
community
our
desire.
This
time
is
to
get
a
preliminary
design,
which
is
an
amendment
to
our
current
application,
go
back
to
the
community
to
get
their
reaction,
but
also
to
continue
to
work
with
staff.
So,
once
again,
I
ask
that
this
committee
defer
the
recommendation
and
allow
us
to
proceed
in
a
public
consultation
process.
D
A
question
Thank
You
art
for
being
here,
I'm
sure
you
can
understand
the
concern
that
staff
may
have
if
an
appeal
were
to
come
and
so
I
guess
a
question
I
have
is,
would
you
be
prepared
to
put
in
writing
a
commitment
not
to
appeal
this
application
before
that
submit
the
resubmission
comes
in
and
our
staff
have
the
chance
to
report
on
it?
Yes,
I
am
okay,
I
think
those
are
all
my
questions
at
the
moment.
Thank
the.
M
M
We've
been
clear
to
staff.
We
were
actually
meeting
with
with
Henry
tang
and
David's
it
when
they
advised
us
that
this
refusal
report
was
coming
forward.
We
asked
them
not
to
bring
forward
a
refusal
report
because
we
didn't
want
to
end
up
having
this
application
be
in
the
hands
of
the
local
planning,
Appeal
Tribunal
in
terms
of
coming
to
a
resolution.
M
I
think
you
all
know
at
least
anecdotally,
that
things
are
a
mess
at
the
local
planning,
Appeal
Tribunal,
even
with
staffs
suggestion
that
we
tried
the
reconciliation
or
mediation
route
at
the
local
planning
appeal
tribe.
You
know
we
are
just
fundamentally
concerned
that
if
we
get
into
that
process,
it's
going
to
be
a
cumbersome
process.
It's
going
to
be
a
legal
litigious
process.
M
We
don't
think
that
that's
necessary
and
in
this
case,
staffs
concerned,
the
way
was
expressed
to
us
is
that
under
bill,
139
there's
a
requirement
within
two
hundred
and
ten
days
for
staff
to
put
their
concerns
formally
in
writing.
That's
now
being
done
through
the
refusal
report
and
it's
our
opinion
and
and
and
since
a
mcdougal
is
slated
out
in
her
letter.
That's
simply
receiving
the
staff
report
and
deferring
consideration
will
allow
those
concerns
to
be
noted
on
the
public
record,
because
it
would
form
part
of
the
public
record
and
certainly
by
deferring
the
report.
M
The
effect
of
it
will
be
to
allow
us
to
continue
to
work
forward
with
staff
and
come
to
constructive
solution,
and,
in
my
opinion
this
is
a
circumstance
where
I'm
really
confident
that,
if
given
the
chance
to
do
it,
we're
going
to
be
able
to
come
to
a
solution
with
staff.
So
thanks
very
much
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
A
F
F
Good
morning,
this
is
my
colleague,
David
Anderson,
we're
here
today
with
hats
of
the
communities
for
sustainable
development
and,
in
light
of
the
conversation
that
just
happened,
we'll
keep
our
remarks
really
brief.
We
just
wanted
to
reiterate
the
the
merits
of
the
many
concerns
brought
up
at
a
city
report.
This.
F
A
A
A
A
F
There's
there's
isn't
a
regulatory
requirement
per
se
that
you
take
a
decision
on
the
application
and
if
you
in
fact
make
a
decision,
then
you
force
me
to
appeal.
So
that
is
why,
when
councilor
cressie
asked
the
very
I
thought
prescient
question
which
was,
would
you
agree
not
to
appeal
to
allow
for
the
application
to
be
amended?
That's
really
the
the
answer,
because
what
I
understand
the
city
is
doing
and
I
respect.
F
That
is
because,
if,
if
I
were
to
appeal
based
on
delay,
the
council
wouldn't
have
had
information
in
front
of
it
with
respect
to
its
concerns,
but
if
it
actually
makes
a
decision,
it
then
triggers
a
different
process
and
bill.
139
does
not
allow
per
se
for
me
to
after
I
appeal
to
make
an
amended
application
in
the
world.
A
F
A
D
D
F
I
would
also
add
that
there's
absolutely
nothing
that
prevent
that
forces.
Ms
MacDougall's
client
to
appeal
the
application
to
t
lab,
and
my
understanding
is
that
City
Planning
is
more
than
prepared
to
continue
to
work
with
her
client.
Even
in
the
event
that
council
does
adopt
the
refusal
report
and.
D
So
I
guess
then
to
planning
the
applicant
has
indicated
a
desire
and
a
willingness
to
revise
the
application
more
in
line
with
city
staff's
feedback.
If
the
refusal
report
is
adopted,
is
there
still
the
opportunity
for
City
Planning
staff
in
the
community
to
engage
with
the
applicant
to
that
outcome
so
through.
M
D
E
Yes,
thank
you
just
sort
of
if
you
can
give
us
the
history
to
the
file.
How
long
has
the
applicant
been
with
the
application
in
front
of
of
heritage
as
well
as
planning
staff?
How
long
have
you
been
working
with
the
applicant
before
even
the
application
came
in
three
application?
Submission
said
a
year
two
years
and
how
many
meetings
have
you
had
with
them?.
E
So
when
the
applicant
now
appears
before
us
and
says
that
there's
opportunities
for
them
to
revise
the
submission
that
they
would
be
perhaps
more
agreeable
to
working
with
you
now
there
were
opportunities
that
were
afforded
to
them
even
before
this
report
was
tabled
to
specifically
provide
planning
staff
and
heritage
with
some
of
those
opportunities
to
accommodate.
The
request.
Is
that
correct
that.
D
I
was
gonna
say
to
speak,
but
that's
what
you
normally
say:
I'll
begin
by
moving
the
staff
recommendations.
Let
me
state
at
the
outset
in
this
case
that
we
have
an
applicant
who
has
been
working
exceptionally
closely
proactively
and
I
believe
heading
towards
a
very
positive
outcome
with
the
city
and
with
the
local
community.
It's
not
perfect.
In
fact,
they
have
acknowledged
that
the
design
in
front
of
us
has
to
be
significantly
redone
and
they
intend
to
do
that
under
a
different
legal
model.
A
Else
to
speak,
seeing
none
on
council
Krusty's
motion,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
okay,
I
believe
next,
we
have
te
five
point.
One
three
refusal
of
an
application
for
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
located
at
six
six
three
through
six
six,
five
King
Street
West.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
A
D
A
A
Right
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te
5.15
refusal
of
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
application
located
at
one
nine
one,
College
Street,
Henry,
Street
flank
egde.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
I,
don't
see
any
councillor
Layton.
Are
there
any
questions
of
staff?
No
counsel,
Layton
people's
motion
to
withdraw
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
guys
were
whipping
through
item
te.
A
C
Between
the
community
and
the
and
the
applicant,
but
I'll
need
a
little
bit
more
time.
So
I
have
a
motion
to
defer.
I
will,
though,
say
that,
if
anyone's
listening
that
wants
to
get
a
patio
granted
when
you
aren't
in
a
good
negotiating
position
with
the
local
Community
Association,
don't
go
to
the
media.
Just
doesn't
bode
well
on
the
relationships
with
anybody,
but
in
this
case
we'll
make
it
through.
A
I
C
A
Anyone
else,
no
all
in
favor,
opposed
carried
item
te
5.18
refusal
of
an
application
for
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
located
at
800
Dundas
Street
West
Palmerston
Avenue
flank
äj--
I
have
Andrew
Chbosky
from
the
old
school
restaurant
listed
as
deputy
Andrew
here,
hi
Andrew,
not
long
as
quickly
but
have
a
seat
you'll
be
able
to
you.
Have
five
minutes
you'll
be
able
to
watch
your
clock
over
there
to
my
right,
I'll.
F
Just
be
brief,
first
of
all,
thank
you
for
the
council
staff
and
letting
me
speak
and
I
just
basically
wanted
to
put
up
face
them
to
the
it's
very
important
to
us,
and
we
take
us
seriously
so
wanted
to
be
here.
My
two
managers
are
here
as
well:
I
believe
that
we're
part
of
the
fabric
of
that
or
the
neighborhood,
where
a
community
cafe
our
biggest
thing,
is
that
we
do
brunches
on
sorry
Sundays.
We
have
a
lot
of.
We
have
a
lot
of
community
that
comes
in
supports
us.
F
The
three
people
right
behind
us,
the
first
three
dwellers
say
they
love
our
place.
They've
been
there
many
times,
even
though
I
haven't
haven't
met
them
and
we
have
people
women
with
mothers
with
strollers.
We
have
little
community
events.
We
have
a
coffee
and
and
careers
day
during
the
day.
Things
like
that,
so
we're
making
a
really
brief.
If
there's
any
questions
for
me,
that's
fine,
but
I
just
wanted
to
show
up
that's.
Why
thank.
A
A
Okay,
any
questions
in
the
mover.
No
anyone
else
to
speak.
No
on
the
motion.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
it
item
te
5.19
refusal
of
a
curbside
cafe,
/
cafe,
permit
application
located
at
997
Bay
Street
Saint
Joseph
Street
flanca
CH
I
have
to
decadence
listed
first
Keith
Holland
hi
Keith
come
on
forward.
A
N
N
So
my
name
is
Keith
Holland
I
live
at
1001,
Bay
Street
a
unit
3:04
and
I
felt
the
need
to
come
here
to
support
this
recommendation
that
the
application
for
this
bill
about
cafe
be
refused.
Based
on
what
we've
experienced
over
the
last
approximately
two
and
a
half
years,
our
apartment
is
two
storeys
above
the
bar
between
us
and
the
bar.
The
story
is
mainly
condominium
facilities,
so
we're
the
first
residential
floor
since
the
bar
opened
in
the
fall
of
2016.
N
N
N
When
they
first
opened,
we
approached
them.
We
talked
to
them.
They
explained
to
us
to
create
the
ambience.
They
needed
in
their
bar,
they
needed
loud
music
with
a
heavy
beat.
We
left
there
with
an
agreement
that
if
we
were
bothered,
we
would
phone
down
and
they
would
turn
it
down,
wasn't
particularly
happy
with
it,
but
it
was
at
least
a
step
forward
that
worked
fine
until
they
stopped
answering
their
phone.
N
So
from
there
I
approached
our
condominium
board.
Our
property
manager
who've
spent
a
lot
of
time.
Helping
me
putting
pressure
on
the
bar
I've
contacted
through
email
and
phone
calls.
Our
counsellor
I
have
worked
with
the
Metro
municipal
licensing
standards.
People
I
phoned
the
mayor's
office.
When
I
got
excited
when
I
realized,
they
were
reviewing
noise
laws
to
find
that
what
I'm
worried
about
wasn't
in
their
purview.
N
So
I
really
think
that
what
I
am
worried
about
is
as
important
as
a
noisy
motorcycle
going
by,
but
somehow
it
didn't
seem
to
be
necessary
for
them
to
review
it.
So,
basically,
since
for
the
last
two
and
a
half
years,
we've
had
to
deal
with
this
obtrusive
noise,
often
and
as
they
mostly
late
into
the
night,
the
thought
of
them
getting
a
patio
to
me
is
just
it's
to
me.
It's
going
to
exacerbate
the
problem,
we're
already
dealing
with
that.
The
problem
hasn't
been
totally
solved.
N
We
still
have
nights
where
we
have
this
late-night
noise
going
on
so
I
just
felt
it
was
necessary
for
me
to
come
and
voice
I've
been
doing
a
lot
of
complaining.
I
wanted
to
come
and
voice.
Once
again,
my
opposition
to
this
bar
getting
any
more
leeway.
They've
they've
treated
us,
obviously
with
disdain
and
just
another
noise
issue,
just
to
sort
of
give
another
idea
of
how
they
are.
They
have
parking
under
out,
and
you
know
underground
gara.
N
They
often
just
Park
in
the
laneway
causing
obstructions
and
obstacles
to
other
people
who
want
to
drive
through
they've,
been
told
about
it
many
times
they
just
keep
doing
it
and
that
I
think
has
been
our
experience
with
them.
We
complain
they
do
it
again.
We
complain
they
do
it
again.
So
I
really
do
support
this
refusal
because
I
think
if
they
got
a
patio,
it
would
just
make
things
much
much
much
worse.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
I
Also,
a
lot
of
our
residence
has
also
sent
noise
complaints
to
the
city
MLE
office
and
also
wrote
to
one
temp
who
is
here
today
and
we
we
have
also
been
communicated
their
property
management,
the
vileness,
requesting
their
compliance,
not
to
make
noise.
Our
residents
can
sleep
properly
during
the
night,
so
we
also
believe
that
the
past
application
for
the
boulevard,
Cafe
privateers,
has
been
processed
on
the
misunderstanding
or
misinterpretation
of
the
property
boundaries.
I
I
A
A
F
My
windows,
my
bedroom
windows,
face
the
strikers,
and
I
would
like
to
echo
the
concerns
expressed
by
the
two
gentlemen.
Could
you
spoke
before
me
and
I
have
filled
out
previously
the
boat
and
they
voted
against
opening
the
cafe.
For
the
same
reasons,
I
just
saw
some
blueprint
of
the
buildings
with
the
notions
of
the
thickness
of
the
walls
and
tallness
of
the
buildings.
None
of
that
matters.
F
What
matters
is
that
I
wake
up
in
the
middle
of
the
night
because
of
the
noise
from
strikers
and
I'm
afraid
that,
once
the
cafe
opens
up
to
out
outside
that
that
noise
will
only
become
louder,
there
will
be
public.
There
would
be
fights
that
occur
currently
from
time
to
time
and
and
I
have
I.
Think
I
came
to
this
country
to
have
a
good
life,
and
that
includes
good
sleep
with
the
strikers
opening
the
cafe
it's,
it's
gonna
be
impossible.
It's
and
I
would
like
to
you
to
to
please
take
that
into
consideration.
F
They
have
been
trouble
to
begin
with,
and
it's
going
to
get
concerns
like
it's
going
to
get
worse.
So
I
have
rearranged.
My
work
schedule
specifically
to
come
to
this
meeting
even
though
have
I
have
a
word
about
it.
It's
very
important
to
the
tenants
of
the
building.
Some
of
us
couldn't
rearrange
their
work
schedule.
I've
done
everything
I
could
to
be
able
to
come
and
say
please,
please
do
not
support
that
application.
It
cannot
go
like
worse
than
that.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
A
E
Thank
you
very
much
and
I
want
to
thank
the
deputy
and
store
for
coming
out
today.
I
reckon
I'm,
sorry
and
I
will
be
moving
a
motion
to
defer
this
item
only
for
one
meeting
cycle,
which
means
that
it
will
come
right
back
to
this
committee
in
approximately
30
days
and
the
reason
I
do.
That
is
because
I
need
to
recognize
that
there
was
a
poll
that
was
sent
out
from
the
city
clerk's
desk,
but
the
results
are
not
all
in
yet
and
I
need
I.
E
Do
think
that
in
in
the
fairness
of
due
process,
we
need
to
have
that
information
before
us.
Having
said
that,
I
think
it's
also
very
important
that
the
owner
and
operator
of
stryker
recognized
that
the
relationship
with
the
community
is
strained.
I
do
recognize
that
the
the
concerns
of
the
community
and
the
voice
complaints
are
that
the
noise
complaints
have
been
filed.
Is
it
should
cause
any
operator.
E
If
I
don't
have
the
positive
poll
results
in
front
of
me
and
if
I
don't
have
striker
making
some
amends
with
the
local
community
to
try
to
reset
the
clock
in
the
Correa
to
reset
the
Community
Relations.
My
intention
is
to
adopt
the
staff
recommendation.
I
mean
hopefully
at
that
point
in
time.
That
message
would
have
been
loud
and
clear,
sent
right
to
the
operators
of
of
the
bar
and
establishment,
but
we
will.
E
A
A
A
E
Thank
you
very
much.
I
do
have
a
motion
I'd
like
to
move
on
to
the
screen
it
is.
It
also
has
a
series
of
conditions
to
attach
to
the
approval.
This
is
an
existing
establishment
on
Church
Street,
just
with
the
flank
egde
of
Maitland
I
think
you
know
with
with
all
patios
and
the
animation
of
sort
of
street
life.
There
is
a
balance
to
be
struck
in
these
mixed-use
environments
and
and
from
what
I
understand
is
that
the
patio
is
already
in
existence.
E
They
are
already
up
and
operating,
but
for
some
reason
there
it's
it's
expired
and
that's
why
it's
before
us
I
believe
that
the
property
owner
and
the
operator
can
do
a
better
job
and
which
is
why
these
these
conditions
are
now
going
to
be
attached
to
their
approval
and
then
to
have
the
an
operational
review
come
back
to
us
in
in
about
two
years
to
make
sure
that
they
have
done
everything
that
they
said
that
they
would
do
and
that
they
will
be
agreeable
to
complying
with
and
so
we're.
Therefore,
we
can
actually
have
this.
E
A
A
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
to
defer
until
May
all
those
in
favor
of
the
deferral.
All
those
opposed
that
carries
item
te
5.2
to
front
yard
parking
appeal,
42,
Belhaven
Road.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
No
questions
of
staff?
No
councillor
Bradford
like.
F
A
A
A
D
A
A
A
D
D
There
was
an
exceptional
amount
of
work
put
into
this
and
if
you
haven't
taken
the
time
to
read
the
study,
I
encourage
you
to
the
history
that
has
been
shaped,
but
on
the
exhibition
grounds
not
just
in
the
built
form,
but
in
the
spaces
in
between
is
something
remarkable
and
it
wasn't.
It
was
a
truly
exceptional
report
that
was
produced
here.
D
Certainly,
we
don't
seek
to
freeze
the
neighborhood
in
time,
but
we
don't
lose
the
grounds
and
end
up
with
a
few
buildings,
much
like
they've
done
in
other
North
American
cities,
and
this
is
an
exceptional
tool
in
our
toolbox
to
help
ensure
that
and
our
staff
of
beena
is
always
fabulous
thanks.
Linda
and
Dan
enjoy.
C
C
We're
the
genesis
of
this
all
came
from
was
a
subcommittee
of
this
committee
on
a
proposed
Official
Plan
amendment
at
Exhibition
Place,
and
it's
so
it's
it's
refreshing
to
see
us
go
through
this
process
and
using
our
subcommittees
to
actually
initiate
other,
really
useful,
worthwhile
and
useful
work.
It
just
really
I,
don't
think
was
anticipated
that
we
need
to
have
it
in
such
a
short
order
to
address
some
of
the
pressures
coming
from
the
province.
C
But
I
commend
staff
on
this,
their
their
research
on
it
and
I
questioned
some
of
this
at
Heritage
Heritage
Preservation
Board.
They
really
have
captured
a
lot
of
I
think
what
the
local
community,
as
well
as
city,
wide
see
as
the
asset
of
Exhibition,
Place
and
and
the
role
that
it
is
served
in
in
the
city,
and
so
thank
you
for
your
for
your
work
on
this.
A
D
And
the
amendment
is
twofold:
one
is
to
require,
from
the
city's
perspective
and
open
and
transparent
decision-making
process
and
to
receive
a
report
from
the
city
manager
and
DCM
on
what
that
evaluation
plan
may
be
before
any
proposals
come
forward,
and
the
second
is
to
ensure
that
the
chair
of
the
on
Terry
play
subcommittee,
who
is
the
local
councillor
myself?
Not
my
Clayton,
though
we
may
look
alike
and
the
chair
of
Exhibition
Place
are
involved.
A
lot
of
work
has
gone
into
this
report
in
front
of
us.
D
Our
city
staff
across
departments
have
been
working
nonstop
behind
the
scenes.
Since
the
summer
we
held
an
Ontario
Place
subcommittee
meeting
where
we
heard
from
49
deputies,
and
that
was
councillor
perks,
councillor
Fletcher
councillor
Layton
and
myself,
and
it
has
frankly
heartened
me
and
surprised
me
to
see
the
level
of
interest
across
our
city
in
Ontario
place
that
here
it's
a
hundred
and
fifty-five
acres
of
public
land
in
the
heart
of
Toronto.
D
It
was
established
in
1971
as
an
urban
park
for
all
Ontarians,
and
so
you
only
get
one
chance
to
revitalize
it,
and
thus
you
only
get
one
chance
to
get
it
right
and
what
we've
realized
through
our
subcommittee
and
our
exceptional
City
of
Toronto
staff
work
is
that
while
the
province
owns
part
of
the
land,
they
don't
own
all
the
land.
The
city
owns
a
part
of
it
and
it
relates
to
the
additional
elements
of
infrastructure
and
servicing
and
transit.
D
The
province
cannot
go
it
alone.
In
fact,
they
must
work
with
the
city
now
one
element
that
was
highlighted
again
and
again
by
the
subcommittee-
and
this
has
been
spoken
of
by
the
City
of
Toronto
by
the
Exhibition
Place
Board
many
times
over
many
years
is
you
can
only
properly
revitalize
Ontario
Place.
D
This
is
risky
because
we
keep
saying
that
the
city,
the
province,
can't
go
it
alone
on
Ontario
place
that
they
have
to
work
with
the
city
and
what's
the
staff
report
in
front
of
us
is
suggesting
that
we
should
also
engage
the
province
to
work
together
based
on
our
principles
now,
given
the
recent
history
of
the
province
going
it
alone,
that
is
not
without
risk,
but
Ontario
Place
does
belong
to
all
Ontarians.
That
future
must
be
decided
in
public,
with
public
input
put
in
with
the
City
of
Toronto
and
I
believe.
D
The
path
were
undertaking
here
clearly
driven
by
public
policy
principles,
is
the
best
way
for
us
to
try
and
make
the
future
of
Exhibition
Place
in
Ontario
place,
something
that
belongs
to
all
Torontonians
and
all
Ontarians
and
something
special,
and
so
with
that
I
can
move
my
amendment
and
the
staff
recommendations.
Thank.
A
A
A
A
Okay,
so
this
is
just
the
regular
expanded
requirements
for
consultation,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
So
we
now
move
to
item
te
5.32.
We
have
a
deputed
on
the
item.
Magda
Heil
mire.
Magda-
are
you
here?
Is
that
Magda
no
we're
counselor
Fletcher?
Do
you
have
any
advice
for
us
on
how
to
handle
this
item?
Oh,
oh
hi
Magda.
How
are
you
thank
you
for
coming
now?
Take
your
time
settle
in
okay,
so
your
microphone
will
go
on
by
itself,
because
we
have
this
wonderful
technician.
L
You
good
morning,
Thank
You
mr.
chair
and
members
of
the
community
Council,
so
I'm
Magda
Heidel
mayor
president
of
the
heavy
well
place
residents
association.
We
represent
about
1,500
residents
in
our
area,
which
is
a
long
broad
view
north
of
Danforth,
and
it
encompasses
about
the
Avenue
so
on
both
sides
from
Pretoria
Avenue
up
to
Mortimer
and
also
including
the
neon
pocket,
which
is
bounded
by
Jackman
on
the
east
and
14th
Avenue.
L
So
I'm
here
today,
to
request
that
you
do
support
planning,
staffs
recommendations,
that
staff
schedule
a
community
consultation
meeting
in
relation
to
954,
958
Broadview
Avenue,
and
also
that
the
notice
for
the
community
consultation
meeting
be
given
to
the
landowners
and
residents
as
specified
in
the
recommendation
in
the
preliminary
report.
And
just
so
you
know
that
proposal
is
within
our
area.
L
So,
first
of
all,
we
do
understand
that
this
is
planning
stuffs
preliminary
report
and
that
there
will
be
more
information
coming
as
planning
and
other
divisions
review
this
application,
including
the
immunity
consultations
and
in
general.
Of
course,
we
agree
with
the
concerns
and
the
impacts
that
are
raised
by
planning
staff
in
their
preliminary
report.
Given
that
this
application
is
for
an
18-story,
fifty
five
point:
seven
meters
without
mechanical
penthouse,
seniors
rental
residents
in
an
area
that
is
predominantly
low-rise
and
slated
for
moderate
intensification
were
not
downtown
as
we'd
like
to
say.
L
In
fact,
I
stood
here
or
sat
here
nearly
four
years
ago,
before
many
more
of
you
urging
you
to
adopt
the
broad
view
of
new
planning,
study,
OPA
343
and
the
Broadway
Avenue
urban
design
guidelines,
and
just
to
give
you
an
idea
that
amendment
so
P
343
helps
to
define
a
human
scale
and
livable
planning
vision
for
our
area.
It
sets
out
the
parameters
for
future
development,
which
we
think
is
responsible
and
sensitive
to
the
local
context
and
which
ensures
compatibility
between
the
existing
and
the
future
development.
L
It
also
includes
changes
to
the
aquifer
and
a
slope
stability,
given
that
particular
proposal
backs
on
to
the
valley.
So
this
is
only
an
initial
list
and,
of
course,
has
further.
Concerns
will
be
identified
as
we
do
work
with
our
planner
and
in
terms
of
consultations.
I
must
say
that
we
do
have
a
very
active,
a
very
dedicated
community,
an
involved
community
which
cares
about
the
future
of
its
neighbourhood
and
which
does
welcome
responsible
and
sensitive
development
in
our
area.
L
So
it's
also
to
address
the
impacts
on
the
buildings
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site
and
also
but
not
limited
to
the
heritage
buildings
at
9:27
to
931,
Broadview
and
also,
and
therefore
not
to
address
only
the
buildings
to
the
south
of
that
proposed
where
the
proposal
will
be,
and
so
that
would
mean
for
planning
to
look
at
things
like
complete,
Sun,
shadow
study,
complete
win
impact
study,
public
view,
impact
study,
tall
building
separation,
noise
impact
study
and
so
on.
And
if
a
working
or
stakeholder
group
or
similar
discussions
are
set
up.
So
that's.
L
Our
second
recommendation
is
to
look
at
the
to
look
at
the
issues
that
are
raised
by
this
proposal,
so
we
as
the
Halliwell
residents
Association,
so
we're
willing
to
participate
in
that
as
long
as
it
as
it
is.
Without
prejudice
to
our
final
position
and
of
course
we
would
be-
we
would
expect
to
be
named
and
to
participate
in
those
discussions.
H
H
Morning,
good
morning,
we
worked
that
timing
out
really
well.
So
this
is
a
preliminary
report
and
the
staff
of
outlined
a
number
of
concerns.
You've
added
some
others
that
will
be
reflected
in
the
consultation.
I.
Think
you
would
you
be
happy
if
we
can
have
a
consultation
very
shortly
to
have
that
community
meeting.
Yes,
I
think
we're
looking
at
May
28th
that
might
be
good
and
that
the
school
is
buried
inside
the
Estonian
house.
Do
you
have
any
idea
how
a
heritage
building
got
buried
inside
another
development
that
is
in
childhood?
My.
L
Some
my
readings
of
the
history
is
that
the
Estonian
community
bought
that
heritage,
so
that's
cool
at
the
time
it
was
just
an
ordinary
school
that
was
closing
in
1961,
I,
believe
and
then
on
because
of
the
needs
they
had
in
their
community.
So
they
proceeded
to
add
a
big
hall,
a
banquet
hall
at
the
back
and
then
in
the
70s.
They
added
this
addition
for
more
office
space
to
the
front
of
that
building,
and
so
the
proposal
itself
does
want
to
remove
the
front
and
the
back
and
relieved.
L
Correct
and
from
the
original
Heritage
Review,
so
when
the
designation
was
you
know,
heritage
was
looking
at
it
in
terms
of
whether
it
should
be
designated
or
not.
So
they
did
actually
talk
in
terms
of
really
the
school
itself
being
intact
and
from
my
also
bein
reading
and
conversations
so
that
school
was
not
the
heritage.
Building
itself
was
not
touched,
in
fact
when
they
were
building
those
additions.
H
L
A
H
K
Certainly
is
an
odd
situation:
councilor
the
I
think
the
because
the
historic
chester
school
was
so
far
set
back
from
the
road
that
there
was
space
in
front
to
to
accommodate.
In
addition,
I
think
of
it
almost
a
little
bit
about
our
historic
schools
that
had
1960s
and
70s
editions
that
were
of
a
different
style
that
were
added
on
the
interesting
thing
was
when
we
did.
The
designation
report
was
to
the
how
much
of
the
front
elevation
the
historic
building
remained
intact,
so
they
didn't
completely
demolish
it.
To
add
the
the
front
addition.
H
F
Do
you,
mr.
chair,
the
that's
my
understanding
as
well,
that
the
the
school
property
and
that
property
is
no
longer
school?
Obviously
it's
owned
by
the
Estonian
house
as
a
community
center
now,
and
so,
as
has
been
described
in
the
report
and
by
the
deputy,
and
the
proposal
includes
removing
that
modern
addition
from
the
front
and
conserving
the
Heritage
School
building
and
it
would
be
used
as
part
of
the
retirement
home
like
the
rest
of
the
building.
F
H
F
H
H
F
H
Do
have
a
motion-
it's
quite
lengthy,
but
it
does
include
a
number
of
issues
that
were
brought
up
by
the
deputy,
also
that
we
have
a
very
wide
circulation
of
the
actual
notice
for
the
meeting,
which
I
hope
will
take
place
on
may
28th.
But
we
will
confirm
that
later
and
that
the
neighborhood
associations
in
the
neighborhood
be
formally
asked
by
planning.
There
have
been
I
know
that
Planning
has
a
number
of
sign-up
sheets,
including
all
for
the
bravia
Avenue
planning
study,
which
so
I
don't
know
where
we're
at
with
that.
H
But
I'm
asking
that
everybody
that's
ever
been
interested,
be
notified
in
the
way
that
you
notify
anybody
about
a
planning
application.
There
might
just
be
a
few
names
on
this
one,
but
whoever
has
put
their
name
down
for
bravia,
which
is
an
area
of
great
interest
that
they
would
all
be
notified,
not
by
me,
because
I
don't
have
all
those
names
but
through
planning
itself
and
unfortunately,
I
don't
have
a
lot
of
names
in
order
to
send
out.
I
did
get
some
from
some
of
the
sign
answer.
H
E
E
A
D
Thank
You,
chair
I
have
an
amendment
if
that
could
be
put
on
the
screen,
and
this
is
with
this
amendment.
I
can
relate
that
to
cycling,
lanes,
pedestrian
access,
cleanliness,
consultation
and
appropriate
signage
and
working
with
our
construction
management
group.
With
that
amendment,
I
can
move
the
the
item.
Okay,.
A
A
O
So
I
am
a
long
time
well,
a
fairly
long
time
volunteer
of
Channel
Jazz
Festival,
especially
we
was
down
here
at
City,
Hall
grounds,
and
our
headquarters
was
in
a
very
nice
wheelchair,
accessible
hotel.
I
have
two
out
two
things:
I
want
to
speak
of
an
end,
Gordon
and
and
Kristyn
wong-tam
and
Mike.
I'll
know
me
well
enough
to
know,
and
so
does
Josh
it's
about.
The
accessibility
of
Yorkville.
O
Currently
our
headquarters
for
volunteers
is
in
a
hotel
along
bleuer.
That
is,
has
no
proper
wheelchair
accessible
washrooms.
So
those
of
us
that
are
volunteers
with
wheelchairs
or
mobility
devices
have
to
use
washrooms
at
other
places.
My
problem
with
York
Phil
is
this:
it
is
barely
wheelchair,
accessible
and
I
mean
barely
and
I'm
being
nice.
So
when
the
festival's
set
up,
it
is
very
difficult
for
us
to
navigate
and
there's
certain
areas.
O
So
thankfully
I
learned
Hazleton
lanes
last
year
and
they
were
nice
enough
to
let
us
use
the
washrooms,
but
one
problem
we're
having
in
the
area,
especially
those
who
come
from
around
the
world.
Basically
I
mean
last
year,
I
met
people
from
all
over
the
place.
One
problem
we're
having
is
wheelchair
accessibility
of
facilities
and
of
venues.
O
It
is
somebody
who
I
greatly
admire
knows
all
too
well
that
when
it
comes
to
accessibility,
I'm
like
a
little
pitbull
I
don't
give
up
and
as
a
volunteer,
it's
been
very
frustrating
getting
around
helping
people
navigate,
helping
people
that
are
coming
to
the
festival
be
able
to
find
a
restaurant,
it's
actually
wheelchair
accessible,
because
there's
so
few
in
that
area
need
I
mentioned
the
first
pot
shop
that
opened
not
accessible.
So
I
would
really
like
to
see
the
festival.
Work.
O
I
think
that
the
move
from
my
own
personal
opinion,
I'm,
taking
my
volunteer
hat
off
for
a
moment.
My
own
personal
opinion
is
accessibility,
went
to
the
trash
bin
when
they
left
Nathan
Phillips
Square
area.
The
venue's
became
a
lot
less
accessible,
not
not
just
sidewalk
issues,
not
just
where
you
guys
are
putting
barricade
issues.
O
O
When
it
was
down
here
near
City
Hall
we
had
Osgood.
We
had
Queen,
and
now
we
have
st.
Patrick,
all
wheelchair,
accessible
great
for
people
coming
to
the
festival.
I
think
Yorkville
is
really
hard
and
difficult
because
there's
narrow,
sidewalks
there's
a
lot
of
people
running
around
with
cars,
and
there
were
some
issues
last
year.
Was
safety
pertaining
to
barricades
being
not
wide
enough
from
the
sidewalk
and
not
the
good
side
of
the
curb
type
where
people
couldn't
get
through
and
another
part
was
there?
O
Was
people
didn't
elderly
people
that
didn't
feel
safe
because
of
the
cars
running
around
in
certain
parts?
So
my
biggest
concern
about
the
festival,
I
love
it
it's
a
great
volunteer.
You
know
and
I
very
much
value
the
organizers
and
I
very
much
respect
them,
but
it's
come
to
a
head.
I
could
barely
volunteer
last
year
because
it's
so
difficult
for
me
to
find
washing
facilities.
Thank
God
for
the
new
McDonald's,
that's
on
Bloor,
but
honestly
accessibility
has
become
a
huge
thing
in
Yorkville.
O
O
A
C
You
very
much
I'll
move
the
the
recommendations
there
you'll
note
in
them.
There
was
a
desire
this
year
to
extend
the
period
of
the
street
closure
in
on
on
Cumberland
we've
granted
that,
with
the
support
of
both
the
BIA
and
the
residents
Association,
there
was
also
a
desire
to
close
Avenue
Road,
just
south
of
Bloor,
to
put
a
big
outdoor
stage
for
for
a
couple
of
days,
transportation,
weren't
too
keen
on
on
that
particular
closure.
C
So
in
meeting
with
them
and
others,
we
actually
opted
for
Bloor
Street,
because
Bloor
Street
you'll
note
you'll
note
that
the
opening
weekend
of
of
the
Jazz
Festival
it
also
also
happens
to
be
proud
Pride
weekend.
Well,
Lauren
Lauren
church
is
closed
for
like
every
day
of
that
weekend.
Anyhow,
and
so
we
figured
if
we're
just
gonna
extend
the
closure
of
Bloor
over
to
Avenue.
That
may
make
some
sense
cuz.
No
one
in
in
probably
their
right.
Mind
would
drive
down
there
that
weekend
anyhow
and
it's
a
well
yo.
C
They
certainly
do
I
think
every
weekend
may
that
people
make
errors
of
judgment
in
that.
But
this
I
thought
was
a
good
compromise,
so
that
opening
weekend
of
the
Jazz
Festival
coincides
with
pride.
There'll,
be
a
lot
of
street
closures
down
there,
but
a
lot
of
good
times
being
had
I
appreciate,
Emily's
comments
and
I'll
relay
that
back
to
the
organizers
on
the
city
doesn't
dictate
where
they
do
their
festival,
except
we
respond
to
their
applications
and
I.
Don't
think
there
was
a
forcible
moving
them
from
Nathan.
C
A
H
A
So
members,
we
have
two
items
of
business:
to
introduce
te
five,
eight
eight,
which
is
a
letter
from
councillor
by
Lao
and
TE
5
8
9,
which
is
account
letter
from
councillor
Fletcher,
can
I
have
a
motion
to
introduce
councillor
Fletcher.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
councillor
Bradford.
Do
you
have
any
advice
for
us
on
a
date
on.