►
Description
Toronto and East York Community Council, meeting 7, June 25, 2019 - Part 2 of 2
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=15413
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avuFGTL4zFY
Meeting Navigation:
0:08:59 - Meeting resume
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
I
am
here
in
a
few
different
capacities,
one
as
a
resident
of
the
area
near
the
site,
I'm
also
actively
involved
in
Tennis
Association
for
my
building,
who
had
spoken
at
her
past
two
meetings
about
the
proposal
and
for
whatever
it's
worth
I
served
on
the
stakeholder
advisory
committee
for
the
planning
framework
that
has
been
submitted,
I
believe
that's
item
t760
or
something
for
this
agenda
meeting.
So
there
are
a
couple
written
submissions
that
our
tenants
association
made.
B
Those
have
been
filed,
but
I'm
gonna
briefly
just
cover
what
tenants
in
our
building
the
issues
that
they
had
with
the
site.
Their
greatest
concerns
were
the
overall
height
that
was
by
far
the
biggest
concern
raised.
Now,
a
number
of
tenants
would
have
been
happy
with
a
proposal
that
was
above
the
current
guideline
for
height
at
that
site.
Some,
not
that
was
not
unanimous,
but
tenants
in
our
building
do
not
have
are
not
universally
opposed
to
taller
buildings
in
this
area.
It
is
the
excessively
tall
scale
of
this
particular
proposal.
B
Tenants
in
our
building.
Also
one
of
the
issues
that
came
up
almost
with
everybody
was
the
mix
of
unit
sizes.
Now
this
is
something
that
is
separate
from
the
refusal
report
that
you
guys
are
considering,
but
given
the
scarcity
of
essentially
family
dwellings
in
the
city,
tenants
in
our
building
have
expressed
that
a
building
in
which
more
than
50%
of
the
units
are
one-bedroom
does
very
little
to
address
what
they
feel
is
a
pressing
issue
of
and
scarcity
on.
B
My
own
behalf,
and
with
regards
to
some
of
the
issues
that
are
brought
up
in
the
refusal
report,
the
report
makes
reference
to
the
growth
plan
that
was
recently
instituted
and
a
number
of
the
guidelines
that
the
growth
plan
has
essentially
outlined
for
development
of
this
sort
and,
in
particular,
development
around
transit
nodes
at
the
community
consultation.
This
was
a
point
that
the
developer
made
quite
strongly
that,
because
the
growth
plan
is
meant
to
encourage
intensification
around
transit
nodes,
that
this
was
an
excellent
example
of
that
being
done.
B
I
feel
that
that
is
only
true
if
you
are
looking
at
this
site
in
total
isolation
without
regard
to
the
context
of
the
unique
characteristics
of
the
area
around
it.
For
instance,
the
fact
that
Ragland
is
a
one-way
street
that
has
a
limited
capacity
for
street
and
pedestrian
traffic
or
the
fact
that
the
geography
and
topography
of
the
area
impedes
people
getting
to
that
transit
station
as
quickly
as
they
might
otherwise
for
something
that
was
at
a
comparable
distance
additionally,
by
jamming
so
much
intensification
into
a
single
site.
B
A
C
I'll
begin
by
thanking
city
staff,
who
you
know
I,
know
a
very
short
time
period
that
they
are
granted
under
provincial
policy
to
review
this.
They
came
to
the
right
conclusion
that
this
is
an
inappropriate
application
for
this
site.
As
patrick
said,
the
community
is
no
absolutely
not
against
a
redevelopment
of
the
site,
the
in
fact
supporter
redevelopment
of
the
site,
but
this
isn't
it.
The
podium
is
excessive.
C
The
height
is
excessive
and
this
doesn't
even
meet
the
framework
for
the
Sinclair
in
Bathurst
area
that
we
I
believe
will
approve
today,
I
even
approached
the
developer
and
I
asked
you
know
in
the
midst
of
a
neighborhood
where
it
is,
there
are
so
many
people
who
are
struggling
to
make
ends
meet
and
would
like
to
live
in
our
Midtown
area.
Would
you
not
even
consider
providing
some
affordable
units
in
the
building
and
they
rejected
that
idea
as
well?
So
we
are
gonna
fight.
A
Thank
you
any
questions.
The
mover
seeing
none
anyone
else
to
speak.
No
on
councillor
Matt
Lowe's
motion,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that's
carried.
Okay
members
will
move
next
teehee
7.16,
which
is
56
Yonge
Street
21
Melinda
Street
80
through
18
from
30
Wellington
Street
187
to
199
Bay
Street
and
25
King
Street
West
zoning
amendment
application
final
report:
I
have
two
deputies
listed.
First
is
George
dark
from
urban
strategies,
hello,
George.
D
Thank
You
counselor
Thank
You,
chair
members
of
council.
My
name
is
George
dark
I'm
from
urban
strategies.
This
is
mr.
Toby
move
from
quadrille
we're
gonna
share
our
five
minutes
this
morning.
I've
just
put
up
a
panel
which
shows
you
the
project.
It's
addition
to
the
Commerce
Court
site.
You
can
see
it
here.
Tipped
in
this
is
a
view
actually
from
the
waterfront
from
the
skyline
first
thing
I'd
like
to
do
is
thank
staff.
Mr.
Henry
Tang,
mr.
D
Paul
Mack,
especially
this
is
years
in
the
making
and
they've,
certainly
pulled
an
incredible
amount
of
effort
to
get
through
all
of
the
paper
in
detail.
So
my
thanks
to
them
and
to
James
Frank
and
urban
design.
This
would
represent
one
of
the
largest
investments
in
the
traditional
financial
core
for
quite
some
time
at
King
and
Bay.
It's
not
just
a
building
because,
as
you
know,
Commerce
courts
an
entire
site.
There
are
layers
of
buildings
going
back
over
many
years
on
this
site,
including
the
original
1928
Bank
Tower.
D
All
of
that
is
held
in
one
consistent
ownership,
so
there
there
is
an
increase
in
building,
but
there's
also
because
of
its
nature
of
an
important
site,
a
really
important
review
related
to
the
public
realm
and
there's
a
lot
of
increase
in
the
public
realm
over
the
years.
The
movement
of
people
from
Union
Station
up
into
the
finding
district
has
increased
incredibly
almost
exponentially,
so
the
project
is
looking
at
considerable,
additional
sidewalk
ability
for
people
to
marshal
it's
looking
at
a
restoration
of
the
courtyard,
which
is
a
much-loved
place
in
in
the
City
of
Toronto.
D
Of
course,
we
will
hear
in
the
next
item
on
the
matters
of
heritage,
those
conservation
plans
and
easements
and
agreements
will
be
brought
forward,
but
basically
we're
here
today
in
full
support
of
the
report
that
staff
has
in
front
of
you
and
in
the
next
item,
in
full
support
of
the
heritage
report
coming
from
preservation
services
we'd
be
happy
to
take
any
questions.
Thank.
A
E
Thank
you
very
much,
I'd
like
to
move
an
amendment
and
the
clerk's
have
places
before
you
largely
its
technical
in
nature
and
also
a
tag.
Actual
number
three
actually
allows
us
to
have
a
an
additional
opportunity
to
finalize
the
the
community
benefits
agreement
prior
four
prior
to
us
reaching
council
and
with
that
I'd
like
to
move
the
recommendations
in
the
staff
report.
I
think
that
this
is
an
this
represents
and
I'll
keep
my
remarks
brief,
but
this
does
represent
a
significant
new
enhancement
to
the
financial
district.
E
Much
of
the
financial
district
has
been
sort
of
built
with
the
mindset
of
bringing
people
into
the
working
Towers
and
then
staying
there
or
then
perhaps
pushing
them
underground
and
containing
them
into
the
path
the
pedestrian
realm
and
the
human
experience
at
the
Podesta
at
the
ground
level
has
been
an
afterthought
for
some
time.
I
think
that
this
is
a
significant
departure
into
that
new
thinking
where
we
were
going
to
Rhian
and
reinvigorate
a
lot
of
those
pedestrian
realm,
as
well
as
connected
pieces
around.
E
E
I
know
that
this
is
a
long
time
coming
as
I
described
to
myself
and
also
for
the
for
our
staff,
both
the
the
pieces
around
the
heritage
preservation
and
the
designation
of
the
property,
but
also
the
fact
that
there
are
just
so
many
different,
multiple
components
that
actually
make
up
this
complex,
which
is
what
I'm
going
to
call
the
Commerce
Court
campus
and
I
know
that
the
the
construction
is
can
be
rather
disruptive.
That
is
going
to
be
for
sure,
because
there
is
a
lot
of
activity
and
a
commercial
activity
that
will
stay
in
place.
E
A
You
taking
the
amendment
and
the
item
together,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carries.
So
now
we
move
to
their
companion
report
te
seven
one:
seven
alterations
to
a
designated
heritage
property
amendment
of
a
designating
by
law,
intention
to
designate
under
part
four
section:
29
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
and
authority
to
enter
into
a
heritage,
easement
agreement,
one
nine,
nine
Bay
Street
twenty
five
King
Street
West
and
fifty
six
Yonge
Street
I
have
listed
mr.
Michael
McClendon
sahlan
michael,
I
I
can't
believe.
I
did
that
to
you
I'm
sorry,
okay,.
F
A
I
I'm
really
here,
I
was
the
heritage
architect
on
this
project.
We've
actually
been
working
on
this
project
since
2012,
so
we
put
a
lot
of
thought
into
making
this
work
really
well,
and
it
really
is
a
bit
of
a
reinvention
about
how
work
actually
happens
in
in
the
financial
district.
So
we're
really
proud
of
this
project.
But
it's
all
about
teamwork
and
I.
I
Gotta
say
that
I
really
thank
the
the
city
staff
for
working
with
us,
especially
James
Parata
and
Paul
Mack
I,
see
them
both
here
spectacular
work
that
they
did
to
help
us
bring
this
all
off.
We
still
have
more
work
to
do.
We
still
have
to
do
easement
agreements
and
conservation
plans
and
and
other
other
work
that's
in
process,
but
we're
we're
very
pleased
that
we're
here
today
and
so
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
and
if
there's
any
questions,
I'm
going
to
dance.
I
A
A
E
Thank
you
very
much,
I
like
to
move
the
recommendations
from
the
Toronto
Preservation
Board.
This
is
actually
to
me.
The
the
Victoria
hotel
I
have
a
lot
of
fond
memories
as
a
child
and
and
the
entire
commerce
court
complex,
but
the
hotel
facade
in
particular
ice
as
a
child.
I
thought
it
was
one
of
the
most
beautiful
and
elegant
buildings
in
the
city.
It
always
seemed
to
to
signify
a
place
of
Oh,
Toronto
and
I'm
really
really
pleased
to
see
the
amount
of
care
and
attention
and
financial
investment.
E
That's
going
back
into
the
heritage
components
that
are
here
because
I
think
there's
going
to
be
a
beautiful
blend
of
the
modern
as
well.
The
traditional
and
that
to
me
is
a
very
great
outcome
and
of
course
it
wouldn't
have
happened
without
the
contributions
of
the
applicant.
He
ER
a
architects
as
well
as
our
staff
who
work
through
every
single
detail,
so
digital
diligently,
if
B,
if
I,
can
just
encourage
the
members
to
read
this
report,
it's
actually
quite
detailed.
E
A
Thank
you
any
questions
of
the
mover
seeing
none
anyone
else
to
speak.
No,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carries
so
we'll
move
now
to
item
te.
Seven
point:
two:
zero:
two:
three:
zero
Oak
Street
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
amendment
application
request
for
directions.
Report
I
have
Miguel
Avilla
Velarde
listed
hello,
Miguel.
J
Want
to
bring
an
update
to
the
application
request.
Our
building
to
do
co-op.
Street
has
been
awarded
twenty
million
dollars
for
capital
repair,
which
will
include
a
mayor
massive
renovation,
our
building,
which
includes
a
whole
envelope
of
the
building
the
pipes
there
renovations
of
the
facilities.
J
J
At
least
this
mouth
for
second,
please,
okay,
so
here
you
start
to
2003
in
2016
there
was
a
tenant
consultation
carried
on
by
the
corporation
at
two-30,
Oak
Street,
and
what
are
the
things
that
were
promised
to
make
to
reduce
mitigation
of
traffic
along
Oak,
Street
and
River?
Was
the
installation
of
a
ramp
of
the
baby?
Was
tension?
J
J
J
The
architects
hire
for
this
project
LG
a
architects
partners.
They
wonder
if
they
wouldn't
have
with
this
proposed
development,
we'll
have
to
modify
the
site
around
the
building
for
the
construction
to
happen
in
at
the
year-end.
So
maybe,
if
Kristin
one
tank
would
inquire
as
to
what
kind
of
traffic
problems
we
can
avoid
as
we
move
ahead
with
this
proposal,.
J
A
J
A
E
E
E
A
E
E
A
L
A
I'll
teach
me
to
try
to
second-guess
the
clerk
item:
te
7.21,
four,
four:
zero,
four,
four:
four:
four:
five:
zero
and
four
six
two
front:
Street
West,
four:
two:
five:
four:
three:
nine
four:
four
one
and
four:
four:
three
Wellington
Street
West
six
through
18,
Spadina
Avenue
and
one
and
nine
Draper
Street
part
lock
control
exemption
application.
Final
report:
do
we
have
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
A
The
staff
recommendations,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
So
now
we
can
go
to
item
T,
7.25
inclusion
on
the
city's
City
of
Toronto
Heritage
Register,
forty
through
44
and
71,
through
75,
Mitchell,
Avenue
and
seven
three,
five
through
seven,
three:
seven
and
seven
five:
three
through
seven
55
Richmond,
Street,
West
and
intention
to
designate
under
part
four
section:
29
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
44,
Mitchell
Avenue.
The
first
step
you
and
I
have
listed
is
Kenneth
chest
knee
Kenneth.
Are
you
here?
Yes,
alright,
come
on
up.
A
H
D
A
M
Good
afternoon
Council
I'm
here
with
Jason
chesty
and
my
architect,
Daniel
Hall
as
the
owner
of
properties,
753
and
755
Richmond,
Street
West.
We
wanted
to
bring
to
the
attention
of
the
council
some
facts
that
were
it
may
or
may
not
have
being
available
to
the
city
staff
regarding
these
properties
as
the
owner.
We
don't
understand
why
the
properties
should
be
included
in
the
city
registry,
and
these
are
some
of
the
facts.
M
M
M
The
building
is
no
longer
a
symmetrical
pair
of
semi-detached
houses.
The
missing
eastern
portion
cannot
be
restored
at
it
as
as
as
as
part
of
a
team
it'll
avenues
access.
The
simple
rectangular
plans
that
are
characteristic
of
the
Robinson
cottages
no
longer
exists
as
a
south
wall
has
been
removed
and
the
extension
extension
built
to
the
rear
in
2014.
M
I
G
Name
is
Daniel
Hall,
I'm,
the
principal
of
the
architect,
Builders
collaborative
and
I'm,
assisting
mr.
Chesney
as
an
architect.
We
focus
on
green
design
and
a
lot
of
adaptive
reuse
of
older
buildings,
although
we
were
not
part
of
this
design
in
2014
I
have
been
in
this
building
extensively
over
the
years.
We
had
a
chance
this
morning
to
speak
with
miss
Hanson
Cartwright
from
the
Heritage
Department,
and
her
staff
did
not
have
the
benefit
of
this
information
that
mr.
Chesney
presented
when
they
prepared
their
report.
G
A
I
Mr.
chairman
members
of
council,
my
name
is
Ernesto
Arduino,
our
firm,
rich
stone
homes
was
engaged
by
the
owners
of
737
Richmond
Street
to
design
and
construct
a
an
addition
on
that
property.
We
we
started
working
2018,
we
went
to
PPR.
We
came
to
this
committee
in
2019.
We
received
approval
by
a
committee
of
adjustments.
We
have
a
binding
letter
and
we
have
a
certificate
of
Zoning.
Our
protic
is
scheduled
to
start
construction.
August
1st.
The
owners
have
acquired
a
temporary
living
accommodations
as
of
July
30th.
I
We
received
notice
or
our
clients
received
notice.
While
they
were
away,
they
came
back
over
the
weekend
and
found
the
letters,
and
they
contacted
us
immediately
to
come
and
speak
to
this
group
here
to
see
if
our
project
will
be
impacted
in
a
way
by
this
decision,
and
if
so,
if
we
can
make
the
deputation
of
regarding
the
report
that
we
find
there's
some
ins
consistencies.
I
A
I
I
I
Renovations
to
the
property,
starting
from
pre
1981,
which
was
the
first
one.
There
was
addition
at
it
at
a
garage
added
to
the
rear
of
the
property.
In
again
pre
1991
there
was
extensive
interior
renovations
completed
to
the
property
in
1981.
There
was
an
addition
added
to
the
back
this
one.
Here
we
don't
seem
to
find
any
records
of
it,
but
the
proposal
does
show
that
there
was
a
complete
renovation
of
the
interior,
as
well
as
the
addition
of
the
the
porch
to
the
back.
I
Then
in
1994
in
1992
there
was
an
addition
of
a
porch
in
the
front
which
again
altered
the
whole
structure
and
in
1994
or
84
there
was
a
two-story
addition
that
was
approved
and
was
built
on
the
property.
Here.
We
believe
that
that
the
the
authors
of
the
report
may
have
missed
us
did
not
get
a
chance
to
visit
the
property
to
inspect
the
rear
of
the
property
where
the
project
was
built
on.
It
actually
sits
approximately
eight
feet.
I
On
top
of
the
original
garrison
structure
that
was
twenty-nine
feet
in
diameter,
the
property
as
it
stands
now
has
been
completely
renovated.
It
is
brought
up
to
two
current
standards.
It
was
renovated
in
a
number
of
years
ago,
before
my
clients
actually
took
possession
of
the
home.
The
entire
project
from
the
basement
on
up
has
been
completely
gutted
and
rebuilt.
The
exterior
walls,
the
cladding,
have
been
removed.
New
brick
has
been
installed
on
the
exterior
and
there's
been.
I
I
Updated
bathrooms
on
the
main
floor
that
we're
not
there
in
the
process
living
quarters
are
sleeping
quarters
on
the
second
floor
and
the
basement
now
has
full
height
ceilings
of
approximately
seven
feet,
whereas
the
house
is
built
back
in
the
early
in
the
1800's
and
early
nineteen
hundred's
basement
loads
were
approximately
six
feet
back
then
we
now
have
full
height
basement
here,
where
they
have
made
into
living
space.
They've
got
Dan,
they've
got
a
gym.
They've
got
a.
I
A
I
N
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Andrea
chambers
and
I've
owned
48
Mitchell
Avenue,
since
2007
I
lived
there
with
my
husband
and
my
11
year
old
daughter,
and
we
very
much
support
the
inclusion
of
4044
Mitchell
Avenue
on
the
City
of
Toronto
Heritage
Register.
We
were
a
little
one
way
street,
where
we
all
know
each
other
and
help
each
other
celebrate
together
and
lend
each
other
cake
plates.
It's
what
makes
up
our
little
community
in
this
huge,
bustling
city.
N
The
cottage
is
at
40
and
44
minutes
to
represent
our
neighborhoods
history
and
the
community
that
came
before
us
military
factory
workers
and
union
shops.
The
cottages
were
torn
down
in
2017
number
18
and
22
were
replaced
by
two
massive
glass
houses
and
one
is
currently
listed
for
3.5
million,
and
it
is
of
no
historical
value.
The
request
to
demolish
40
and
44
and
replace
with
three
townhouses
is
about
making
money.
N
The
owners
have
no
regard
for
our
neighborhood
or
our
tight-knit
community
I
realize
the
development
will
happen
and
it
should
we're
a
growing
city,
but
I
do
feel
it
is
very
important
for
the
city
to
retain
its
historical
pockets.
Its
little
gems,
especially
now
when
it's
very
enticing,
especially
in
this
neighborhood,
to
tear
houses
down
and
build
new
expensive
glass
houses,
we
as
a
culture,
need
to
hold
on
to
and
preserve
what
remains
from
a
historical,
architectural
and
a
community
perspective.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
Thank.
A
O
M
Bukowski
and
I
live
at
27,
Mitchell
Avenue
I,
don't
keep
this
very
short.
I
just
want
to
point
to
the
very
wide
media
attention
that
these
cottages
have
got.
There
are
sometimes
called
Robinson
colleges,
sometimes
called
garrison
common
partners,
they're
small
and
they're
often
overlooked,
but
they
have
caught
the
attention
of
people
like
Steven,
Auto,
Kathryn,
Naismith,
Alex
buzz
a
Colvin
Sean
McAuliffe
Joe
Fiorito,
because
they
may
be
small
but
they're,
not
insignificant.
I.
M
Don't
need
to
tell
you
how
important
these
cottages
are
to
the
city,
because
those
people
and
the
Toronto
Heritage
Preservation
study
already
have
I
just
will
say
that
Steven
Auto,
who
won
the
award
order
of
Canada
for
his
heritage.
Work
in
Toronto,
really
wanted
them
to
be
known
as
the
garrison
common
cottages,
but
I'm
pretty
sure.
Now
that
at
this
point
he
wouldn't
have
cared
what
they're
called
as
long
as
they're
saved,
and
that
is.
A
F
You
have
five
minutes.
Thank
you
a
good
afternoon.
First,
thank
you
to
the
chair
and
the
members
of
Community
Council
for
allowing
us
the
opportunity
to
speak
today,
I'm
here
today
as
the
managing
principal
of
LHC,
to
respond
directly
to
the
proposed
notice
of
intention
to
designate
on
42:44
Mitchell
Street.
However,
before
I
begin,
there
are
several
points
of
clarification
that
must
be
stated
as
a
direct
result
of
last
Thursday's
Toronto
Preservation
Board,
meeting
LHC
was
not
hired
to
justify
a
particular
position.
F
This
would
be
contrary
to
our
professional
and
firms
code
of
ethics,
which
we
take
extremely
seriously.
Second,
our
client
has
not
applied
for
a
demolition
permit.
Well,
an
application
has
been
made
to
the
committee
of
adjustment.
No
application
for
demolition
has
been
submitted
further.
The
committee
of
adjustment
application
process
has
been
paused
depending
upon
the
outcome
of
this
process.
F
Third
I
would
bring
to
community
councils
attention
that
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
bylaws,
should
only
include
attributes
that
are
existing
on
the
property
and
I
would
draw
attention
to
the
ministry
of
tourism,
culture
and
sports
publication,
designating
heritage
properties,
page
29.
The
description
of
the
heritage
attributes
should
keep
the
existing
ones,
not
those
that
could
or
should
be
added
them.
With
these
comments,
we
are
here
today
to
ask
for
a
deferral
of
the
notice
of
intention
to
designate
based
upon
our
review
of
the
property.
F
In
our
professional
opinion,
we
respectfully
disagree
with
some
of
the
identified
heritage,
attributes
and
values.
Well,
initial
findings
are
that
the
property
does
appear
to
meet
some
of
the
criteria
of
Oh
reg
906.
This
is
made
with
the
strong
caveat
that,
in
our
professional
opinion,
the
buildings
are
highly
evolved
and
some
of
the
attributes
disc
may
not
be
original
or
have
been
a
ravika
bleagh
altered
further.
F
We
will
respectfully
disagree
with
some
of
the
specific
analysis
based
upon
a
site-specific
examination
of
the
property,
notably
some
of
the
historical
and
associative
values
in
some
of
the
contextual
values.
We
have
serious
concerns
with
the
structure
itself
and
working
with
our
client
have
been
working
to
try
and
find
an
architect
or
engineer
with
a
heritage
specialization
to
look
at
the
structure,
as
well
as
to
undertake
a
designated
substances
survey
of
the
property.
F
F
We
also
have
questions
about
why
other
conservation
tools,
such
as
cultural
heritage,
landscape
policies,
part5
heritage
conservation,
district,
designation
or
commemoration
were
not
considered
for
these
properties.
Our
client
has
offered
a
site
visit
and
we
are
willing
to
work
with
city
staff
to
better
understand
these
properties.
My
client
is
also
willing
to
publicly
state
that
he
will
not
undertake
or
apply
for
a
demolition
permit
on
these
structures.
Pending
the
outcome
of
this
process,
we
did
make
an
offer
of
a
site
visit.
It
was
refused.
F
We
would
ask
community
counsel
to
defer
the
notice
of
intent
to
allow
for
additional
research
to
be
completed,
to
provide
for
an
opportunity
for
discussion
with
city
staff
and
to
allow
for
a
site
visit
so
that
all
parties
could
understand
the
properties
better.
Ultimately,
we
would
like
to
work
with
the
city
in
order
to
find
a
solution
for
everyone.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
M
M
Us
back
from
proceeding
with
the
plans
that
we've
gotten
the
approvals
on
our
neighbors
were
ok
with
it.
Committee
of
adjustments
was
okay
with
it.
We
have
a
place
to
live,
it's
all
coming
together,
so
we
want
to
respect
the
neighborhood
and
we
respect
the
home
in
the
history
of
the
home
is
magnificent
and
that's
why
we
love
living
in
Toronto,
and
we
will
respect
that.
Please,
let
us
continue.
Thank
you.
Thank.
M
Mass
parties
of
a
hundred
people,
or
so
more
than
once
happens
on
a
regular
basis
to
where
there's
destruction
to
my
property,
my
neighbor's
property
with
vomit
and
urine,
and
those
lovely
Red,
Solo
cups.
All
over
my
neighborhood,
the
people
who
own
these
houses
don't
seem
to
care
much
for
our
community.
They
don't
seem
to
get
along
with
us.
They
don't
care
to
get
along
with
us.
H
A
K
A
K
A
K
K
K
K
A
G
A
A
E
Thank
you.
The
reason
why
the
deputies
aren't
here
is
because
I've
told
them
that
we'll
be
deferring
this
item
to
TYC
cease
meeting
of
October
2019.
The
community
has
made
a
request
that
they
would
like
a
little
bit
more
time
to
review
the
the
staff
report
in
findings
and
that
their
intentions
are
to
seek
a
third
party
consultants
opinion
before
coming
back
to
make
a
final
decision
with
us.
Okay,.
O
Thank
you.
So
there
you
can
see
a
picture
of
28
Bracken,
Avenue
and
I
am
here
to
support
the
city's
recommendations
in
their
report
about
the
intention
to
designate
and
the
inclusion
on
the
Heritage
Register.
My
name
is
Barbara
burbled
and
I
live
one
house
away
from
28th
Bracken
Avenue
I'm
at
the
northeast
corner
of
Kingswood,
Road
and
Bracken,
and
there's
another
house
between
us,
which
used
to
be
on
the
tennis
court
of
28th
Bracken
and
then
there's
28th
Bracken
I
want
to
thank
the
city
heritage
staffer.
O
It's
very
detailed,
an
excellent
report
about
this
property
and
they
certainly
the
research
I,
have
done
I.
Do
a
lot
of
local
history
work.
In
addition
to
living
very
close
to
this
house
and
I
have
written.
Quite
a
few
are
supervised
de
bout.
15
books
of
local
history,
including
two
about
the
beach
and
I,
also
do
a
lot
of
work
in
my
neighborhood
and
with
the
local
Historical
Society
about
the
heritage
of
the
beach
and
east
Toronto.
But
the
books
I
do
are
all
over
the
city
and
the
city
report.
O
The
evaluation
that
the
staff
made
and
its
report
said
that
28
bracken
met
the
criteria
for
designation,
the
Ontario,
Heritage
Act
under
all
three
categories
of
design,
associative
and
contextual
values.
So
I
just
would
like
to
point
out
a
few
things
that
the
city
pointed
out
just
to
bring
you
up
to
speed
on
this.
First
of
all,
this
28
brac
and
with
its
complemented
garage,
which
is
over
on
the
Bingham
side,
is
an
exceptionally
finally
craft
example
of
Arts
and
Crafts
architecture
rendered
in
the
shingles
style.
O
O
Now
the
historical
and
associative
value
the
house
was
built
in
1916
and
it's
the
second
bullet
on
the
street,
which
was
created
in
1908
when
the
area
was
subdivided
and
soon
annexed
to
Toronto.
It
has
value
for
its
association,
with
the
transition
of
the
bamhi
Beach
neighborhood
from
a
summer
resort
to
a
year-round,
a
settlement,
there's
nothing
cottagey
about
this
place
over
the
last
to
say.
Over
the
last
centuries,
nine
families
have
lived
at
this
house
and,
in
the
latter,
part
of
the
20th
century.
Two
people
were
cited
in
the
report.
O
One
was
killed:
air
dogs,
a
well-know,
an
Irish
Canadian
writer
and
a
member
of
the
Order
of
Canada,
and
he
was
followed
by
the
Ptolemy
family
and
Kathleen
served
as
Secretary
of
the
Canadian
Council
of
refugees.
They
just
regarded
for
her
work,
the
contextual
value
the
house
is
located
on
a
prominent
corner
in
the
heart
of
the
body,
Beach
neighborhood,
and
it
defines
and
maintains
the
historical
architectural
character
of
this
area.
O
I'm
just
going
to
show
you
a
few
other
buildings
in
the
area
which
will
show
you
how
much
in
keeping
it
is
with
the.
In
fact,
it
was
the
leader
of
this
style
in
the
neighborhood.
This
is
the
house
directly
across
the
road
at
33
bracken
very
similar,
because
it's
got
the
same
design,
the
same
builder
and
the
same
shingles
bottom
and
brick
bottom
shingles
on
the
top.
O
And
if
you
look
carefully
at
the
veranda
same
formation
of
the
columns
and
the
piers,
as
you
can
see
from
this
picture,
so
very
similar
in
scale
now
just
show
you
a
few
other
Arts
and
Crafts
style
houses
in
the
neighborhood.
This
are.
These
are
two
houses
on
Kingswood
Road
just
around
the
corner
south
of
Bracken,
and
this
is
a
Heritage
Conservation
District.
And
then
there
is
this
house
on
Scarborough
Road,
again
a
very
unusual
Arts
and
Crafts
style,
but
there's
a
lot
of
these
Craftsman
style
houses
in
the
neighborhood.
O
Is
okay,
so
I
just
can
assure
you
that
this
is
a
much-loved
house
in
the
neighborhood
and
from
comments
made
to
me
personally,
as
well
as
emails
to
city
staff
and
online
postings
on
social
media.
There
is
almost
a
unanimous
opposition
to
the
proposed
demolition
and
wholehearted
support
for
having
it
preserved.
Q
O
You
see
it
was
a
very.
It
was
a
February
day.
It
was
during
January.
January
I
got
a
notice
from
the
committee
of
adjustment,
saying
I
didn't
understand
it
at
first,
because
they
talked
about
a
new
house.
There,
I
went
new,
hoping
they'd,
be
building
a
new
house
and
then
I
found
out
that
that
meant
that
this
house
was
going
to
be
demolished
and.
M
Name
is
Millie
Rowan
and
I
love.
It
I
love
it
Bingham
Avenue,
which
is
just
at
the
corner
of
big
and
and
Rackham.
I've
lived
in
the
neighborhood
for
39
years
and
28
bracken
Avenue
sits
at
the
great
quarter
where
I
live,
it's
a
very
beautiful
home
and
it's
much
loved
in
the
community.
It's
always
been
known
as
a
landmark
home
which
has
had
a
moose
at
the
doorway.
It's
character
characterized
by
this,
but
read
at
the
very
front
door
and
it's
always
been
beautiful,
especially
at
Christmastime
when
they
put
lights
on
it.
M
The
house
has
the
character
in
the
architecture
of
the
many
homes
in
the
beaches
and
the
reason
why
many
families
have
bought
homes
and
have
lived
in
the
beaches
for
so
many
years.
It's
also
what
families
have
chosen
to
live
in
the
neighborhood
and
I
strongly
support
the
heritage.
Designation,
twenty-eight
Bracken,
Avenue
and
I
concur
with
everything
that
mrs.
Mobile
has
done
and
all
the
work
she
has
put
into
having
this
go
to
the
Heritage
Preservation
Board
and
that's
all
I
have
to
say
thank
you.
A
M
Its
Leslie,
Spencer
and
I
know
no
worries.
I
live
at
6
Bingham,
which
is
just
around
the
corner,
and
I
live
in
a
house
built
in
1914
one
of
the
first
in
the
area.
Also
an
arts
and
crafts
house
and
I
want
to
thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak
to
you
here
today,
not
least
because
I
know
that
you've
heard
before
all
the
sentiments
that
I'm
going
to
express
today.
M
M
We
love
our
neighborhood.
We
love
the
feel
of
the
area
I've
been
in
my
house
for
47
years
and
I'm
there
because
of
the
well
spaced
houses,
trees
and
Gardens
the
heritage
and
historical
character
of
the
area
and
the
the
unique
beech
architecture
with
its
throat.
Excuse
me,
strong
arts
and
crafts,
design
elements
and
the
strong
sense
of
community
that
pervades
it.
M
We
have
a
duty
to
preserve
it
for
our
children
and
grandchildren
and
residents
to
come.
So
in
my
letter,
I've
spoken
of
the
many
under
other
underlying
issues
around
the
demolition
of
this
house.
So
I
won't
repeat
it
all
here
today.
I
just
want
to
beg
you
to
consider
the
historical
context
of
the
home
in
question
and
its
unique
architecture
and
features
that
make
it
such
a
contribution
to
the
area
and
the
quality
of
life.
M
A
Q
Q
Q
Q
O
A
Q
Okay,
thank
you
through
the
chair,
I'd,
like
to
move
the
recommendations
in
the
staff
report
and
just
very
quickly
say
that
preserving
heritage
in
Toronto
in
a
comprehensive
manner
is
you
know
it's
it's
relatively
recent
advancement,
but
it's
something
that
is
so
important
to
our
neighborhoods
and
to
our
communities.
I.
Q
Think,
as
we
heard
from
staff
they're,
given
the
sheer
number
of
properties,
more
than
300
nominations
that
require
an
in-depth
review
from
HPS
I'd
like
to
thank
Tamara
and
her
team
and
staff
for
prioritizing
28th,
Bracken
and
I'd
also
really
like
to
thank
Barbara,
Millie
and
Leslie
for
their
work
on
this
file
and
acting
as
a
catalyst
to
move
this
forward.
That
was
hugely
important,
as
we
heard
in
January
to
get
us
to
where
we
are
today
to
preserve
this
important
peach
piece
of
the
development
of
balmy
Beach.
A
A
A
A
E
Thank
you
very
much.
I
would
like
to
move
the
alternative
recommendations
and
also
an
amendment
which
the
clerk
have
put
for
us.
This
was
an
amendment
that
was
drafted
in
consultation
with
city
planning
staff
as
well
as,
if,
in
encapsulate
the
essence
of
a
conversation
that
we
had
with
the
applicant
about
working
together
to
determine
the
final
outcome
and
use
of
that
particular
site,
and
and
and
thank
you
very
much
Paul
for
your
patience-
you've
been
waiting
here
all
day.
Hopefully
this
is
satisfactory
to
you.
A
Okay,
so
on
the
motion,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
next
I'm,
going
to
call
te
7.33
residential
demolition
application
to
1:3
Church
Street.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
that
item?
Yes,
sir,
please
come
up.
Please,
please
I,
can't
just
have
you
shut
across
the
room.
G
A
E
Thank
you
very
much
and
again
I'd
like
to
move
the
alternative
recommendations,
as
well
as
an
amendment
that's
identical
to
the
first,
these
two
properties,
211
and
213
and
church.
We
are
obviously
adjacent
to
one
another,
we'll
be
working
through
with
the
applicant
and
city
planning.
What
the
final
use
of
that
space
will
be.
Okay,.
A
E
That's
correct,
I
have
a
motion
to
reconsider
and
you
thought
specifically
name
the
item
number.
The
clerk's
can
put
that
on
the
screen.
I
believe-
and
there
was
just
just
by
way
of
technical
and
we'll
be
moving
an
amendment.
There
was
a
there
was
a
mistake
in
the
in
the
parking
machines
payment
I'll,
be
happy
to
tell
you
that
we're
gonna,
be
we
caught
it
we're
adding
one
more
dollar
in
addition
to
the
hourly
fee,
that's
due
from
$4
per
hour
to
$5
per
hour.
I'm
sure
everyone
is
excited
about
that.
Every.
A
R
A
R
A
Q
A
G
There
is
often
angst
from
existing
property
owners
over
uncertainty
around
what
this
entails
and
we've
had
some
conversations
and
the
in
the
hallway
and
for
property
owners
who
continue
to
have
questions
I
would
invite
them
to
reach
out
to
my
own
office,
and
we
will
facilitate
those
conversations
with
heritage
because,
again
not
losing
sight
of
our
past
in
history
does
not
freeze
buildings
in
time,
but
rather
ensures
that
as
they
grow
and
change.
We
maintain
that
historical
component
as
well
and
with
that
I
will
adopt
move
to
adopt
the
staff
recommendations.
A
S
S
A
A
Item
te
7.3
for
requests
for
offense
exemption
to
the
Toronto
Municipal
Code
Chapter,
four,
four,
seven,
four,
eighty
six
Rose
Heath
Avenue
I
have
a
submission
from
Eleanor
Turner
Ellen
are
you
here?
Yes,
please
make
yourself
comfortable
and
you'll.
Have
five
minutes
and
you'll
be
able
to
watch
your
time
on
that
clock
over
there?
Okay.
L
Thank
you
very
much.
My
name
is
Eleanor
Turner
and
I
live
at
86.
Rose
Heath,
my
husband
and
I,
are
asking
for
your
approval
to
maintain
the
height
of
the
panels,
1
2
and
5
that
are
located
on
the
retaining
wall,
straddling
the
property
line
at
86
and
88
Rose
Heath
Avenue.
We
understand
that
because
of
the
retaining
wall,
the
allowable
height
for
this
fence
is
60
inches,
as
shown
with
the
dark
line
across
the
screen,
rather
than
the
78
inches,
showing
with
dotted
line
that
is
usually
allowed
for
a
rear
yard
fence.
L
The
over
height
portion
of
panels,
1,
2
and
5
is
above
the
black
line,
and
please
note
that
panels,
3
&
4
are
actually
below
the
black
line.
The
60
inch
allowable
height
I
next
have
a
picture.
I
can
get
yeah
that
shows
the
real
fence
with
its
panels
panel,
one
on
the
eastern
or
left
side
is
tall
and
narrow
and
panels.
Two
and
five
are
wider
and
the
same
width.
Although
the
perspective
in
the
picture
makes
them
look
different.
L
Our
fence,
as
you
can
see,
is
not
an
overwhelming
blank
wall
in
design,
appearance
and
height.
The
fence
is
compatible
with
other
rear
yard
fences
along
the
lane,
scape
of
the
public
Lane,
and
we
feel
that
it
provides
a
pleasing
Vista.
We
are
asking
that
the
existing
height
of
the
narrow
panel
one
be
maintained,
as
it
is
a
structural
panel
actually
attached
to
the
house,
which
is
22
inches
behind
it,
and
so
it
contributes
to
the
fences,
lateral
rigidity
and
sound
construction.
L
The
height
also
allows
a
six-foot-three
homeowner
carrying
gardening
tools
to
pass
under
it
safely.
We
are
also
asking
that
the
existing
height
of
panels,
2
and
5,
be
maintained
for
reasons
of
security
and
privacy.
We
are
at
the
south
end
of
a
public
Lane.
There
have
been
security
and
safety
issues
in
the
public
Lane,
for
example,
tagging
of
fences
and
garages.
Our
vines
were
cut,
a
car
was
tampered
with,
there
have
also
been
theft
and
other
issues
near
us,
along
Rose,
Heath
and
also
along
Danforth.
L
Avenue
people
use
the
unfenced
property
of
number
88
as
a
connector
route
from
the
public
Lane,
which
is
over
here
through
to
Rose
Heath
Avenue
and
vice
versa.
The
unprotected
north
side
of
the
retaining
wall,
as
you
can
see
along
here,
is
very
easy
to
climb
on
to
anywhere
along
it,
particularly
when
using
the
patio
stones
which
are
here
that
are
stacked
against
the
retaining
wall
under
panel
5.
Even
children
climb
on
the
patio
stones
and
used
them
to
walk
along
the
wide
ledge
on
the
retaining
wall.
L
Our
fence
was
originally
built
in
2003
for
safety
reasons
because
of
the
retaining
wall
as
well
as
for
security
and
privacy.
It
was
originally
clad
with
dense,
flowering
vines
in
2012,
a
vandal
cut
the
vines,
so
they
died.
As
a
result,
we
installed
horizontal
cedar
boards,
which
you
can
see
as
cladding,
which
was
about
one
and
a
half
inches
apart,
so
the
fence
was
not
climb
above
it
still
attractive,
as
the
horizontal
bar
boards
were
and
are
regularly
peered
through.
L
We
installed
decorative
metal
strips
between
them
for
privacy,
also
to
make
staring
over
the
fence
more
difficult.
We
have
hung
decorative
art
work
above
panel,
two
and
above
panel
five
again
for
privacy.
We
also
use
vines
and
foliage
to
create
additional
privacy.
We
understand
the
artwork
and
foliage
are
not
considered
when
measuring
fence
height.
We
also
installed
a
tarp
recently
completely
over
panel
five
to
prevent
ongoing
peering
through
the
spaces
and
also
prevent
the
stuffing
of
leaves
mud
and
other
things
into
the
fence
structure.
L
Our
privacy
has
also
been
compromised
by
the
very
unexpected
use
of
the
retaining
wall
as
a
perch
to
stand
on
and
use
as
a
vantage
point
to
look
over
and
or
through
the
fence,
into
our
rear
yard,
towards
our
downstairs:
full-length,
glass,
French
doors
and
back
windows.
The
interior
is
easily
seen
when
lights
are
on
our
security
cameras
installed
in
2016
after
discussion
with
the
police
have
shown
in
many
instances
of
the
retaining
wall
being
used.
In
this
way,
panel
five
has
been
particularly
popular,
given
its
easier
access.
L
L
Since
shade
is
largely
from
the
Manitoba
maple
growing
in
the
public
lanes
behind
the
Arts,
therefore,
we
request
your
approval
to
maintain
the
existing
height
of
panels,
one
two
and
five
for
reasons
of
privacy
and
security,
and
we
would
also
recommend
that
the
patio
stones
be
removed
from
the
retaining
wall
to
discourage
access
to
it.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
A
L
A
D
A
I
D
M
A
Would
you
like
to
hold
this
one
and
35
if
I
may?
Okay,
oh
geez,
very
good,
so
I'll
allow
that
and
keep
those
two
items
on
hold
for
a
moment
which
brings
us
to
te
7.36
refusal
of
an
application
for
boulevard
cafe
permit
located
at
1638
Bloor
Street
West
unit
2
inroad
Frankish
members
I've
received
a
communication
from
the
owner.
He
is
at
I
believe
it's
a
graduation
ceremony
for
one
of
his
children
this
afternoon,
which,
by
the
way,
if
you
don't
go
to
your
children's
graduation,
your
life
is
full
of
misery
and
bad
karma.
A
R
A
L
G
I
represent
the
begins
field,
village,
residents,
Association
and
I'm
here
today
to
oppose
the
the
patio
application
and
I
have
brought
with
me
a
petition
with
408
signatures,
82
pages
long
gathered
up
amongst
the
residents
and
neighbors
of
the
Beaconsfield
area.
The
little
Portugal
neighborhood
you're
gonna,
hear
from
some
other
deputies
today
that
are
gonna
spell
out
the
personal
reasons
that
they're
opposed
to
it,
so
I'm
not
going
to
labor
them.
G
The
issue
too
much
I
do
want
to
add
that
I
saw
an
email
from
councillor
Ana
by
Lao
that
the
other
day
to
the
residents
and
I
just
want
to
quote
something
because
I
think
it
was
pertinent
to
this
meeting
on
behalf
of
our
community
I'm
asking
for
your
help.
No
one
knows
the
community
better
than
those
who
live
in
it.
Each
and
every
day
you
experience
your
neighbourhood
and
see
the
subtle
differences
that
make
it
a
unique
place
to
live,
work
and
play.
G
That's
why
I'm
watching
a
series
of
town
halls,
etc,
etc,
which
Ana
had
in
her
newsletter
on
June
21st,
so
was
well-timed?
We
believe
the
big
picture
is
that
our
neighbourhood
has
enough
bars.
Restaurants,
special
event,
locations,
etc
in
the
neighbourhood
nature
and
immediately
adjacent
to
it
that
we
don't
need
the
precedent
that
might
be
set
by
establishing
a
business
that
is
running
a
patio
as
well
as
possibly
a
liquor
license
which
were
in
front
of
the
AG
CEO.
G
At
this
point,
opposing
I
also
like
to
point
out
that
we
believe
that
the
there
is
more
licensees
license.
The
liquor
license.
Seats
adjoining
our
neighbourhood
on
Queen,
Dundas
and
Ossington
than
there
are
actual
residents
of
all
ages
within
those
boundaries,
and
we
can
just
look
at
it.
One,
for
example,
the
Great
Hall
at
Queen
and
over
court
1800
licensed
and
we're
surrounded
by
licensed
establishments,
which
is
part
of
the
reason
we
we
do
oppose
the
whole
concept
of
this
patio
and
possibly
a
liquor
license
associated
with
down
the
road.
G
A
A
H
H
When
we
open
two
and
a
half
years
ago.
This
is
what
the
city's
chief
planner
had
to
say
that
our
city
was
coming
up
aged
because
we
know
how
to
bike
cafe
in
it
and
we
couldn't
agree
more.
We've
been
welcomed
into
the
community.
We
have
a
lot
of
neighborhood
support,
we're
trying
to
build
a
community
hub
and
that's
what
we've
done
so
far
and
we'll
continue
to
do
it.
H
We
try
and
build
community
through
hosting
coffee
tastings
hosting
a
bike
storytelling
night
showing
bike
races
taking
Sunday
morning
rides.
We
have
a
ride
club
that
introduces
people
to
our
city's
bike
lanes
our
trails
and
just
builds
community
and
introduces
people
to
the
joy
of
riding
in
the
winter.
We
have
a
project
where
we
take
the
abandoned
bikes
that
the
city
cuts
off
post
and
rings.
We
fix
them
up
over
the
winter
and
we
give
them
to
newcomers
who
need
them
in
the
spring.
This
is
our
corner,
its
Gladstone
in
Alma.
H
What
we're
proposing
is
a
little
bit
of
seating
on
Gladstone
a
little
bit
of
seating
on
Alma,
seven
tables
total.
This
is
a
drawing
you
can
see
where
we
are
in
terms
of
meeting
all
the
requirements
of
the
current
bylaw
and,
as
you
know,
there
is
a
new
bylaw
that
will
come
into
effect
in
September.
The
only
deficiency
is
the
sidewalk
on
Gladstone
on
Alma.
H
We
have
the
clearance
to
point
one
three
meters
on
all
my
it's
only
1.9,
that's
the
width
of
the
sidewalk
and,
as
you
can
see,
all
our
neighbors
have
built
up
to
the
sidewalk
line
with
their
planting
and
with
their
fencing.
That
is
just
the
width
of
the
sidewalk
in
this
neighborhood
everything
else
passed
in
terms
of
the
requirements.
There
are
a
lot
of
these
former
corner
stores
in
our
downtown
area
that
have
been
turned
into
cafes
and
they're
great
meeting
spots
for
community.
H
You
can
see
this
one
in
councillor,
Layton's
Ward,
with
a
little
outdoor
seating.
It's
a
meeting
spot
for
neighbors
a
lot
of
vibrancy
for
the
street.
It
just
adds
the
neighborhood
and
has
risk
that
respectful
operators.
This
is
another
example
just
near
our
shop,
just
a
couple
blocks
away
and
councilor
Chrissy's
Ward
another
cafe
with
a
little
bit
of
outdoor
seating
on
the
public
Boulevard-
and
this
is
also
quite
close
by
and
counselor
by
Lila's
neighborhood,
another
former
corner
store.
These
were
all
former
corner
stores
turned
into
cafes
or
restaurants,
with
outdoor
seating
operating
responsibly.
H
This
is
a
I
have
a
few
vintage
photos
of
our
location,
the
friendly
grocery,
which
is
up
in
operation
for
decades.
These
were
given
to
me
by
the
former
owners
Joe
and
Teresa,
who
have
visited
our
shop
and
really
liked
what
we've
done
with
this
space.
We
didn't
just
turn
it
into
something
dormant.
It's
felt
lively,
it
brings
people,
it
gets
neighbors
to
meet
each
other
and
they
are
very
supportive
of
what
we
were
doing
and
we're
continuing
to
do
a
few
pictures
of
them.
H
So,
to
sum
up,
the
issues
I
wanted
to
share
some
information.
Our
zoning
restricts
our
operating
hours
to
end
by
9:00
p.m.
our
indoor
capacity
is
30
people
in
terms
of
the
9
p.m.
closing.
We
did
I'll
be
upfront
about
this.
We
did
have
a
few
private
functions
that
went
past
past
9
p.m.
we
thought
the
9
p.m.
up
referred
to
our
operating
our
normal
business
operations.
Only
we
now
know
that
and
we
haven't
booked
any
functions
past
9
p.m.
and
we'll
continue
to
do
that.
Our
record
is
clean.
H
And
if
we're
approving
for
Boulevard
cafe
we'll
be
very
ready
to
respond
to
concerns
from
neighbors,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
this
works,
we
want
to
make
sure
it's
a
positive.
This
is
public
property
on
the
boulevard.
If
we
don't
have
something
for
a
place
for
community
to
gather
what
are
we
gonna
do
with
it?
Are
we
going
to
leave
it
as
a
for
Boulevard
parking?
Are
we
gonna
leave
it
as
an
empty
lot
or
just
a
dumping
ground?
Let's
do
something
great
for
the
community
somewhere
where
people
come
enjoy
sit
be
outside.
H
They
don't
have
to
purchase
things
from
us.
They
can
just
enjoy
the
space.
A
lot
of
the
Opposition,
as
you
already
heard,
is
around
our
application
for
an
indoor
liquor
license.
That's
before
the
license
field
tribunal,
that's
going
in
October.
We
don't
even
know
if
we're
getting
that
license.
This
is
about
seating
outside
for
our
cafe
as
it
stands
today,
a
very
modest
number
of
seats,
so
I
hope
you'll.
Consider
just
that
issue
today,
because
that's
what's
before
you,
we
also
have
some
concerns
with
the
poll.
A
T
My
name
is
Kareem
Chan
I
am
a
resident.
I
live
with
my
family
at
98,
Gladstone
Avenue!
That's
here
on
the
map.
I
just
wanted
to
share
this
map
with
you,
because
I
wanted
to
have
you
visualize
what
our
neighborhood
looks
like,
as
you
can
see,
80
Gladstone
is
here
where
the
business
is.
It
is
surrounded
360
degrees
by
residential
homes
and
the
building
itself
is
attached
to
a
row
of
homes,
I'm
kind
of
here
to
speak
on
behalf
of
one
of
my
neighbors
who
lives
at
84
Gladstone,
who
is
attached
to
the
building
itself?
T
What's
highlighted
in
the
map
in
yellow
is
actually
to
just
demonstrate
the
majority
of
homes
who
are
in
opposition
of
the
boulevard
cafe.
Permit
we've
collected
over
400
signatures
for
our
petition,
and
within
that
petition
we
have
141
signatures
within
the
120
meter,
radius
of
the
business
at
80,
Gladstone.
T
One
of
my
I
guess
main
concerns
is
the
despite
the
fact
that
the
city,
the
city
staff,
has
recommended
a
the
patio
to
be
denied,
and
we
are
here
dealing
with
the
appeal
process.
The
owner
is,
at
this
time
still
operating
outdoor
seating
on
the
Alma
Avenue
flank.
They
have
put
a
big
wooden
log,
just
off
of
the
sidewalk,
and
it
attracts
it,
attracts
loitering.
T
It
attracts
noise
and
that
that
space
is
supposed
to
be
a
permit
for
two-car
Boulevard
parking,
which
residents
who
live
at
80
Gladstone,
because
there's
three
apartments
in
that
building,
or
even
for
delivery
trucks
to
be
able
to
use
that.
This
morning,
for
example,
after
dropping
off
my
kids,
I
was
walking
home
and
the
sidewalk
was
blocked
by
a
delivery
truck
that
was
parked
in
front
of
the
shop.
T
If
you
look
in
the
map,
there's
a
at
the
very
top
there
there's
the
school
there's
a
elementary
school
there
and
a
YMCA
daycare
and
across
the
street,
from
where
I
live.
There's
a
church
as
well,
so
there's
lots
the
neighborhood's
kind
of
a
mix
of
young
families,
longtime
elderly
residents
and
families
who
lived
there
lived
there
for
many
generations.
T
T
It's
it's
mostly
the
disregard
of
recklessness
that
the
owner
has
demonstrated.
It's
been
a
bit
of
a
pattern:
it's
negatively
impacted
our
community,
it's
put
a
strain
on
its
residents
and
it's
partly
because
they
have
been
violating
municipal
bylaws
such
as
going
over.
There
allowed
they're
allowed
hours
of
operations,
but
also
operating
as
a
venue
rental
for
parties
and
they
have
and
being
and
using
that
space
over
capacity,
we
had
a
community
meeting
with
Annabelle
AO
about
our
concerns
about
a
liquor
license
application
back
in
February.
T
There
was
about
a
hundred
people
in
the
room,
and
the
owner
had
told
us
all
s
neighbors
that
moving
forward.
He
would
not
operate
any
special
events.
Past
9:00
p.m.
two
nights
later
on
a
weeknight
a
school
night.
He
had
his
special
events
party
and
there
were
patrons
still
in
there
up
till
10:30
p.m.
T
T
T
D
Thank
You
chair
Thank
You
committee
for
having
a
skirt
first
off
I,
live
70
metres
away
from
this
location
and
I'm,
not
only
here
as
a
resident
I'm.
Also
here,
as
a
small
business
owner
myself,
I've
operated
a
coffee
shop
in
the
City
of
Toronto.
First
thing,
I
did
was
walk
up
and
down
the
street
and
introduce
myself
and
let
everybody
know
what
my
intentions
were
get
to
know
your
neighbors,
because
your
neighbors
are
important,
even
if
they're,
not
your
customers,
so
back
in
2015,
mr.
D
stilinski
came
door-to-door
and
told
everybody
what
his
intentions
were
and
I
addressed.
My
concerns
saying
that
I
didn't
really
care
for
a
commercial
type
of
business
on
a
residential
street
and
I
refused
to
sign,
but
I
looked
at
it
and
I
said
wow
he's
gonna
have
a
bikes
bike
shop
and
a
coffee
shop.
We
have
bike
lanes
right
here.
That
should
be
good.
You
know,
like
people
can
ride,
stop
off
for
a
coffee
have
their
bikes
repaired.
I
wish
them
well
as
a
small
business
owner,
I
wish
everybody
well.
D
Our
city
thrives
and
small
businesses
thrive.
However,
when
you
change
the
concept
of
your
business,
because
your
business
is
going
the
direction
it's
troublesome
for
our
neighborhood,
the
minute
alcohol
was
involved,
it
changes
everything
sure
the
presentation
is
nice,
but
next
time
what
happens
when
the
next
person
opens
up
something
or
this
place
gets
sold
the
patio,
the
liquor,
it's
all
transferrable
and
we're
still
there
most
of
us
are
in
for
the
long
haul.
The
school
100
metres
north
Alexander,
Mir
Gladstone,
the
population
was
declining.
Our
school
is
now
a
surplus.
D
We
have
an
abundance
of
family
members,
we
have
so
many
families
moved
in.
We
have
seniors
that
couldn't
attend
today.
We
have
several
seniors
that
are
here,
as
mr.
Kerr
stated,
we're
surrounded
with
alcohol
around,
not
to
say
that
this
is
gonna,
be
a
place
where
people
are
gonna
cause
trouble
or
vomit,
but
we
just
don't
believe
that
alcohol
or
a
patio
belongs
in
a
neighborhood.
If
this
was
at
the
bottom
of
Gladstone
and
done
that
a
queen
or
at
the
top
it'd
be
a
whole
different
ballgame.
D
When
you
own
a
house
15
meters
from
a
major
street,
it's
a
different
ballgame.
This
isn't
a
residential
neighborhood,
surrounded
by
homes,
360
degrees
around
there's,
people
that
have
been
there
for
40
years,
we've
canvassed.
We
have
400,
we
submitted
408.
We
have
more
sheets
that
are
out
there
because
we're
doing
this
as
a
community.
The
best
thing
that's
come
out
of
this
is:
we've
become
a
community
you've
gotten
to
know
everybody
and
you've
gotten
to
know
why
we
don't
on
it
without
getting
personal,
there's
people
in
our
neighborhood
that
have
mobility
issues.
D
There's
people
that
have
shared
addiction
issues.
There
are
people
with
children
with
special
needs.
Those
are
the
people
that
we're
here
representing
today.
Not
everybody
can
take
a
two
o'clock
meeting
off
and
we're
here,
because
we
don't
believe
this
is
in
the
best
interest
of
a
residential,
neighborhood.
I
know
as
councillors,
you
see
so
many
patio
applications.
This
one
has
to
be
looked
at
differently,
because
it's
in
the
middle
of
a
neighborhood
and
I
know.
Mr.
sieminski
asked
that
you
look
at
it
differently,
but
realistically
alcohol
is
in
play.
D
A
K
K
We
live
approximately
3.3
meters,
away
from
the
property
line
from
the
establishment,
we're
less
than
25
meters
from
the
zone,
patio
that
proposed
patio.
My
parents
had
been
there
for
45
years.
My
dad's
and
loves
his
garden
he's
out
there
all
the
time
my
mom
is
always
outside
on
the
veranda.
Sorry,
there's
a
log
on
the
property
as
you've
heard
where
people
sit
two
three
four
o'clock
in
the
morning,
sound
that
that
our
travels
we
are
disturbed
by
it,
so
the
log
is
illegal,
it
shouldn't
be
there
and
it
was
placed
there
by
the
owner.
K
Sorry,
so
also
we've
I've
made
many
calls
3-1-1
and
they
have
this
2-day
inspection
which
really
no
one's
gonna,
be
hanging
around
for
two
days
making
noise.
So
they
don't
really
do
anything.
To
be
honest
with
you
also,
there
is
a
vote
as
you
heard
on
our
street,
because
we
will
be
affected
by
it,
and
the
vote
was
thirty
eight
to
seven.
So
that's
a
pretty
lopsided
vote.
K
So
I
don't
understand
why
we're
here,
if
the
people
who
are
affected
by
this
patio
everyday
have
spoken
loudly
and
has
raised
their
voices
about
having
this
patio
and
in
their
neighborhood
and
also
I'm
just
you
know,
there's
been
events
at
this
establishment
where
the
sidewalk
has
been
blocked
by
bikes
and
my
mom
couldn't
get
to
church.
She
had
to
walk
on
the
street.
So
it's
not
just
my
mom
there's
many
other
seniors
and
young
families
with
strollers
pushing
their
kids
around.
Also
I'm.
K
Just
here
to
ask
you
guys
to
protect
the
families
and
the
seniors
in
the
neighborhood,
and
it
is
a
neighborhood.
I
grew
up.
There
move
they
raised
7
kids,
there's
been
many
families
that
grew
up
there.
There's
the
picture
right
at
the
bottom
right
there.
That's
the
sidewalk.
My
parents
used
to
get
to
church,
so
they
had
to
walk
on
the
street,
for
car
comes
around
the
corner:
they're
not
jumping
out
of
the
way.
So
this
is
just
gonna
be
troublesome
for
everybody
like
Karen's
got
a
young
family.
K
She
strolls
with
her
kids
in
a
stroller.
This
belongs
on
a
major
intersection.
People
have
invested
money's,
buying
their
homes
to
raise
their
families
and
now,
all
of
a
sudden,
we're
being
forced
trying
to
force
us
to
accept
this
patio.
Meanwhile,
we
have
spoken.
We
voted
against
it
and
now
we're
here.
This
gentleman
is
here
trying
to
force
it
down
are
down
on
us
because
we
voted
on
it.
It's
been
voted
upon.
I
I,
really,
don't
understand.
Why
we're
here
sorry
I'm,
not
very
much
into
politics.
K
A
M
Hi,
my
name
is
Sophie
Berg
and
I
am
in
favor
of
the
application
for
the
Boulevard
addition
to
fix,
I
moved
it
into
Gladstone,
ear
fix
in
late
2017,
and
it
has
been
a
wonderful
part
of
living
in
the
neighborhood
in
the
summer
of
2018.
The
patio
was
a
great
place
to
meet
and
bump
into
neighbors
and
friends.
I
think
it's
important
for
any
neighborhood
to
have
outdoor
spaces,
where
people
can
congregate,
work,
eat
and
drink
and
spend
time
together
during
our
short
summer
months.
M
On
top
of
that,
inside
seating
at
fix
is
limited
and
the
cafe
is
almost
always
busy,
so
I
feel
it
makes
sense
to
expand
the
seating
out
to
the
patio
I
go
to
fix
almost
every
day,
I'm
a
freelancer
and
spend
many
hours
there
on.
My
laptop
I
can
attest
that
the
clientele
are
extremely
respectful
and
are
almost
are
also
mostly
freelancers
on
their
laptops
or
friends
catching
up.
It
has
a
warm
and
friendly
vibe
that
I'm
certain
would
carry
over
to
an
outdoor
patio
and
wouldn't
be
a
disturbance.
N
Name
is
Gabriella
Koontz
I
live
at
94
glides,
don't
Avenue
I've
been
a
member
of
the
community
for
15
years
I'm,
a
mother
of
three
young
children,
my
neighbor
on
92,
Gladstone
Avenue,
wasn't
able
to
come
here
today.
She's
a
mother
of
three
young
children
as
well
I
have
three
girls.
She
has
three
boys
I
understand
that
one
of
the
things
that
could
be
considered
here
today
is
the
fact
that
the
type
of
the
business
we're
dealing
with
at
80
Gladstone
is
a
bicycle
shop
and
it's
a
cafe.
I
understand.
N
There's
a
lot
of
allure
to
that,
and
there
is
I
am
a
huge
cyclist.
My
neighbor
with
three
boys
is
a
huge
cyclist
I
own
one
of
those
crazy
yuba
bikes,
with
the
three
seats
on
the
back
and
my
neighbor
got
went
to
so
that
she
could
transport
her
children
all
around
the
neighborhood
I
really
loved.
The
fact
that
my
neighborhood
in
the
last
15
years
has
grown
you
put
in
bike
lanes.
I
can
get
to
and
from
work
on
my
bike,
I
love
it.
My
neighbor
does
the
same
thing.
N
I
get
my
kids
around
everywhere
with
my
bike.
That's
how
I
commute,
but
please
I
urge
you
not
to
think
of
this
appeal
for
a
patio
to
do
anything
to
do
with
a
bike,
because
it
doesn't
have
anything
to
do
with
bicycling.
This
is
a
patio
that's
illegal.
The
person
before
me
that
spoke
talked
about
how
she
sat
on
it.
Let's
really
think
about
that
for
a
second,
because
that
is
a
person
who's
sitting
on
an
illegal
patio.
N
Fred
will
tell
you
that
he's
not
he's
abiding
by
all
the
bylaws,
but
that
is
clear.
We
have
it
here
that
it's
being
used
illegally.
It's
a
pattern
of
behavior
you've
heard
it
from
the
neighbors
here
today
it
is
becoming
a
problem
in
our
neighborhood
I.
Don't
want
you
to
think
of
this
particular
petition
have
to
do
anything
with
bikes.
It's
really
about
settling
alcohol
and
food
would
on
a
patio
that
really
doesn't
belong.
It
is
a
residential
neighborhood.
It
really
isn't
about
anything
else,
other
than
that
and
I've
gone
online.
N
I
have
looked
at
all
of
your
decisions
from
2014
through
to
where
we
are
today
trying
to
find
some
precedent
where
you
were
considering
a
patio
in
a
residential
neighborhood,
let
such
as
ours-
and
you
know
what
I
couldn't
find
one,
because
every
single
application
that
you're
been
dealing
with
has
always
been
about
a
big
residential
neighborhood
and
they
have
something
on
Bloor
that
fronts
on
a
side
street
or
st.
Clair
that
fronts
on
a
little
side
street
or
it's
Bloor
Street
that
fronts
on
a
little
side
street.
But
we
are
them.
You've.
N
Seen
the
map
that
my
neighbor
Corrine
has
provided
you
the
map
the
Corrine
has
provided.
You
shows
that
where
this
particular
location
is
is
squarely
in
the
middle,
we
are
hiding
between
Queen
and
Dundas.
We
are
a
very
small
little
neighborhood.
We
have
a
ton
of
children.
My
kids
use
the
sidewalks
to
bike.
N
My
kids
use
the
sidewalks
to
run
and
play
and
I
love
it,
but
I
want
to
protect
our
neighborhood
I,
don't
want
to
have
it
where
I've
got
to
deal
with
a
bar
or
I've
got
to
deal
with
a
cafe
and
the
noise
and
the
people,
and
it's
just
not
meant
for
that
purpose
and
I-
would
really
really
urge
you
not
to
consider
that
today
on
this
appeal,
the
last
thing
I
wanted
to
bring
to
your
attention
is
when
I
was
reading.
The
appeal
I
noticed
that
there
is
something
called
the
Toronto.
N
What
is
it
called?
It's
the
Complete
Streets
guideline:
it's
the
vibrant
document
that
you
talk
about
when
you're
deciding
on
streets
I
had
a
good
look
at
that
document.
I
tried
to
figure
out
what
is
it
that
could
make
a
street
have
a
patio
on
it,
because
this
is
something
that
you
consider
when
you're
considering
streets.
When
do
we
put
a
patio
on
it
and
so
I
looked
at
it.
So
chapter
1.4
of
the
document
speaks
about
the
vision
for
Complete
Streets
and
it's
tapes
in
quotes.
N
Streets
should
reflect
the
existing
and
planned
function,
scale
and
character
of
the
neighborhood
and
communities
that
surround
them,
respond
and
respect
the
local
context
and
character
in
the
city.
The
local
context
and
character
of
our
neighborhood
is
a
tiny
neighborhood.
It
isn't
we
don't
need.
We
don't
need
another
another
seating
outside.
We
don't
need
another
bar.
We
don't
need
anything
of
that
nature.
We
want
to
keep
it
quiet
chapter.
One
point
five
point
two
points
to
the
need
to
respect
local
context.
N
The
points
of
consideration
under
this
heading
include
in
quotes,
respecting
and
responding
to
existing
and
planned
land
uses
scales
of
buildings,
setbacks
and
to
engage
with
residents
and
community
groups
to
understand
the
neighborhood
and
its
priorities.
The
neighbors
have
spoken,
they
provided
their
opinion
on
it
and
the
priority
isn't
for
this
type
of
application.
Can.
P
P
P
Some
of
the
issues
that
congestion,
there's
very
little
street
parking
in
the
area
Alma
is
kitty-corner
to
Gladstone
within
a
hundred
feet
of
fixed
bikes
and
coffee.
Since
business
arrived
parking
is
non-existent
for
residents
and
will
only
get
worse
with
a
potential
bar
and
party
zone
that
fix
bikes
could
inevitably
become
there's
a
traffic
danger
as
well
for
families
and
children
living
in
the
area.
Waterloo
Avenue
became
a
one-way
street
eastbound
to
facilitate
a
bike
lane.
P
Noise
is
another
issue.
An
outdoor
patio
containing
two
so
catering
to
social
events,
such
as
weddings
as
advertised
by
fixed
bikes,
will
create
a
nightmare
for
residents
and,
possibly
imagine
50
drunk
party
types
in
your
backyard.
Would
you
want
that
on
a
continuous
basis?
Quality
of
life
is
another
issue.
A
neighborhood
provides
a
great
environment
for
raising
a
family
Toronto's
little
neighborhoods
provide
a
safety
zone
and
a
relief
from
the
noise
and
congestion
of
busy
city
life.
It
is
a
lifestyle
that
we,
as
residents
on
Alva
I,
was
chosen.
P
The
business
known
as
fixed
bikes
and
coffee
is
also
applied
for
a
liquor
license.
A
meeting
of
the
community
hosted
by
Annabeth
Abellio
MPP
on
February
25th
was
it
tended
by
concerned
parents
and
neighbors
living
in
the
vicinity
of
fix
bikes
and
coffee.
The
community's
objections
to
this
were
mixing
liquor
with
bicycle
riding
is
problematic.
Make
it
worse.
The
cafe
is
located
one
street
away
from
a
public
school
liquor.
P
P
Increased
parking
issues
on
our
already
crowded
street,
which
relies
on
street
parking
for
his
residents,
will
again
be
affected
by
the
traffic
from
opening
up
this
patio
and
initially,
when
the
owner
of
fixed
bikes
had
coffee
canvassed
the
neighborhood
prior
to
buying
the
building.
He
assured
the
residents
that
it
would
only
be
a
cafe
and
bicycle
repair.
We
supported
this
business
plan
based
on
trust
and
that
doesn't
seem
to
be
the
case
in
wrapping
up
a
liquor
license
or
an
outdoor
boulevard
cafe,
permit
our
issue
to
fix
bikes
and
coffee.
P
A
I
You
first
of
all,
I
like
to
say,
I,
always
like
to
look
at
both
sides
to
make
my
own
decision
on
what's
right.
What's
what's
wrong,
I've
spoken
with
with
Fred
the
owner
and
I
really
like
to
find
out
what's
right,
what's
wrong,
he's
an
intelligent
person,
but
when
it
comes
to
business
license
and
the
business
conditions,
one
is
when
it
says:
you're
only
allowed
X
a
maximum
amount
of
people,
your
business
hours.
You
should
stick
to
it.
It's
pretty
basic
and
also
respecting
city
property
city
reports
on
the
application
for
the
boulevard
cafe.
I
I
So
that's
the
main
thing
is
safety
and,
of
course,
with
the
city
denying
it.
They've
also
mentioned
that
it's
not
appropriate.
The
second
thing
is,
those
pictures
were
great.
Everybody
wants
cafes
and
businesses
to
thrive,
I'm,
a
cyclist
myself,
but
the
actual
owner
of
this
property
I
feel
is
a
risk.
I
Like
you
can't
just
say:
well,
I'll
behave
next
time.
I
won't
operate
past
9:00
p.m.
or
I
rented
it
out
and
I
got
an
SOP
liquor
license.
You
know
just
because
you
got
the
liquor.
Permit
doesn't
mean
you
can
go
past
the
9
p.m.
hours.
Oh
it's
in
the
past.
You
know,
I
haven't
done
anything
for
a
while,
but
it
seems
to
keep
on
happening.
So
it's
a
lack
of
trust,
the
safety
issue
and.
I
Lastly,
I
just
want
to
say
I'm.
The
one
thing
I've
got
out
of
this
is
that,
even
though
my
granddaughter
is
the
fourth
generation
in
that
area,
I'm
open
to
change,
I
love,
positive
change,
but
I
want
to
thank
all
my
neighbors
like
that's
one
thing
that
I
found
is
that
we
bonded
and
I'm
proud
of
them
for
standing
up
for
the
community.
I
Other
areas
on
Main
streets
bars,
cafes,
you
name
it
that's
great.
We
had
a
previous.
Was
there
any
objection?
Nobody
objected
because
they
feel
it's
a
fit.
The
majority
have
spoken
and
if
it's
people
in
your
ward
and
the
majority
say
we're
not
comfortable
with
it,
are
you
gonna
vote
against
them?
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
R
Thank
you
chair,
as
you
can
imagine,
and
all
of
us
have
gone
through
one
way
or
another,
a
very
difficult
issue,
divisive
issue
that
we
have
in
the
community
and
and
tough.
This
is
one
of
those
issues.
So
two
and
a
half
years
ago,
Fred
approached
my
office
and
approached
I,
approached
my
office
and
approached
many
members
of
the
community
to
go
to
committee
of
adjustment
and
ask
for
a
change
of
use.
This
used
to
be
a
supermarket.
He
wanted
to
have
a
coffee
shop
and
a
bike
repair
shop
and
I.
R
Application
and
I
know
that
people
have
asked
here
and
I've
said
you
know
this
is
a
patio
application
that
is
in
front
of
us,
and
it's
true
but
I
think
that,
given
that
this
is
right
in
the
center
of
residential
and
as
the
residents
mentioned,
this
is
not
on
a
flank
edge.
This
is
this
is
completely
surrounded
by
residential
streets.
I.
R
Think
the
context
of
everything
needs
to
be
taken
in
consideration
and
and
I
think
that
I
think
that
the
scenario
would
probably
be
different
if
there
was
a
liquor
license,
application
in
jeopardy,
I
still
think
that
what
staffs
say
is
is
needs
to
be
taken.
Consideration,
I
think
the
patty
would
have
to
be
reduced
because
I
wouldn't
approve
the
fact
that
we
would
only
have
1.5
meters
and
1.93
of
right-of-way.
R
So
even
that
I
think
needs
to
be
revisited
as
well,
but
I
think
at
this
point
in
time,
as
my
colleagues
also
understand,
I
think
there's
a
relationship
that
needs
to
be
repaired
and
and
I
think
that's
what
we
need
to
concentrate
as
a
community
there's
a
business
that
has
been
there
for
two
and
a
half
years
that
had
had
a
lot
of
support
from
the
community
until
this
issue
came
up
and
there
were
other
ones
starting
to
brewing.
You
know
people
were
starting
to
be
concerned
about.
R
You,
know:
advertising
for
parties
or
advertising
for
the
wedding,
or
you
know
this
was
a
concern
and
truth
be
told.
I
think
this
was
brought
to
the
attention
of
the
owner
and
he
committed
right
away
to
not
open
after
nine
o'clock
and
ensure
that
that
wouldn't
happen,
but
I
think
the
community
needs
to
see
that
happening,
because
the
community
needs
to
repair
that
relationship
and
Fred
needs
to
repair
that
relationship
with
with
the
community.
So
I
cannot
support
this
application
as
it
stands
right
now.
R
R
But
I,
you
know,
I
I,
like
the
shop
I,
do
I
think
it's
great
to
have
a
coffee
shop
in
some
of
these
places
and
be
able
to
go
outside,
and
you
know
have
these:
what
used
to
be
little
grocery
stores
to
turned
into
some?
You
know
little
grocery
store
or
fruit
market
or
or
a
cafe
where
you
can
grab
your
coffee,
but
I
think
we
as
a
city
also
need
to
be
careful
on
how
those
conversions
happening
and
how
we
do
that.
R
R
I
think
that
everybody
wants
the
the
establishment
to
succeed
and
to
grow,
but
to
be
considerate
of
the
concerns
of
the
neighbors
and
everybody
around
so
I'm
committed
to
working
and
trying
to
bring
things
and
people
together,
but
at
this
point
in
time
I
think
maybe
at
a
later
time,
maybe
as
the
relationship
gets
repaired.
But
at
this
point
in
time,
I
think
that
we
need
to
concentrate
on
repairing
that
relationship.
I.
S
Fletcher,
yes,
I
just
wanted
to
address,
flanked
each
patios,
because
it's
been
so
long
since
they
were
established
and
they
were
established
with
very
strict
and
rigorous
conditions
because
they're
on
a
residential
street,
unlike
Main
Street,
where
you
have
your
front
patio
once-
and
these
are
all
from
the
old
city
of
Toronto,
there
were
no
other
former
cities
that
had
frankish
patios
and
most
of
the
patio
life
is
in
the
old
city
of
Toronto.
So
along
all
of
the
streets
that
have
commercial
and
restaurants,
all
those
patios
that
are
down
the
side.
S
It's
a
long-established
requirement
that
the
street
has
to
have
something
to
say
about
that
and
I
know
many
times,
I've
gotten
in
some
of
the
frankish
patios
that
I've
dealt
with
and
I
think
I've
only
ever
refused
one
completely
and
all
the
neighbors
said
simply
no
to
that
one.
But
there
are
these.
Are
it's
very
important
for
the
relationship
and
just
for
the
city
that
we
continue
this
requirement
and
at
times
city
staff
have
said?
Well,
it's
very
onerous
to
have
to
do
the
polling.
S
We
think
this
is
a
great
business
and
this
will
work
or
we
think
this
is
the
wrong
patio
for
this
location
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
that's
that's
how
we
work
and
I
know
that
sometimes
people
get
petitions
of
people
around
the
city
or
that
want
to
go
to
that
patio
and
sometimes
owners
and
others
who
want
the
patio
feel
there's
the
same
weight
between
a
petition
or
emails
from
people
that
don't
live
on
that
street
and
those
who
live
on
that
Street.
But
the
city
rules
are
those
who
live
on.
S
That
street
have
to
be
able
to
say
whether
or
not
that's
going
to
work
for
them
and
in
the
majority
of
cases
they
generally
do.
But
there
are
times
such
as
this
one
and
I'm
going
to
support
the
councillor
where
they
don't
and
that's
the
way
it
works.
So
I
know
people
get
upset
because
a
lot
of
people
said
we
like
that
patio,
but
they're
not
living
there.
S
E
I
just
will
make
it
very
brief.
I
want
to
thank
the
deputies
for
coming
out
as
well.
I
think
that
you
really
did
articulate
your
position
extremely
well,
but
also
the
to
the
local
councillor.
I.
Think
one
of
the
one
of
the
things
that
you
did
raise
in
your
remarks
was
that
the
patio
would
have
created
a
substandard
sidewalk
condition
in
that
pedestrian.
E
Right
of
way,
where
we
strive
to
have
2.13
metres
of
sidewalk
enough
to
push
a
baby
stroller
enough
to
push
a
walker
enough
for
a
person
carrying
some
bags
of
groceries
home,
you
should
not
be
able
to.
You
should
not
be
forced
on
to
the
onto
the
roadway
of
oncoming
cars
just
to
get
to
your
location,
whether
it's
your
place
of
worship
at
your
school
or
in
this
case
going
home
and
I,
want
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
lose
that
in
in
this
entire
discussion.
E
As
much
as
it
is
important
to
have
good
neighborhood
relations,
chips
and
I
know
that
the
counselor
is
well-intentioned
because
she
wants
to
bring
people
together
and
beat
the
ward
healer.
But
I
would
actually
say
that
the
prop
on
the
business
operator,
above
and
beyond
anyone
else,
because
it
really
is,
if
you're
asking
for
permissions
to
operate
in
a
different
fashion,
you're
asking
to
appeal
a
decision
that
that
staff
have
made.
You
want
to
overrule
that.
E
If
you
want
to
be
up
here
before
this
Community
Council
again,
the
onus
is
really
on
you
to
actually
appease
the
community
and
to
work
together
to
bring
everyone
together.
Councillors
are
busy
staff
are
busy,
it's
not
necessarily
our
job
to
do
the
mediation.
It
really
is
the
person
who's
actually
asking
for
the
permission.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
Thank
you.
Anyone
else
No
so
on
counselor
by
allows
motion
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carries
all
right.
Moving
along
te,
7.39
refusal
of
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
application
located
at
one
to
seven
eight
st.
Clair
Avenue
West
unit,
one
to
girls,
Court
Avenue,
flank,
egde
I
have
listed
Jason,
Jason,
Ruiz,
Jason,
hi
Jason
come
on
out.
M
The
main
issue
with
my
patio
is,
it
is
a
bit
close
to
residential,
but
I
am
on
a
Main,
Street
and
I'm
with
flank
äj--,
and
the
other
problem
is
that
I
decided
that
a
black
metal
fence
would
be
ugly,
so
I
built
a
cedar
fence
instead
with
beautiful
flowers,
and
this
is
against
the
bylaw.
I
also
left
room
plenty
of
room
for
strollers
to
get
by.
M
As
you
can
see,
there's
the
side
of
my
of
my
building
and
you
can
see
whether,
with
the
Bullards
there,
that's
where
your
strollers
would
normally
go
through
and
there's
actually
even
room
for
you
to
park.
Your
stroller
when
you,
while
you're
enjoying
the
patio
which
is
just
on
the
side
of
the
building
the
side
of
my
building,
was
pretty
ugly
previously,
so
I
decided
to
make
it
pretty.
G
M
A
R
Thank
you
and
I
appreciate
the
work
that
the
business
owner
has
done.
He
did
you
know,
reach
out
to
the
residents
associations
and
the
BIS
and
everybody
made
sure
to
contact
the
office
and
say
how
are
actually
how
excited
they
are
that
you're
opening
the
business
that
well,
the
business
was
open,
but
the
transfer
and
everything
that
you're
doing
to
the
business
and
how
actually
you're
pretty
involved
in
the
community
and
supporting
a
lot
of
local
organizations
as
well.
So
thank
you
for
for
that
as
well.
R
A
R
A
A
B
A
Q
A
On
item
three
for
councilors
moving
to
remain
with
or
retain
the
fence,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
and
on
items.
Three
five
same
thing:
that's
right!
All
those
in
favor
opposed,
that's
carried
I'm.
Also
I
need
a
motion
from
you
councillor
to
reconsider
item
T,
seven
point
one:
three:
six!
Yes,.
A
Q
A
N
H
N
C
A
A
A
M
M
Name
is
Simon
Ben
Stein
I'm,
the
proprietor
of
Marvin
restaurant,
which
is
located
at
48
Wellington,
Street
West,
which
is
the
location
in
question.
Marvin,
has
been
operating
continuously
at
that
location,
since
2003
I
have
been
the
provider
continuously.
During
that
time,
we
had
a
Boulevard
Cafe
permit
in
place
until
approximately
2007
2008,
at
which
time
there
was
a
change
of
general
management
that
manager
who
was
under
my
supervision.
M
Unfortunately,
we
failed
to
renew
that
Boulevard
license
a
new
general
manager
several
months
ago
reached
out
to
the
city
to
confirm
the
license,
only
to
learn
that
it
is
no
longer
valid.
So
we
essentially
reapplied
from
my
understanding
the
the
conditions
that
were
we're
not
suitable
were
the
outdoor
speakers.
We
had
a
garage
shed
and
or
like
a
storage
shed,
and
we
also
had
a
concrete
planter
box.
All
three
of
those
things
have
been
removed.
M
The
only
remaining
issue
was
that,
in
order
to
build
a
deck
on
a
patio
location,
you
have
to
have
a
five
percent
incline
or
decline
hours.
It's
like
three
and
a
half
percent
to
make
a
long
story
short
I'm,
simply
requesting
that
we're
able
to
continue
using
the
patio
in
the
same
way
we've
been
using
it
for
the
last
16
years.
Okay,.
A
G
A
Good,
okay
and
questions
the
mover:
no
anyone
else
to
move
all
those
in
favor,
close
carried
item
te,
seven
point:
four:
three
refusal
of
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
application
located
at
seven
nine,
eight
and
Bloor
Street
West.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
none
questions
to
staff
no
counselor
late,
there's,
not
even
a
restaurant
there.
It's.
H
A
So
in
the
motion
to
defer
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te
7.44
refusal
of
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
application
located
at
four
one
through
four
three
Clinton
Street
commercial
frontage
of
College
Street.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
I
see
none
any
questions
of
staff
no
counselor
later
so.
N
A
N
Working
with
the
applicant
on
and
community
on
whether
or
not
we
can
find
some
conditions
that
would
allow
it
to
proceed.
It's
a
flank
achieve
a
deal
well
back
into
the
residential
zone
and
when
we
fly
'red,
we
we
drafted
a
flyer
in
in
multiple
languages,
because
it
was
clear
that
that
needed
to
be
done,
and
we
got
a
lot
of
different
responses
that
weren't
exactly
favorable
once
we
actually
reached
out
in
in
in
multiple
languages.
So
we're.
A
The
motion
to
defer
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te,
seven
point:
four:
six
application
for
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
located
at
five
one:
nine
Danforth,
Avenue
frontage
and
Fenwick
Avenue,
flanked
egde
I
have
a
deputy
listed
John
pantagathus.
Are
you
here
John?
No.
Are
there
any
other
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
none
questions
of
staff?
No
councillor,
Fletcher
I,.
S
Met
mr.
Faneca
office
earlier
and
have
a
revised
patio
drawing
that
he's
submitted
a
revised
attachment.
One
that's
been
circulated
and
we'll
move
to
approve
that
as
the
flank
each
patio
and
look
for
some
noise
mitigation
to
the
neighbors
to
the
south
and
let's
hear
about
how
well
that's
going
in
a
year's
time
at
the
October
2020
meeting
of
Toronto,
New,
York,
Community
Council,
and
just
to
thank
the
staff
for
working
along.
S
It
was
a
difficult
one
and
I
will
just
take
note
that
often
I've
heard
this
earlier
today,
real
estate
agents
sell
places
and
then
say:
oh
yes,
it's
got
a
boulevard,
cafe
flanca
cafe
when
actually
transfer
hasn't
been
completed
and
times
actually
it's
expired
and
they
still
have
done
that.
It's
just
tell
everybody
check
with
the
city,
not
your
real
estate
agents.
So
with
that
I'll
move
that
motion
mr.
chair
and
thank
everybody
for
helping
us
get
to
the
finish
line
on
this
questions.
A
Of
the
mover,
no
anyone
else
to
speak.
No,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that's
carried
item
T
7.47
refusal
of
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
application
located
at
1
1
4
8,
Queen,
Street,
East,
Cody,
Avenue,
flank
äj--
I
have
no
deputies
listed
for
this.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation,
seeing
none
questions
of
staff?
No
councillor
Fletcher?
Yes,.
S
A
Okay
on
the
motion
to
approve
all
those
in
favor
opposed,
carry
item
te,
seven
point:
five,
one:
two:
nine
four:
six:
two:
two:
nine
six,
eight
Dundas
Street
West
zoning,
bylaw
amendment
and
rental
housing,
demolition
applications,
viola,
Varga,
had
signed
up
to
I,
don't
see
viola.
Is
there
anyone
else
here?
Who
wishes
to
make
a
deputation
on
the
item?
Oh,
do
I
ever
feel
bad
that
I
made
planning
staff
stay
all
afternoon.
Okay,
sorry,
Sara.
A
Any
questions
of
staff
nope,
so
I'm
gonna
move
the
staff
recommendations
and
hang
my
head
all
those
in
favor.
Well,
I
could've
got
rid
of
it
this
morning,
but
we
had
a
deputy
listed
Sara.
It
works
in
Etobicoke
and
had
to
stay
here
all
day.
She
did
get
the
benefit
of
seeing
how
much
better
we
do.
The
work
down
here
at
Toronto
restore
Community
Council.
So
there's
that.
Thank
you,
sir
okay.
A
B
B
The
area
extraordinarily
well,
but
also
identifies
its
opportunities
for
commute
future
commercial
and
residential
development
and
as
an
excellent
job
of
balancing
the
preservation
of
the
existing
character,
while
providing
opportunities
to
build
up
those
future
residential
and
commercial
developments
and
create
more
of
a
community
street
feel,
which
is
what
the
framework
identified
and
tenants
were
also
extremely
in
favor
of
a
number
of
the
recommendations
made
for
the
what
has
turned
the
station
district.
That
is,
the
area
around
Saint
Michael's
or
st.
Mike's
and
the
TTC
station
at
st.
Clair
West.
B
Of
course,
we
do
understand
that
the
this
is
a
framework
and
that
it
is
in
many
ways
an
aspirational
document,
but
we
feel
that
the
suggestions
contained
within
the
document
for
the
public
realm
would
greatly
improve
the
area
and,
in
particular,
for
the
station
district
that
they
would
be
essential
to
creating
that
sort
of
connected
community
hub
feel
that
I
talked
about
just
a
moment
before
and
I'll
wrap
it
up.
They're,
given
them
for
running
a
little
delayed.
Thank.
A
B
I'm
Justin
Wilbert
I'm,
a
resident
of
the
area,
I've
owned
a
house
there
on
Raglan
since
2010
yeah,
so
I
guess
I'm.
Just
here,
I've
been
talking
quite
a
lot
with
my
neighbors,
some
of
which
are
have
members
cleaning
for
much
longer
than
I.
Have
one
thing
we've
been
just
trying
to
to
really
get
our
head
around
is
what
this
means
for
the
community
and
what
this
means
for
for
our
street
in
particular
on
Raglan
generally
I
would
say.
B
There's
there
has
been
confusion,
at
least
in
the
north
end
of
Raglan,
about
what
this
means
and
the
consultation
process
with
us,
and
so
I
just
say.
We
have
felt
that
this
has
been
somewhat
rushed
and,
and
the
study
itself
I
think
typically
can
be,
can
be
longer
and
and
just
voicing
a
concern
on
on
really
what
this
means
for
us
and-
and
you
know
the
the
length
of
time
that
that's
gone
into
this
so
appreciate
that
okay.
A
M
M
A
C
You
thanking
mr.
chair,
so
the
I
think
the
the
the
very
first
sort
of
major
initiative
that
I
that
I
moved
on.
After
this
past
election
and
after
I
I
took
over
this,
this
portion
of
the
new
ward
was
meeting
with
staff
from
our
Planning
Division
to
ask
them.
You
know
what
do
we
have?
What
don't
we
have
given
the
experiences
that
we've
gone
through
in
areas
like
Yonge
and
Eglinton,
and
the
Davisville
Village,
neighborhood
and
elsewhere?
C
And
what
was
clear
to
me
was
that
while
there
were
you
know,
ad
hoc
studies
happening
throughout
the
general
area,
there
was
no
sort
of
comprehensive
and
thoughtful
planning
framework
for
the
greater
st.
Clair
and
Bathurst
neighborhoods
together,
and
you
know
to
speak
to
why
why
this
moved
at
the
speed
that
it
did.
C
There
have
been
a
number
of
things
coming
at
us
and
happening
now,
so
we
had
just
today
we
for
those
of
you
who
weren't
here
earlier.
We
we
moved
on
fighting
65,
83
Ragland,
that's
a
huge
33
storey,
building
that
they're
proposing
there
at
the
L
pass
at
the
appeals
body
and
that's
coming
at
us.
We
also
are
going
to
be
having
another
community
meeting
eventually
about
the
same
Mike
site,
and
there
are
a
number
of
other
developments
applications
coming
forward
in
the
Sinclair
in
Bathurst
area.
The
challenge
over
the
years
has
been.
C
C
I
want
to
begin
by
thanking
seafoam,
Afonso
and
all
of
our
planning
staff
who
have
really
run
with
this.
As
a
labor
of
love,
there
really
has
been
even
in
the
short
time
period.
Remember
I
moved
this
I
think
it
was
January
February
at
Council,
and
then
it
kind
of
swiftly
moved
forward.
But
there
have
been
community
meetings
that
there
were
enormous
turnouts
at
and
yes,
there
will
always
be
people
and
I
regret
that
that
haven't
heard
about
something.
C
But
there
really
was
the
due
diligence
to
get
notices
out
to
every
single
door
throughout
the
throughout
the
study
area.
For
all
the
different
public
meetings,
there
was
also
like
Jane's
Walk.
There
were
sort
of
various
different
pop-up
events
and
various
working
group
efforts,
as
we
continued
with
the
working
group
to
you,
know,
really
understand
what
people
in
the
neighborhoods
want
to
see
out
of
the
planning
outcome,
and
what
was
very
clear
to
us
is
that
people
want
the
built
form
to
be
in
context
and
in
character
with
the
local
neighborhoods
they
want
transition.
C
They
don't
want
to
just
see
the
tallest
buildings
pop
up
right
within
the
neighborhood's,
but
there
should
be
transitioned
from
the
corner
of
st.
Clair
and
Bathurst
into
the
neighborhood's.
There's
a
big
demand
for
affordable
housing
that
actually
came
up
consistently
at
our
meetings
and
that
there
be
regard
and
great
concern
for
climate
change
and
sustainability
and
and
resiliency.
C
C
C
Unfortunately,
we
live
in
a
reality
now,
where
it's
not
developers,
taking
advantage
of
the
system,
its
developers
dictating
what
the
system
is
and
buying
the
system
that
they
want
to
purchase
with
bill
108
with
the
new
for
those
of
you
who,
don't
you
know,
know
what
that
is.
That's
those
are
the
new
rules
that
the
Ford
government
just
enacted
that
essentially
handed
over
the
development
process
to
the
development
industry.
It's
more
important
than
ever
that
we
have
everything
we
can
on
the
ground
to
be
able
to
point
to.
C
When
we're
fighting
at
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board,
it's
called
the
L
pad,
but
they're
bringing
back
the
old
developer
friendly
rules
to
be
able
to
say
no.
We
actually
have
a
plan
at
the
city
level.
We
can't
just
you
know,
kowtow
to
the
the
well
financed
development
industry
that
has
bought
off
this
provincial
government.
So
I'm
really
happy
that
this
work
has
begun.
I'm,
really
proud
of
the
planning
staff
that
put
their
heart
and
souls
into
it.
C
Also,
look
forward
to
you
know
meeting
those
of
you
who
were
not
part
of
that
process
to
you
know
as
because
this
is
this
is
a
living
document,
and
this
is
an
ongoing
journey
that
we're
on
and
I
look
forward
to
meeting
with
you
and
hearing
from
you
directly
as
well,
so
I
hope
for
your
support
today.
Thank
you.
Any.
A
Questions
the
mover,
no
any
other
members
to
speak.
No,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carries.
Okay.
Now
we
get
to
the
highlight
of
the
business.
So
members
I'm
gonna,
call
item
te.
Yes,
we
do
te
7.78
residential
on
street,
permit
parking
results
of
community
consultation
and
potential
implementation
plan.
I
have
listed
Victoria,
Ruby,
Victoria
Victoria
come
on
up.
G
G
Various
people
crossing
five
of
the
eight
wards
that
are
represented
here
and
those
people
live
in
on
streets
that
are
similar
to
mine
again,
where
there
would
be
no
benefit
to
us
as
residents
of
the
area
to
have
permit
parking,
and
they
were
all
surprised
to
hear
about
it.
To
begin
with,
they
all
said
that
they
would
object
to
it.
They
feel
it
would
change
their
streets.
And
what
I'm
here
today
to
ask
is:
if
there
are
so
many
pockets
in
your
wards
where
it
would
disadvantage
the
residents.
G
Don't
know
how
you
I
mean
you're
this
smart
people
that
design
these
people
these
things
I,
think
that
you
could
could
do
it
in
so
many
different
ways,
but
to
put
permit
parking
throughout
neighborhoods
that
don't
need.
It
is
I
think
that
we
deserve
some
protection
from
you
as
the
residents
of
the
area
and
you
as
our
councillors
and
and
preservation
of
that
neighborhood.
G
So
I
asking
that
you
consider,
if
you
are
going
to
implement
this,
that
you
consider
the
the
opportunity
for
neighborhoods,
where
it
doesn't
really
work
for
them
to
opt
out.
But
I
also
am
a
little
misunderstanding.
Why?
You
would
feel
that
you
would
need
to
paint
all
eight
wards
with
the
same
brush.
They
are
so
diverse
and
so
different,
and
it's
totally
understandable
that
the
downtown
areas
need
something
it's
totally
understandable
that
Forest,
Hill
or
Chaplin
estates,
or
whatever
does
not,
and
so
to
paper.
Those
areas
with
permits
is
is
also
wasteful.
S
G
A
G
A
A
A
So
this
is
going
to
take
a
little
moment
to
explain.
First
of
all,
I
can
I
once
again
begin
by
thanking
the
premier
for
destroying
our
ability
to
do
business
in
a
coherent
and
carefully
planned
way
here
at
Toronto,
East
York,
Community
Council.
This
is
a
left.
This
whole
process
is
a
left
over
from
last
term
when
the
boundaries
of
Toronto
East,
York,
Community
Council,
were
quite
different.
A
So,
for
example,
several
of
the
streets
mentioned
by
the
deputies
we
just
heard
we're
not
even
within
the
Toronto
East
York
Community
Council
at
the
time,
but
thanks
to
the
premier
Ford,
all
of
that
got
changed.
So
we
found
ourselves
in
a
position
where
we
had
consulted
with
some
communities
and
not
others.
So
my
colleagues
and
I
have
been
out
busily
trying
to
figure
out
what's
the
right
approach
in
each
neighborhood
and
where
most
of
the
way
there
I
know,
councillor
Bradford
had
a
recent
community
meeting
councillor
Matt
Lowe's
had
community
meetings.
A
I
know
that
the
other
councillors
have
been
talking
with
people
on
certain
streets.
I
had
a
meeting
last
week
and
discovered
that
an
awful
lot
of
people
didn't
actually
understand
how
permit
parking
worked.
So
in
some
of
the
streets
that
their
previous
stuff
you
didn't
mentioned,
people
had
the
idea
that,
if
we
put
in
permit
parking
it
meant
that
everybody
in
the
ward
could
park
on
their
street
and
that's
absolutely
not
the
case.
A
So
I
think
that
what
we've
moved
here
based
on
what
staff
have
told
me,
each
of
us
have
done
in
our
words,
allows
us
to
go
to
the
next
step,
bring
forward
a
little
bit
more
detail
and
maybe
finalize
those
conversations
in
the
community.
So
that's
what
I
am
proposing
I
understand.
Councillor
Matt
Lowe
has
another
motion
as
well.
I'll
take
any
questions.
No
okay,.
C
C
If
I
did
my
way,
I
I
I
wouldn't
have
wanted
to
see
this
move
forward,
even
as
far
as
it
had
I
think
this
has
been
council.
Crest
earlier
talked
about
how
hard
it
is
for
you
know,
for
those
of
us
now
with
110,000
people
in
our
Ward's
challenges
from
the
policy
and
legislative
side
coming
at
us
all
the
time,
street-by-street
controversies
and
issues
that
we
need
to
be
digging
into
all
the
time
three
or
four
meetings,
a
night
weekends
working
all
the
time.
C
Those
of
us
who
are
active
and
I
think
everyone
in
Toronto
is
gorge,
certainly
fulfills,
that
category
to
deliberately
go
and
look
for
like
something
that
has
not
like
it.
It
wasn't
a
controversy
until
we
created
a
controversy
to
go
and
start
start
this
up
right
now,
I,
just
don't
I,
don't
even
get
the
wisdom
of
that
the
political
strategy
of
that
never
mind
even
the
whether
or
not
this
is
right
or
wrong
and
I
fundamentally
believe
it's
wrong.
C
We
have
currently
the
status
quo
is
that
we
have
a
democratic
system
of
polling
the
streets
and
an
understanding
as
local
councillors.
What
the
will
of
the
community
is
in
the
street
is
an
opportunity
to
tell
us
how
they
feel
about
a
policy
or
regulatory
change
to
their
streets
as
it
should
be.
But
let's
talk
about
this
process
before
Doug
Ford
screwed
everything
up
before
Doug
Ford,
so
we
were
not
given
a
mandate.
We
went
out
for
consultation
and
there
was
a
very
low
attendance.
C
C
They'd
have
to
set
up
basically
like
a
much
bigger
shop
to
deal
with
this
and
I.
Don't
think
that
they
were
ready
for
that
in
or
did
they
advise
it?
Staff
actually
never
recommended
this
in
the
first
place.
This
is
completely
political
initiative.
This
was
not
a
staff
recommended
project,
so
I
would
like
to
just
stop
all
this
right
now.
That
being
said,
I
recognize
that
some
of
you
want
to
pursue
it
in
your
own
words.
C
They
disagree
with
you,
but
I
also
recognize
you're
right
by
the
privilege
of
being
elected
to
represent
that
community
to
have
that
conversation
in
your
community
so,
but
for
me
to
support
the
omnibus
motion
that
chair
purse
has
moved.
I
would
need
that
assurance
of
my
amendment
to
be
what
this
would
do
by
the
way
would
be,
and
my
amendment
would
be
an
amendment
to
councilor
purchases,
amendment
right
so
so
I
would
end
up
being
able
to
support
the
whole
thing
very
candidly.
C
Just
so
I
can
get
that
insurance
policy
that
my
award
will
not
be
affected
by
what
those
of
you
who
want
to
go
in
this
direction
will
go
in
I
will
intend
by
the
way,
to
try
to
kill
it
in
October,
but
I.
Just
my
heads
I
fundamentally
disagree
with
the
direction
that
some
of
you
want
to
go
in,
but
I
certainly
want
to
omit
my
word
from
it.
A
A
A
C
S
Well,
why
don't
you
park
on
the
street
rather
than
apply
for
front
yard
parking,
and
they
would
say
because
there
isn't
any
permanent
parking
and
I
don't
think
you've
had
too
many
front
yard
parking
permits
come
to
this
council
in
a
while,
at
least
since
we've
started,
we
haven't
had
any,
but
there
were
an
awful
lot
in
the
last
term.
Do
you
recall
those
I.
C
Q
Very
quickly
want
to
thank
the
chair,
my
colleagues
here
for
bringing
this
motion
forward
at
this
point.
I
think
it
allows
us
to
move
forward
on
the
motion.
That's
kind
of
carried
through
a
number
of
terms
of
council
here
and
is
before
us
today.
I
share
many
of
the
sentiments
of
councillor
Matt
Lowe.
We
had
a
community
meeting
on
June
20th
in
East
York,
which
is
largely
were
the
the
area
of
my
ward.
That
would
be
impacted
by
this,
and
feedback
was
mixed
for
sure.
Q
There
there
were
descriptions
of
some
residents
talked
about
how
you
know
they
live
near
East,
York,
Memorial,
Michael,
Guerin
hospital
and
they
can't
get
street
parking
because
there's
so
many
people
that
are
parking
around
the
hospital
and
that
makes
them
very
challenging
for
them.
But
it's
also
been
difficult
to
pull
into
the
process,
so
they
in
particular
have
challenges.
Q
You
know
neighborhoods
to
the
the
east
of
Victoria
Park
than
they
do
to
parts
of
the
downtown
and
I
think
we
have
a
democratic
process
for
for
permit
parking
and
you
can
pull
in
and
you
can
go
through
that
process
and
that's
always
been
the
option,
and
so
what
I'm
hearing
from
residents
is
there's
a
lot
of
areas
that
don't
don't
want
to
change
that
process.
The
motion
here
will
allow
us
for
areas
that
have
an
existing
permit
parking
area,
but
streets
that
are
outside
of
that
process.
Q
We're
gonna
explore
the
opportunity
for
them
to
be
pulled
in,
which
is
the
process
that
exists
today,
but
just
to
help
them
with
that
process.
If
they
want
to
and
then
they
can
democratically
decide
themselves
so
again,
I
want
to
thank
the
committee,
for
you
know
working
together
recognizing
that
in
each
of
our
wards
it's
a
different
context
and
that
the
local
councillors
should
work
with
their
community
to
bring
something
forward.
That
makes
sense.
In
that
context,
thanks
very
much.
Thank.
S
I
just
want
to
thank
the
chair
for
spending
the
amount
of
time
that
you
have
on
this
kind
of
navigating
through
what
is
always
a
minefield.
I
personally,
just
wish
we
dealt
with
this
last
term.
That
is
my
fervent
wish
that
we
hadn't
been
talked
out
of
just
moving
forward
with
it
and
I'll
recall,
as
you
do
councillor
Bradford,
that
there
are
people
living
around
all
that
construction
at
Michael,
Guerin
hospital
that
don't
have
permit
parking.
S
S
The
other
thing
is
the
I've
spoken
to
people
who
say
we
don't
want
Street
parking,
we
don't
want
permit
parking
and
I've
said
well
what
you
do
when
somebody
comes
from
out
of
town
while
they
park
on
the
street.
Nobody
gets
a
ticket
by
the
way
the
the
honey
hole
for
tickets
is
you're
out
there
parking
without
a
permit,
and
that's
every
part
of
the
boards
that
have
permit
parking.
They
are
targeted.
That's
the
only
place
parking
enforcement,
go
they
don't
troll
around.
S
In
areas
that
don't
have
permit
parking,
yet
residents
are
parking
on
the
street
and
it's
patently
unfair
that
the
streets,
if
you're
paying
to
park
in
zones
or
just
it's
just
unfair,
that
there's
different
treatment
for
different
streets
and
different
neighborhoods
and
very
evident,
is
the
Scarborough
border
where
all
of
your
residents,
councillor
Bradford,
are
paying
on
your
side
and,
on
the
other
side,
they're
just
parking
all
night
with
nothing
happening.
So
this
actually
upsets.
S
Obviously
many
residents
who
are
bordering
a
non-permanent
parking
area
where
they're
watching
people
parked
and
they're
paying
and
others
aren't.
These
are
our
streets.
I
think
they
need
to
be
used
well,
I
prefer
to
have
people
parking
on
the
street
than
ripping
up
their
front
lawns
and
paving
them
over
to
Park
on
those
and
so
I'm.
Looking
forward
to
this
report,
coming
back
in
October
and
I
also
want
to
thank
mr.
Lefroy
D.
S
A
E
This
is
the
first
of
two
amendments
staff
for
putting
on
the
screen.
One
is
to
make
the
one
is
to
make
the
appropriate
accommodations
and
yes,
there
should
be
some
light
refreshments
during
I
here.
Well,
it's
actually
very
spotty,
depending
on
which
developer
is
hosting.
Sometimes
you
get
cookies
and
tea,
and
sometimes
you
get
little
cute
sandwiches,
but
nevertheless,
you've
got
you're
inviting
the
resins
to
come
out
to
a
meeting
directly
after
work.
Many
of
them
are
coming
without
opportunities
to
have
supper.
E
The
very
least
if
you
want
to
keep
them
alert
and
engaged
you've
got
to
give
them
some
sustenance.
So
that's
the
first
one
and
then
the
second.
The
second
motion
is
to
to
ensure
that,
as
the
application
moves
forward,
if
we're
getting
to
a
final
report,
we
need
to
keep
all
the
appropriate
cycling
lanes.
Open,
we're,
cycling
lanes
exists
and
then
to
direct
all
the
the
appropriate
stakeholders
to
work
with
planning
staff
to
move
to
a
site
plan
working
group
at
the
end
of
the
process.
S
S
Do
we
still
do
the?
Would
you
like
in
the
chair
the
do
we
still
do
the
municipal
significance,
designations
on
festivals
and
if
this
will
go
to
council,
yes,
I'm,
asking
if
an
event
falls
outside
of
the
delegated
authority
of
the
city
clerk,
we
can
still
bring
it
to
community
council
for
the
municipal
significance.
M
M
T
A
Any
other
questions
of
staff
no
on
councillor
Matt,
Lowe's
amendment,
all
those
in
favor
on
councillor
crises
now
amended
amendment
all
those
in
favor
and
that's
the
item
right:
okay,
very
good,
so
I'm
waiting
to
hear
from
councillor
Layton's
office,
okay,
no
young
in
price,
is
not
11,
whose
word
11.
I
can't!
Remember
it's
my
call!
So
right!
A
A
Right
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried,
no
I
think
that
just
leaves
the
one
item
right,
yeah,
so
I'm
gonna
just
ask
people
to
be
patient
for
five
minutes.
Councillor
Layton
moved
emotion,
which
has
created
a
small
technical
problem
and
I'm
just
getting
someone
to
go
see
if
anyone's
in
his
office.
I
can't
reach
them
right
now,
so
we'll
just
relax.