►
Description
Toronto and East York Community Council, meeting 29, January 16, 2018 - Part 2 of 2
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=12948
Part 1 of 2 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgmWklf0pv4#t=13m17s
Meeting Navigation:
0:14:36 - Meeting resume
B
A
A
A
C
D
Point
of
point
of
order,
some
of
us
would
have
wanted
to
go
to
general
and
Spooner
role
in
that
and
it's
exactly
at
two
o'clock,
I'm
wondering
at
the
suggestion
of
someone
and
I
think
it's
a
good
idea,
but
you
know
I'm
just
putting
it
out
there
that
at
two
o'clock
we
observe
a
moment
of
silence.
Stand
in
his
word,
observe
a
moment
of
silence
and
recognition
of
she
was
the
mayor
of
this
community
council
so
to
speak
at
two
o'clock
and
to
caucus
her
funeral
time.
E
sharon
vete,
who
is
my
clients,
architectural
historian,
a
member
of
the
canadian
association
of
heritage
professionals
and
goldsmith
for
GLE
architects
I'm
here
primarily
to
offer
you
the
opportunity
to
ask
any
questions
you
may
have
of
me
of
dr.
Vijay
or
mr.
Bisset,
but
first
I
will
say
to
follow
over
the
last
several
months.
My
client
and
its
experts
have
worked
intensively
with
city
planning
transportation,
inherited
staff
with
the
Toronto
region,
Conservation
Authority,
and
with
the
province
to
resolve
concerns
about
this
proposal.
Centered
around
really
four
things.
E
First,
is
the
conversion
of
the
property
to
mixed-use,
which
was,
of
course
supported
by
the
city?
Secondly,
was
floodplain
planning
a
provincial
and
TRC
a
concern?
Thirdly,
was
urban
design
squarely
within
your
bailiwick
and
fourthly,
was
heritage
conservation
also
squarely
within
the
city's
bailiwick
and
last
fall.
The
issues
with
the
province
and
the
conservation
authority
were
resolved,
and
my
client
then
focused
on
working
with
your
staff
with
local
residents
and
with
councillor
Fletcher.
E
There
was
an
intensive
iterative
dialogue
that
took
place
over
several
months,
and
the
result
is
that
you
now
have
before
you
staff
reports
from
Planning
and
from
heritage
preservation,
which
unequivocally
recommend
support
for
the
revised
development
proposal,
which
is
currently
before
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board.
Your
professional
staff
are
telling
you
that
this
proposal
meets
all
of
the
required
statutory
and
policy
tests
that
it
will
be
good
planning
and
that
it
employs
an
appropriate
approach
to
heritage
conservation
and
adaptive
reuse
of
the
bakery
buildings.
E
I
want
to
take
a
brief
moment
to
respond
with
five
points
to
the
members
of
the
public
who
spoke
to
you
before
lunch,
and
let
me
start
with
height
and
massing
the
conversation
about
the
adaptive
reuse
of
this
building
as
to
height
and
massing
starts.
With
this,
the
zoning
permitted
height
is
18
metres
were
seeking
27.
E
The
setbacks
to
the
west,
to
the
south
and
to
the
east
has
a
right
in
the
zoning
are
zero
and
the
setback
to
the
north
is
three
meters.
That's
where
the
conversation
about
height
and
massing
began
with
respect
to
traffic.
I
want
to
direct
your
attention,
not
to
the
BA
report,
which
councillor
Fletcher
has
drawn
to
your
attention
in
a
series
of
questions.
E
Those
are
the
facts
about
traffic
with
respect
to
the
site
with
respect
to
lane
way,
safety
I
suspect
the
residents
have
not
had
an
opportunity
to
very
carefully
review
your
staff
report
because
again,
at
page
17
of
the
staff
report
in
direct
response
to
concerns
about
lane
way
safety.
My
client
has
agreed
to
install
and
pay
for
speed
humps
in
that
lane
way
and
also
has
agreed
as
part
of
the
site
planning
process
to
signage,
to
direct
cars
where
they
are
and
are
not
supposed
to
go.
I
want
to
talk
about
parking.
E
E
Without
my
advice
in
the
almost
five
months
since
I
was
introduced
to
the
lawyer
for
the
residents
at
which
I
told
him
I
would
invite
a
dialogue
between
us
to
try
and
resolve
the
residents
concerns
I
have
never
been
contacted
once
I
was
invited
to
a
meeting
with
the
residents,
and
then
I
was
D,
invited
from
that
meeting.
I
stand
ready
today
to
meet
with
the
residue,
to
further
discuss
their
concerns
and
to
try
and
resolve
them,
but
I
need
everyone
to
understand.
E
E
F
F
And
the
issue
of
it's
very
complicated,
you
would
agree
with
me
that
having
bought
it,
you
bought
it
with
a
lot
of
complications
on
the
site
because
it
was
in
the
floodplain
has
been
identified
by
the
TRC
a
and
what
we're
basically
spending
1.25
billion
dollars
to
mitigate
the
flooding.
For
this
section
it
is
a
conversion,
and
then
there
is
the
Heritage
which
I
moved
which
you've
agreed
to,
and
then
there
the
heightened
density
issues
that
you've
heard
from
from
the
clients
from
your
neighbors.
Well,
you
haven't
met
directly
I.
F
Guess
I'll,
just
ask
you
mr.
Melling!
Well,
you
haven't
met
directly.
You
must
have
heard
from
your
clients
the
concern
of
the
neighbors
for
what
will
be
these
looming
looming
buildings
against
these
very
small,
old-style
housing
that
were
surrounding
this
former
industrial
site,
probably
all
built
around
this
time.
The
bakery
and
the
houses
I
have.
D
F
D
F
D
Was
a
request
as
it
as
noted
in
the
staff
report
to
move
the
building
back
further
along
booth
at
a
height
of
18
meters
will
be
meeting
a
45
degree
angle.
Er
plane
results
in
a
3
meters,
step
back
at
the
ninth
floor
and
a
1
meter
step
back
at
the
eighth
floor
as
I
understand
that
and
from
the
from
the
beginning
as
a
planner.
This
that
always
is
an
issue
in
terms
of
the
how
how
the
building
presents
itself
along
Logan
and
booth
at
the
back.
D
You
do
have
a
step
back
from
from
the
north
toward
the
7th,
so
it
does
reduce
the
massing
in
that
sense
and
we're
also
dealing
with
a
situation
where,
as
was
noted,
it's
an
as
of
right,
built
form
height
of
18
meters
in
this
area,
on
this
site
and
as
well
as
the
existing
building,
which
is
already
21
meters.
It
sort
of
sets
a
context
for
the
property.
Thank.
F
D
F
F
F
F
F
A
F
G
F
D
F
F
The
approval
of
the
city
I
think
we
have
a
well
I
think
we
have
a
problem
I'm
just
identifying
here
that
we
might
need
to
fix,
because
the
south
side
of
Eastern
Avenue
is
clearly
within
the
core
employment
district.
One
of
the
only
two
districts
that
exists
still
in
the
old
city
of
Toronto,
correct
one
and
councillor
perks,
is
Ward
and
one
in
mind
that.
F
But
because
we
have
conversion
available
there
using
the
zero
setback
for
all
of
these
sites,
does
that
not
pose
a
problem
that
we
can't
actually?
Is
there
some
way
we
can
fix?
That?
Would
you
suggest
we
need
a
planning
study
for
Eastern
Avenue
or
that
we
just
put
an
H
everywhere
so
til
we
get
that
sorted
out,
because
we
heard
the
applicants
say
they
have
the
right
to
build
right
to
the
edge
27
metres
up.
D
F
Correct
so
I'm
asking
you
about
the
industrial
permissions,
should
we
not
and
what
what
we
have
to
do
in
order
to
maintain
the
city's
goal
of
allowing
conversion
on
the
north
side,
but
being
able
to
take
away
the
industrial
permissions
for
all
of
those
sites.
What
would
the
steps
I
would
need
to
take.
D
A
Thank
you
very
much
councillor
Fletcher.
We
can
actually
come
back
and
continue
asking
the
questions.
I
want
to
dis
acknowledge
that
it
is
two
o'clock
if
I
can
ask
all
members
of
council
to
rise
and
to
take
a
moment
of
silence
for
a
former
Toronto
Mayor
june
Rowland's,
who
had
passed
away
earlier
this
this
past
year.
She
was
93
years
old
in
her
passing.
She
of
course
served
as
a
sixtieth
mayor
of
Toronto,
the
very
first
woman
to
hold
that
particular
office,
and
she
was
missed.
B
Perhaps
some
other
ways
we
can
commemorate
and
celebrate
the
life
of
June
Rowland's
and
in
the
career
of
June
Rowland's,
so
that
we
can
perhaps
provide
another
opportunity
for
her
her
family
to
move
from
the
appropriate
mourning
period.
To
perhaps
another
celebration
of
her
life
too.
So
we're
gonna
have
a
conversation
about
that
in
Midtown.
Thank.
F
And
then
you
also
have
Barbara
Hall
following
her,
and
so
how
really
important
that
her
victory
was
that
that
she
broke
through
the
glass
ceiling
in
politics,
and
she
was
a
very
capable,
highly
capable
woman
in
the
office
of
mayor
who
had
great
deal
of
respect
across
the
city
and
she
did
a
very,
very
good
job.
So
she
was
accomplished
on
many
different
boards.
She
handled
many
important
files
and
I
just
think.
F
A
Thank
you
very
much
councillors.
We
will
be
able
to
resume
our
business
councillor.
Fletcher
I,
don't
know
if
you
want
to.
If
you
have
any
other
questions,
I
didn't
want
to
jump
cut
you
off.
Do
you
have
more
questions?
Okay?
So
why
don't
I?
Just
just
give
you
two
more
minutes
and
you
can
finalize
your
questions.
I.
F
I
F
Yet
been
submitted,
can
the
OMB
approval
tree
removal?
No,
so
really
there's
a
tree
there
and
the
application
would
have
to
be
heard
here
and
then
go
to
council.
Has
that
ever
been
discussed
with
you,
the
situation
that's
or
you're
hearing
about
this
now
has
that
conversation
ever
been
held
with
you
about
saving
the
tree
or
what
that
implication
is
of
having
a
tree
kind
of
in
the
way
of
this
project
that
we're
asking
to
approve
today.
F
Consideration,
the
item
be
deferred
till
February
21st.
The
traffic
study
be
forward
the
acting
director
transportation
services
for
a
review
as
and
then
the
second
one
is
basically
that's
for
the
heritage
item
to
be
deferred
along
as
its
companion.
Now.
This
is
a
as
I
think
you
heard
me
ask
the
question
about
the
Unilever
site,
which
is
across
the
street,
which
has
a
smart
truck
station
at
downtown
relief,
Station
50,000
jobs,
the
downtick
Gardner
takedown.
Everything
is
happening
in
that
little
area
and
as
well.
F
Eastern
Avenue
having
this
committee,
having
approved
the
smart
Center
redevelopment
and
shortly
the
planning
and
growth
and
council
will
be
asked
to
approve
the
General
Motors
application,
which
is
at
the
old
film
studio,
721
Eastern.
So
all
of
Eastern
Avenue
on
the
south
side
is
an
active
employment
area
is
to
me
that
needs
to
be
taken
into
consideration
around
the
Transportation
Study
and
good
news
is
that
we
do
have
something
that
we're
looking
at,
as
does
the
applicant
for
721
I
need
to
make
sure
that
the
answer
really
is
negative,
negligible
impact.
F
After
what
the
community
has
raised
here
today
about
their
neighborhood
and
the
fact
that
in
this
particular
area,
with
many
acres
of
employment,
I
wouldn't
know
how
many
acres
it
extends
right
over
into
councillor
McMahon's
area,
all
the
way
over
to
Cox.
Well,
that's
dedicated
for
employment.
That
rollin
in
a
higher
bird's-eye
view
of
these
of
these
applications
is
pretty
important.
I
also
just
want
to
stress
the
complications
here.
It
was
purchased
when
the
bakery
closed
and
those
it
moved
actually
into
another
part
of
Toronto,
but
that
was
basically
Loblaws
put
in
an
application.
F
F
F
I
was
a
little
surprised
to
hear
nobody's
ever
mentioned
the
tree
when
you're
bringing
in
a
big
application-
and
there
is
this
gorgeous
tree-
that
is
part
of
the
migratory
route,
a
lot
of
birds
off
the
spit
and
one
of
the
few
in
the
neighborhood,
with
the
nests
that
that's,
a
very
big
ask,
so
to
be
assuming
that
you're
removing
a
tree
without
having
looked
at
that
it
just
is
a
bit
of
a
surprise
to
me.
Given
the
community
council
here
and
how
we
feel
about
trees,
so
that
is
kind
of
the
straw.
F
That's
broken
camel's
back
this
point
as
to
what
we're
going
to
do
about
the
tree,
what
we're
going
to
do
about
the
traffic?
What
we're
going
to
do
about
the
height
and
I,
fully
understand
mr.
Melling
saying
that
he's
going
to
be
involved
and
that's
very
good
news,
because
we
have
a
month
to
discuss
this
and
what
other
types
of
changes
might
be
available.
F
I
also
just
want
to
comment
that,
while
I
have
supported
conversions
and
there's
many
more
conversions
that
will
be
brought
forward
for
the
north
side
of
Eastern
in
my
ward,
Margaret's
Ward
that
the
notion
that
you
can
just
build
to
the
lot
line
and
if
you're
27,
however
many
meters
straight
up-
and
if
you
don't
do
that,
aren't
you
nice.
That
is
a
planning
problem.
Perhaps
we
shouldn't
allow
any
more
conversions
there
until
we
get
this
sorted
out,
because
it's
not
an
actual
built
form.
F
What
you're
introducing
along
Eastern
is
a
built
form,
that's
very
irregular
for
all
of
the
other
houses
that
are
there,
unlike
Carla
and
Dundas,
where
it's
all
industrial
buildings,
where
they're
building
right
to
the
lot
line.
This
is
something
we
need
to
review
here
on
Eastern
Avenue,
because
you
have
former
industrial
residential
former
industrial
residential
and
to
simply
have
the
right
to
build
right
up
exactly
to
the
lot
line
with
no
setbacks
is
I,
think
a
planning
problem
that
has
been
introduced
to
us
today
and
that
we
have
to
solve.
Thank
you
very.
A
F
A
A
F
A
Thank
you
very
much.
That
was
my
question
and
thank
you
for
answering
it
any
other
questions
for
the
mover.
No
okay,
so
we
have
before
us
the
deferral
motions
we
can
vote
on
them
together,
I
think
all
and
we
will
be
discussing
this
matter
again
in
February,
all
those
in
favor
any
opposed.
Yes,
thank
you
that
has
been
adopted.
Thank
you
very
much.
We
are
going
to
be
moving
to
te
29.2.
A
I
I
A
A
Do
you
want
to
table
your
second
motion
on
the
same
item?
Yep?
Okay,
go
ahead,
take
them
as
a
package;
okay,
okay!
So
just
cuz.
We
had
just
done
that
if
I
can
get
all
those
in
favor
for
the
second
motion,
any
opposed
that
carries
item
as
amended
0.55
any
pose
that
carries.
Thank
you.
Teehee
29.56
construction,
staging
area,
1884,
Queen,
Street
East.
Please
table
your
emotions,
counselor
all.
A
I
A
D
A
H
A
You're
simply
moving
the
recommendations
in
the
report.
Okay,
voting
on
T
29.41,
curbside
management
strategy,
parking
amendments,
delegated
locations,
Wars,
20,
27,
28,
all
those
in
favor
any
opposed
that
carries
vote,
teehee,
29.4
to
curbside
management
strategy,
parking
amendments,
non
delegated
lotion
locations
were
20,
27
28,
all
those
in
favor
any
opposed
that
carries.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
have
more
go
ahead.
H
H
H
A
A
D
A
A
D
A
Those
in
favor
of
the
motion,
the
amendment
any
opposed
that
carries
an
item
as
amended
and
opposed
that
carries.
Thank
you
very
much.
Let's,
head
back,
we
are
now
heading
to
t29
point
to
one
residential
demolition
application:
130
Sears,
Street
East.
We
have
one
registered
speaker,
Jonathan
Bench
Kowski,
mr.
Jonathan
Bench
Kowski.
A
I
A
A
All
those
in
favor
any
opposed
item
as
amended
any
opposed
that
carries.
Thank
you
very
much,
T
29.2,
to
request
for
a
fence
exemption,
23,
Forest,
Hill
Road,
any
members
of
the
public
here
to
speak
to
this
matter,
none
members!
So
with
questions
the
stuff,
no
members
to
speak,
counselor,
my
havoc.
Oh
sorry,
mallow,
sir
thank.
A
A
B
A
A
A
Thank
you
t29
point
two:
three
request
for
a
fence
exemption:
36,
Berryman,
Street
I
understand
that
the
parties
in
dispute
are
now
in
the
second
phase
of
their
mediation
I'm,
going
to
request
that
this
item
be
deferred
for
one
meeting
cycle,
and
that
is
what
I
will
be
moving
right
now
and
we
all
get
to
reconsider
this
again
in
February,
all
those
in
favor
of
the
deferral
motion
any
opposed
that
carries.
Thank
you,
ge,
29.2,
for
request
for
a
fence
exemption
to
a
for
Seton
Street.
A
A
L
Thank
you
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
council.
My
name
is
Jennifer
Walker
and
I'm,
the
home
owner
of
204
Seton
Street,
where
my
husband
and
I
have
lived
for
the
past
13
years.
We
are
located
between
Dundas
and
Gerrard,
backing
on
to
Oz
Connaughton
Lane
I'm
here
today,
to
follow
up
on
a
request
for
a
fence
exemption.
As
you
know,
from
our
initial
meeting,
our
fence
complies
with
our
pool
permit
requirements
and
has
been
approved
by
the
city
inspectors.
L
Our
neighbors
on
the
other
side
of
us
are
on
board,
with
the
height
of
the
fence
and
of
sign
letters
to
say
so.
There
are
two
items,
however,
I
would
like
to
add
today.
The
first
one
is
that
the
request
for
this
exemption
is
not
first
etics
or
to
ignore
our
neighbors.
We
love
our
neighbors
and
our
neighborhood.
However,
it
does
not
come
without
its
challenges
as
a
mother,
my
job
is
to
protect
my
family
and
my
home,
and
this
fence
allows
me
to
do
so.
L
Since
we
installed
the
fence,
I
no
longer
have
to
clean
up
crack
pipes,
used,
condoms
or
syringes
that
would
continually
be
chucked
over
our
fence
into
our
yard,
where
my
daughter
and
our
neighborhood
kids
would
play.
I
am
no
longer
woken
up
in
the
middle
of
the
night
by
sounds
of
strangers,
jumping
over
my
fence
to
either
steal
something
or
get
away
from
illegal
activity
that
has
taken
place
close
by
the
second
item.
Since
our
initial
meeting
last
November
we
reached
out
to
51
division
and
extended
an
invitation
to
visit
and
expect
inspect
our
fence.
L
Our
main
thought
was
that
we
wanted
to
ensure
that
in
no
way
would
the
height
of
our
fence
impede
on
the
work
that
our
officers
need
to
follow
up
on
on
a
day
to
day
basis
or
at
an
emergency.
In
this
neighborhood
constable
David
McAllister
came
by
on
Tuesday
November
21st
at
2
p.m.
in
our
discussions,
constant
McAllister
fell.
Their
fence
heights
were
within
reason,
given
the
neighborhood,
he
felt
we
had
installed
adequate
lighting
in
place
for
nighttime
activity.
L
He
was
also
pleased
that
our
fence
doorway
on
the
night
north
side
of
our
house,
into
the
backyard
from
the
street
had
a
large
window
to
see
into
the
backyard
if
needed.
Since
we
have
not
had
any
unwanted
activity
in
our
backyard
with
the
extension
of
our
fences,
he
felt
taking
them
down
would
in
fact
open
us
back
up
to
illegal
activity
in
closing,
I
would
just
like
to
say
we
love
our
neighborhood
and
its
diversity.
I
A
M
A
You
very
much
councilor
or
any
other
members
with
comments
and
remarks,
seeing
none
I
just
like
to
thank
the
deputy
and
for
coming
out
and
the
counselor
troi
C
for
doing
a
site
visit.
This
is
the
area
that
we
all
affectionately,
known
as
the
as
the
Downtown
East
and,
as
you
have
heard,
there's
been
lots
of
conversation
in
the
public
around
the
opioid
crisis,
the
the
crisis
that
we're
trying
to
manage
around
homelessness
and
vulnerable
people.
A
The
remarks
share
to
us
today
by
the
homeowner
is,
is
probably
something
that
you
don't
necessarily
hear
about
in
every
single
community,
but
in
our
neighborhood
in
the
Downtown
East.
It
is
extremely
difficult
and
challenging
when
the
norm
of
the
neighborhood,
our
fences
that
are
well
in
excess
of
any
by
law
and
and
as
a
neighborhood
that
has
erected
fences
six
feet
tall
seven
feet
tall.
In
some
cases,
I've
seen
eight
feet
tall
as
cases
we've
seen
barbed
wire,
a
lot
of
surveillance
equipment.
A
This
is
all
not
a
healthy
condition
in
the
long
run
in
the
short
term,
while
communities
are
trying
to
keep
each
other
safe
and
watch
out
for
one
another.
It
is,
it
has
become
the
norm.
What
I'd
like
to
see
one
day
is
those
fences
start
to
come
back
down
to
a
more
human
scale,
friendly
environment
and,
and
that
is
something
I
think
that
we
can
all
aspire
to
moving
forward.
So
this
is
a
normal.
Unfortunately,
it's
a
normal
condition
in
our
neighborhood
counselor
Troi's.
A
A
N
Good
afternoon,
members
of
council
the
application,
what
I'm
looking
for
is
to
have
the
tree
removed
not
just
strictly
for
aesthetic
purposes
but
more
of
safety
reasons.
We
moved
in
there
approximately
three
and
a
half
years
ago
and
had
no
clue
what
a
black
walnut
tree
can
do.
We
love
it.
It's
it's
beautiful,
but
it
has
caused
so
much
damage
to
the
lawn
to
the
existing
trees
and
shrubbery.
I
have
two
neighbors
on
the
right
of
me
who
fully
support
this
removal.
N
N
N
So
I
know
only
spoken
for
two
minutes,
but
that
is
pretty
much
as
I
said
that
my
main
appeal
here
is
about
the
safety,
not
the
aesthetics
at
all.
It's
just.
We
would
like
our
kids
to
play
more
in
the
backyard
they're
12
and
14
we'd
like
them
to
have
people
over
and
hang
out
at
our.
But
it's
just
it's
not
a
it's,
not
a
very
welcoming
backyard
given
every
summer
and
into
October
and
November.
It's
just
a
complete
the
walnuts
own,
the
backyard
and
the
squirrels.
A
A
Seeing
none
questions
of
staff
I
have
just
two
may
be
very
quick
questions
of
staff.
The
the
tree
in
question
is
51
centimeters
in
diameter,
I
understand
from
the
report
that
it
is
a
healthy
tree.
Also,
there's
a
reference
in
here
that
private
trees
do
not
that
the
tribe,
the
private
tree
by
law,
does
not
contain
a
mechanism
that
would
allow
the
removal
of
this
subject
matter
tree
based
on
the
concerns
outlined
by
the
the
applicant.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,.
A
The
the
concerns
around
the
tree
per
tential
e,
harming
other
trees
or
harming
the
landscape,
or
perhaps
creating
an
unwelcoming
condition
for
for
children,
but
a
very
welcoming
condition
for
squirrels.
That
does
not.
That
does
not.
That
does
not
concern
that
does
not
apply
as
a
legitimate
concern
in
the
in
the
private
tree
by
law.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,.
A
P
D
O
Just
very
quickly,
I
wanted
to
thank
city
staff
for
the
thoroughness
of
their
report.
Here,
they've
they've
gone
through,
for
example,
showing
that
city
staff
have
contacted
the
city's
risk
management
unit
and
look
through
all
historical
records,
and
if
we
have
never
received
a
claim
for
damage
or
personal
injury
related
to
walnuts.
So
you
know
that's
a
great
deal
of
work
that
they've
done.
They've
also
indicated
where
members
of
the
public
can
go
to
find
plants
that
can
be
companion
planted
with
black
walnuts.
O
It's
a
very
common
thing
for
tree
species
to
have
a
variety
of
strategies
for
eliminating
certain
kinds
of
competitors.
So
you
know
they've
done
a
lot
of
thorough
work
here
and
once
again,
I'm
tremendously
impressed
with
the
dedication
and
detail
of
our
urban
forestry
staff
in
dealing
with
applications
like
this.
Thank.
A
You
very
much
councillor
or
anyone
else
is
being
know,
I'd
like
to
move
the
recommendation
in
the
staff
report
and
also
just
to
to
highlight
that
this
is
also
a
report
that
goes
a
bit
further
than
what
most
reports
do
with
respect
to
risk
management.
But
it
also
contains
comments
from
staff
that
the
arbors
report
provide
provided
by
the
applicant
did
not
provide
any
comments
on
the
condition
of
the
trees,
but
rather
just
highlighted
the
concerns
of
the
of
the
of
the
applicant,
which
of
course
was
reinforced
by
the
comments
from
the
staff.
A
Is
that
it
doesn't
really?
It
doesn't
really
speak
to
the
grounds
the
legitimate
grounds
of
private
tree
removal,
so
with
that
I
don't
think
we
have
I
think
we're
in
a
best
position
to
follow
the
advice
of
staff
and
to
retain
the
tree
on
site
any
other
ones.
Anyone
knows
to
speak.
Okay,
councillor,
McMahon
well,.
I
Yeah
and
I
would
just
echo
everyone's
comments
and
and
the
athletes
for
amazing
forestry
staff
and
remind
people
that
we
are.
We
are
working,
you
know
to
double
our
tree
canopy
and
that
we
don't
take
down
trees
lightly
and
and
especially
when
they
are
in
good
health
and
they're,
adding
improving
our
air
quality
across
the
city,
reducing
our
greenhouse
gases
and
all
kinds
of
endless
benefits
that
trees
provide
for
our
city
and
I'll.
Leave.
Let
that
thing's,
okay.
A
If
there
are
no
more
speakers,
all
those
in
favor
of
the
recommendations
in
the
report,
the
report
is
before
us
any
opposed
that
carries.
Thank
you
very
much
and
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
share
with
us
your
feedback
t
twenty
nine
point.
Two
six
front
yard
parking
appeal.
Fourteen
hetman
avenue
we
have
a
speaker,
wendy
hi,
miss
welcome
both.
M
My
name
is
wendy
hi,
miss
and
I
live
at
fourteen
Pittman
Avenue
I've
brought
my
mother
Glenda
in
support
of
my
appeal
of
a
front
yard
parking
pad
at
my
house.
I
have
gone
through
this
process
once
you've,
worse
so
I'm
hoping
that
I
will
be
successful
in
my
appeal,
I'm
asking
for
approval
of
a
front
yard
parking
pad
as
opposed
to
parking
on
the
street
the
street,
although
it
does
have
permit
parking.
There
are
several
problems
involved
with
that.
M
The
other
problem
with
parking
in
that
neighborhood
is
that
there
are
a
lot
of
commuters
who
come
down
to
Toronto,
to
work
from
other
areas
of
the
GTA
who
Park
on
the
street
and
actually
throughout
that
neighborhood
and
are
there
for
the
day
and
do
not
come
and
actually
retrieve
their
car
until
quite
late.
At
night,
so
when
I
get
home
from
work,
there
is
physically
no
space
for
me
to
actually
park.
My
car
on
the
street,
leaving
me
without
anywhere
to
go
I
also
have
chronic
foot
issues
which
I
do
have
some
documentation.
M
That
will
support
that.
That
often
leaves
me
walking
in
pain
so
being
able
to
park
on
my
or
having
a
front
yard
parking
pad
will
go
a
long
way
in
helping
to
leave
the
chronic
foot
issues
that
I
do
experience
and
so
I
do
have
documentation
from
a
chiropractor
that
has
been
treating
my
chronic
foot
issues
for
ten
years.
Now
that
I'm
happy
to
share
with
you
I
have
copies
of
that,
as
well
as
having
copies
or
pictures
just
showing
how
difficult
it
is
during
the
day
or
actually
coming
home
from
work.
M
I'm,
a
teacher,
so
I
am
gone
early
in
the
morning
and
don't
get
home
until
about
5:00
at
night
and
there's
nowhere
to
park.
So
I
have
pictures
that
actually
support
there.
Being
no
physical
space
on
the
street
for
me
to
actually
park
on
the
street
and
I'm
often
left
talking
to
a
juggler
car
around.
If
I
find
a
spot
anywhere
in
the
neighborhood,
which
is
next
to
impossible,
so
I'd
certainly
appreciate
any
consideration
of
approving
a
front
yard
parking
pad
to
allow
it
to
it
easier
for
me
to
actually
find
parking
on.
A
J
I'm
Glenda
Amos,
I'm,
Wendy's,
mom
and
I.
Guess
you
never
stopped
worrying
about
your
children.
Patman,
as
you
know,
is
a
little
street
that
joined
Eglinton
to
sudan,
running
north
and
south.
There
are
two
pubs,
two
daycares
and
two
apartment
buildings
at
that
one
at
the
north
and
south
end
of
padma
not
covered
both
ends.
The
pubs
and
the
daycare
seemed
to
be
the
real
problem,
because
at
that
time,
when
Wendy
comes
home
from
school
any
time
between
5:00
and
6:00,
she
arrives
home.
J
There
isn't
a
space
to
be
had
with
mums
and
dads
picking
up
children
from
these
two
daycares
and
as
the
weather
improves
and
the
construction
along
Eglinton
is
finished.
It's
going
to
be
even
more
of
an
issue
because
the
pubs
will
become
more
popular
in
the
good
weather
and
and
once
that
two
LRT
across
Eglinton
is
finished
and
running.
Then
it's
going
to
be
major
problems
on
all
of
those
streets,
but
certainly
on
PETMAN.
J
The
parking
pad
per
se
has
been
there
for
15
years.
Wendy
has
been
there
since
what
year
now
20
years,
I've
been
in
the
house
20
years,
so
it's
been
more
than
15
years
that
the
actual
interlocking
paving
stones
have
been
there,
but
not
quite
in
the
shape
that
the
city
would
like
it
to
be.
So
all
that
is
required
to
make
it
meet
the
city
requirements
is
a
small
addition
at
the
end
where
the
interlocking
hits
the
sidewalk.
J
It
needs
to
be
a
little
wider
by
about
two
feet
at
that
point,
which
requires
only
three
or
four
inches
below
the
level
of
the
bricks
to
would
be
dug
by
hand
and
then
a
few
more
bricks
put
in
to
straighten
it
right
now.
It
has
a
rather
pleasing
curve,
but
the
city
would
like
it
rectangular
and
straight
so
it's
a
very
minor
job
to
meet
the
requirements
that
the
city
is
asking
for.
So
I'm
really
here
just
to
support
Wendy
I'm
concerned
about
certainly
about
her
ongoing
issues
with
her
ankles
and
her
her
feet.
J
The
pain
that
she
is
in
each
day,
especially
as
a
teacher.
She
doesn't
have
a
sit-down
job
she's
on
her
feet
all
day,
she's
coming
home,
exhausted
and
in
pain.
I
want
her
to
be
able
to
park,
get
in
the
house
and
put
her
feet
up,
which
is
what
she
has
to
do
at
the
end
of
every
day.
I
think
it's
my
time
up
or
do
I
have
more
time,
because
I
have
more
than
that
more
time.
Do
you
have
something
new
to
say?
J
Okay,
I'm
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
hers
is
the
last
house
to
receive
approval
everyone
else
on
her
side
of
the
street
they're
all
semies,
mostly
semies,
all
the
way
up
on
the
other
side
of
the
street.
Some
of
their
houses
are
detached
with
private
drives.
Wendy's
property
is
only
85
feet,
deep,
as
all
of
them
are
from
the
corner
of
Sudan
up
to
Wendy's
after
Wendy's
house.
It
then
goes
to
full
depth
properties.
The
older
semies
built
on
that
street
have
very
narrow
mutual
drives.
J
A
O
A
Any
other
speakers-
okay,
all
those
in
favor
of
the
counselor
Matt
Lowe's
motion.
First
to
approve.
Please
indicate
your
support.
One
two,
three,
four,
those
opposed
counselor
by
Lao.
Do
you
have
an
opinion?
Oh
you.
Oh
sorry,
okay,
councillor,
McMahon
gisbert
one,
two,
three,
four,
five,
six
that
loses
councillor
perks,
has
moved
the
recommendations
contained
the
staff
report,
all
those
in
favor
and
then
those
opposed
1,
2,
3
4.
That
has
been
endorsed,
so
the
recommendations
and
the
staff
report
have
gone
it
they're
going
ahead.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
A
A
C
C
The
poll
positive
poll
that
we
have
we
have
year-round
challenges
I
can
get
into
that
a
little
bit
later.
The
proposed
plan
is
exceeds
all
physical
requirements
of
the
code
in
bylaws
also
reduces
congestion
after
the
approval,
pedestrian
safety
and
traffic
flow.
Also,
we
took
it
out
into
account
and
we
can
address
that
increased
city
revenue
I'm,
not
gonna,
explain
too
much,
but
on
street
parking
is
definitely
less
expensive
to
the
off
street
parking
crimin.
So
there
would
be
a
positive
net
impact
to
the
city.
C
C
C
C
C
C
Now
the
store
banks
build
up
immediately
in
front
of
my
house,
making
it
Bernoulli
a
brutal
mission
to
safely
drop
drop
off
my
kids
and
groceries
before
parking
further
away.
So
I
have
two
sons,
ones
three
and
one
six,
so
sometimes
my
kids
would
race
me
to
the
house
when
my
hands
are
full,
which
causes
you
know,
it's
quite
dangerous
and
they
feel
you
know
they
can
they
can
outrun
the
cars.
It's
also
always
a
scare
for
us.
C
So
this
is
the
part
of
the
snow
bank
issue.
Just
the
other
day,
January
11th,
I
dropped
off.
Groceries
took
me
a
minute
and
40
seconds.
My
neighbor
left
me
and
no
on
my
car,
saying
that
you
know
they
don't
don't
partially
Park
on
obstructing.
In
my
driveway
it
was
literally
you
know
she
left
us
after
she
parked
saying
that
you
know
feel
told
my
car
if
this
happens
next
time,
apparently
not
of
not
too
many
neighbors
work
in
on
Selma.
C
So
this
is
also
evening
just
the
other
day,
January
14.
This
is
a
Sunday
night.
It's
also
fully
parked
and
you
can
see
just
randomly
capturing
a
truck
or
a
courier
car,
speeding
down
Thelma
just
to
save
time,
sometimes
without
realizing.
This
is
a
cul-de-sac
because
there's
a
lack
of
signage,
it
doesn't
say,
there's
no
exit.
So
it's
always
a
concern
for
my
family
with
young
children.
Some
drivers
could
be
rushing
to
the
gym
or
an
appointment
to
the
village,
while
other
rushing
to
pick
up
the
kids
from
daycare
at
the
end
of
thermo
I'll.
A
O
You
very
much
Stephen.
Thank
you
for
all
the
work
you
put
in
preparing.
Obviously,
the
staff
report
on
page
three
notes
that
there's
currently
an
on
street
parking
permit
registered
to
your
address
is
that
yours?
Yes,
so
so
the
the
parking
pad
you're
asking
for
here
that
would
be
for
that
vehicle
or
is
it
a
new
vehicle?
It.
O
D
A
D
M
A
A
A
Okay,
that
wins,
so
the
staff
recommendations
to
deny
are
the
ones
that
were
adopted
by
this
community
council.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
Moving
along,
we
are
now
dealing
with
T
twenty
nine
point.
Two
eight
front
yard
parking
appeal:
162,
more
Avenue,
gordon
robinson,
welcome,
Gordon.
A
A
G
G
G
We
understand
there's
very
few
recommendations
that
are
positive,
so
we
appreciate
their
work
and
and
that
recommendation
they've
made
and
just
to
outline
the
conditions
that
they've
reviewed
and
commented
on.
There's
no
on-street
parking
on
our
street
more
Avenue
and
that
block
is
a
minor
arterial
and
it
has
parking
restrictions
at
rush
hour.
Our
mutual
drive
is
less
than
the
2.2
meters
that
the
Municipal
Code
stipulates
as
the
minimum
and
there's
only
about
8
inches
clearance
for
our
car
on
either
side.
G
When
we
do
try
to
park,
it's
not
possible
to
use
side
mirrors
when
you
park
in
that
driveway
and
you're,
pretty
much
blind
and
need.
My
wife
actually
guides
me
out
if
I
have
to
park
in
the
garage
in
the
back,
so
it's
not
practical
for
daily
parking
transportation
services
has
confirmed
that
we
meet
the
landscape,
open
space
requirements.
The
city
poll
was
81
percent
of
residents
responding
in
favor,
and
they
also
commented
that
19
residences
in
our
block
have
licensed
front
yard
parking
already.
G
A
G
Took
a
clay
park
on
the
street
and
take
our
chances
with
the
parking
police.
So
that's
really
our
only
alternative.
We've
done
that
for
27
years
and
and
that's
it
would
be
more
advantageous
for
the
city
to
charge
us
a
fee
to
park
on
our
property
than
to
place
the
street,
which
is
also
inconvenient
for
neighbors
and
people
who
use
more
partner
Vale
park
across
the
street.
So
we'd
like
to
get
our
car
off
the
street
and
put
it
in
a
place
where
it's
safe
and
practical.
G
D
G
A
K
K
I
moved
there
five
years
ago,
I've
seen
a
significant
increase
in
heavy-duty
equipment,
garbage
trucks
and
the
like,
and
my
simple
appeal
to
the
council
is
regarding
safety,
someone
who
does
park
their
car
on
the
street,
because
I
don't
haven't
been
able
to
arrange
a
mutual
arrangement
with
neighbors
who
are.
We
are
on
good
terms.
K
A
I
don't
take
my
car
to
work
because
I
can't
figure
out
the
seven
to
nine
four
to
six
thing
and
and
have
the
car
off
the
street
at
certain
times
so
I'm
adding
extra
burden,
albeit
small,
and
a
minor
point
to
traffic
I'd,
much
prefer
to
take
public
transportation,
but
there's
nowhere
for
me
to
personally
put
my
car.
But
the
bigger
issue
is
that
I
wanted
to
convey
to
the
councillors
here
today
that
I've
personally
been
victimized
by
three.
K
What
I
will
call
hit
and
runs
where
my
vehicle
parked
on
the
street
has
lost
its
sideview
mirror.
So
that's
come
at
a
personal
cost
to
me
of
well
over,
let's
say
$1,200
for
repairs.
My
daughter
has
been
hit
by
a
car
when
I
park,
my
car
on
the
street
I
am
Dwight
trepidatious
about
opening
the
car
door
and
worrying
about
getting
out
safely
and
sometimes
like
sit
there
for
two
three
four
minutes,
which
is
no
big
deal,
but
that
I
also
wait.
K
Two
three
four
minutes
last
night
was
very
unpleasant
to
safely
cross
the
street.
So
the
speed
through
that
area,
I
know,
is
a
factor
that
the
city
is
very
aware
of
the
densification
and
the
dangers
and
the
traffic
issues
on
that
particular
strip
and
so
I
think
any
cars
that
you
can
get
off
the
street,
so
the
traffic
can
flow
more
smoothly.
K
The
middle
of
the
road
there
is
no
proper
signage
in
terms
of
what
demarks
the
east-west
lanes,
so
you
have
many
more
issues
over
and
above
whether
someone
should
get
a
parking
pad
in
this
area,
I
simply
believe
you
should
support
those
who
ask
for
one
to
remove
their
cars
from
the
street
and
to
be
able
to
safely
get
in
and
out
of
their
vehicles,
particularly
if
they
are
of
a
certain
age
or
have
children
or
disadvantaged
in
any
way.
I
think
it
would
be
grossly
irresponsible
not
to
put
this
forward.
A
D
A
Any
other
members
with
questions
to
staff,
seeing
none
speakers
I'd
like
to
move
the
recommendations
in
the
staff
report.
I
recognize
that
you
do
not
members
see
a
lot
of
frontier
parking
approvals
in
war
27
and
largely
because
number
one.
We
don't
take
applications
because
of
the
moratorium,
but
also,
more
importantly,
I
think.
A
That
is
very
important
to
note
that
this
is
an
exception
to
the
rule,
which
is
why
staff
have
come
forward
with
a
favorable
report
and
to
note
that
the
the
the
feedback
in
the
route
and
the
the
claims
made
by
the
the
residents
today
about
the
safe,
driving
and
walking
conditions
of
more
Avenue
are
absolutely
true.
There
has
been
an
inability
to
find
a
solution
forward
from
transportation
operations,
transformation
services
on
how
to
make
this
street
safer.
A
It
is
literally
the
only
East
and
West
connection
between
two
significant
pockets
of
neighborhood
and
everything
feeds
on
to
this
tiny
little
street
called
Moore
Avenue,
which,
on
one
side
has
the
the
park,
the
more
Vale
Park.
On
the
other
side,
it
has
a
series
of
homes
and
their
backyard
is
the
Mount
Pleasant
Cemetery,
and
it's
not
just
pedestrian
vehicles
that
single
passenger
vehicles
that
passenger
vehicles
that
pass
along
the
street.
They
are
major
trucks
that
do
not
pay
attention
to
the
the
road
restrictions
and
requirements,
and
there
is
never
enough
police
enforcement.
A
The
claims
about
side
over
side,
rear
sort
of
side
mirrors,
you
know
coming
off
of
vehicles,
I've
heard
about
them
for
years,
I'm
sure
councilor,
a
kind
of
array
has
has
been
trying
to
deal
with
it,
and
none
of
it
has
been
ever.
As
has
ever
been
come
to
a
resolution,
and
I
have
a
very
small
vehicle
myself.
It's
not
a
very
large
vehicle,
but
even
my
small
little
vehicle
cannot
fit
on
Moore
Avenue.
A
A
A
D
A
Don't
we
hold
that
down
hold
it
for
a
moment
there
are
any
members
of
the
public
who
are
here
to
speak
to
item
number
29
121,
browning
Avenue.
The
local
councillor
is
interested
in
deferring
this
matter.
So
please,
let
us
know
if
you
are
here
to
speak
to
that
moving
right
along
t20
9.30
refusal
of
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
application
with
deck
located
at
180,
Eglinton
Avenue
East
Redpath,
Avenue
frankish.
We
have
one
speaker
here:
Tony
Walton,
Tony,
Walton,
Emily,
I,
see
you
you
just
want
to.
A
P
Afternoon
counselor
I'm,
representing
scruffy
Murphy's
Irish
pub,
which
is
a
180
Eglinton
Avenue
East,
which
used
to
be
the
Golden
griddle
restaurant
or
was
there
for
many
years,
and
we
have
an
existing
patio
that
has
been
there
approximately
20
years
we
applied.
We,
we
did
some
changes
to
the
patio
as
the
city
requested,
we
applied
for
a
patio
license,
it
went
out
to
poll
and
it
was
rejected
because
the
local
condominium
building,
which
is
half
a
block
down
the
street,
rejected
it
because
they
thought
that
it
would
generate
a
lot
of
noise.
P
Well
in
our
finding
that
the
corporation
did
the
condo
board
sent
letters
around
to
all
the
tenants
in
the
building
telling
them
to
reject
the
patio
at
scruffy
Murphy's
Irish
pub,
because
they
would
regret
it
because
the
noise,
the
there
is,
a
patio
within
20
feet.
Above
of
the
patio
entrance,
there's
also
a
patio
across
the
street
at
Dimitri's
restaurant,
which
is
now
closed.
P
What
I'm,
what
I'm
asking
for
is
to
consider
the
rejection
of
the
application
that
we
sent
in
and
if
we
could
get
a
patio
up
for
this
year,
would
otherwise.
We
have
a
problem
that
if
we
cannot
have
a
patio,
we
cannot
consider
continued
business.
We've
already
been
put
out
of
business
once
at
150
Eglin
tab,
you
least
because
of
the
construction,
which
was
a
real
downturn
in
sales.
So
we
moved
our
business
to
180,
hoping
that
we
would
get
the
patio
up
and
running
last
summer,
which
didn't
happen.
A
I
I
Let's
not
you
know,
the
sidewalks
are
for
everybody
not
just
for
able-bodied
patios
are
for
everybody,
not
just
able-bodied
and
we're
working
on
in
this
city,
a
sidewalk
policy
for
everybody,
not
just
people
that
are
able
by
people
with
disabilities
I
mean
we
want
to
be
at
these
establishments.
We
want
to
bring
these
establishes
business
and,
if
they're
not
wheelchair,
accessible,
even
cluding
the
patios,
then
how
can
we
give
them?
I
A
B
B
So
he
did
that
and
he
was
able
to
demonstrate
a
vast
amount
of
support
throughout
the
community,
so
I'm
I'm,
convinced
being
the
one
who
has
to
you,
know,
respond
and
be
accountable
to
to
the
community
that
there
actually
is
a
preponderance
of
support
for
it.
Let's
park
that
for
a
moment,
Eglinton
Avenue,
as
you
all
know,
has
been
done
under
an
enormous
pressure
for
all
the
right
reasons.
Our
community
supports
the
Eglinton
crosstown
being
constructed.
B
B
Think
it's
reasonable
that
if
there
are
things
that
we
can
do
to
support
the
success
of
this
business
as
councillor
Krusty
is
working
on
with
businesses
in
his
area
and
others
that
we
should
do
what's
reasonable
and
what's
right,
so
I
ask
for
your
support
to
support
the
success
of
this
business,
but
also
confident
that
this
reflects
what
I
believe
will
be
the
the
preponderance
of
other
communities
positions.
You
thank
you.
A
A
D
A
A
And
do
they
need
to
know
okay,
so
thank
you
we
are
on.
We
are
dealing
with
t
29.89
endorsement
of
events
for
liquor,
licensing
purposes
and
before
we
go
ahead
and
address
the
staff
report.
I'd
like
to
elect
members
of
community
council,
know
that
there's
a
withdrawal
of
two
correspondents,
one
from
celebrate
Toronto,
as
well
as
a
letter
from
the
distillery
district,
their
Christmas
market
2018.
So
those
two
pieces
of
Correspondence
will
be
withdrawn
from
the
record.
I
know:
Christmas
has
not
been
canceled.
A
Please
continue
with
all
your
festivity
planning's
for
2018
there's
just
a
few
months
before
its
time.
All
those
in
favor
actually
I'll
be
moving
the
recommendations
and
the
in
the
report,
all
those
in
favor.
Okay,
any
opposed
that
carries.
The
party
continues:
t
29.9,
888,
Queen,
Street
East,
a
public
art
plan.
There
are
no
members
of
the
public
here
to
speak
to
this
matter.
I
held
it
largely
because,
well
it's
a
mistake:
I
should
have
let
it
go
sooner,
but
I'm
glad
the
staff
did
not
stick
around
to
wait
for
this.