►
Description
Toronto and East York Community Council, meeting 20, November 10, 2020
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=17159
A
A
Today's
meeting
is
being
held
with
members
of
council
participating
both
in
person
and
by
video
conference
city
of
staff
are
also
connected
to
the
meeting
by
video
conference.
As
city
hall
remains
closed
to
the
public
to
participate
electronically,
you
can
watch
the
meeting
streaming
live
on
youtube
at
youtube.com
forward.
Slash
toronto
city.
Council
live.
A
I
ask
everyone
for
their
patience
with
any
delays
and
technical
issues.
The
clerk's
staff
have
connected
all
registered
speakers
to
the
meeting
by
audio.
The
list
of
speakers
can
be
viewed
online
by
visiting
the
toronto
east
york
community
council
page
at
toronto,
dot
ca
forward,
slash
council
and
clicking
the
speakers
box
for
today's
meeting.
A
Clerk's
I.t
staff
will
also
be
available
to
assist
members
with
their
devices.
I
would
like
to
remind
staff
to
keep
their
microphones
muted
and
their
videos
turned
off
unless
they
need
to
answer
questions
or
speak
to
the
committee.
This
will
be.
This
will
make
it
easier
for
me
as
chair
and
for
those
watching
on
youtube
to
observe
the
members
as
they
participate
in
the
debate
and
vote
on
items
for
those
members
who
are
joining
us
remotely.
A
Please
keep
your
microphone
muted
unless
you
wish
to
question
staff
or
speak
to
an
item
and
ensure
that
your
video
is
turned
on
as
part
of
each
item.
I
will
ask
members
to
raise
their
hand
or
unmute
their
microphones
if
they
wish
to
question
staff
or
speak.
I
will
then
create
a
speaker's
list
and
will
call
on
members
when
it
is
their
turn
to
speak.
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
E
E
Yes,
thank
you
very
much.
My
apologies.
I
had
a
bit
of
a
connection
issue
on,
on
my
end,
we'll
be
supporting
the
staff
recommendations
or
I'll
advance
the
staff
recommendations.
Just
to
note
this
is
a
70-story
building
on
top
of
the
that
glass
hydro,
building
on
at
the
corner
of
college
and
and
and
and
at
a
university.
So
this
is
a
rather
significant
deviation
from
the
current,
the
the
current
planning
regime
in
that
space.
E
A
A
Item
te
20.23
185
beloyl
street
and
eight
halton
crescent
zoning
bylaw
amendment
application
preliminary
report,
councillor
matlow.
I
move
the
recommendations.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carries
item
te,
20.24
1913
through
1951
young
street
17
through
21
millwood
road
and
22
davisville
avenue
zoning
bylaw
amendment
application.
Preliminary
report,
councilor
milo.
A
A
Item
te
20.28
removal
of
on-street,
accessible
parking
spaces
october
2020,
delegated
counselor,
layton
I'll
move
the
staff
recommendation
on
the
staff
recommendations.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
back,
carries
item
te,
20.29
construction,
staging
area,
one
bluer
street
west
belmuto
street
councilor,
leighton.
A
E
A
D
E
A
F
B
A
B
A
F
I'm
also
happy
to
move
these
great
folks
onto
that
board
of
management
and
just
say
both
of
those
apple,
grove
and
east
view
have
really
been
outstanding
during
the
pandemic
for
their
work
on
food
and
apple
grove
worked
with
tchc
johnsonville,
so
it
it's
just
fantastic.
So
thank
you
to
both
of
those
agencies.
A
A
A
E
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
Okay
item
te,
20.15
designation
of
fire
roots,
an
amendment
to
chapter
eight,
eight,
zero
fire
route
for
one
hundred
gam
councillor
fletcher
has
moved
it
all.
Those
in
favor
opposed
carried,
and
I
will
note
that
this
was
inadvertently
attributed
to
counselor
bylaw,
which
it
shouldn't
have
been
okay,.
A
A
B
B
B
We've
been
working
hard
with
staff
on
implementing,
and
I
just
I
wanted
to
also
register,
because
I
wanted
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
staff
and
that
would
be
planning
parks,
real
estate
and
the
council's
office
for
all
the
hard
work
to
get
us
to
this
point
in
continuing
to
advance
this
project.
But
we're
just
here
to
answer
any
questions
there
may
be
on
this
item.
B
E
E
A
Any
questions
of
the
mover
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
of
the
well
we'll
take
the
amendment
and
the
item.
All
is
one
all.
Those
in
favor
opposed
that
carries
item
te
20.2
one
through
seven
young
street
application
to
lift
the
holding
provisions
h
on
phase
two
final
report,
I
have
one
deputy
listed
jason
park,
jason.
B
B
The
subject
application
is
the
lifting
of
a
holding
provisions
for
the
phase
2
building,
which
is
the
second
mixed-use
building
on
the
north
parcel
we've
had
an
opportunity
to
review
the
report.
We
support
the
recommendations
set
out
in
the
report
and
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
the
counselors
may
have.
A
A
B
B
A
A
A
B
Good
morning
it's
mike
bissett
again
with
bowsefields.
I
am
the
planner
on
this
file
with
rockport
again
we're
just
here
to
answer
any
questions,
and
just
just
to
note
that
there
would
be
that
motion
that
that
came
from
discussions
with
the
neighbors
in
order
to
address
issues
and
concerns
raised
by
the
neighbors.
So
this
specifically
would
address
those.
A
A
B
Okay,
thank
you.
So
I
represent
your
dangerous
homes.
Inc.
We
filed
a
written
submission.
That
summarizes
well
gives
a
bit
more
detail
on
what
I'm
about
to
say,
but
essentially
we
operate
the
homes
for
people
with
dementia,
and
one
of
them
is
beside
the
276
290
merton
property,
and
we
had
discussions
on
and
off
with
rockport
for
a
couple
of
years
now
and
as
of
this
morning,
there
was
another
change
that
they
apprised,
us
of,
which
looks
like
a
favorable
change,
but
we
just
learned
about
it
about
half
an
hour
ago.
B
In
any
event,
so
we've
been
in
discussions
with
the
planning
department
over
what
our
development
rights
will
be
with
the
rockport
development
in
place,
and
so
our
request
to
council,
which
is
in
the
letter
I
filed
this
morning,
was
just
that.
They
allow
us
some
time
to
continue
these
discussions
with
the
planning
department
and
firm
up
and.
B
Of
what
our
rights
are,
after
after
the
rockport
property
goes
up,
so
we
haven't
proposed
any
delay
in
anything.
We
just
would
like
the
planning
department
to
continue
discussions
with
us
and
ask
that
the
community
council
support
our
discussion
with
city
staff
and
request
that
the
planning
staff
report
directly
to
city
council
on
on
our
issues
or
concerns.
B
B
B
B
Good
morning
councillors,
my
name
as
mentioned
is
mark
yonya
from
tribute
mutual
street
limited
regarding
7783
mutual
street
at
signalisk
is
also
on
the
call
on
behalf
of
tribute.
This
is
regarding
our
application
for
part
lot
control
exemption.
We
don't
have
any
presentation,
but
I
just
wanted
to
be
on
the
call
to
answer
any
questions.
If
there
were
any
that
came
up,
if
there
are
no
questions
I'll
just
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
staff
for
their
work
on
this
file
and
and
leave
it
there.
Thank
you.
D
A
A
A
D
D
And-
and
I
think
that
this
is
going
to
be
part
of
the
the
constant
and
ongoing
challenges
as
we
get
ready
for
the
tunneling.
The
massive
construction,
which,
of
course,
will
be
impactful,
but
not
to
mention
the
fact
that
we
already
have
very
busy
streets
with
already
existing
construction
sites
all
over
the
place.
It
makes
it
very
difficult
for
for
someone
to
be
walking
through
the
area
and
and
that-
and
we
know
that
the
changes
that
are
coming
are
probably
going
to
reveal
that
it's
going
to
further
some
of
those
challenges.
D
So
that's
the
the
overall
strategy
to
try
to
do
the
very
best
we
can
to
manage
the
growth
that's
coming
in.
We
don't
necessarily
have
the
right
to
say
no
to
tall
buildings,
as
we
know,
especially
since
the
omb
has
come
back
as
l
patton
has
gotten
bigger
and
stronger.
I
have
struggled
with
this
application,
largely
because
of
its
size.
D
But
I
am
troubled
by
the
the
the
volume
of
activity
that
continues
to
come,
marching
down
on
our
our
main
streets,
and-
and
this
is
the
very
best
we
can.
This
is
where
we've
landed
today,
and
I
will
continue
to
work
with
staff
in
the
community
to
make
sure
that
we
continue
to
do
this
work
in
the
days.
Moving
ahead,
thank
you
very
much.
A
A
Item
te,
20.628,
davenport
road
and
141
through
145,
bedford,
road
official,
planned
zoning,
amendment
application
and
rental
housing,
demolition
application
request
for
directions
report
I
have
one
deputent
listed
josh
fullen,
I'm
told
josh
is
not
with
us.
Are
there
any
questions
of
staff
on
this
item?.
E
E
We
have
given
approvals
for
taller
buildings
on
the
north
side,
but
because
of
the
proximity
to
to
lower
rise
buildings
on
the
south
side,
it
has
been
deemed
not
appropriate
at
this
site,
and
so
the
application
that
came
in
is
rather
aggressive.
We
have
tried
working
with
the
applicant
through
the
beginnings
of
a
working
group
with
community
associations.
Unfortunately,
it
hasn't
seen
any
movement
on
the
the
built
form,
and
so
we
are
being
asked
for
direction
so
that
we
can
go
fight
it
at
the
lpat.
A
A
A
A
A
Item
te
20.8
inclusion
on
the
city
of
toronto
heritage
register,
intention
to
designate
under
part
4
section
29
of
the
ontario
heritage,
act,
alterations
to
a
heritage
property,
an
authority
to
enter
into
a
heritage,
easement
agreement
60
queen
street
east
and
13133
and
135
church
street.
I
have
no
deputations
listed.
Are
there
any
questions
of
staff
sing?
None
counselor,
wong
tam
your
floor
is
yours.
A
On
the
staff
recommendations,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carrie
item
te,
20.9
intention
to
designate
under
part
4
section
29
of
the
ontario
heritage
act,
41
and
47
fraser
avenue
and
135
liberty
street
note
that
there's
a
9a
attached,
which
are
the
which
is
the
communication
from
preservation
services.
I
assume
yeah
preservation
board.
Sorry,
I
have
no
deputies
listed
councillor,
layton.
E
E
E
A
A
A
Item
te,
20.11
demolition
of
a
property
designated
under
part,
4,
section
29
of
the
ontario
heritage,
act,
33,
avenue,
road
and
again
there's
a
communication
from
the
preservation
board.
I
do
have
deputies
paul
farrelly
paul
will
not
be
making
a
deputation,
I'm
told
brian
brisbane
brian.
Could
you
make
sure
that
you
have
connected
your.
A
A
C
Thank
you.
This
is
going
to
be
a
word
painting.
I
assume,
because
I
obviously
no
visual
here
over
the
last
year
and
a
half
we've
spent
a
critical
time
both
with
the
client
the
residents,
including
abc,
to
look
at
the
existing
submission
and
what
we
now
call
the
improved
submission
for
the
yorkville
project.
C
The
intent
was
to
develop
a
better
ability
to
create
public
realm,
both
a
greater
size,
space
orientation
and
light
one
that
was
more
connected,
both
in
terms
of
muse,
walkways,
passageways
and
more
viable,
literally
in
the
sense
of
trees
and
sunlight.
So
in
order
to
do
that,
we
rotated
the
building
at
an
angle
that
no
longer
faced
other
buildings,
but
rotated
it
slightly
towards
avenue
road.
The
result
is
the
all
of
the
conditions
that
were
set
forth
before
in
terms
of
setbacks,
height
fsi
remained
the
same.
C
It's
actually
an
enhancement
in
terms
of
the
relationship
to
the
other
buildings,
but
the
biggest
feature
is
that
the
public
realm
at
the
lower
level
has
now
gone
from
roughly
three
thousand
square
feet
to
over
five
thousand
square
feet,
of
which
it
is
almost
entirely
because
of
the
angular
plane.
The
terracing
underneath
of
the
building
and
our
sun
shadow
studies
will
be
enveloped
in
sunshine
for
for
both
parts
of
the
morning
in
the
afternoon.
C
So
with
that,
we
developed
a
public
realm
that
is
more
programmable.
It
has
a
unique
water
feature
in
the
sense
of
a
large
waterfall
that
waterfall
is
partly
a
base
of
the
reclamation
system
for
storm
water
management,
the
building
itself.
It
will
be
the
second
building
in
toronto
under
consular
layton's
auspices.
Here
to
be
a
vertical
forest,
I
will
have
trees
that
not
only
contribute
to
the
heat
island
effect
of
the
city,
but
also
to
the
viability
of
the
horizontal
parks
and
transmigration.
That
is
part
of
the
other
project.
C
So
in
total,
what
we
have
now
is
a
much
more,
I
think,
responsive
design
to
the
public
realm
in
the
street.
It
has
direct
connectivity
into
the
yorkville
center
shopping
rather
than
down
below
grade.
It
has
a
connection
through
to
avenue
road.
It
opens
up
the
corner
of
avenue
road
in
yorkville
to
the
rest
of
the
community
in
a
much
more
public
sense,
so
that
when
we
landscape
it
all,
it
will
appear
very
much
a
part
of
that
extension
and
not
owned
or
corporate.
C
So
we
think
in
the
end,
this
will
become
a
better
program
for
it.
It
was
accomplished
by
the
addition
of
land,
where
the
other
access
to
the
yorkville
shopping
was
before
that
inclusion
gave
us
the
leeway,
the
space,
the
flexibility
to
open
up
and
create
a
much
more
meaningful,
and,
I
think,
fundamentally,
sound
public
realm
for
everyone.
Thank
you.
A
A
H
H
Those
of
us
who
came
of
age
in
the
60s
and
70s,
of
course,
will
remember
jack,
diamond
and
barton
meyer's
creation
and
how
it
really
came
to
anchor
an
important
corner
of
yorkville
and
and
live
enliven.
It
the,
however,
the
the
building.
As
you
see
it
today,
is
actually
its
third
iteration
as
it
relates
to
heritage.
So
there's
the
original
victorian
slash
edwardian
building.
H
H
H
So
as
a
result
of
that,
there
is
a
development
proposal
that
is
as
of
right
that,
as
I
said,
will
see
the
building
that
you
see
today,
extensively
modified
in
and
in
those
in
that
process.
We
obviously
take
these
things
very
seriously.
We
engage
people
like
ken
greenberg
to
help
us
guide
us
through
this
process
and
et
cetera
so
and
michael
spazziani
and
others.
H
The
the
proposal
that
mr
brisbane
just
spoke
to
is
what
we
call
sort
of
the
last
piece
of
the
puzzle,
which
was
that,
at
the
time
of
the
omb
decision,
the
site
to
the
immediate
east
was
not
part
of
this
parcel
this
assembly
and
that
site
to
the
immediate
east
is
a
tunnel
for
lack
of
a
better
term.
I
think
first
capital
might
be
offended
if
we
call
it
that,
but
it's
an
entryway
to
what
we
used
to
know
as
hazelton
lanes
is
now
called
yorkville
village.
H
This
proposal
consolidates
the
site,
so
it's
dramatically
larger
footprint
density
actually
goes
down
a
bit,
but
speaking
again
to
what,
mr
president,
to
say,
the
public
realm
now
has
evolved
in
dramatically
in
a
very,
very
positive
way,
and
it's
just
not
for
our
community.
This
is
something
important
for
the
city
and
it
anchors
the
sort
of
western
end
of
yorkville.
H
As
many
of
you
know,
we
were
very
successful
in
achieving
extension
of
village
of
yorkville
park
recently
to
bay
street,
which
is
pretty
monumental,
so
this
would
also
anchor
in
terms
of
public
ground
to
the
west,
and
I
want
to
leave
you
with.
Actually,
a
quote
from
from
mr
diamond,
which
I
think
would
be
helpful
for
all
of
us.
So
in
cbc
news
december,
7th
2016,
mr
diamond,
was
asked
what
he
thought
of
the
fact
that
his
buildings
may
be
coming
down.
So
I
quote
from
that
article.
H
One
person
who
is
not
against
demolition
is
architect
diamond
84..
He
said
he
wouldn't
mind
if
his
red
brick
construction
was
torn
down
as
long
as
a
new
building
is
supported
with
proper
infrastructure
and
connects
pedestrians
to
the
streets.
Streetscape
quote
all
things
it
did
were
really
important
things
to
do.
He
told
cbc
toronto
thursday,
but
it
wasn't
spectacular.
H
Architecturally
cities
change
unquote,
so
I
think
in
a
sense,
what
we've
been
working
for
the
next
last
four
or
five
years
is
effectively
that
a
a
proposal
that
evolves
that
site
into
a
far
more
accessible,
far
more
usable
piece
of
public
realm
for
not
just
our
community
but
for
the
city.
So
thank
you.
A
A
A
G
G
Together
with
the
abc
residence
association,
we
have
been
actively
engaged
in
collaborative
discussions
with
the
developers.
For
over
a
year,
the
developers
attended
a
gyro
board
meeting
where
representatives
from
most
of
our
member
buildings
attended
the
developers
made
a
presentation
of
their
proposal
and
answered
a
number
of
questions.
The
developers
then
left
the
meeting
and
a
folsom
discussion
took
place.
G
On
another
point
that
should
be
noted,
a
gyro
does
not
take
the
position
that
all
buildings
should
be
torn
down
to
make
way
for
new
developments
on
several
occasions.
Generals
strongly
supported
keeping
what
we
consider
to
be
important
heritage,
buildings
and
precincts.
As
an
example,
we
fully
supported
keeping
the
buildings
on
the
west
side
of
yonge
street
between
yorkville
and
cumberland,
and
to
incorporate
them
into
the
new
condominium
development,
and,
if
you
recall,
from
last
month's
meeting,
jair
was
also
actively
involved
in
opposing
the.
G
Not
all
old
buildings
are
equal
simply
because
a
building
is
old,
we
feel
should
not
automatically
make
it
heritage.
The
city
must
be
selective
in
choosing
which
building
should
be
preserved.
A
well-known
resident
of
the
yorkville
area
and
former
gyre
board
member
until
his
health
issues
made
it
difficult
for
him
to
attend.
Meetings
is
bill.
Greer
bill,
as
many
of
you
know,
is
one
of
toronto's
most
respected
heritage
advocates.
G
I
spoke
with
him
a
few
days
ago
and
once
again,
bill
confirmed
his
opinion
of
york
square.
He
told
me
that
I
could
quote
him,
so
I
quote
bill
as
follows:
york
square
served
its
purpose
at
the
time,
but
it
has
been
obsolete
for
its
proposed
uses
for
several
decades,
and
I
am
supportive
of
it
being
demolished
and
being
replaced
with
the
proposed
development
is
my
understanding
that
one
of
york,
square's,
original
architects,
jack
diamond,
does
not
consider
this
a
heritage
property
on
behalf
of
our
residents.
G
A
E
E
And
if
you
can
scroll
through,
it
also
has
some
other
pieces
attached
about
documenting
the
site
and
having
an
interpretation
plan
in
place.
This
has
been
a
a
particularly
difficult
file.
It
was
started
by
my
my
predecessor,
councillor
wong
tam,
in
the
area
with
the
development
that
certainly
was
not
ideal
for
for
the
site
and
that
went
to
the
ontario
municipal
board
and
was
approved
and
it
involved
protecting
the
buildings,
but
only
the
very
big
basic
shell
of
part
of
the
shell
of
a
building.
E
So
we've
got,
we've
got
a
big
trade
off
here.
It's
protect
the
building
and
get
a
development
that
protect
the
building
in,
in
that
you're,
protecting
a
wall
of
a
building
or
and
and
get
a
development
that,
generally
speaking,
the
new
owners,
don't
love
the
community.
Doesn't
love
and
the
city
doesn't
love
or
get
an
improved
building,
but
trading
off
the
loss
of
a
of
a
heritage.
What
would
have
been
left
of
a
heritage
asset?
E
Now?
I
I
think
you've
heard,
like
we've
heard
from
the
two
residents
associations
in
the
community,
there's
widespread
support
for
this
new
application
and
it's
in
its
evolving
form
and
you,
you
haven't
been
able
to
see
the
the
the
proposed
plans
for
the
public
realm,
but
I
think
you
can
trust
our
deputies
in
in
from
the
community.
E
That
say
it's
a
it's
a
vast
improvement,
so
it
isn't
without
some
level
of
regret
that
I'm
putting
this
motion
forward,
but
on
the
understanding
that
this
is
something
that
this
community
is
in
desperate
need
of,
and
that's
more
space
to
move
around
and
to
live
in
the
community.
That's
built,
that's
growing
so
quickly
around
them.
E
A
A
A
A
Okay,
counselor
bradford.
Could
I
ask
you
to
sit
in
frame
so
that
I
know
that
we
have
quorum,
I'm
just
realizing.
I
only
have
four
members
of
council
that
I
can
see,
including
well
three
members
I
can
see
plus
me,
so
I
need
one
more
for
quorum.
Counselor
bradford.
Are
you
there
or
counselor
by
lyle,
there's
counselor
by
law?
Okay,
very
good!
We
have
quorum.
A
A
A
D
Ahead,
I
may
have
this
opportunity
now.
Thank
you
on
the
in
your
report.
There's
a
letter
that's
submitted
by
the
owner
that
cites
that
they
hope
to
demolish
this
one-story
structure
and
replace
it
with
a
six-story
structure,
but
in
the
same
agenda.
There's
a
there's,
an
application
for
rezoning
that
cites
a
different
height
for
this
building.
D
So
in
the
letter
submitted
by
the
owner
on
this
matter
at
2,
not
252
parliamentary,
they
cite
that
they're
going
to
replace
the
one-story
structure
with
a
six-story
building,
but
on
the
planning
report,
the
preliminary
planning
report
for
252
parliament,
which
is
item
25
later
in
the
agenda.
They
submit
an
application
for
rezoning
that
that
that
is
asking
city
council
for
the
permissions
to
build
a
nine-story
building.
D
B
D
Yeah
yeah,
no
thank
you
very
much.
I
will
move
the
the
recommendation
to
approve
the
demolition.
I
recognize
that
this
property
is,
is
unsecured
and
and
and
one
that
needs
to
be
secured.
We've
had
a
number
of
challenges
there
and
we
don't
necessarily
want
to
see
this
building
set
on
fire
and
perhaps
community
members
harmed,
but
I
did
want
to
flag
for
members
of
community
council
that
there
is
a
discrepancy
between
this
matter
before
us
as
the
demolition
request
and
the
rezoning
application.
D
One
is
the
six
story
proposal
to
replace
and
then
one
is
the
nine
story,
so
I
think
we
can
all
take
it
at
face
value
that
the
zoning
amendment
requested
in
the
item.
25
that
comes
later
late,
a
little
bit
later,
is
the
correct
structure,
or
at
least
the
the
request
for
the
replacement
structure
that
the
applicant
is
asking
for
and
then,
of
course,
we
will
go
through
the
planning
review.
Have
our
public
meeting
with
the
community
and
we'll
sort
through
that
detail
a
little
bit
later
on.
Thank
you.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
Yes,
thank
you.
I'd
like
to
move
the
recommendation,
sorry,
my
motion-
and
this
is
exactly
the
item
that
I
was
speaking
to
when
we
were
discussing
the
demolition
application
for
252,
so
we
will
proceed
and
hold
the
public
meeting,
but
also
to
ensure
that
we
have
a
site
plan,
a
an
undelegated
process
of
a
site
plan
working
group
as
we
head
to
a
final
report.
If,
if
and
only
if
the
application
gets
approved,
thank
you
very
much.
Sharon.
E
B
E
B
A
E
E
B
Yes,
counselor:
we
always
that
that's
our
starting
point.
When
we
look
at
any
construction
staging.
Certainly
we
don't
want
to
give
up
our
right
of
way
to
be
occupied
for
staging.
Our
first
first
question
to
developers
is
always
state
your
construction
on
site,
unfortunately,
with
planning
requirements
and
conditions
that
are
in
that
allow
us
to
build,
allow
developers
to
build
lot
lines
a
lot
line.
There
is
absolutely
no
ability
to
stage
construction
from
private
portion.
A
E
So
I'm
sure
many
of
you
have
had
a
community
meeting
about
construction
management
plans
with
your
neighbors
that
don't
go
well
on
this
particular
site.
We've
had
four
so
far
and
and
we've
explored
every
possible
option
on
on
this
file
I
and
it
it
is
a
significant
safety
concern
on
belmuto,
but
at
the
same
time
there
are
no.
There
seems
to
be
no
other
options,
we've
exhausted
all
other
possibilities,
and
it
would.
It
is
with
much
reluctance
that
I'll
I'll
adopt
the
item.
This
moves
it
forward.
E
If
I
understand
correctly,
it
refers
the
report
to
council,
because
council
act,
despite
the
fact
that
this
is
a
small
road.
There
is
a
deviation
to
our
normal
protocols
on
on
this
particular
station,
a
staging
that
needs
council
approval-
and
I
I
understand
there'll-
be
more
reporting
going
to
council
on
this
item.
So
it's
with
much
reluctance
that,
after
several
deferrals
I'll
move
this
on
to
council.
A
E
Thank
you.
I
have
a
technical
amendment
from
staff
and
I
should
have
said
this
in
the
last
item-
I'd
like
to
thank
transportation
staff
for
their
involvement
in
the
previous
item
and,
of
course,
this
one,
but
the
previous
item
in
particular.
They
have
done
an
enormous
amount
of
work
for
that
for
for
that
staging
area
and
I'm
sure
they
do
just
as
much
for
this
one.
We
just
didn't
need
to
have
four
public
meetings
to
get
there.
A
A
D
Don't
have
questions
mr
chair,
I
do
have
a
motion
and
the
clerk
can
put
that
on
the
screen.
This
motion
is
to
largely
try
to
strengthen
the
existing
staff
report.
I
think
that
staff
have
done
a
commendable
job
and
they
have
already
amended
their
regular
motion
with
items
that
we
have
always
asked
for,
including
clean
debris,
free
conditions
around
the
construction
site,
regular
sleeping
24
hour,
construction,
posted
hotline.
This
amendment
is
to
to
go
an
extra
distance
and,
and
the
members
can
put
see
that
it's
on
the
screen.
A
A
E
A
F
A
F
F
A
So
could
I
ask
for
a
show
of
hands
all
those
in
favor
councillor,
layton,
councillor,
wong,
tam
counselor
by
lao
councillor,
matlow,
councillor
fletcher
and
myself,
and
the
chair
members?
We
neglected
to
do
this
on
item
three
where
counselor
bradford
also
had
an
interest,
so
I'm
going
to
move
that
we
reopen
that
all
those
in
favor
of
reconsideration
posed
if
any,
that
carries
and
I'll
call
for
a
recorded
vote
on
that
item.
A
A
B
D
D
She
was
struck
by
a
cement
truck
because
there
is
a
lot
of
construction
taking
place
in
that
area
and,
and
it's
still
unclear
to
us
exactly
what
happened,
but
I
can
say
that
the
community
has
experienced
a
significant
loss.
I
know
that
councilor
cressie
and
I
are
both
quite
moved,
but
by
what
has
happened-
and
this
particular
motion
is
actually
asking
staff
to
do
three
things.
D
One
is
to
immediately
investigate
that
intersection
and
to
find
out
if
there
are
things
that
we
can
do
in
the
immediate
term
to
try
to
make
intersections
safer
and
even
as
we
don't
know,
all
the
outcome,
all
the
details
surrounding
her
death
we
do
need
to.
We
do
recognize
that
there
are
probably
ways
that
we
can
make
every
street
in
the
city.
Every
neighborhood
has
the
improve
opportunity
for
improvement.
D
The
second
and
third
thing
that
we're
asking
staff
to
do
is
bring
us
mid-term
and
long-term
longer-term
solutions.
Any
loss
of
life
in
our
city
is
especially
due
to
road
violence
is,
is
one
too
many
and
as
a
vulnerable
senior.
We
know
that
that
the
city
moves
at
an
incredibly
fast
pace.
Trish
is
not
necessarily
someone
who
who
didn't
have
access
to
to
mobility,
however,
and
when
you
have
a
a
vehicle,
especially
an
industrial
use,
vehicle
striking,
humidity,
being
loss
of
life
will
occur
and
that's
exactly
what's
transpired
here.
D
Some
of
it
could
have
been
human
error.
It
could
have
been
the
fact
that
the
driver
didn't
see
the
pedestrian.
It
could
have
been
a
turn
that
that
resulted
in
in
in
this
loss
of
life,
whatever
it
is,
we're
asking
staff
to
not
leave
any
stone
unturned
to
investigate
in
any
and
every
single
perspective
to
make
sure
that
no
one
else
will
ever
be
harmed
crossing
that
intersection
and-
and
with
that,
mr
chair,
I
submit
to
you
our
our
letter.
Thank
you.
A
A
F
Counselor
long
time,
yes,
this
is
a
terribly
tragic,
tragic,
tragic
event,
especially
with
all
of
the
work
that
went
into
planning
the
transportation
area
in
the
distillery
and
west
online.
Do
you
happen
to
know
which
firm
it
was
or
which
cement
truck?
That
was
that
was
involved
in
this
loss
of
life.
F
Yeah,
I'm
really
going
to
support
this
motion
that
counselor
longtime
has
brought
forward,
and
when
I
heard
about
this
or
read
about
this,
I
was
very
deeply
disturbed.
These
are
huge
trucks
that
we
have
approved
so
much
construction
and
they
are
going
tending
to
go
through
neighborhoods
as
if
they
were
not
residential
zones,
as
if
they
were
highways
or
more
industrial
zones,
because
they
are
a
construction
site
at
a
certain
point.
So
I
know
that
this
summer
I
had
a
situation
which
was
a
close
call
and
thank
goodness
it
wasn't.
F
So
there
is
just
a
tremendous
amount
of
construction,
and
these
are
very
big
trucks.
I
actually
think
there's
more
than
just
the
intersection
we're
looking
at
counselor.
I
think
it
just
has
to
do
with
the
protocols
of
these
firms,
most
of
which
are
actually
on
commissioner
street,
and
they
I
don't
know
what
the
safety
protocols
are
for
heavy
trucks
on
these
residential
streets
or
in
construction
zones,
where
there
are
a
lot
of
public
amenities.
A
A
A
A
A
I
move
that
the
toronto
easter
community
council
pass
and
declare
as
a
bylaw
the
confirmatory
bill,
to
confirm
the
legislative
proceedings
of
the
toronto
east
york
community
council
acting
under
delegated
authority
at
meeting
20
on
november
10
2020,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
members
that
completes
our
work.
Thank
you.
So
much
have
a
great
afternoon.