►
From YouTube: ORGANIZED RESIDENTIAL WASTE & RECYCLING COLLECTION CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE - June 9th, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
B
B
B
Did
you
see,
remember
kawanabe's,
meeting
or
notice
and
then.
C
C
A
All
right,
since
we
have
enough
so
who's
missing,
then
besides
member
of
kamanabe
and
member
vice
chair,
gorman,.
A
Okay,
we'll
call
this
meeting
to
order
business
support
specialist
chavez.
Will
you
please
take
roll
yep.
A
A
B
Yeah
we
did
receive
one
email
this
morning,
so
I
did.
We
did
attach
that
to
the
agenda
and.
B
A
A
D
Oh
okay,
I
see
it
on
the
on
on
the
presentation.
It's
fine
right.
B
Yeah,
so
it's
just,
it
was
an
email
from
a
karen
stouter
and
she
said
that
in
the
fall
of
2019
I
attended
one
of
the
meeting
discussing
englewood
going
to
a
one
provider
trash
service.
My
understanding
was
that
things
would
be
decided
and
finalized
by
early
summer.
2020.
then
covid
came
along
well
here.
It
is
a
year
later
and
I've
heard
nothing
nor
have
any
of
my
neighbors.
What
is
the
plan
thanks?
Karen.
A
B
E
A
A
Okay,
thank
you,
director
deandre,
then
we'll
move
past
the
public
part
and
does
anyone
have
any
questions
on
the
summary
of
previous
motions.
A
I
mean
that's
the
same
as
it
was
before,
with
the
addition
of
what
we
had
from
our
last
meeting.
It
looked
right
to
me.
We
still
have
our
minutes
to
approve.
Let's
is
there
a
motion
to
approve
our
minutes
from
the
last
meeting.
D
C
Of
course,
chair
green.
A
A
All
right
so
now,
back
to
my
question:
did
anyone
have
anything
to
go
over
on
the
previous
motions?
Okay,
so
director
d'andrea?
Will
you
please,
let's
pick
back
up
on
our
view
of
the
draft,
I'm
not
sure
what
the
most
effective
way
to
do.
This
would
be
there's.
I
definitely
wound
up
with
questions
that
go
back
to
some
of
the
changes
in
the
earlier
part
of
the
document.
A
So
maybe
the
most
efficient
way
would
be
to
just
start
at
the
beginning,
say
who
has
any
points
to
address,
raise
your
hand
and
then
we'll
get
through
all
of
those
and
then
and
then
you
can
go
over
the
changes
that
you
know
the
new
information
that
you
had
gathered
and
new
decisions
we
had
to
make.
Does
that
make
sense.
A
Three:
okay:
I
noticed
just
a
typo
on
page
three.
The
contract
will
provide
the
city
may
terminate.
I
would
assume
that
that
should
still
be
that
the
city
I
don't
know,
that's
just
probably
not
that
big
a
deal
yeah.
A
Okay,
when
will
we
be
able
to
review
that.
B
Probably
within
the
next
day
or
so
I'll
send
that
out
for
comment.
They
they're
his
his
the
city
attorney
the
assistant
city
attorney
that
I'm
working
with
wants
to
keep
it
fairly
vague,
though
in
terms
of
that,
it's
not
going
to
be
as
many
specifics
as
much
as
yes
for
cause,
but
it
would
be
basically
up
to
the
city
to
determine
what
that
is
so
he's
working
on
that
language.
D
Yes,
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
the
attorney
will
put
in
whatever
the
city
can
agree
to
be
the
terms.
It's
nothing
that
we
can
debate
among
ourselves
right,
it's
whatever
the
city
attorney
says,
and
so
I
I
wonder
if
we
really
need
to
review
it
after
the
city.
Is
the
attorney's
already
made
that
determination?
A
A
D
Yeah,
I
make
a
motion
that
we
don't
need
to
review
that
for
a
subsequent
meeting.
C
C
Of
course,
chair
green.
A
A
Continue
down
the
path
that
the
members
of
the
committee
who
want
to
rush
this
through
have
chosen?
Does
anyone
have
anything
before
page
13.
A
So
we've
as
part
of
our
discussion
around
the
the
tag
version
of
this
we've
said
that
the
tags
wouldn't
expire
and
that
they
would
not
be
particular
to
a
citizen
or
an
address.
I
think
that
needs
to
be
specified
so
that
someone
can
you
know
someone
who
likes
to
have
no
trees
and
no
lawn
and
no
anything
who
gets
these
tags
can
give
them
to
people
who
participate
in
the
canopy
and
the
green
space
of
our
city.
B
F
A
B
A
D
You
probably
have
a
setting
you
look
up
in
the
corners
of
this
application
and
see
if
there's
something
to
unclip
or
a
view
button,
because
I
think
if
you
do
click
on
like
a
certain
person
like
if
I
were
to
click
on
you
right
now,
it
just
shows
the
person
and
not
the
rest.
I
know
I've
been
I've
gotten
stuck
in
this
vortex
before
I'm
sure.
B
Yeah
so
the
text
that
was
already
in
there
said
these
items
would
be
placed
outside
of
the
container
and
collected
by
the
contractor,
and
then
I
said,
tags
may
be
used
by
any
household
I.e
by
another
household
and
are
not
unique
to
the
individual
property.
A
Okay,
and
since
I
I
since
we're
right
at
this
point,
you
know
everyone
anyway,
I'm
gonna
make
a
motion
I'll
try.
I
know
that
for
people
who
mow
their
own
lawns
and
deal
with
their
own
yard,
waste
10
tags
a
year
is
not
remotely
enough.
A
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
that
we
increase.
That
number
to
I
mean
I'm
still
not
a
fan
of
this
at
all.
You
know
lowering
the
service
to
this
and
taking
our
negotiation
capabilities
away,
because
you
know
nobody's
going
to
give
us
a
deal
on
unlimited
when
there's
another
option,
but
I
would
like
to
see
at
least
25
tags
rather
than
10..
So
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
that
we
at
least
bump
that
up
to
25
over
10.,
remember
hubka,.
D
D
D
D
C
I
just
had
a
quick
kind
of
inquiry
about
this
and
just
a
thought
of
how
we
could
potentially
put
some
wording
in
that
would
maybe
provide
some
kind
of
compromise.
Would
there
be
a
way
that
we
could,
in
the
rfp,
ask
the
haulers
to
give
us
an
estimate
of
what
it
would
be
if
we
did
10
tags
and
then
have
a
line?
If
for
an
estimate
of
what
the
cost
would
be
with
25
tags,
just
to
see
the
cost
since
we're
putting
it
out
there
anyway,
I
mean
from
a
negotiation.
A
We
can
do
whatever
we
want,
but
from
a
negotiation
standpoint
we've
already
given
up
on
this,
because
we're
not
making
the
base
service
require
what
the
current
standard
levels
of
service
are.
So
anything
we
do
to
give
more
options.
It's
just
going
to
cause
them
to
price
it
such
that
the
one
they
want
to
sell
is
the
one
that's
appealing.
So
if
we
add
another
option
on
25
versus
10
they're
just
going
to
weigh
the
the
10
heavier
to
in
making
that
the
best
deal,
but
we
can
do
it
if
you,
since
my
motion,
failed.
A
C
I
mean
I
don't
know,
I
guess
I
would
want
to
hear
from
maybe
member
hubcut
member
brinker
just
because
I
don't
actually
feel
that
passionate
about
this
issue.
Personally,
like
I
think,
10
tags
is
plenty,
and
I
you
know
I
I
just
am
trying
to
figure
out.
I
agree
that
every
household
has
unique
needs
and
that
so
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
if
we're
gonna
put
out
an
rfp
anyway.
A
C
I
also
want
to
remind
us
we
do
still
have
in
our
menu
of
options
the
unlimited,
so
we
will
at
least
get
pricing
for
the
10
bags,
as
well
as
the
unlimited
bags.
I
think,
for
grass
clippings
everyone
I
talk
to
in
the
interim
has
lawn
mowers
that
mulch
it
into
your
yard,
which
I
heard
as
people
said,
it's
better
for
your
yard
and
helps
prevent
the
the
weeds
and
dandelions.
C
E
A
E
Well,
I've
just
heard
the
last
few
minutes
and
I
agree
with
you,
chair,
green,
that
you
know
I
just
mowed
my
lawn
my
backyard
today
I
have
four
bags
so
where's
I
going
to
put
me
when
this
goes
on
with
10
or
20
bags.
I'm
sorry,
I
didn't
hear
your
emotion
chairman
greene.
I
mean
I
did
get
the
end
of
it,
but
I
would
have
seconded
it
that
I
couldn't
get
to
it.
E
A
Okay,
thank
you,
member
brown.
For
the
sake
of
the
situation,
I
remember
brown
showing
up
late
I'll,
pose
my
motion
again.
I
move
that
we
switch
the
limit
of
10
on
the
limited
version
to
25..
A
E
A
B
B
B
Yeah,
let
me
call
that
up
so
that
was,
I
updated
the
large
item
list
and
we
can
go
over
that
I'll.
Stop
sharing
the
document
and
share
the.
B
Correct
so
we're
I
and
just
clarify,
if
you
guys
didn't
hear
it
the
same
way,
but
that
I,
if
you
had
a
voucher
that
for
each
voucher,
it
would
be
valid
for
up
to
10
bags
of
trash
up
to
10
and
up
to
10
bags
of
or
bundles
of
yard
waste
and
up
to
three
of
the
line
items
listed
below
and
then
I
was
very
specific
about
on
each
of
those
line
items
so,
for
example,
the
first
one
it
says
sofa,
couch
or
loveseat
one,
and
then
I
also
added
includes
all
pieces
of
a
sectional
sofa.
B
A
C
A
A
Line
12
says,
and
so
I'm
looking
at
what
at
the
separate
version
of
this,
that
you
sent
me
as
an
excel
file
in
the
review
email,
is
that
different
than
what
has
ended
up
in
the
packet.
B
B
B
So
then
I
have
clarified
in
the
rfp
that
it
would
be-
or
it's
in
the
motion
I
should
say
so-
it's
three
or
ten
trash
bags
and
ten
big
bags
or
bundles
of
yard
waste
and
then
three
of
the
following
items.
A
B
C
A
B
This
this
is
the
attachment.
That's
part
of
the
that
was
part
of
the
agenda
and
that
was
sent
to
chair
green.
So,
but
what's
clarified
in
the
motion
that
was
made
at
the
last
meeting,
is
that
it's
the
first
two
lines,
basically,
which
is
the
10
trash
bags,
the
yard
waste
and
then
three
of
the
following
items.
A
A
B
Well,
I
thought
we
were
going
to
get
get
a
still
get
a
price
for
that.
B
C
C
A
A
A
A
Okay
on
39,
in
regard
to
the
customer
service,
it's
still
not
specifying
clearly
in
a
way
that
oh
remember
lab,
did
you
have
something.
C
Sorry,
just
director
d'andrea,
do
you
mind
sharing
the
rfp
documents
again?
Oh
yeah,
thanks.
A
Yeah,
so
I
was
asking
about
so
one
of
the
things
that
you
know
we
did
vote
on
was
to
ensure
that
citizens
are
able
to
submit
whatever
they
need
of
the
the
standard
list.
They
might
need
to
report
or
request,
etc,
without
having
to
wait
for
someone
to
answer
the
phone
or
someone
to
respond
to
a
chat
that
they
can
just
fill
it
out,
submit
it
and
then
it's
on
the
hauler
to
get
back
to
them,
and
I
don't
feel
like
that's
clear
enough
in
this.
Okay.
A
Requiring
all
of
these
things
almost
seems
overly
complicated
when
I
I,
I
know
that
a
lot
of
tech
companies,
you
know,
if
they're
going
to
call
something
besides
standard
email,
email
and-
and
I,
and
as
far
as
like
a
customer,
sending
an
email
for
request.
I
recognize
that's
a
difficult
thing.
Everybody
might
do
it
in
a
different
way
it
might.
They
might
not
include
the
appropriate
information
in
an
email
that
they
just
generate
without
a
template.
I
mean
as
much
as
I
like
that
as
a
user.
A
I
think
that
they're
gonna
resist
that
and
for
good
reason,
when
you're
dealing
with
a
ton
of
customer
input,
normal
emails
that
are
not
an
issue
that
are
not
initiated
by
the
company
can
be.
You
know
difficult
to
handle.
I'm
actually
looking
at
that
from
their
perspective
in
this
case,
and
that's
why
I
brought
up
the
the
web-based
form
initially
and
it
they
could
be
actually
requiring.
A
This
could
end
up
costing
us
more
to
require
that
they
have
to
do
all
of
these
things,
when
what
we
really
want
is
that
citizens
be
able
to
not
be
on
a
hold
and
not
not
be.
On
hold
for
a
phone
or
for
a
chat,
that's
the
goal
so
requiring
that
they
do
email
and
online
chat
and
web-based
form
and
phone.
A
D
Sorry,
I
agree
with
you,
so
I
had
it
with
me.
I
agree
with
you.
We
should
probably
simplify
this
to
just
be
get
back
to
us
within
a
reasonable
amount
of
time.
You
know
please
get
back
because
they're
not
going
to
stop
it.
24
7.
they're,
also
not
going
to
sometimes.
E
D
D
I
don't
think
any
call
center
doesn't
make
you,
you
know
press
buttons
and
wait.
Okay,
remember
this
was
voted
on.
D
D
D
A
Yeah,
the
point
is
that
citizens
should
not
have
to
wait
for
someone
to
respond
to
a
chat
or
to
a
phone
call
that
they'd
be
able
to
submit
a
request
and
that's
why
we
ended
up
with
email
and
web-based
form
so
that
they
can
hit,
submit
and
then
forget
about
it
until
the
hauler
gets
back
to
them.
And
we
already
have
it
specified
that
it's
on
the
it's
on
the
hauler
to
get
back
to
them
within
one
day.
D
The
the
only
problem
with
this
is
that
we're
telling
them
how
to
run
their
operation
and
not
really
just
asking
for
the
metrics
as
in
you,
must
get
back
to
the
customer
within
n
number
of
minutes
and
we're
telling
them
that
they
will
have,
like
you
said
all
this
technology
available
and
that
they
won't
nobody
has
to
wait
on
a
phone
call
or
whatever,
but
we're
really
telling
them
how
to
run
their
operations
in
this
matter.
Just
so,
you
know.
A
It
actually
makes
it
easier
on
the
hauler,
because
they
don't
have
to
have
a
person
come
on
and
deal
with
it
right.
Then
it
goes
into
a
queue
that
then
they
can
work
against
and
get,
and
they
have
to
just
manage
their
staff
to
be
able
to
process
their
cue
within
the
day
where
they
get
back
to
the
customer.
The
point
is
absolutely
very
simple.
The
way
it's
been
stated
from
the
beginning
has
been
more
simple
than
what
this
has
ended.
Up
with.
A
What
I'm
saying
is
that
every
what
has
been
voted
on
what
what
has
been
the
way
this
has
been
worded
from
the
beginning,
and
what
we've
all
agreed
to
is
that
citizens
have
the
option
to
submit
a
request
for
anything
that
they
might
need
to
submit
a
request
for
without
having
to
wait
if
they
want
to
make
a
phone
call
and
wait
for
someone
to
answer
fine.
They
can
do
that
if
they
want
to
use
online
chat
and
wait
for
someone
to
answer.
A
E
A
E
Thank
you
chairman.
I
thought
we
had
already
decided
on
all
this,
so
I
don't
know
why
we're
rehashing
this.
A
A
This
somewhat
ambiguously
covers
that,
because
it
says
a
web-based
form
for
submittal
of
issues,
and
what
I'm
saying
is
a
hauler
could
argue
that
an
online
chat
serves
the
purpose
of
a
web-based
form
and
when
a
citizen
fills
out
the
form
to
initiate
the
chat,
they
have
to
wait
for
someone
to
respond
and
that
an
email
could
they
could
interpret
that
as
the
same
thing.
And
that's
why
I
want
to
specify
what
we
all
agreed
to,
which
is
that
the
citizen
can
submit
a
request
without
having
to
wait.
A
D
Okay,
so
one
of
the
ways
that
we
measure
their
response
time
is
in
the
key
customer
metrics
that
we're
going
to
get
them
in
another
part
of
this
rfp.
That's
one
and
two
wait:
we're
arguing
the
idea
of
how
long
what
a
way
is
because
of
course,
there
is
a
time
to
from
when
you
press
send
on
your
email
versus
when
you
call
there
is
a
time
from
when
that
connects
and
someone
comes
on.
So
are
you
saying
that
there
absolutely
will
be
no
hold
time
and
all
emails
must
be
answered
within?
A
A
Hello
vice
chair,
borman,
has
joined,
I'm
not
sure
what
time
he
joined
vice
chair
borman,
to
bring
you
up
to
speed,
we've
been
moving
through
the
rfp
and
addressing
some
of
the
modifications
right
now
I
had
brought
up
that.
It's
not
clear
enough
in
page
39
that
the
goal
of
what
we
all
agreed
to
and
voted
for,
which
is
that
and
I'll
try
and
make
this
more
clear,
because
there's
some
confusion,
I'm
not
talking
about
the
wait
time
from
when
a
submission
by
a
citizen
is
made
to
when
the
hauler
gets
back
to
them.
A
What
what
I'm
talking
about
is
the
other
part
of
what
we
agreed
on,
which
is
that
a
citizen
have
the
option
to
not
have
to
wait
for
a
phone
call
to
be
answered
or
a
chat
to
be
connected
to
that
when
they
need
to
make
a
request,
they
can
just
submit
the
request
and
it
that
turned
into
email
and
web-based
form
web-based
form
would
be
fine.
Citizen
have
the
ability
to
go
fill
out
a
form
to
notify
about
a
missed
pickup
that
goes
into
the
hauler's
queue.
The
citizen
forgets
about
it.
A
D
D
D
We
trust
that
they
will
do
that
when
we
win
and
if
we
ever
get
this
thing
out
the
door
and
get
awarded
all
the
carriers
are
going
to
give
us
the
key
metrics
and
if
they
don't
abide
by
the
the
contract
of
like
you
know
how
a
specific
time
that
they
have
to
get
back
to
the
customer,
then
we
can,
you
know,
get
out
of
the
contract.
A
D
A
C
A
A
Okay,
but
it's
absolutely
possible
to
do
that,
and
and
by
not
specifying
the
key
point
of
what
we
voted
for
we're.
Leaving
that
open
to
ambiguity
and
all
we
have
to
do
is
say,
email
and
or
web-based
form,
submittal
of
issues
without
waiting
for
a
chat
response
or
phone
response
to
complete
the
submission
submission
without
waiting
for
a
representative.
A
Since
I
can't
see
your
screen
director
d'andrea,
I
don't
know
what
you've,
if
you've
done
anything
or
what
you
might.
A
I
mean
again
we're
making
it
more
complicated
and
more
expensive
than
it
needs
to
be
because
as
long
because,
if
we
just
make
it
to
where
households
have
the
option
to
submit
any
request
without
having
to
wait
for
a
phone
call
to
be
answered
or
a
chat
to
be
responded
to
yes
via
a
web
form
or
email,
it
doesn't
have
to
be
both.
So.
B
A
B
Here's
what
I
wrote
so
households
shall
be
able
to
submit
requests
at
any
time
without
waiting
for
a
chat
or
phone
response
to
complete
that
submission
without
waiting
for
a
response
from
a
hauler
representative.
I
guess
I
said
that
twice
so.
B
A
B
B
A
C
A
A
A
I
wondered
if
the
so
under
vehicle
reports,
any
instances
of
contact
with
overhead
cables
or
wires
upon
occurrence
of
any
of
these
instances.
The
contractor
will
be
required
to
contact
the
england
police
department
shouldn't
the
upon
occurrence,
apply
to
all
to
both
crashes,
traffic
violations,
or
at
least
vehicle
crashes,
not
just
overhead
cables
and
wires.
B
A
Violations
does
anyone
have
anything
up
to
page
47.
A
A
A
E
Yeah,
I
was
just
does
that
say:
150
dollars
per
penalty;
yes,
okay!
So
if
they
don't
just
say,
for
instance,
someone
does
not
receive
any
feedback
from
the
trash
company.
Let's
just
say
two
three
days:
they're
fined,
150
dollars.
A
F
E
D
D
A
A
A
All
right
does
anyone
else
have
any
other
things
to
go
over
on
rfp,
okay,
director
d'andrea.
Can
you
please
address
the
things
that
we
had
asked
you
to
get
more
info
for
us
on.
B
Yes,
so
the
I
think
one
of
the
items
we
had
talked
about
was.
B
The
option
for
either
you
know
having
the
contractor,
provide
the
billing
completely
or
within
using
the
city
facilities
and
just
looking
back
through
my
notes,
talking
with
our
utility
billing
manager.
You
know
there
is
definitely
a
cost
savings,
since
we're
already
issuing
those
bills
on
a
monthly
basis.
B
If
you're,
you
probably
all,
are
aware
that
we
recently
went
from
a
quarterly
bill
for
your
utilities
for
water
and
sewer
to
a
monthly
bill,
and
so
you
know
it
seems
like
it
would
be
a
fairly
simple
process
to
add
this
to
the
bills
and
based
on
you
know
that
they
provide
the
data
in
a
reasonable
format
that
fits
with
our
software,
but
that
we
wouldn't
incur
additional
costs
for
the
mailing
portion
of
it
or
the
stuffing
of
the
envelopes
all
that
stuff.
B
The
generation
of
the
paper
bill,
as
a
result
of
that,
so
I
think
that's
still.
The
recommendation
from
staff
would
be
is
to
make
the
payments
come
from
the
city
and
have
it
be
part
of
your
existing
or
current
utility
bill,
along
with
water,
sewer
and
storm
water.
A
B
A
C
B
If
you'd
like,
I
just
did
a
little
bit
more
detailed
breakdown,
let
me
make
this
just
a
little
bit
larger
here,
so
I
did
break
out
with
some
titles
here
like
what's
considered
the
base
service
versus
what
would
be
called
additional
service
as
requested
by
household.
So
something
like
that
might
be.
You
know
additional
residential.
So
if
you
wanted
a
second
container
that
would
be
under
this
section
and
then
optional
services,
which
is
what
we'll
select
from,
is
some
of
those
options.
B
So
I
broke
that
out
a
little
bit
in
both
the
pay
as
you
throw
in
the
uniform
container.
You
see.
I
still
have
the
five
seven
and
ten
year
in
there
and
then
I
did
break
out
each
of
the
facilities
for
both
garbage
and
recycling,
and
I
know
we
had
decided
not
to
do
that,
but
I
thought
it
was
would
be
helpful.
Just
in
case.
Let's
say,
for
some
reasons,
one
of
these
buildings
would
go
away.
You
know
there
is
a
potential
for
the
englewood
environmental
foundation
to
be
serviced
in
a
different
manner.
B
And
then
we
we
saw
the
large
item
list
and
just
a
couple
of
items
there.
So
I
try
to
make
this
clear
so
based
on
our
last
discussion,
so
a
dining
table
and
chairs
is
considered.
One
set
a
mattress
and
a
box
spring
is
one
set,
the
headboard,
the
footboard
and
the
side
rails.
All
together
are
one
set
specifying
a
diff.
I
was
looking
around
my
house,
I'm
like
what
other
pieces
of
furniture
are
there
that
are
typical,
so
a
dresser,
a
buffet.
We
have
all
kinds
of
different
names
for
these
things.
B
A
bookcase
television
stand
one
of
those
each
of
those
would
be
considered
some
of
these
items,
and
you
know
the
other
thing
is
too-
and
I
recall
this
from
previous
previous
places
where
I've
worked.
Is
the
hauler
is
going
to
work
with
you?
So
if
you've
got
something
unusual,
they're
gonna,
you
know
as
when
you
call
in
with
your
voucher,
they're
gonna,
say
yeah.
This
fits
in
that
category
or
this
counts
as
two.
B
Yeah,
so
this
that
was
a
version
I
was
working
on
up
here
in
this
section
where
it
says
up
to
three
of
the
line
items.
I
had
added
some
text,
but
that
is
not
the
version
that's
in
the
agenda,
so
I
will
send
that
out.
That
has
something
that's
clear
up
here
that
basically
it
includes
this
first,
the
first
two
lines.
Then
I
had
a
gap
and
then
I
said
three
of
the
lines
listed
below.
A
B
E
A
Well,
this
this
is
for
the
each
citizen
gets
two
large
item,
pickup
events
a
year
and
what
is
included
in
each
one
of
those
is
the
maximum
10
trash
bags,
maximum
10,
bundles
of
yard,
waste
plus
three
of
any
of
the
other
ones,
and
you
can
use
that
as
a
citizen.
Whenever
you
want
you
make,
you
submit
a
request
for
to
the
hauler
to
get
that
to
happen.
So
that
would
be
one
of
the
things
you
could
submit.
B
E
B
E
B
E
A
You're
thinking
there's
two
different
aspects
to
the
yard:
waste.
There's
the
right.
Now
we
have
the
optional
thing
they
can
give
us
pricing
for
one
is
up
to
unlimited
of
five
bags
and
bundles
every
week,
or
each
citizen
only
gets
10
tags
a
year.
That's
probably
what
you're
thinking
about
and
that's
what
you
and
I
tend
to
think
of
as
normal
standard
service
yard
waste.
This
is
separate
from
that.
E
E
I
guess
I'm
thinking
that
know
how
it's
going
to
be
clear
to
other
citizens,
that
it
says
each
note
more
than
four
feet
long
and
weighing
no
more
than
25
pounds
each.
If
we're
talk,
are
we
talking
about
picking
up
like
a
mattress.
A
It's
bags
that
could
contain
grass
clippings
if
you
chose
to
use
that
and
bundles
it's
basically
it's
what
you
and
I
think
of
as
yard
waste,
okay,
but
you,
but
it's
not
something
you
can
put
out
with
your
trash
this
this.
What
we're
talking
about
here
is
not
about
a
weekly
option.
This
is
about
a
twice
yearly
option
and
it's
a
larger
amount.
A
So
twice
a
year,
each
citizen
can,
if
they
want
use
this
large
item
event,
that
they
can
schedule
at
their
discretion
and
when
they
do
that
they
can
get
rid
of
up
to
10
bags
of
trash,
10,
bundles
of
branches
plus.
Three
of
these
other
things
it.
This
is
a
this
is
what
we've,
as
a
group,
put
into
the
base
service
under
the
title.
Large
item
pickup.
So
it's
it's
the
same
thing
as
you
can
get
rid
of
a
mattress.
E
A
No
problem,
please
continue
director
d'andrea.
B
Yeah,
I
believe,
that's
pretty
much
it
and
then
just
the
same
exact
list
was
listed
here,
but
then
again
so
they'd
list
a
price
for
a
trash
bag
or
a
couch.
B
If
you
didn't,
let's
say
you've
already
used
your
two
vouchers,
and
this
would
be
the
price
you
could
pay
for
an
additional
service
like
we
were
just
talking
about
on
your
bill.
In
case
you
had
one
of
those
additional
items.
You'd
know
what
the
price
was,
so
this
list
is
identical
to
the
previous
one.
It'd
just
be
that
this
would
be
in
addition
to
the
vouchers,
if
somebody
so
needed
that.
A
A
A
Each
citizen
has
the
option
twice
a
year
to
contact
the
hauler
and
say
I
want
to
utilize
one
of
my
large
item
pickups.
It
could
be
because
someone
left
the
mattress
in
your
portion
of
the
alley
and
you
want
to
get
rid
of
it
or
it
could
be
because
you
just
did
a
huge
amount
of
yard
work
and
you
want
to
get
rid
of
a
ton
of
branches
and
bags
of
of
leaves.
So
when
so,
you
have
two
of
those
come
with
the
base
price
and
the
trash
bags
and
yard
waste.
A
A
Large
item
pickup
item:
can
you
please
go
back
to
that
next
page
now,
director
d'andrea,
so
this
is
the
breakout
of
what
that
the
additional
would
cost
the
citizen,
and
what
I'm
saying
is
since
the
large
item
event,
the
two
that
you
have
is
about
10
trash
and
10
yard,
up
to
10
bag
and
10
yard
waste.
The
price
for
an
additional
should
be
based
on
that
same
metric,
not
singular.
E
A
If
they
go
beyond
that,
if
you've
already
used
your
two
and
now
you
need
to
schedule
a
third,
we
need
to
know
what
the
price
is
for
each
of
these
things,
and
my
motion
is
to
change
the
number
of
the
separate
pricing
for
yard
waste
and
bundles
to
match
what
the
other
events
that
are
included
are
of
10.
Instead
of
singular.
A
D
A
Thank
you
did
we
have
anything
else
on
this
director
d'andrea.
A
Oh,
is
he
back
in
attendees?
Yes,
we've.
A
C
A
B
We're
still
collecting
that
we
hope
to
have
that
out
to
the
committee
on
this
friday.
A
C
B
Did
we
did
attach
the
current
rate
list
for
other
communities
to
this
agenda,
so
we.
C
B
That
survey
or
that
information
for
other
communities.
C
B
So
I
think
I
had
shared
this
early
on
in
our
process
yeah.
I
thought
it
looked.
B
Information,
so
that
I
believe
I
had
done
it
back
in
2019,
so
deputy
director
lundqvist
took
this
on
to
update
this.
So
this
reflects
the
rates
for
basically
2021
for
a
variety
of
different
municipalities.
A
Loveland
with
the
did
you
happen
to
like
actually
communicate
with
any
of
the
representatives
from
cities
who
have
the
single
large
container,
and
just
wondering
did
you
ask
about
if
anyone
had
issues
with
you
know
what
we've
heard
that
you
know
some
elderly
or
disabled
people
might
have
trouble
with
the
large
bin
I
mean:
do
they
have
other
options
or
do
they
have?
How
do
they
deal
with
that.
F
I
spoke
to
the
city
of
arvada,
that's
I'm
currently
launching
their
program
and
they
were
going
through
the
process
where
you
could
pick
out
the
different
sizes
of
containers.
F
They
did
not
have
pushback
on
the
specific
size
of
the
containers
and
then
I
did
also
speak
with
the
city
of
lafayette
and
they
they
also
did
not
have
issues
with
the
containers,
and
I
spoke
with
a
person
with
north
glenn
and
they
also
did
not
have
issues
with
the
containers
and
I'm
trying
to
read
through
the
list
here
and
see
who
else
I
spoke
to
specifically
commerce
city
and
they
did
not
have
complaints
regarding
the
container
size
as
well.
A
F
Although
they
appear
the
same
so
I
I
was
surprised
by
that
too
95
versus
96
and
asked
the
question:
is
that
a
typo
on
their
website
and
they
told
me
no,
we
call
it
95
so
so
that
was
an
interesting
conversation
but
yeah.
I
did
not
hear
any
complaints
or
concerns
of
the
larger
containers.
Through
my
conversation
with
other
municipalities,
staff.
E
A
A
Okay,
remember
hubka.
D
Yeah
I'll
respond
to
that
just
keep
in
mind
that
one
of
our
biggest
cost
drivers
is
this
front
end
alley
situation,
the
island
ranch
doesn't
have
alleys
and
highland
ranch
is
well
laid
out
with
an
infrastructure
that
supports
a
trash.
C
I
was
just
curious
if
our
like
the
list
that
we
came
up
with
or
that
director
deandrea
created
with
the
large
item
pickup,
including
the
like
10
bags
of
trash
and
10
bags
of
yard
waste-
is
that
similar
to
what
some
of
these
other
communities
that
have
this
in
place?
I
just
looking
at
the
large
item.
Pickup
column,
it
seems
like
ours
is
much
more
liberal.
I'm
just
curious.
Do
you
know.
B
Yeah
so
again
I
had
used
lakewoods
as
a
basis
for
the
list.
I
think
the
idea
of
having-
and
you
can
you
just
as
you
say,
they're
so,
like
edgewater,
two
free
items
per
year.
Ours
is
quite
generous
so
having
the
bags
and
the
bundles
and
three
items
so
be
basically
six
items
per
year,
right,
plus
the
yard,
waste
and
the
trash.
If
you
had
it.
C
A
C
A
Yeah
it'll
be
interesting
to
see
what
it
what
it
comes
to
any
other
discussion
on
this.
A
B
No,
so
the
next
steps
would
be
is
we're
going
next
monday
evening,
at
a
study
session
to
present
the
items
that
the
committee
has
acted
on
and
the
changes
that
you're
recommending
to
city
council
so
we're
going
to
bring
those
before
city
council
in
a
very
detailed
manner
and
then
they're
going
to
actually
determine
whether
to
move
forward
with
the
rfp
or
not
most
likely
they
will.
A
Sure,
okay,
member
brinker.
C
Can
I
make
sure
that
I
understand
right
about
when
we
were
looking
at
the
column
for
large
item
pickup
and
looking
at
the
cost,
even
if
it
does
increase
our
per
household
monthly
cost?
That's
not
something
we'll
be
able
to
edit
out
once
we
do
get
the
bids
in
right,
because
that's
part
of
our
base
cost.
F
C
A
C
A
All
right,
so
will
you
be
sending
us
these
final
docs
you're
presenting
to
the
city
as
soon
as
you
have
them.
A
But
I
would
like
us
to
get
it
as
soon
as
it's
available,
please,
okay,
so
next
meeting
I
I
I
would
like
to
review
the
whole
thing
before
you
know.
I
don't
know
if
the
city
approves
it.
What's
the
timeline,
then
for
actually
putting
it
out.
B
So
it
probably
so,
if
we
meet
next
monday,
the
14th
it'll
probably
go
out
the
week
of
the
21st
of
june
and
then
I
believe
I've
got
about
a
60-day
window
in
there
for
responses,
so
we'd
get
those
back
sometime
in
mid-august.
A
B
B
The
evening
of
the
21st
is
a
pretty
significant
study
session
with
budget
items,
and
so
I
need
to
be
there
to
speak
to
that.
A
So
you're
left
to
your
plan
for
us,
then
what
would
you
suggest
we
wait
until
to
meet
and
because
it
doesn't
sound
like
there's
really
room
for
us
to
meet
to
do
another
review
before
you
post
it?
So
then
the
next
thing
for
us
would
be
to
review
responses
right
or
is
there
anything
else.
B
Yeah,
I
could
certainly
send
out
the
kind
of
final
draft.
If
you
had
any
small
wording
changes
we
could
make
those
before
it
was
issued,
and
maybe
that's
just
via
email
versus
an
in-person
meeting,
sure
and
then
probably
plan
to
meet
sometime
in
late
august.
Once
we
get
the
proposals
and
they're
sent
out.
C
C
C
E
Yeah
director
d'andrea
now,
when
you
present
this
have
have
we
even
decided
about
the
people
that
the
city
is
going
to
hire
because
you
know
there
there
was
conversation
about
two
full-time
and
one
part-time,
which
would
cost
the
city
a
lot
of
money.
I
mean.
Have
we
decided
on
that,
or
is
that
not
for
us
to
decide.
B
That
is
part
that
is
not
part
of
the
rfp.
That
is
part
of
the
overall
program.
So
this
first
step
that
the
council
is
making
a
decision
on.
I
did
include
that
language
or
you
know
the
the
background
of
how
we
got
to
that
dollar
amount
in
the
council
memo
just
as
background.
They
are
not
acting
on
that
though,
so
the
idea
would
be.
B
Is
we'd
move
forward,
we'd,
get
proposals
back
and
then,
let's
say
once
we
go
through
our
public
process
to
get
input
the
vote,
or
this
would
come
before
city
council
to
vote.
Probably
now
it's
looking
probably
january
or
february
timeline,
and
then
at
that
time
they
would
talk
about
all
the
aspects
of
the
program.
So
if
they
chose
to
move
forward
with
the
contract,
then
they
would
also
determine
what
is
the
staffing
levels?
What
is
the
administrative
fee?
All
of
those
other
elements
of
the
program
that
are
beyond
the
actual
hauler
proposals.
B
B
D
I
just
wanted
to
thank
director,
dr
andrea
and,
of
course,
janet
lundqvist
and
everybody
with
the
city
and
for
their
hard
work
on
this
and
you're
patient
with
us
and
tell
everybody
on
the
crew
too.
I
think
we
did
a
great
job.
I
know
you
all
care,
I
know
it
got
needed,
but
I
think
we
really
care
about
this,
and
I
think
this
is
something
we
can
be
very
proud
of.
Thank
you.
C
A
I
also
thank
everyone.
I
know
we've
had
some
contentious
times
and
I'm
certainly
part
of
that,
but
I
I
do
appreciate
working
with
you
all,
and
I
think
that
we've
I
mean.
Hopefully,
everyone
feels
like
we've
maintained,
civility
enough
to
move
through
all
of
these
disagreements
and
I
do
think
the
rfp
is
looking
pretty
good.
So
I
appreciate
everyone's
efforts.
B
Just
so
you
know
there
were
we
held
the
committee
held
18
meetings.
I
counted
them
all
up,
so
that's
a
significant
amount
of
time
committed
from
each
of
you,
and
I
appreciate
that
and
on
behalf
of
the
city
and
the
city
council,
I
want
to
say
thank
you
and
that
is
recognized
in
the
council
memo
next
week
too,
you
and
you
each
of
you
individually,
as
well
as
our
previous
members
and
the
time
commitment
that
has
been
made
to
this
effort.
B
A
A
A
Okay,
thank
you
all
right!
Well,
we
will
be
meeting
again
when
we
schedule
it
and
director
d'andrea
will
all
be
watching
for
the
final
updates
on
these
docs.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Everyone.