►
From YouTube: IURA Board Mtg.
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Just
a
quick
note,
I'm
going
to
step
back
for
about
15
minutes
at
8
55
just
for
a
few
way
to
call
across,
and
we
need
to
share
it
in
my
absence
and
we
will
still
have
Quorum.
So
we
can
kind
of
providers.
B
Any
other
changes
admissions
divisions.
The
agenda
Charles
is
doing
public
comments.
Today,
no
they'll
probably
come
okay,
so
we
have
meeting
ads
for
October
27th,
believe
it
or
not.
B
Is
there
a
motion
to
accept
those
minutes?
Thank
you,
Laura
a
second,
thank
you
Donna.
Any
other
comments,
changes
amendments.
You
know
all
those
in
favor
expecting
us
for
a
hero.
We
have
a
number
of
items
in
that
neighborhood
investment
committee,
so.
E
D
First
resolution
that
we're
going
to
review
is
on
page
29
of
our
agenda
Professor
revision.
We
build
coaching
standards,
our
home,
assisted
projects
at
Mrs,
revising
and
there's
a
Nissan.
This
is
a
revising.
A
resolution
was
passed
in
2006.,
so
as
an
entitlement
Community,
we
are
required
to
ensure
that
projects
that
receive
funding
from
home
funds,
for
rehabilitation
for
new
construction
and
also
this
includes
housing.
Choice
voucher
programs
such
as
those
that'll,
be
fun
with
Catholic
Charities,
for
example.
D
We
have
to
ensure
that,
as
the
standard
says,
that
the
units
that
have
been
built
or
rehabilitated
or
decent,
safe
and
sanitary,
so
we
have
to
have
some
some
method
to
determine
that
so
home
has
some
regulations,
and
you
will
notice,
prior
to
this
resolution
and
our
agenda
packet,
there's
an
inspection
checklist
and
that's
related
to
this.
This
resolution.
Now
the
expected
inspection
checklist
system
standards,
by
which
we
can
determine
that
the
units
are
decent
and
safe
and
sanitary
right.
D
Okay,
the
city
of
Ithaca
also
has
housing
standards
and,
in
fact,
that
the
city
standards
are
stricter
than
homes
standards.
Our
host
standards,
I,
should
say,
and
a
certificate
of
compliance
has
to
be
issued
prior
to
any
residents
moving
into
the
building
and
again
whether
that's
we
all
know
are
familiar
with
those.
D
So
what
this
resolution
is
saying
is
that
we
want
to
adopt
the
minimum
standard
test
required
by
cut.
We
could
also
use
the
certificate
of
compliance
issued
by
the
city
of
Ithaca,
because
that
has
higher
standards
than
HUD.
So
we
will
accept
that
also
related
to
this
issue
of
Rehabilitation
are
a
couple
of
other
things.
It
isn't
just
about
Rehabilitation
of
existing
housing,
stock
or
buildings.
It
also
covers
new
buildings,
so
any
project
that
receives
home
funds,
as
I
mentioned,
also
housing,
Choice
voucher
programs
which
are
funded
through
Home
Products.
D
So
this
we
are
asking
the
agency
to
adopt
this
resolution
that.
D
Hugs,
minimum
hugs
housing
Choice
program
voucher
using
that
checklist
as
the
rehabilitation
standard
for
home
assistant
projects
and
that,
because
the
city's
housing
code
exceeds
the
HUD
standards,
issues
of
issuance
of
a
city
compliance
certificate
of
compliance
office
of
alternative
means
to
to
verify
that
we're
complying
with
code.
D
D
This
is
it
calls
for
an
inspection
or
re-inspection.
Let's
say
every
three
years:
affordability
programs
on
these
projects
are
usually
five
to
twenty
years
and
our
staff,
in
this
case
Anissa
Charles,
used
to
do
it.
Her
niece
will
be
taking
over
starting
this
year.
Doing
the
inspections,
in
fact
we're
behind
on
inspections.
I
think
we
saw
that
in
the
paper
report
that,
because
of
the
pandemic,
but
I,
think
we
were
behind
prior
to
the
pandemic,
but
but
the
pandemic
did
delay.
D
The
agency
had
planned
staff
had
planned
to
start
the
inspections
again,
but
we're
delayed
because
of
the
pandemic.
So
the
goal
is
to
start
again,
I
think
this
month,
but
sometimes
soon
starting
those
inspections
and
that
put
inspection
checklist
will
be
used
by
staff
and
during
the
inspections,
and
you
don't
have
to
do
is
inspect
all
the
units.
So
you
can
imagine
that
the
Founder's
way,
for
example,
that
would
be
pretty
on
our
substant
Edge
inspect
all
units.
So
you
have
to
do.
Is
you
do
a
statistics
statistically
and
significant
sample.
F
D
No,
that
is
not
required
for
the
re-inspections,
so
the
certificate
Appliance
is
done
by
someone
from
the
building
department.
F
D
Has
the
expertise
the
staff
will
follow,
and-
and
it
is
this
talk
with
people
who
do
these
types
of
inspections?
So,
for
example,
agencies
that
provide
House
of
choice,
vouchers
do
inspections
and
if
they
don't
use
this
particular
checklist,
they
use
one.
That's
very
similar
I
think
if
I
remember
correctly,
it
needs
to
say
they
pretty
much
do
use
the
hook
and
checklist
staff
is
also
considering
working
with
some
of
those
agencies.
I
think
contractors
not
really
the
right
word,
but
because
they
do
inspections
for
their
clients.
D
F
A
Any
other
questions
just
in
terms
of
trying
to
clarify
it,
because
there
were
some
questions
back
and
forth
between
the
Nic
committee
and
Anissa
and
and
Carol,
and
they
raise
some
good
questions
because
we
kind
of
have.
We
think
our
initial
one
standard
would
meet
everything,
but
we're
finding
that
the
language
is
a
little
awkward
to
do
that.
A
No,
that's
not
true,
and
then
there's
kind
of
the
issue
when
they,
when
we're
going
to
undertake
a
rehabilitation
project
and
making
sure
that
that
Rehabilitation
includes
enough
investments
in
things
that
are
wearing
out.
So
the
furnace
says
two
years
left,
you
can't
do
a
rehab
and
leave
a
furnace.
You've
got
to
make
sure
you've
got
it
through
a
through
a
regulatory
period
that
it's
going
to
be
fine.
A
So
I
think
what
would
be
a
clear
clarification
here
would
be
to
look
at
that
first
resolve
and
make
just
a
few
different
terms,
so
that
it
is
clear
for
future
staff
and
future
members.
So
the
regional,
the
IRA
here,
adapts
right:
heads,
housing,
quality
standards
for
the
housing
Choice
voucher
program
as
the
rehabilitation
agenda
for
home
assistant
projects.
A
I
think
it
would
be
clearer
to
add
that
the
the
area
hereby
adopts
housing
quality
standards
and
then
add
the
words
and
inspection
protocol,
so
that
we're
clear
we're
using
that
checklist
for
the
housing
Choice
Voucher
Program,
as
and
rather
than
as
the
rehabilitation
standard,
is
the
housing
quality
standard
for
inspections
of
home
assisted
projects.
So
that
makes
it
very
clear
that
that's
this
is
what
this
these
standards
are
fours
when
we're
going
out
and
inspecting
whether
it's
a
rehab
project
that
we're
looking
at
or
an
ongoing
conditions
of
projects.
A
This
is
a
standard
to
use
and
I.
Think
that
would
just
you
know,
help
a
little
bit
clarify
I
wish
that
I
would
have
brought
those
things
forward
before
I
went
to
the
community,
but
I
think
it
was
a
really
good
discussion
to
Kennedy
and
I
brought
back
this
issue
that
we
kind
of
have
different
approaches,
and
one
standard
is
with
everything.
But
this
is
a
very
good
standard
for
anything
we
have
to
inspect,
because
that's
what
I
suggest.
E
A
F
B
E
E
No
there's
a
place
where
something
would
trigger
a
building
permit,
but
what
is
it
but
not
energy
code,
compliance
for
the
Indica
energy
coselling?
Yes,
so,
for
instance,
if
I'm
and
I'm
just
I'm
generalizing
better
for
building,
if
you're
going
to
do
a
substantial
renovation
of
a
building,
you
would
have
to
bring
it.
You
know
in
that
situation
you
mentioned.
The
heating
system
is
gonna
is
not
up
to
code.
Our
code
you'd
have
to
replace
it.
If
you
were
just
doing
a
small
Edition
or
something
which.
C
A
During
that
scenario,
so
I
think
we'd
have
to
balance
it
out,
but
I
think
that's
a
really
good
point,
but
just
focuses
on
one
is
an
inspection
standard
and
the
other
one
is
kind
of
a
you
know.
A
rehab
standard
and
I
think
this
is
really
intended
to
be
more
of
an
inspection
standard.
D
D
The
committee
discussed
this
this
contract
communication
at
our
November
meeting.
We
would
have
had
it
to
you
sooner,
particularly
because
some
of
the
dates
of
the
contract
is
over
as
of
1231,
but
it
did
need
to
come
to
the
agency.
D
So
there
was
we
had
funded
the
Ithaca
Farmers
Market
for
a
project
in
2019
as
part
of
the
CBG
coven
special
funding.
We
funded
a
project
for
the
farmers
market
to
enhance
their
online
Market,
particularly
with
the
focus
on
low-income
and
people
of
color
to
try
to
bring
those
folks
in
that
train
them
and
get
them
to
use
the
online
system
which
the
market
had
implemented
during
the
covet.
D
Unfortunately,
there
was
some
misunderstanding:
it
wasn't
miscommunication
so
much
but
misunderstanding
on
the
market
staff's
part
as
to
the
the
numbers
of
of
customers
that
they
were
to
to
bring
in
to
impact
under
this
project
now
I
understand
the
market
itself
had
set
these
standards
that
they
were
going
to
impact
450
households
in
the
city
of
Ithaca.
B
D
So
the
market
stat
told
us
that
really
they
were
thinking
450
transactions
in
that
households.
So
there
are
multiple
transactions
per
household,
so
450
households
was
a
pretty
big
measure
for
them
to
make
and
they
were
unable
to
do
so.
D
D
So
we
agree
the
committee
heard
from
this
Market
staff
and
agreed
that
we
would
change
the
metric
from
households
to
transactions.
D
D
But
we
thought
it
was
a
worthwhile
project.
We
thought
that
they
were
trying,
but
unfortunately,
and
that's
a
huge
gap.
You
know-
and
we
were
concerned
about
what
HUD
would
think
about
this,
but
the
committee
felt
that.
D
We
felt
that
we
should
at
least
allow
them
to
reduce
the
number
of
transactions
or
the
number
of
households,
change
that
to
transact
or
reduce
the
number
of
transactions,
rather
instead
of
households,
but
we
felt
that
some
disappointment
in
the
fact
that
they
had
not
made.
We
felt
a
more
robust
effort
to
reach
out
to
the
communities
of
color
here
here
in
the
city.
D
So
therefore
we
decided
not
to
extend
the
amount
of
time
for
them
to
fulfill
the
contract,
so
the
contract
is
modified,
resolved
that
we
approved
the
contract
modification
and
that
the
termination
date,
the
end
date
of
the
project
would
not
be
changed
from
December
31st
2022..
So
obviously
the
project
has
ended,
but
again
we
did
modified
or
agreed
to
modify
so
we're
bringing
this
to
the
agency
now
I'd
like
to
move
this
resolution,
I.
D
And
I'm
sorry
I
just
wanted
to
yeah.
There
may
be
a
a
few,
a
couple
hundred
dollars,
I
think
between
two
and
three
hundred
dollars
left
on
the
contract
that
can
then
be
switch
to
another
coveted
cdbg
CB
project.
C
Yeah,
thank
you,
and
this
is
somewhat
disappointing.
As
you
point
out,
Carl
there
have
been
changes
in
the
market.
Leadership
I,
think
they're
executive
director
changed
over
the
actual
numbers.
I
noted
are
from
November
12th.
Was
there
any
reported
additions
to
use
both
of
this
program,
especially
heading
into
holidays?
Did
those
numbers
did
the
transactions
increase
from
169
transactions?
Do
we.
A
B
G
Yes,
so
they
in
their
last
quarter,
they
reached
49
additional
households.
So
now
they
have
60
they.
They
ended
the
project
at
the
end
of
the
year
with
having
reached
62
households,
I
don't
have
the
number
of
transactions
that
they
created,
but
they
did
exceed
their
modified
50
households
by
12.,
so
they
they
actually
did
recruit
more
customers
more
beneficiaries
in
the
final
quarter
than
they
did
through
the
rest
of
the
project.
A
G
So,
and
just
for
one
other
clarification,
Laura
I,
don't
know
if
this
will
help
clarify,
but
when
we
speak
about
transactions,
I
think
the
market
staff
had
was
working.
As
Carl
pointed
out
like
trying
to
create
the
number
of
transactions
to
be
450
and
having
a
smaller
number
of
beneficiaries.
The
market
staff
expressed
that
with
a
smaller
number
of
beneficiaries,
then
each
beneficiary
household
have
the
potential
to
have
a
deeper
subsidy
than
if
they
had
done
450
beneficiaries.
G
I,
think
that
was
part
of
what
contributed
to
their
I.
Don't
want
to
say
how
the
method
that
they
had
in
recruiting
households
is
I
I
think
they
were
working
towards
giving
a
deep
subsidy
rather
than
if,
if
there
had
been
450
beneficiaries,
each
household
would
have
gotten
a
substantially
smaller
subsidy,
probably
a
total
of
forty
dollars,
or
something
like
that.
F
E
Thank
you.
That's
such
a
great
idea,
I
wonder
if,
in
between
November
and
December,
did
they
do
something
different
or
for
additional
people,
and
will
they
continue
to
do
that?
Just
for
our
information.
D
Well
to
the
second
part
of
the
question:
I
I
believe
that
they
are
committed
or
Express
their
commitment
to
trying
to
to
reach
out
more
for
low-income
people
and
folks
of
color,
which
makes
sense
you
know
they
want
to
expand
the
amount
of
business
that
their
farmers
are
doing
and
part
of
the
vendors
I
should
say,
are
doing
at
the
market
whether
they
did
something
different
in
that
last
month.
I'll
leave
that
to
what
you
said.
G
You
know
I,
don't
think
they
did.
I
think
that
one
of
the
Impressions
that
those
of
us
that
heard
about
this
project
in
the
application
Phase
had
is
that
they
were
going
to
really
substantially
partner
with
Community
groups
to
create
opportunities
for
people
through
those
groups,
served
to
learn
about
the
market
and
understand
how
to
more
easily
connect
with
the
market
via
their
online
system.
G
And
but
what
appears
to
have
happened
is
that
really,
they
kind
of
relied
on
doing
things
like
flyers
and
sort
of
broad
but
I
would
say
more
of
a
light
touch
Outreach.
G
They
did
find
that
the
when
they
were
trying
to
enroll
people
into
how
to
use
the
online
Market
that
it
required
a
lot
of
time
from
their
staff
person
to
work
through.
You
know
to
orient
people
to
the
electronic
system,
and
so
on
and
I
think
that
they
were
when
they
were
envisioning.
This
project
I,
don't
think
they.
It
seems
as
though
they
weren't
prepared
for
that
that
it
would
take
a
long
time
to
kind
of
sit
with
a
person
and
kind
of
get
them
up
to
speed
online.
G
So
I
think
that
that
was
one
lesson
that
they
learned
the
the
project
as
it
was
proposed,
I
think
for
Ithaca
Farmers
Market
was
trying
to
meet
various
goals.
One
was
to
assist
the
farmers
who
had
been
really
affected
by
the
drop
in
sales
because
of
the
pandemic,
which
the
project
did
end
up
doing,
but
the
farmers
were
not
counted
as
beneficiaries.
G
I
think
it
was
to
help
the
Farmers
Market
kind
of
increase
participation
in
their
online
system,
which
may
or
may
not
have
happened,
and
it
was
to
bring
new
folks
who
weren't
currently
using
the
market
and
maybe
were
underexposed
to
the
market
and
into
into
the
market,
and
that
was
really
the
the
one
that
you
know.
G
We
were
looking
at
as
far
as
like
trying
to
reach
people
who
were
loading
on
our
income,
who
would
not
normally
be
able
to
use
the
market
who
had
SNAP
benefits
that
could
be
used
in
the
market
and
so
on.
So
for
us
that
that
third
category
was
the
one
that
we
were
considering
as
beneficiaries.
I,
don't
think
that
I
mean.
D
G
I
think
in
retrospect
the
market
just
did
not
seem
prepared
to
be
able
to
do
the
level
of
Outreach
and
really
kind
of
very
closely
partner
with
the
community
groups
that
they
initially
named
to
make
that
happen.
I
think
it
was
more
of
a
you
know,
kind
of
marketing
approach
that
had
to
you
know
kind
of
sending
flyers
and
doing
some
orientation.
Yes,
but
it
didn't
seem
as
deep
as
what
I
it
seemed
like
the
market
was
aiming
to
do
when
they
first
crafted
the
application.
D
G
Yeah
I
did
I,
did
make
some
introductions
as
well
and
I,
don't
know
in
the
last
quarter
and
I
didn't
hear
from
any
of
the
groups
or
the
market
stats
themselves
about
further
steps
of
those
groups
together.
G
That
right,
no,
you
do
order
online,
it's
an
online
ordering
system
and
then
they
pack
up
the
the
goods
and
deliver
them
to
one
of
two
Central
sites
for
people
to
pick
up.
D
D
I
don't
know
if
we
have
to
officially
know
this,
but
chairman
crew
had
to
leave
for
a
few
minutes,
so
I
mean
Vice,
chair
Graham
is
stepping
in
to
run
the
meeting.
We
do
have
a
quorum.
So
let
me
continue
to
vote.
D
So
it
gives
them
an
advantage
for
applications
for
public
service
activities.
As
you
can
see,
there
are
certain
advantages
that
are
received.
They
can
carry
out
a
special,
what's
known
as
a
special
activity
by
a
community-based
development
organization.
So
it's
an
exemption
from
the
15
cap,
that's
otherwise
applicable
to
your
public
service
activities
that
are
seeking
funding
under
cdbg
funds.
D
There
are
tests
that
have
to
be
met
and
staff.
You
know
it
ensures
that
these
tests
are
met.
You
can
see
that
on
the
second,
where
I
think
it's
the
second
we're
at
the
third,
whereas
which
is
important,
whereas
list
those
tests.
D
The
agency
qualifies-
and
that
includes
51
of
the
board
members,
and
that
51
test
is
explained
a
little
bit
later,
that
they
will
undertake
an
eligible
project
that
they
were
carried
out,
carry
out
the
fund,
the
project
directly
or
the
another
partner.
That's
not
the
funding
agency,
in
this
case
the
area
rate
and
they
won't
Carry
On
Any
prohibited
activity.
D
While
we're
on
this
I
do
want
to
bring
up
something
that
won
the
board
or
one
of
the
committee
members
brought
up.
The
the
agency
will
undertake
an
eligible
project.
D
D
Otherwise,
for
example,
an
agency
May
seek
the
designation
and
then
which
might
Elevate
the
the
the
agency
in
the
eyes
of
other
funders
when
they
really
have
no
attention
or
are
not
qualified
to
run
an
eligible
project,
but
for
HUD
the
determination
is
quite
specific
and
it's
laid
out
here
in
the
next,
whereas
whether
the
agency
can
meet
you
know
the
test
for
the
termination
of
whether
they're
eligible
to
be
to
have
a
designation.
D
So
it
is
separate
now
if
they
do
come,
if
any
of
our
desert
agencies
designated
it
as
a
community-based
development
organizations
wish
to
run
a
project,
they
will
apply
for
it
and
then
we
get
to
evaluate
the
project.
D
But
it's
not
only.
The
designation
is
not
necessarily
linked
directly
to
a
project
that
they
may
run.
They
apply
for
the
designation
and
then
at
some
point
in
the
future.
They
apply
for
a
project
under
this
designation
and
then
we
determine
whether
they
can
do
the
project.
It
was
a
little
confusing
and
our
it
may
remember
that
voting
no
on
this
audience
resolution,
but
I
didn't
want
to
bring
that
because
it
makes
I
perfectly
understand.
This
is.
F
D
Makes
sense
the
board
membership
designation,
the
51
have
to
make
be
made
up
of
low
and
moderate
income
residents
of
the
area
of
operation,
the
area
that
the
agency
operates
in
owners
to
senior
offices
and
private
establishments
or
other
institutions,
so
financial
institution,
for
example,
or
another
not-for-profit
in
the
area
or
a
representative
low
and
moderate
income
neighborhood
organizations.
So
someone
in
the
South
Side
Community
Center
or
we
have
a
learning
web,
for
example,.
D
So
staff
bills
out
and
evaluates
the
application
and
that's
on
the
following:
Pages:
the
staffs
response
to
the
application,
starting
on
page
36
and
they
go
through
and
ensure
that
all
the
requirements
are
met.
The
board
members
self-certified
whether
they
meet
one
of
these
tests,
whether
they
are
low
income
or
representative
of
an
agency
that
serves
low-income
folks.
D
And
I
don't
believe
and
well.
Let
me
ask
the
question:
if
I
remember
correctly,
staff
was
not
to
verify
that
this
person
works
there
but
am
I.
Is
that
correct
the
Lisa
I'm?
Sorry
I?
Don't
quite
remember.
G
Self-Certification
are:
are
we
don't
investigate,
for
example,
what
their
incomes
are,
the
actual
incomes
we
whatever
they
certify
as
their
income?
As
what
is
certified
we
do
do
we
do
ensure
that
the
addresses
that
are
listed
as
their
home
addresses
exist
and
that
they're
within
you
know
if
they
need
to
be
within
the
city
of
Ithaca,
which
they
do.
If
they're
certifying
as
a
low
to
moderate
income
person
resident,
then
they
do
need
to
be
in
the
city
of
Ithaca.
G
G
So
we
do.
We
do
certify
certain
things
or
I'm.
Sorry,
we
do
verify
certain
things,
but
it
is
a
self-certification.
So
if
we
don't,
for
example,
investigate
how
many
members
are
in
their
households,
if
they've
said
that
there
are
two
members
in
their
household,
then
that's
how
many
members
are
in
their
household.
We
don't
do
more,
we
don't
require
pay
stubs
or
things
like
that.
So
there
we,
while
we
do
check
certain
things,
the
existence
of
the
address
to
make
sure
isn't
within
the
city
boundaries
things
like
that.
G
D
Right
so
Sam
determines
that
the
board
members
meet
the
qualifications,
the
purpose
of
the
organization
right
and
which
is
listed
here.
You
know
the
Improvement
of
the
physical,
economic
or
social
environment
of
the
area
of
operation,
which
in
this
case
in
the
city
of
Ithaca,
with
a
particular
emphasis
of
some
low
mod
income
persons
and
that
when
they
do
apply
for
projects
it
can
be
a
neighborhood
revitalization
under
Community,
Economic,
Development
energy
conservation
or
something
to
improve
the
lives
of
really
blowing
our
people.
D
It
cannot
be
just
job
training
it
has
to.
It
has
to
be
a
job
placement
component
involved
in
any
project.
So
a
good
example
is
GX
program
to
place
people
in
the
hospitality
industry.
It's
not
just
we'll
train
you,
but
we
will
be
the
active
assistance
in
finding
a
job
as
a
component,
so
it
was
determined
that
black
hands
Universal
does
meet
all
the
requirements
for
eligibility
as
a
community-based
development
organization
and
that
the
agency
designates
black
and
it's
Universal
as
such.
F
C
Another
question
as
much
as
just
pointing
out
something
that
is
included
in
the
materials
that
black
hands
chief
executive
officer
on
its
board
of
directors
is
not
a
standard
practice,
but
there's
nothing
illegal
or
inappropriate
about
it.
Yeah.
D
Thank
you
Laura
for
bringing
that
up.
That
was
something
else
that
Denise
had
to
do
some
research
in,
because
it
is
unusual,
but
it's
it's
not
legal,
not
against
HUD
regulations.
D
So
that
was
something
that
caught.
You
know
it's
called
staff's
eye,
but
is
not
an
issue
there
and
you
know
it
also
has
a
small
board
only.
D
F
Oh
sure,
okay,
so
I
think
I
understand
what
your
you
said.
There
was
somebody
on
your
committee
who
thought
that
there
should
be
a
proposal
for
a
project
in
order
to
certify
eligibility
for
this
designation.
I
think
I
understand
that,
but
then
any
future,
but
there
would
presumably
subsequent
projects
with
each
one
of
which
would
need
to
qualify
as
a
project
we're
talking
in
circles.
F
D
That's
if
I'm
understanding
correctly
any
projects
that
they
may
decide
to
apply
for
under
this
designation,
we
will
have
an
opportunity
to
evaluate,
but
the
designation
itself.
They
just
have
to
meet
certain
tests.
D
That
they
meet
those
tests
and
so
therefore
we're
recommending
that
they
be
given
the
designation.
They
may
come
forward
with
a
project
in
this
funding
round.
They
have
until
Tuesday
the
31st
to
get
a
project
dancing
we're
not
sure
if
they're
going
to
they
may
come
in
in
future
Project
funding
years.
But
at
that
time
we
will
note
that
they
have
the
designation
and
and
vote
on
the
project,
whether
to
fund
it
or
not.
The
designation
is
not
permanent.
D
It's
annual,
so
I
should
have
mentioned
that
also
so
they
will
come
before
us
and
within
the
next
I'm,
not
sure,
sometimes
the
next
few
months
or
whether
it's
sometime
this
year,
the
other
organizations
that
have
the
designation
will
become
will
be
submitting
for
re-application
or.
F
A
follow-up
question
so,
but
if
a
Criterion
of
Eligibility
is
to
undertake
an
eligible
project-
and
they
haven't
done
that,
then
they
don't
need
all
the
criteria
for
eligibility
right.
That's
and
that's
what
you
said:
you're
Committee,
Member
brought
up.
Is
that
right,
correct,
so
how
if
they
haven't
met
that
Criterion?
How
do
they?
How
are
they
eligible
for
this
designation.
A
A
So
it
really
that
test
is,
is
determined
at
the
time
that
we
have
a
full
proposal
for
use
of
cdvg
funds.
It's
worthwhile
for
many
reasons
to
explore
whether
you
see
video,
because
they
don't
want
to
put
forward
a
project,
that's
only
eligible
as
a
special
activity
by
a
CDO
if
they're
not
going
to
meet
the
cvdo
standards.
So
it
gives
them
some
guidance
about
whether
if
they
wanted
to
pursue
a
job,
training
and
placement
program
with
any
of
the
qualifications
to
do
not
have
to
hit
the.
B
B
F
A
Right,
yes,
I
just
wanted
to
like
help
a
little
bit
a
brief
discussion
of
these
acronyms
that
we
use
a
lot
the
cbdo,
but
what
we're
discussing
now
is
only
relevant
to
cdbg
funding.
So
it's
it's
a
cdbg
funding
special
category
of
eligible
uses.
We've
been
talking
about,
there's
no
requirements
or
expectations
that
we
had
analyzed
the
capacity
of
the
organization
carry
on
a
project
until
they
brought
forward
that
project,
whereas
the
community
housing
development
organization.
A
This
has
been
Shoto
as
we
call
it
is
more
only
for
home
and
multiple
projects
for
a
home
funding
and
that
one
does
have
a
criteria
for
analyzing
whether
they
have
capacity
to
professionally
administer
Housing
Programs.
So
there's
there's
a
distinction
between
those
two
and
then
even
one
step.
More
complicated,
a
choto
usually
qualifies
as
a
cbdo
automatically
100
billion
because
they
do
have
those
kind
of
boards
that
have
special
diversity,
as
well
as
expertise
in
Community
Development
activities
like
I.
G
And
if
I
could
just
add
in
something
quickly
as
well
during
my
time
here
at
the
agency,
this
is
when
I
first
got
here.
We
have
four
agencies
in
the
in
the
community
that
normally
annually
or
almost
annually
are
going
to
be
applying
to
undertake
a
project
that
requires
them
to
be
a
cbdo.
G
This
is
the
first
and
they
get
certified
as
a
cbdo.
This
is
the
first
time
since
I've
been
here
that
we've
had
a
new
organization
attempting
to
certify
as
a
cbdo
so
and
those
of
you
who
might
have
might
be
on
or
might
have
been
on
organizational
boards
that
are
trying
to
qualify
as
a
cbdo
know
that
you
know
it's
a
pro
it's
an
undertaking,
that's
not
small
for
the
organization
they
have
to
fill
out.
You
know
a
lot
of
paperwork.
They
have
to
get
all
their
board
members
organized
to
self-certify.
G
They
have
to
make
sure
that
they're
bored
I
mean
because
often
there's
changes
on
board
composition
throughout
the
year.
A
board
member
may
change
to
a
new
job.
The
new
job
may
not
qualify
them
to
be
able
to
self-certify.
They
may
move
to
a
new
neighborhood
that
could
affect
their
self-certification.
Their
income
could
change
their.
You
know
the
number
of
people
in
their
household
could
change,
and
if
their
income
doesn't
maybe
they're
now
over
income,
so
maintaining
the
status
is
something
that
is
not
as
easy.
G
That's
coordinating
the
board
members,
it
usually
does
take
several
months,
and
so
this
was
part
of
the
reason
that
staff
recommend
it
to
bhu
when
they
noted
that
you
know
they
have
a
bigger
vision
for
projects
that
they
want
to
pursue
in
the
future
that
it
would
be
better
to
try
to
attain
their
certification
sooner
rather
than
later,
so
that
they
could
understand
whether
or
not
as
Nell
said
that
they
could.
You
know
whether
or
not
they
can
apply
to
do
certain
types
of
projects.
G
So
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
this
is
a
little
different
than
the
certifications
or
redesignations
that
you're
going
to
see
come
forward
in
future
months,
because
this
is
the
first
time
this
organization
has
attempted
to
certify,
whereas
our
other
organizations
have
certified
in
the
past
and
we're
moderately
confident
that
they'll
be
able
to
certify
again
because
they
they
understand
the
process
and
they
know
what
they
need
to
be
looking
for.
So
that's
a
little
bit
different
about
this
certification
as
well
and
why
it's
coming
through
before
their
application
comes
through.
B
G
One
last
thing
too:
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
as
a
another
level
of
turdness,
I
guess
is
when
and
cbdo
is
certified
and
if
they
get
an
project
that
is
allocated
funding
if,
if
their
project
is
approved
for
funding,
then
before
they
implement
the
project
when
they,
when
the
contract
is
executed,
staff
also
does
another
snapshot.
Look
to
make
sure
that
their
board
composition
is
still
compliant.
G
So,
there's
a
number
of
steps
to
this
and
a
number
of
ways
that
we,
you
know,
ensure
that
they're
they're
still
meeting
the
standards
that
are
required.
B
And
that
worked
to
the
point
where
yeah
program
and
our
Action
Packers.
D
Entitlement
program:
this
is
a
2023
annual
action
plan.
If
this
is
your
organizational
meeting,
so
you
know
the
purpose
of
the
2023
plan
the
years
the
planning
years
are
to
advance.
You
know
Hud's
objectives
with
the
funding
from
the
home
and
cdbg
funding,
but
also
to
to
meet
the
goals
that
have
been
identified
in
the
city's
Consolidated
plan,
which
you'll
note
this
was
last
year,
and
so
that's
another
job
that'll
be
coming
up
here,
the
next
five
years
Consolidated
plan
and
then
the
objectives
of
the
Consolidated
plan
are
listed
here.
D
So
I
won't
no
need
to
read
those
normally.
We
would
have
held
this
this
at
our
December
meeting
at
the
latest
definitely
want
to
have
it
before
we
entered
into
the
new
year.
But
of
course
we
had
a
couple
of
meetings
canceled,
so
we
weren't
able
to
hold
a
meeting.
D
I'm
not
sure
how
much
in
detail
we
need
to
go
into
there's
a
lot
of
good
information
here
in
the
following:
Pages
funding
levels:
historic
funding
levels,
staff
has
a
formula
for
determining
or
guesstimating
how
much
funds
will
receive
from
HUD.
It's
always
kind
of
Hit
or
Miss.
We've
seen
some
as
you
can
see
from
here
some
vast
ups
and
downs.
D
Fortunately,
there
seems
to
be
General
like
partisan
agreement
at
the
federal
level,
and
so
when
presidents
have
said
you
know
we
want,
they
want
drastic
cuts
and
Congress
is
generally
put
more
funds
back,
but
the
overall
trend
has
been
lower
and
lower
funding.
Year
after
year,
though,
there
was
quite
influx
because
of
covet
of
separate
funds.
D
So
at
the
bottom
of
page
50,
you
would
see
the
the
formula
that's
used
to
estimate
how
much
funding
we
may
get.
So
I
was
predicted
that
there
will
be
a
slight
decrease
in
funding.
A
A
You
know
incorporating
includes
population
and
age
of
Coast
levels,
and
so
it's
not
agent.
What's
the
age
of
housing,
I'm,
sorry
in
their
formulas,
so
they're
always
adjusting
the
you
know
the
formula,
but
we
think
it's
going
to
be
about
920
000
available
for
investments
in
community
rights.
A
We
were
level
the
program
cdg's
level
funded
by
the
in
the
budget,
and
the
home
program
was
a
very
modest
increase
at
the
national
level.
D
So
yeah
I
was
just
going
to
say
I'm
starting
on
page
51
is
the
schedule
of
meetings,
and
that
could
that's
pretty
important
to
us,
because
there
will
be
more
and
longer
meetings
as
we
review
applications.
So
it's
important
to
check
your
calendars
to
make
sure
that
we're
going
to
leave
these
things
funding
purposes
in
the
community
from
Community
organizations
are
due
next
Tuesday
the
31st,
and
it
was
a
hard
deadline
on
that
which
had
to
be
implemented
for
the
sanity
of
our
staff.
D
Here
there
are
people
just
kind
of
rolling
in
and
calling
and
wanting
extensions,
and
so
a
hard
deadline
was
said.
I
know
now
who
will
apply?
Seth
has
some
idea
from
conversations
you
can
see
that
there
are
public
information
sessions,
so
at
least
it
gets
an
idea,
I'm
sure
it's
not
just
an
Issa,
but
Seth
has
an
idea
of
who's
coming.
What
projects
may
be
coming
true
in
some
applications,
hopefully
already
in
but
we'll
know
by
the
end
of
day
Tuesday
how
many
applications
we
can.
G
Of
course,
we
never
locked
anybody
into
just
because
I've
consulted
with
us
does
not
mean
they're
required
to
apply
or
anything
like
that,
as
Carla
said
really
made
a
point
this
year
to
just
like
recommend
to
people
like.
Why
didn't
you
even
get
your
application
in
one
day
in
advance?
So
then
you
don't
need
to
worry
that
your
PDF
maker
is
not
working
at
the
last
minute
and
giant
snap
Blues,
which
do
always
occur.
You
know
to
create
a
lot
of
stress,
don't
happen.
G
So,
yes,
I
think
that
in
the
year
ahead,
we
it's
been
really
hard
to
anticipate
I've
I
thought
we
were
going
to
see
a
few
new
projects
come
forward.
We
may
one
thing:
I'll
say,
is
that
you
know
Ithaca
I
think
has
a
reputation
for
really.
You
know
the
IRA
board
really
and
committees
really
look
very
carefully
at
the
applications
that
we
receive
really
try
to
distribute
the
funds
in
a
way
that
are
both
efficient
and
Equitable
and
you
know,
are
doing
the
utmost
to
leverage
other
dollars
in
the
community.
G
Other
organ
other
communities
of
our
size
when
I've
looked
out
into
the
world
of
entitlement
communities,
I've
noticed
that
you
know,
without
doing
like
a
full
survey
of
all
that's
out.
There
is
that
a
lot
of
communities
are
size
fund.
Many
fewer
projects
than
Ithaca
does
so
I've
looked
at
communities
that
really
fund
three
types
of
projects
year
over
year
and
that's
what
they
do
with
their.
G
You
know,
with
a
similar
sized
block,
grant
or
home
home
fund
funding
stream
that
we
have
I
think
there
are
reasons
that
those
communities
do
that
one
is
is
there's
a
high
level
of
complexity
of
administering
this
many
projects,
and
fortunately
we
have
Charles
who's,
a
wonder
and
a
dream.
Charles.
Thank
you
for
all
the
the
work
that
you
do
to
like.
Get
all
the
contracts
ready.
G
There's
you
know,
we
fund
a
lot
of
projects
and
I
just
want
to
note
that
in
in
the
recent
years,
with
our
cdbg
funding
with
the
upcoming
home
ARP
funding,
we're
really
funding
more
projects
in
this
community
than
we
really
ever
have
we're
currently
monitoring
about
50
projects,
and
that's
a
lot
so
I'm
just
putting
it
out
there
that
we,
we
really
receive
a
lot
of
application
for
very
worthy
projects
and
I.
Think
the
the
board
and
committees
have
really
done
the
best
they
can
to
provide
funding
to
as
many
projects
as
possible.
G
There's
another
method
that
could
be
taken,
which
is
giving
deeper
funding
to
fewer
projects
I'm,
not
necessarily
recommending
that
I'm
just
reminding
folks
that
that
is
also
an
option
when
you're
looking
at
the
applications
that
come
forward.
G
I
will
also
say
that,
just
as
a
side
note,
I
participate
in
a
funders
network
in
the
the
community
of
you
know,
mostly
philanthropy
in
the
in
the
group
came
together
to
really
be
able
to
coordinate
efforts
during
the
pandemic,
and
it's
been
a
very
good
way
for
the
funding
Community
to
understand
what
needs
are
and
then
for
different
funders
who
are
able
not
necessarily
us
but
other
funders
in
the
community,
to
kind
of
partner
to
make
an
application.
G
You
know
a
reality
or
something
like
that,
but
we
have
in
across
the
funding.
Community
they've
just
pointed
out
that
they're
they're
organizations
are
receiving
applications
that
maybe
seem
less
complete
than
they
might
have
in
the
past.
G
Perhaps
because
we've
had
new
organizations
rising
up
to
meet
new
needs,
and
there
is
some
discussion
within
that
or
the
funders
network
to
try
to
provide
more
opportunities,
maybe
not
necessarily
technical
assistance
like
what
we
do,
but
training
sessions
for
applicants
to
understand
kind
of
more
about
providing
the
kinds
of
information
that
funders
are
looking
for.
Another
reason
is
that
a
lot
of
organizations
have
experienced
a
high
amount
of
staff
turnover.
G
So
it's
new
staff
they're
trying
to
put
together
applications
so
I
just
point
this
out,
because
we
also
have
noticed
in
applications
that
we
received
in
recent
years
that
sometimes
they
aren't
as
complete
as
what
might
have
what
committee
and
board
members
might
like
to
see
and
what
they
might
have
seen
in
the
past.
G
So
just
acknowledging
that
the
funding
Community
is
also
seeing
that
and
working
on
ways
to
address
that
as
I
thought
that
I'll
just
say,
I
was
just
reflecting,
as
we
you
know,
did
our
organizational
meeting
that
the
action
plan
process
really
does
take
most
of
the
year.
G
So
so
we
will
be
following
through
on
this
through
June
and
then
in
June
is
when
I
create
all
the
back
end
information
that
HUD
needs
and
submit
it
to
HUD,
and
then
HUD
has
its
amount
of
time
45
days,
I
think
to
ensure
that
the
plan
that
we've
developed
is
compliant
and
then
in
August.
We
will
kick
off
this
program
year.
D
I
understand
that
in
the
Committees
will
begin
reviewing
applications
in
our
early
mid
February
meetings
in
general,
neighborhood
investment
committee
reviews,
the
public
service
applications
and
economic
development
committee
and
reduce
the
economic
development
applications.
D
But
we
do
look
at
all
issue.
Videos
of
well
I'll
speak
for
an
eye
right
that
looks
at
all
the
applications
and
makes
recommendations,
and
then
we
will
generally
we're
able
to
get
through
the
applications
and
I
am
Lisa
in
our
two
February
meetings
and
then
bring
them
to
the
board
and
see
for
the
public
hearings
over
here
directly
from
the
applicants
themselves
and
they're
able
to
ask
questions.
D
G
D
Big
process
and,
if
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
the
biggest
part
of
our
our
job
across
the
most
important
part
of
our
job,
ensuring
that
these
funds
get
out
of
the
community.
The
insights
requirements
and
the
city's
Consolidated
plan.
B
I'll
just
add
a
couple
more
times
again.
Thank
you
to
the
staff.
I
know
this
is
a
huge
undertaking
at
every
stage.
So
thank
you
and
thank
you
for
your
conscience
as
well
and
Carl
and
justified
by
Ed
committee,
all
known
as
an
ed
applications
and
typically
feed
that
feedback
to
the
ni
committee
said.
You
haven't
seen
everything
and
strategy
that
usually
resolvement
at
a
board
level.
B
Unless,
if
we
had
different
recommendations,
so
that's
one
and
then
the
second
to
what
Anita
was
saying
is
you
know,
I
think
we
struggled
I
think
we
have
had
some
conversations
about
as
funding
as
the
value
of
this
funding
stays
the
thing,
but
the
buying
power
decreases.
Should
we
be
decreasing.
You
know
in
funding
fewer
things
which
would
also
simplify
the
staff
burden
as
well
as
providing
jobs.
You
know
an
organization
with
deeper
funding
allows
them
to
have
a
deeper
impact,
but
I
think
that's
always
been
kind
of
balance
with.
B
We
want
to
see
you
again,
so
you
want
to
diversify
the
applicants
and
I
think
we
have
never
really
been
able
to
send
a
clear
message
and
support
if
we
want
and
I
think.
As
a
result,
you
know
we
end
up
with
you
know.
Let's
say
here
and
I
went
back
on
things.
What
it
looks
like
somewhere
around
yeah
the
last
few
years.
We've
actually
had
21
organizations,
you
know
funded,
it
was
six
million
for
a
while.
B
So
you
know
I'm
sure,
we'll
end
up
in
a
similar
number
this
year,
but
I
just
do
want
to
reflect
on
I.
Think
the
tensions
between
looking
at
some
new
programs
trying
to
diversify,
trying
to
meet
some
different
needs
in
the
community
with
different
partners,
while
at
the
same
time,
I'm
trying
to
simplify
the
administration
of
the
program
and
making
sure
the
organizations
that
we
are
funding
are
receiving
the
funding.
They
need
to
do
the
work
that
they
are
entitled
and
not
entitled
against
anything
to
do
so
people
so
data.
B
This
would
be
your
first
goal
at
this
correct,
because
this
is
the
first
time
you
mentioned
this
process
so
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
anybody
at
any
point
in
you
know
any
questions,
because
Carl
said
it's
very
good,
so
there
was
time
to
anything.
I
think
he's
meant
I
wanted
and
probably
the
most
important
anything
else
in
terms
of
the
review.
D
Sure
the
only
thing
I'll
mention
is
that,
with
the
resignation
of
Tracy
Carroll
from
the
agency
we're
still
down
a
Committee
Member,
we
currently
have
four
members.
B
Great
that's
great
Segway
and
see
the
next
item
in
the
agenda.
We
have
a
resolution
too
I
appreciate
Tracy's
service
to
the
IRA,
and
the
committee
didn't
have
a
December
meeting.
Well,
thank
you.
November.
B
Appropriately
sent
Tracy
off
but
I
think
just
for
the
record.
Obviously
yeah,
because
Tracy's
contributions
to
the
this
organization
into
the
city
are
and
really
significant.
G
B
Whereas
Tracy
Powell
resigned
for
that
in
the
urban
Manila
agency,
Ira
effective,
December,
31st
2020
to
under
22
years
of
Public
Service
as
an
IRA
board
membership
doesn't
count
as
good
as
a
common
Council
minority
for
that,
whereas
since
February
is
stuck
in
2016
neighborhood
and
having
Community,
which
is
available,
whereas
as
I
am
a
court
member
serve
the
pleasure
of
the
mayor,
Tracy
has
maintained
a
continued
conference
and
there's
Cohen
Peterson
Lewis
as
an
IRA
board
member
and
whereas
Tracy
share
her
knowledge
of
affordable
housing.
B
Neighborhoods
include
government
Health
crop
over
25
entitlement
action
plans
are
investing
in
CBB
team
and
home
funds
and
community-based
projects,
and
whereas
the
IRAs
adopted
mission
statement
to
improve
the
social,
physical
and
economic
characteristics
by
expanding
access
to
quality,
affordable
housing
spending
me
with
animal
world
Harmony
and
whereas,
during
the
return
on
Ira
JC
paralyze,
take
fastly
worked
to
implement
the
library.
Mission
include
the
construction
of
the
1200
equality,
affordable
housing
units
in
the
city
and
now,
therefore
fear
dissolved.
B
All
right,
yeah
I've,
learned
a
lot
which
I
see
is
in
terms
of
my
getting
on
the
board
and
and
I'm
talking
to
tracing
and
listening
to
situations
and
the
issues
of
tracing
Grace.
It's
just
a
tremendous
amount
of
activities
as
she
rolls
off
this
board
and
I
mean
I.
Just
think
of
all
the
things
that
she's
advocated
for
at
different
meetings
is
almost
analysts
so
because
yeah.
D
D
B
B
We
have
a
number
of
other
items
under
all:
the
summaries
are
reviews
and
not
when
I
talk
about.
Some
of
these
reviews
can
also
occur
at
the
government's
meeting,
but
let's
just
kind
of
go
through
each
of
these
kind
of
high
level
anyway,
so
we
have
the
home
ARP
Award.
G
Okay,
so,
oh
my
heartbeat,
this
is
a
special
one-time
funding
stream,
the
entitlement
communities
are
eligible
or
the
yes
are
eligible
for
we
are,
if
they
tell
my
community,
receives
home
funding.
G
This
is
kind
of
a
mashup
of
Home
funds
and
another
funding
stream
that
the
regulations
are
between
home
funds
and
another
funding
stream
that
that
Ithaca
doesn't
get
and
then
there's
some
new
ones
thrown
in
too
so
every
entitlement
community
that
is
receiving
those
funds
you
know,
has
this
learning
curve
that
we're
going
through
to
understand
the
particular
requirements
of
this
program,
which
are
different
than
home
home
funds
in
the
past
have
not
supported
projects
that
you
know.
G
Some
of
the
projects
that
you
see
here
bulletin
on
funds
traditionally
do
not
fund
Supportive
Services,
nor
do
they
normally
fund
shelter
type
activities,
because
it's
focused
on
the
establishment,
more
of
affordable
housing,
home
funds.
Do
traditional
home
funds,
do
fund
tenant-based
rental
assistance,
as
they
do
here,
and
creation
of
rental
housing,
whether
that's
new
construction
or
rehab,
a
webinar
that
I
went
to
that
had
sponsored
I
found
very
validating.
G
One
of
the
facilitators
said
that,
yes,
we've
heard
from
communities
that
you
know
learning
about
this,
you
know
having
these
funds
is
kind
of
like
having
a
really
great
gift,
wrapped
in
a
Rubik's
Cube,
because
the
rules
are
pretty
complicated
so
but
we're
we're
learning
and
we're
getting
up
to
speed.
So
originally
I
went
home
or
I'm
sorry
when
a
HUD
rolled
out
these
funds
that,
because
they
are,
they
can
be
used
up
until
March
of
2030.
They
were
accepting
the
framework
plans
that
are
required
by
communities
on
a
rolling
basis.
G
However,
it
seems
I,
don't
know
if
I
should
speculate,
but
what
I
noticed
was
that
communities
like
us
were
learning
and
kind
of
getting
up
to
speed.
And
you
know
not.
A
lot
of
communities
had
submitted
those
framework
plans
to
to
HUD,
especially
in
New
York
state.
We
weren't
seeing
any
examples
that
we
could
refer
to
and
then
in
this
or
I'm.
Sorry
in
October,
on
October
35th,
first
had
issued
a
I,
don't
know
what
we
call
it:
a
declaration,
a
memo
requiring
the
communities
submit
their
framework
plan
by
March
31st.
G
So
that's
exciting.
We're
going
to
be
doing
this
concurrently
with
our
action
plan,
but
to
our
advantage.
We,
the
foresight
of
Mills
and
HSC
working
together,
had
commissioned
Lisa
horns
needs
and
gaps
report
last
year,
so
we
already
have
a
major
portion
of
our
study
that
we
need
to
show
to
HUD
or
needs
assessment
done
I.
Also,
just
so
you'll
see
on
the
the
schedule
that
follows
us.
G
I
had
posted
a
supplemental
survey,
mostly
for
service
providers
to
fill
out,
but
we
encourage
them
to
you
know
just
read
it
within
their
networks,
any
Community
member
could
fill
it
out
to
kind
of
augment
our
knowledge
of
what
our
local
conditions
are.
Currently
what
service
providers
are
seeing
as
needs
where
they
would
like
to
see
perhaps
kind
of
funds
go
and
I
will
tell
you
a
little
bit
more
about
that
supplemental
survey
in
a
moment.
G
The
purpose
of
this
funding
which
for
us
totals
about,
will
have
about
a
million
dollars
to
spend
on
projects,
and
it
does
give
us
administrative
funds
as
well
to
to
administer
these
these
projects
and
monitor
them
for
the
entirety
of
the
10
years
that
we
have.
This
funding
is
to
reduce
homelessness
and
increase
housing
stability
and
there's
a
number
of
different
ways
that
communities
can
go
about
that
the
eligible
activities
are
there
bulleted
as
you
as
you'll
see
so
communities
could
undertake
something
like
tenant
base
rental
assistance.
G
We
already
do
things
like
that
in
our
community
or
you
know,
create
you
know,
a
plan
that
includes
more
than
one
of
these
activities.
Obviously,
at
the
same
time,
what's
a
little
different
about
this
funding
stream
is
how
the
intended
beneficiary
is
kind
of
are
categorized
and
who
you
know
what
kinds
of
projects
are
eligible
based
on
who
they'll
serve.
So
it's
a
pretty
broad
group
of
potential
beneficiaries,
everything
from
people
who
are
currently
experiencing
homelessness.
What
HUD
considers
the
literally
homeless
number
one
people
who
are
at
risk
of
homelessness?
G
These
are
people
who
I
would
say
in
in
a
lot
of
Hud
programs
aren't
considered
homeless
yet
but
they're,
for
all
intents
and
purposes,
on
the
very
precipice
of
being
homeless,
because
either
they
have
an
eviction
notice.
Perhaps
they
have
a
not
an
eviction
notice
necessarily,
but
they
have
a
subsidy
that
is
ending
and
they
don't
know
where
they
will
be
next.
G
Things
like
that
people
who
are
looking
at
a
situation
where
they
don't
have
a
stable
home
identified
for
them
within
the
next
30
days,
there's
also
a
qualifying
population
or
people
who
are
fleeing
domestic
violence,
sexual
assault,
Dating,
Violence,
stalking
or
human
trafficking,
sexual
trafficking
or
labor
trafficking.
G
And
so
these
are
folks
who
you
know
maybe
may
have
housing
right
now.
But
if
they
leave
their
situation,
which
is
one
of
abuse,
then
they
are
in
danger
of
not
having
a
home.
So
they
can
be
assisted
by
this
funding.
And
finally-
and
this
is
really
the
biggest
category
out
there
and
the
newest
kind
of
that-
we're
used
to
dealing
with
with
home
funds,
so
I
think
our
cdbg
funds
often
try
to
assist
people
in
this
situation,
but
people
who
are
very
low
income
and
have
one
or
more
risk
factors
for
becoming
homeless.
G
So
there's
quite
an
extensive
list
in
the
HUD
regs
that
we
didn't
put
here.
But
these
are
folks
who
actually
do
possibly
have
a
roof
over
their
head
right
now,
but
you
are
in
a
situation
of
precarity
that
possibly
they're,
not
you
know,
facing
imminent
homelessness,
like
the
group
at
number.
Two
are
but
they're.
Definitely
a
group
of
people
who
are
vulnerable,
whose
members
are
very
very
frequently
do
fall
into
homelessness
because
they
do
not
have
enough
assistance.
G
This
could
be
people
who
you
know,
as
a
risk
factor
have
been
homeless
in
the
past
and
possibly
are
now
in
a
home,
but
perhaps
you
know
fall
into
a
group
of
people
who
could
be
benefited
by
having
housing,
Supportive
Services
so
that
they
can
deal
with
challenges
or
economic
struggles
that
you
know
they're
facing
that
again,
generally
lead
somebody
into
homelessness.
So
it's
a
very
broad
group
of
qualified
populations
that
can
be
served
and
part
of
our
work
in
creating
this
framework
plan
is
understanding.
G
You
know
how
we're
going
to
you
know
if
we're
going
to
prioritize
any
of
these
groups
and
how
we're
going
to
serve
those
that
are
qualified.
So,
as
I've
mentioned,
the
submission
deadline
is
March.
31St,
oh
I
said
March
earlier
that
2030
is
September
20th
odd
date
in
2030.
To
remember
that
we
have
to
spend
the
funds
by
so
there's.
G
Also
quite
an
extensive
consultation
process
required
by
this,
and
we
do
you
know
I
I
feel,
like
you
know,
generally
HUD
has
been
very
happy
with
the
the
types
of
consultations
we've
done
for
things
like
our
action
plan,
but
HUD
is
making
sure
that
we
reach
out
to
communities
that
might
normally
get
left
behind
specifically
communities
whose
first
language
is
not
English.
G
So
I
consulted
with
some
of
our
area
contacts,
sue
chafee,
for
example,
immigrant
Services
Community,
to
ask
her,
which
she
feels
is
best
in
terms
of
reaching
those
folks.
And
she
let
me
know
that
you
know
people
are
people
in
this
group
are
very
busy
trying
to
make
a
living
and
working
and
are
very
probably
would
we
would
have
a
difficult
time
getting
them
to
come
to
a
focus
group
or
fill
out
a
survey.
G
That
would
be
helpful,
but
it
sounded
like
yes
that
that
we
were
doing
our
due
diligence
and
you
know
at
least
you
know,
we
need
to
hear
from
the
service
providers
for
those
groups,
but
that
sounds
like
you
know:
we're
gonna,
you
know
meet
that
threshold
and
then
there's
just
other
public
agencies,
not
just
housing
agencies
that
we
consult
with,
but
all
sorts
of
providers
of
services,
civil
rights
organization,
fair
housing
organizations,
people
that
are
serving
people
with
disabilities.
G
G
So
we'll
have
a
public
hearing
at
your
next
Ira
meeting,
probably
before
the
public
hearing,
where
we
hear
from
action
plan,
applicants
and
I've
already
addressed
the
needs
and
gaps
analysis
that
we're
talking
about
as
I
said,
preferences
and
priorities
are
kind
of
our
Challenge,
and
you
know
understanding
how
we
want
to
handle
that,
and
this
is
you
know,
for
those
of
you
that
really
love
all
the
detail.
Just
like
our
cdbg
CB
funds
were
added
as
an
amendment.
G
All
the
all
the
information
about
those
projects
was
added
to
an
amendment
of
our
2019
action
plan.
All
of
the
information
for
a
homework
will
be
added
to
our
as
an
amendment
to
our
2021
action
plan,
no
matter
what
year
it
takes
place
in
I
wanted
to
tell
you
just
briefly
about
that:
supplemental
survey
that
I
distributed
to
the
community.
G
We
have
a
137
responses
from
people
who
you
know
identify,
as
you
know,
from
everybody
from
affordable
service
or
formal
housing
developers
to
concerned
community
members
to
people
who
are
in
kind
of
governmental
staff
positions
or
elected
positions.
But
the
majority
of
those
who
filled
out
the
survey
35
of
them
are
service
providers
to
people
who
are
unhoused
currently
another
28
of
them
are
service
providers
to
people
who
may
or
may
not
be
in-house,
but
maybe
it's
you
know,
people
with
health
issues
or
another
vulnerability
or
mental
health
issue.
Something
like
that.
G
25
of
those
who
filled
out
the
survey
and
dedicated
that
they
had
lived
experience
with
makes
you
know
with
homelessness
being
unhoused
from
the
survey
results.
It
seems
pretty
clear
that
those
that
answered
the
survey
really
felt
like
the
first
qualifying
population.
Those
people
who
are
currently
experiencing
homelessness
had
the
you
know
highest
need
that
they
really
wanted
to
see
this
funding
be
able
to
touch
those
those
people
and
then
the
other
three
qualifying
populations
were
very
close,
and
you
know
people
also
found
them
important.
G
You
know
very
similar
in
their
ranking
they're,
all
within,
like
Five
Points
of
each
other,
but
domestic
violence,
survivors
and
people
fleeing
Central,
also
Etc
were
kind
of
identified
as
the
next
highest
needed
population
among
people
we
asked
the
question
like
who
within
the
community
is
not
being
served
currently?
What
is
the
highest
need
and
we
provided
a
list
of
people.
G
You
know
potential
groups
of
people,
and
you
know
people
could
also
identify
their
own,
but
people
with
disabilities,
people
who
are
currently
using
alcohol
and
drugs
and
unaccompanied
youth
all
received
at
least
you
know,
50
or
more
of
the
votes
in
terms
of
they
can
rank
them
again,
but
people
with
disabilities,
61
percent
people
with
and
again
I,
don't
know.
If
I
just
mentioned
this,
you
could
vote
for
more
than
one
Whatever
bias
need
was
followed
by
people
who
are
actively
using
them.
G
Unaccompanied
youth,
all
above
50
of
respondents,
felt
like
they
really
needed
the
most
help,
and
in
terms
of
where,
among
which
eligible
activities,
there
was
the
most
interest
developing,
affordable,
permanent
rental
housing
received.
58
of
the
vote.
I
have
to
admit.
I
was
a
little
bit
surprised
by
this
only
because
we
all
know
that
that
takes
a
lot
of
time,
but
it
sounds
like
the
community
members
that
participate
in
the
survey
also
understand
that,
and
they
feel
like
that.
That
is,
as
you
know,
a
big
lack.
G
This
is
you
know
that
if
you
ever
read
the
framework
report,
you'll
probably
see
that
the
this
this
was
a
ranking
again.
So
it's
a
little
bit
nuanced.
You
know
people
were
asked
to
say
what
what
is
their
number
one?
What
is
their
number
you
know
if
they,
if
they
could
assign
These
funds?
What
would
be
their
number
two
project?
Number
three
Etc.
So
most
people
voted
for
developing,
affordable,
permit
housing
at
rental
housing
as
their
number
one
project.
But
then
you
know
kind
of
how
do
you
slice
and
dice?
G
It
depends
on
how
the
what
would
be
the
second
most
needed
project
20
of
people
voted
for
developing
a
non-congregate
shelter,
but
when
you
dig
into
it
a
little
more
most
people,
most
people
identify
tibra
and
it's
kind
of
based
rental
assistance
as
the
their
number
two
Choice,
after
whatever
they
chose
for
number
one.
G
So
we
asked
a
question
because
Hallmark
can
include
communities
can
elect
to
use
five
percent
of
the
funding
for
capacity
buildings,
which
could
be
training,
assisting
organizations
who
maybe
need
a
little
more
capacity
to
be
able
to
undertake
a
project,
whether
that
might
be
some
consulting
or
Professional
Services.
Something
like
that
should
we
include
five
percent
capacity
building
in
what
we
do
and
there
was
kind
of
a
resounding
yes,
75
percent
of
people
felt
like.
Yes,
we
should
include
some
of
you
direct
some
of
the
funds
to
that
activity.
G
We
asked
you
know
what
is
more
important.
Is
it
more
important
to
you
know,
have
long-term
Housing
Solutions
to
address
the
short-term
needs
in
our
community?
G
Can
you,
or
would
you
say,
they're
equally
important
or
can't
decide
46
percent
of
people
responding,
said
long-term
housing
kind
of
congruent
with
what
I
said
earlier
and
39
said
that
either
the
short
term
or
the
long
term
are
equally
important
or
they
couldn't
decide.
So
85
percent
of
individuals
voted
for
one
of
those.
Two
with
you
know
short-term
being
much
farther
down
in
the
priority
list.
People
indicated
they'd
like
to
see
fewer
projects
receive
more
funding.
G
80
88
of
the
respondents
said
that,
rather
than
funding
an
array
of
projects
across
the
community
and
about
39
percent
of
those
that
responded
said
that
they
were
at
an
agency
that
was
discussing
or
had
ideas
of
how
they
might
want
to
apply
for
these
funds.
So
we
let
them
know
that
they
could
schedule
time
to
talk
with
me.
They
wanted
to
and
leave
their
information
so
that
I
could
reach
out
to
them.
So
that's
where
we
are
with
the
Hallmark
plan.
G
You'll
be
kind
of
next
like
I,
said
next
month
will
be
a
public
hearing,
we'll
be
producing
there'll,
be
a
published
legal
notice
between
now
and
then
people
will
have
the
opportunity
to
comment
publicly
about
what
they
see
the
needs
are
and
then,
when
the
plan
is
formulated,
they'll
have
15-day
comment
period
for
that
as
well
before
we
submit
foreign.
D
Qualifying
populations
are
there
restrictions
on
who
can
receive
funding
so,
for
example,
people
who
are
registered
sex
offenders,
we
know
are
in
danger
of
like
being
homeless.
Are
they
able
to
be
served
or
folks
who
are
not
US
citizens?
Any
restrictions
like
that.
G
What
an
excellent
question
I
do
not
remember,
seeing
anything
like
that
in
the
roles
and
guidelines
that
I've
reviewed
that
that
that
no
no
particular
type
of
individual
has
been
identified
as
being
restricted
from
being
assisted
by
these
funds.
B
D
A
question
for
nails,
the
the
50
administrative
funds
from
this
award
is
that
included
in.
A
Our
budget
for
this
year
or
we've
stretched
that
admin
funds
over
a
couple
years,
because
we
started
the
work
last
year
with
kind
of
the
survey
work
and
that
kind
of
education
component.
Most
of
the
funding
is
allocated
a
good,
a
good,
serious
allocator
for
this
year's
budget,
but
I
will
only
release
five
percent
of
the
funding
until
the
allocation
plan
has
been
submitted
and
approved.
So
there's
there's
there's
going
to
be
funds
remaining
after
we
submit
the
allocation
plan
and
we
really
want
to
time
that
with
when
we're
going
to
be
implementing
projects.
Okay,.
B
A
Back
the
things
you
would
be,
you
know
if
anybody
has
questions
or
or
if
you're
going
to
want
to
raise
right
now
would
be
great,
but
I
think
the
governance.
Community
is
going
to
be
taking
a
look
at
this
and
maybe
report
that
to
the
agency,
with
with
some
comments
or
oftentimes,
it's
it's
more
of
an
educational
piece.
So
I'm
just
you
know
reviewing
what
the
agency
is
doing
and
our
projects
and
where
they
stand
and
looking
at
those
issues
we
have
a
five
year,
we
think
of
a
strategic
plan.
A
We
call
it
our
Consolidated
plans,
you'll
see
the
word
strategic
planning
here
and
then
we
have
some
new.
You
know
kind
of
performance
analysis
of
where
we
stand
with
our
original
goals,
to
our
outcomes.
Again,
as
Anissa
alluded
to
housing
projects
take
a
couple
years
before
they
are
realized,
and
we
can
only
report
them
on
this
report.
Once
we
have
beneficiaries,
so
homeowners
or
or
residents
so
you'll
see
those
leg
a
little
bit
in
terms
of
the
housing
performance.
A
I.
Think
that's
a
good
place
to
look
at
is
that
that
table
of
comparing
a
one-year
goal
in
in
the
five-year
strategic
month.
It's
a
good
place
to
take
a
look
at
if
you
want
to
just
analyze
how
we're
doing
compared
to
our
goals.
The
other
thing
is
to
look
at
that
just
to
emphasize
again
what
you
mentioned
a
couple
times
here:
exam,
oh,
where
is
that
chart
looking
at
our
finding
one?
What
page
81
81
is
the
chart
showing
kind
of
visually
the
funding
Awards
of
cdbg
and
home
over
years?
A
Both
is
in
the
actual
dollars
and
operationally
just
dollars,
and
it's
not
a
very
pretty
picture.
The
downward
Trend
in
terms
of
our
purchasing
power
to
moving
through
involvement
programs
so
but
I
think
the
government's
Community
could
take
a
closer
look
at
this
and
raise
any
question
of
their
issues.
They
want
to
bring
back
to
the
agency.
B
A
In
November
December
they
had
been
reworking
this
plan,
and
but
it
still
is
pretty
much
the
same
plan
as
they
were
bringing
forward
before,
and
this
is
a
good
thing,
with
Jerry's
plan
for
addressing
on
children,
homelessness
and
and
there's
a
more
detailed
document
which
I
can
share
with
you
when
when
they
release
it,
what
they
think
is
in
the
next
week
or
so,
but
this
this
you
know
this
is
taking
a
tourism
presentation
level.
A
The
main
focus
here
of
their
recommendations
is
you
know,
coordination
between
all
the
players
involved
is
important
to
get
to
be
successful,
but
that
really
are
suggesting
that
there's
a
huge
gap
Block
in
our
process
of
moving
people
from
homeless,
to
home,
to
housing
and
that's
a
shortage
of
permanently
Supportive
Housing
units.
A
Those
are
units
that
have
not
just
affordable
housing,
rents,
but
also
wraparound
services
that
help
people
address
all
the
other
issues
that
they're
working
through
as
they
may
have
led
to
why
they're
homeless
in
the
first
place
and
get
them
back
unstable
state
of
the
ground.
So
they're
saying
the
big
key
here
is
to
working
to
address.
This
issue
is
to
create
100.
F
A
In
the
next
five
or
so
years
to
get
to
get
past
that
that
obstacle
and
what
the
recommending
is
as
a
way
to
short-term
aggressive,
is
to
have
a
surge
where
trying
to
reach
as
many
people
who
are
unshiltered
and
provide
them
with
options
to
get
into
some
short-term
housing
or
shelter
services,
and
to
reduce
the
friction
of
getting
into
those
programs.
A
One
of
the
barriers
they
identify
is
there's
an
18
page
application
form
for
DSS,
and
you
know,
keeping
appointments
are
hard
for
them
to
do
and
a
lot
of
agencies
require
you
to
come
to
their
office
and,
if
you're,
somebody
who
who
needs
a
lot
of
services,
you
end
up
going
to
six
different
agencies
and
trying
to
coordinate
all
that.
So
the
idea
is
to
really
bring
the
services
to
people
where
they
are
and
reduce
and
help
them
get
through
those
process.
A
Those
administrative
processes
as
much
as
possible
linking
them
with
some
tenant-based
rental
assistance,
though,
because
we
don't
have
rental
stuff
in
each
you're,
not
going
to
be
able
to
you
know,
pay
the
rent,
for
at
least
you
know
for
the
folks
like
that.
So
this
is
a
very
important
input,
I
think
for
potential
home
ARP
initiatives
and
Investments,
because
they
can
they
can
link
up
and
maybe
in
many
ways
and
I
think
this
is
important.
A
You
know
analysis
to
take
a
look
at
and
it's
a
very
comprehensive
kind
of
analysis
of
focusing
on
children,
homeless
populations.
All
prior
reports
were
really
just
addressed
now
the
obviously
there's
a
big
group,
but
this
is
really
more
that
that
on
children,
homelessness
group
that
has
higher
service
needs
than
than
the
rest
of
the
unless
population
I
mean
it's
a
harder
group
to
have
success
with
and
they
oftentimes
get
housing
and
lose
housing.
A
Their
kids
I
was
in
the
Middle
East
housing
and
then
finally,
they
step
up
and
it
works
out
for
them
over
time.
Usually
so,
I
think
it's
a
really
important
issue
to
take.
A
look
at
and
I
want
to
be
able
to
share
the
coc's
final
approved
for
plan
with
you
when
it
comes
out
very
soon,
and
they
may
be
thinking
they're
talking
about
what
their
next
steps
are.
A
I
think
they're
going
to
see
endorsements
of
the
plan
or
components
of
the
plan
by
a
number
of
agent
and
Community
agencies,
so
they
may
become
a
good
array
and
they're
having
Council
and
the
county.
We're
looking
to
see
if
there's
buy-in
to
this
framework
and
approach
to
addressing
the
issue.
A
B
Okay
and
so
Financial
review.
A
Should
have
the
grand
summary,
the
loan
report
and
the
Leisure
report
in
terms
of
the
grand
summary
or
focuses
on
making
sure
we're
spending
down
gdpg
funds
on
a
daily
basis
to
meet
that
June
threshold
review
date,
where
HUD
looks
to
see
if
we're
meeting,
mainly
expenditure,
which
is
equal
to
1.5
percent
of
our
most
recent
award.
Only
looking
at
CDD
keep
going
we're
going
to
be
challenged
to
meet
that
because
we
have
a
number
of
projects
that
slow
down
their
expenditures
during
the
coping
on
the
pandemic.
A
We
thought
we
were
going
to
explain
Wendy's
a
lot
quicker
and
a
couple
of
projects
like
the
GF
gym
of
a
hundred
thousand
dollars,
but
then
they
ran
into
issues
with
the
expansion
plan
or
the
renovation
plan
that
they
decided
expand
it,
which
triggers
a
the
larger
environmental
review,
which
has
a
30-day
review
period
on
it.
So
we're
gonna.
We
expect
to
expect
we'll
be
able
to
spend
those
funds
down
before
the
deadline,
but
it
won't
be
more
than
30
days
before
the
deadline.
A
A
You
know
early
April
to
make
sure
we're
covering
the
first
quarter
of
the
year
to
try
to
meet
that
spend
our
requirement
we're
over
300
000
away
from
getting
that
requirement
right
now,
but
we
do
have
some
loan
discouragements
that
are
going
forward
and
some
larger
projects
that
we
know
are
going
you
know
are
spending
down,
for
example
the
Catholic
Charities
building
project
that
the
governor's
way
is
underway
right
now.
A
So
that's
another
one,
that's
going
to
be
sitting
around,
but
if
we
don't
need
that
standard,
then
I'm
just
going
to
invite
us
to
develop
a
workout
plan
and
for
the
next
year
it's
not
a
it's,
not
as
if
we're
going
to
who's
acted.
The
funding
immediately,
a
lot
of
communities
are
having
troubles
from
being
a
spend
on
requirements.
Part
of
it
caused
by
very
late
budget
actions
by
the
federal
government
doesn't
help
matters,
but
also
the
pandemic
has
really
put
up
for
the
hit
on
some
of
these
projects.
A
But
we
have
to
be
very
careful
looking
at
programs
for
2023
that
already
have
funding
in
place,
and
some
of
those
we've
talked
to
some
of
those
agencies
already
about.
A
We
don't
have
a
lot
of
you
know,
agency
a
you,
have
a
lot
of
funds
already
available
to
you
think
twice
before
you
apply
for
a
new
plans,
because
we're
going
to
do
an
analysis
to
see
if
you
need
them,
but
one
of
the
tricks
of
the
action
plan
issue
is
we're
going
to
get
an
action
plan
now
that
will
provide
funding
until
October
or
later
this
year,
and
if
you
skip
this
year,
we
will
keep
going
in
again
into
October
2024.
A
So
you
have
to
look
at
the
months
going
out
and
if
you're
providing
the
non
you
know
continuous
services.
Are
you
know
you
just
plan
on
how
that's
going
to
work
practice
for
his
agency?
So
that's
going
to
be
a
focus
for
us
going
forward.
A
B
So
I
wanted
to
point
that
out.
Yeah
I
said
it's
in
other
videos.
I
do
think
we
need
some
reason.
We
will
get
burned
rate
is
one
of
the
criteria
and
I
understand
the
point
of
it.
We
don't
want
to
create
a
gap,
but
it's
the
only
two.
Basically,
what
we
have
right
like,
which
is
to
say
you
know,
we
really
need
to
spend
money
on
settling
and
propose,
is
key
to
us
on
the
minimum.
B
D
Committee,
that
was
discussion
also
and
ensuring
that
agencies
are
still
have
fun
surveying,
particularly
if
it's
more
than
one
years
you
know
the
department
is
still
remaining,
that
we
I
really
strongly
consider
whether
they
should
be
funded
at
full,
ask
or
even
funded
at
all.
During
this
this
round,
you
know
keeping
in
mind
that
there,
a
Gap
may
be
May
develop
a
good
thing
is
we
talked
about
a
little
bit
earlier.
You
know,
funding
is
limited
and
funds
that
we
awarded
that
aren't
being
used.
D
B
The
way
out,
okay,
we're
at
reports.
A
We've
been
disconnected
with
people
who
haven't
read
up
a
lot
of
data
report
that
those
those
Susan
LLC,
which
is
the
president
of
Brewing
business,
has
become
current
at
that
time,
receiving
our
invoice
for
them.
So
they're
current
and
Congress
Community
Action
is
the
student
they
one
month
later.
It
goes
back
at
least
six
or
eight
months
and
they're
working
through
the
comparison
between
their
books
and
our
loan
services
books.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Yeah
I,
don't
I
don't
have
a
report.
As
a
chair,
I'm
sitting,
there
hasn't
even
really
important.
F
C
As
people
know,
I
believe
ibookers
McGonagall
will
be
the
liaison
going
forward,
he's
not
able
to
make
it
to
today's
meeting,
but
he
didn't
email,
others
just
a
few
other
updates.
We've
welcomed
a
new
achievement
staff
name
and
a
face
not
new
to
many
of
us.
Deb
mullenhoff
started
in
a
role
as
she's,
a
chief
of
staff
on
January
9..
C
We
are
also
in
the
process
of
recommending
two
common
Council,
a
Fifth
Ward
vacancy,
a
replacement
for
my
seat
on
Hassle,
and
hopefully,
Council
will
be
approving
that
recommendation
at
the
February
1
meeting
next
week
it
was
reported
last
night
at
the
city,
Administration
committee
meeting
that
we
are
beginning
the
process
of
a
significant
transition
of
state
government
to
city
manager,
so
very
pleased
that
the
referendum
passed
by
a
significant
margin,
80
approval
of
the
referendum
for
a
city
manager
that
was
cooked
by
the
public
in
November.
C
We
in
the
city
are
still
at
current
city
staff
and
shortages,
as
are
also
being
experienced
by
a
number
of
other
organizations,
some
of
which
has
now
had
the
information
that
we
were
just
just
discussing.
There
are
two
working
groups
right
now.
One
of
which
is
addressing
unsafe,
encampments
in
the
city
and
Lisa
and
Nells
I'm
very
grateful
that
they
are
serving
our
Network
group
as
Israel
Thorne
and
three
common
council
members.
C
So
this
is
an
issue
that
we
know
must
be
addressed
and
we
need
to
be
looking
at
short-term
remediate
responses
as
well
as
simultaneously
developing
long-term
Solutions
on
the
unhouse
issues
that
all
communities
are
generally
I
think
it
is
not
unique
in
this
regard,
but
I
hope
we
will
have
uncounter
that
we
will
have
some
responses
going
forward.
So
I'm
really
pleased
with
that.
C
So
those
are
I
think
the
most
key
updates
right
now.
A
Real
quick,
just
imagining
up
the
day
check,
there's
a
new
order
proposed
rule
to
re-establish
the
fair
housing
mining
process,
which
we
couldn't
do
that
since
anything,
and
then
it
was
abolished
essentially
by
the
Trump
Administration
for
all
practical
purposes.
So
it's
back
with
a
new,
improved,
streamline
approach.
A
But
you
know
we
are,
you
know
strongly
supported
the
fair
housing
initiatives
and
and
working
on
those
issues,
but
last
time
we
did
it,
we
spent
the
equivalent
of
you
know:
Hungary
I
think
we
need
to
get
to
you
know
simply
going
through
it.
We
could
do
it
in
less
time,
but
you
know,
as
proposed,
every
hoop
has
to
jump
through
the
same,
whether
you're,
a
large
13
million
dollar
grantee.
A
So
we'll
see
where
that
goes.
But
that
is
in
the
process
of
being
issued
and
providing
first
week,
overtime
period,
yeah
and
I.
Just
want
to
keep
you
up
to
date
on
is
the
Restore
New
York
grant
program?
That's
the
New
York
State
program,
which
spoke
to
our
best
patient
and
abandon
condemned
buildings.
The
city
applied
for
the
first
round
six
of
this
year
for
the
buildings
net,
the
corner
of
green
and
yoga
Street
115
123,
South,
Paducah
Street,
and
that
was
funded
not
at
the
request.
A
I
don't
know,
but
at
1.5
million
dollars
for
working
in
the
building
that
project
to
grade
16
hosting
units
performance
that
were
previously
used
for
office
uses
offices
during
evangelic.
A
Is
associated
with
that
sensitive
historic
reservation.
A
The
round
seven
is
due
at
the
end
of
this
week,
and
that
is
a
proposal
from
self-works,
formerly
known
as
chainworks
project,
to
begin
that
property.
That's
now
met
the
environmental
clinical
standards
and
has
transferred
to
the
developer
from
the
Emerson
Associated
ownership
entity
and
they're
ready
to
start
what
they
call
a
350
million
dollar
rebuilding
project
phase.
One
is
to
address
the
lead
and
asbestos
hazards
in
Building
24.
As
the
building
closest
to
the
street.
A
We
got
43
100,
000,
Square,
Athletic
Warehouse
and
due
to
the
selective
demolition,
as
well
as
inclusion
of
an
854
liter
distance
of
the
Gateway
Trail,
which
is
that
trail
that
will
connect
between
Aurora
Street
and
go
all
the
way
to
whatever
Falls.
So
that's
the
will
be
submitted
later
this
week
or
that's
around
seven.
Every
story:
Grant
wins
200
is
a
request.
It'll
take
them
probably
three
months
or
30-day
decisions
on.
A
Property
stand
City
in
town,
most
of
the
land
is
in
the
town.
Most
of
the
buildings
are
in
the
city,
but
there's
a
fair
number
of
buildings
level.
Lisa
knows
that
if
I
remember
that
I
do
with
that
breakdown
issue
comes
with
all
the
details,
but
the
buildings
that
are
proposed
to
be
baited
for
as
good
as
materials
and
demolished
or
in
the
city.