►
From YouTube: NOV 3, 2021 | Downtown Parking Board
Description
Downtown Parking Board meeting of November 3, 2021
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/78979/637708632172270000
B
B
A
A
B
A
So
looking
at
2021,
actuals
obviously
impacted
by
the
pandemic.
Our
revenues
for
the
year
were
7.1
million
5.5
of
that
was
from
off
street
lots
and
garages
1.5
of
that
from
parking
meters.
Obviously,
the
parking
meters
were
only
the
downtown
core
meters
with
none
of
the
peripheral
meters
turned
on
until
later,
in
21..
A
A
D
A
A
A
A
So,
let's
see
just
real
quick
on
the
downtown
event,
dynamic
message
signs:
this
is
a
project
that's
effectively
now
as
we're
ahead
of
this
timeline.
This
project's
done.
We
should
see
this
line
come
off
in
our
future.
Looks
at
this
stuff.
These
are
the
signs
off
of
the
freeway
off
ramps,
87
at
santa
clara
julian
and
some
other
areas
and
around
the
arena
and
diridon
area
that
they
replace
those
signs.
A
That's
done
garage
elevator
upgrades
public
works
is
still
evaluating
and
bringing
on
consultants
to
develop
a
plan
of
attack
on
several
of
our
facilities,
elevators
and
upgrades
that
might
be
necessary
on
those.
So
we
still
have
this
money
earmarked
and
carry
that
forward
to
the
next
year
to
have
it
available
to
us.
A
This
downtown
wayfinding
project
is,
I
think,
monies
that
were
set
aside.
To
be
honest,
I
don't
know
that
any
work
has
been
completed
on
this.
This
is
not
a
project
by
the
parking
team.
This
is
a
project
from
another
dot
team
that
they
encumbered
some
monies
for
a
conceptual
downtown,
wayfinding,
walking,
biking.
A
Mapping
system
of
downtown-
to
be
honest,
I
don't
know
exactly
where
that
project
stands
and
actually
being
completed,
greater
downtown
parking
inventory.
This
is
the
money
set
aside
for
ghirardhan
arena
area
parking
development,
specifically
on
two
sites,
the
milligan
site
and
the
lotte
site.
So
work
continues
on
design,
land
acquisition
and
consultant
work
to
get
those
projects
moving
forward.
A
Nothing
in
our
green
tech
program,
minor
facility
improvements.
This
is
where
we
undertake
most
of
our
small
minor
projects
throughout
our
facilities
spent
about
500
000.
In
that
we're
carrying
this
1.6
million
that
was
remaining
at
the
end
of
the
year.
We
then
transferred
into
our
reserves
knowing
that
the
arena
duradon
capital
numbers
were
going
to
need
to
be
bolstered
in
the
future
years,
because
that's
where
we
were
taking
a
lot
of
the
money
to
bolster
the
operating
side.
So
as
we
had
that
unspent
monies,
we
put
that
1.6
million
back.
A
The
city's
purchasing
team
is
undertaking
a
city-wide
approach
to
this,
so
everything
from
police
and
fire
stations
to
city
hall,
libraries,
community,
centers
and
everybody
is
going
to
be
included
in
one
large
rfp
or
proposal
for
services,
so
the
city's
purchasing
team
is
finalizing
that
project.
So
we've
got
money
set
aside
for
our
piece
of
that
when
that
goes
forward
and
we'll
be
working
on
that.
Probably
this
coming
year,
public,
art
and
city-wide
overhead
public
art
is
tied
to
some
expenditures.
A
E
A
B
B
A
A
The
contractual
services,
I
think,
is
the
biggest
one
that
does
get
more
granularly
parsed
out
based
on
actuals,
but
the
others
are
actually,
I
think,
utilities
and
rent
and
insurance,
I
think,
is
also
more
granularly
put
together
like,
for
example,
this
number
564
000
at
almond
and
was
is
not
representative
of
just
an
allocation.
We
pay
a
large
sum
of
monies
for
the
the
rent
of
that
site.
F
B
Thank
you.
What
about
deferred
maintenance
aaron?
Is
there
a
link
here,
I'm
just
trying
to
get
a
correlation
between
you
know,
revenues,
and
then
most
of
this
is
peanut
buttered
expenses.
So
it's
it's
not
overly
meaningful,
but
is
there
something
the
bird
maintenance
wise?
That
would
be
interesting
to
compare
to
the
revenue
versus
the
number
of
spots?
I
think
I.
A
Think
for
is
it
the
next
item?
No,
the
item
5c.
When
we
look
at
or
not
the
five
year,
5d
I've
generated.
I
mean
it's
more
relevant
to
the
conversation
later,
but
this
is
a
report
that
highlights
some
of
the
projects
that
we're
likely
to
undertake,
because
you
had
asked
for
some
details
on
what
are
some
big
projects
you
guys
are
going
to
undertake
in
in
the
future.
So
this
was
an
attempt
to
throw
together
some
details
on
items
that
we're
looking
to
put
together,
but
not
so
relevant
to
2021,
more
forward-looking.
B
A
A
B
A
A
A
D
G
A
F
B
F
A
H
I
I
There's
there's
no
kind
of
democratic
process,
there's
no
kind
of
protocol
that
the
public
has
been
challenged
to
engage
in
order
to
determine
whether
or
not
we
want
that
or
not
it.
Just
it
and-
and
I
I
think
that
we're
we're
kind
of
moving
away
from
democracy
and
we're
gearing
very
close
to
totalitarianism,
and-
and
I
and
I
mean
that,
like
specifically,
because
totalitarianism
is
just
simply
one
governing
body
stating
that
they
know
best
and
they're,
going
to
do
what
they're
going
to
do
like
it
or
not.
B
B
Let
us
vote
on
this
measure
because
your
comments
are
not
relative
to
this
discussion
item
and
then
I'm
happy
to
go
back
to
the
public
comment
and
have
you
finished
your
minute
or
so
that
you
have
left,
if
you
think,
okay
with
that
paul.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Any
other
comments
on
this
particular
5a.
I
I
It's
creating
a
lot
of
confusion,
a
lot
of
in
sense
of
entitlement
and
the
sense
of
having
people
like
me
that
when
we
push
on
it,
because
we
know
what
we're
looking
at
that
when
we
push
on
it,
we
are
seen
as
as
somebody
that
is
being
disruptive.
That
is
just
somehow
another.
Just
disgruntled
and
just
doesn't
like
it
when
they.
I
A
D
D
D
D
If
you
look
at
the
table
in
the
memo,
you
will
see
that
the
first
column
has
the
2021
revenue
in
each
of
the
areas
and
we
have
the
historical
based
which
we
typically
in
the
previous
years.
We
subtracted
this
historical
base
from
the
from
their
revenue
for
that
year,
and
we
came
we
added
up
to
a
positive
number,
but
this
year,
with
almost
no
revenue
generated
in
those
areas,
we
ended
up
with
a
negative
balance.
B
D
D
B
D
D
B
D
Because
this
this
chart
was
meant
only
to
address
the
recovery
cost
of
the
expansion
and
we
just
put
the
down
core
downtown
core
at
the
bottom,
just
to
give
you
additional
information,
but
it
is
not
part
of
the
calculation
for
the
expansion.
The
expansion
was
only
for
the
exterior
area,
and
that
was
the
object
of
this
chart
is
to
address
the
exterior
area,
expansion
and
the
sofa
included
in
it.
F
Take
a
run
at
it,
please
david!
So
I
think
what
you're
saying
the
first
first
question:
the
the
earlier
chart
that
aaron
went
over
had
off
street
total
parking
of
one
five,
seven
five
and
if
you
add
up
these
two
numbers
they're
one
four,
two
three
and
change
so
there's
a
difference
of
about
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
any
idea.
Why.
D
F
Oh
okay,
good
enough,
and
really
this
is
an
exercise
when
you
come
to
that
hundred
and
thirty
nine
thousand
one
twenty
seven
you're
saying
hey
a
long
time
ago.
We
spent
a
whole
bunch
of
money
and
we
still
have
to
somehow
pay
for
the
hundred
and
thirty
nine
thousand
that
we
have
not
recovered
from
that
project.
That
was
done
another
a
long
time
ago
in
order
to
end
up
to
zero
with
that
project,.
D
F
F
B
Expansion
of
cost
and
we
have
91
000
of
ongoing
current
year
and
I'll
assume
every
year
expenses
all
right,
so
240
000
worth
of
expense.
We
need
to
recover
against
the
198
of
revenue.
We
had
the
historical's
interesting,
but
I
don't
see
how
that's
relevant
here.
At
all
other
than
say,
we
had
a
real
bad
year.
H
There
are
other
expenses
that
have
to
be
covered
that
aren't
outlined
specifically
in
the
chart,
so
the
historical
base
revenue
makes
the
city
whole
on
what
we
were
making
pre-expansion.
Then
we
expanded
and
we
increased
the
revenue.
It
is
that
revenue
increase
that
dollar
increase
that
is
now
eligible
to
be
put
into
reserves,
but
that
money
has
to
also
cover
the
capital,
outlay
costs
and
the
additional
ongoing
new
expenses
that
the
smart
meters
charge
every
annually.
H
H
H
Correct
this
is
we
have
off
street
revenues,
which
is
parking,
lots
and
garages,
and
then
we
have
on
street
revenues
which
are
meters
and
then
that
on
street
revenue
is
divided
a
little
bit
further
into
single-sized
meters.
So
all
the
smart
meters
throughout
the
downtown
core
and
then
in
the
exterior,
and
then
we
have
multi-space
and
special
event
meters.
So
those
are
meters
that
are
kind
of
over
by
convention
center
down
by
the
sap.
H
G
Are
not
included
in
here.
That's
why
I
wanted
to
see
this.
The
breakdown
on
the
prior
chart,
because
we
used
to
have
breakdowns
by
the
lots
and
willow
glen
how
much
they
used
to
cost
even
for
the
the
maintenance
for
lots
that
were
not
in
the
downtown
periphery.
We
had
lots
in
alum
rock
willow
glen
that
you
guys
were
monitoring
I'd
like
to
see
a
breakdown
from
not
only
the
meter
districts
per
meter
district,
but
the
off
street
lots
and
where
they're
at.
G
G
G
I'm
conflating
both
the
the
lots
and
the
the
district
yeah.
We
do
have
them
by
the
the
my
bad
on
the
law.
Okay,
you're
good-
I
do
want
to
see
it,
but
I
do
want
to
see
it
by
district
on
the
meters.
It's
right
here.
This
is
my
district
on
this
one,
but
in
the
in
the
other
chart
too,
can
you
please
add
them
back
so
it's
in
like
we
have
this.
G
A
H
G
B
B
B
C
I
B
I
I
B
I
No,
you
didn't
give
this
to
me.
Those
those
are
mine
to
have
this
is
this.
Is
a
democracy
getting
back
to
reinforcing
the
point
that
I
made
earlier,
you
you're
not
giving
me
anything
all
right.
These
are
right.
These
are
the
rights
that
I
have
as
a
citizen.
Oh
so
you're,
not
you're,
not
you're,
disrupting.
B
I
A
B
A
A
Okay,
so
now
everybody
can
see
it
yep
we're
good,
go
all
right.
Sorry,
everyone,
technical
difficulties,
so
I
was
saying
proposed:
2122
left
column
totals
2.9
million
with
the
breakout
by
project.
The
next
column
over
is
our
carryovers
of
unspent
monies
from
2021,
which
is
totaled
5.7
million
again
identified
by
project.
A
Then
there
were
spring
budget
moves.
2021
moved
over
to
2122
totaling,
another
4.5
million
for
a
total
modified
budget
for
21.22
of
13
million
dollars.
So
that's
what
we
effectively
had
for
this
fiscal
year
21.22
for
our
projects,
then,
in
this
year
we've
effectively
identified
that
we're
not
going
to
spend
all
of
this
money
and
given
the
fact
that
a
we're
not
going
to
undertake
some
of
the
projects
that
we
might
have
identified
or
we
were
over
budgeted,
we
transferred
monies
to
our
reserves
of
1.6
million,
so
it
finally.
A
With
a
budget-
oh
I'm
sorry
budgeted
over
from
re-budgeted
savings
from
the
prior
year,
totaled
1.6
million
totaling
4.8
million.
The
far
right
column
is
identifying
the
project
expenditures
to
date,
with
some
notes:
totaling
5.9
million.
As
you
can
see,
the
vast
majority
of
that
again
is
our
parking
control
system,
which
is
in
monies
that
we've
encumbered
this
year
and
haven't
actually
spent
many
checks
against
it.
A
So
that
is
our
current
look
at
2122
very,
very
minimal
projects
undertaken
this
year.
It's
very
difficult
for
us
to
significantly
spend
monies
this
year.
We've
got
staffing
shortages
within
our
own
team,
and
working
on
significant
projects
has
been
been
a
challenge,
but
I
think,
as
we
move
into
this
next
year
on
the
next
item
for
the
five
year,
we
will
have.
A
C
A
It's
a
fairly
convoluted
chart
of
starting
a
year
moving
monies
from
one
year
to
the
next
savings
monies
moving
forward,
but
in
totality
we
have
14.8
million,
we've
spent
quote
unquote
either
spent
and
or
encumbered
about
6
million
some
large
chunks
of
money
in
our
garage
facade
improvement
project
which
is
going
to
be
a
multi-year
project.
As
you
can
see
from
the
bullets
there
on
the
far
right,
we
don't
even
anticipate
bid
and
award
until
later
in
2022
construction
in
23
and
kind
of
close
out
of
that
project
in
late
23..
A
B
So
ariane,
thank
you,
my
question
or
two
on
this
is
so
the
14
15
million
is
what's
in
the
budget,
that's
going
to
roll
forward.
If
you
don't
spend
it
this
year,
you've
spent
so
far.
Six
million
right,
as
you
said,
is
there
any
on
the
revenue
control
items
right.
The
budget's
five
six
you
spent
five
three.
A
A
The
only
things
like
elevators,
for
example,
we've
got
2.5
if
the
consultants
in
public
works
identify
the
projects
and
then
start
to
bid
them,
and
it
comes
back
at
something
higher
than
we
would
need
additional
monies,
but
depending
on
timing,
I
think
next
year
I'm
not
mistaken.
We've
got
500
000
in
there.
So
then,
starting
next
year,
we'd
have
3
million
right.
So
maybe
we're
good.
F
B
A
B
A
F
F
A
F
J
A
B
A
J
A
We've
historically
said
you
know.
For
us,
these
are
pretty
far
out
looking
unless
we
have
any
large
projects
identified
for
some
of
these
out
years,
where
we
would
augment
numbers
to
identify
a
big
spin,
because
the
last
item
I
already
identified
things
like
elevators,
like
the
facade
project,
like
our
parks
project,
where
we've
got
five
three
million
two
and
a
half
million
tied
up
in
those.
A
A
A
A
A
The
category
b
and
c
items
are
b
were
moderate
importance.
They
would
be
good
to
undertake,
as
they
will
increase
the
service
slice
of
a
structure,
and
then
category
c
are
more
aesthetic
or
functional
that
the
city
may
wish
to
address.
So
when
we
look
at
the
total
of
outstanding
items
that
need
to
be
touched
are
roughly
1.4
million,
1.37
million,
with
just
about
a
million
in
category
b
and
400
000
in
category
c.
So.
A
Those
and
those
will
fall
into
our
minor
parking
facility
improvement
projects.
So,
as
you
can
see,
we
have
monies
currently
in
our
current
budget
2122
and
we
will
have
currently
budgeted
1.75
million
for
every
year
out
currently
budgeted.
So
we
have
enough
bandwidth
to
address
all
of
the
regular
and
ongoing
minor
projects
that
come
up
throughout
any
given
year,
but
as.
A
A
A
A
The
the
bullet
above
it
is
the
higher
of
market
rate
or
something
so
if,
for
some
reason,
our
market
rate
were
to
jump
above
what
that
three
and
a
half
percent
increase.
So
it's
they
say
you're
at
a
hundred
dollars
and
the
increase
would
take
you
to
103.50,
but
our
market
rate
jumps
to
110.
Well,
the
mark.
The
rate
is
110.
A
C
C
A
A
Our
I
don't
know
that
the
moxie
is
our
gold
standard
of
the
agreement,
types
that
we
want
to
sign
going
forward.
Obviously
we're
not
looking
to
necessarily,
I
mean,
first
and
foremost,
we're
looking
at
commercial
property
under
this
office
building,
specifically
mostly
under
this
program,
so
it
wouldn't
necessarily
even
be
tied
to
a
hotel
development.
J
Yeah
aaron,
if
I,
if
I
could
chime
in
this,
is
councilman
perales,
the
moxie
project
is
actually
part
of
the
impetus
of
what
spurred.
I
think
some
of
this
discussion
definitely
is
not
the
gold
standard
and,
in
fact,
having
something
that
was
much
more
fair
and
not
just
on
a
one-off
basis.
Where
you
know
a
project
could
come
in.
You
know,
and
just
by
timing
by
sheer
timing.
C
A
E
A
You
know
some
of
their
term
maximums
and
we
haven't
seen
any
anything
moving
on
those.
So
I
think
we're
open
to
what
that
could
look
like
and
maybe
putting
in
some
milestone
triggers
that
a
development
has
to
has
to
hit
in
order
to
maintain
the
agreement
or
the
active
status
of
an
agreement
with
something
like
that,
I'm
far
from
an
expert
in
what
those
triggers
can
could
be
permitting
or
different.
You
know
entitlement
milestones,
but.
A
You
have
I
mean,
does
anybody
have
you
know
some
some
idea
around
a
number
of
years,
let's
say
and
then
some
triggers
within
those
years.
That
say
if
this
is
hit
at
this
point
in
this
point.
In
this
point,
let's
say
that
number
is:
if
the
whole
period
is
four
years,
then
do
we
get
to
a
point
where
okay
well
within
the
first
24
months,
something
has
to
happen,
or
does
the
city
just
sign
up
a
bunch
of
these
deals,
because
every
time
we
sign
one
of
these
we've
got
this?
A
C
Well,
so
there
are
a
number
of
steps
that
you,
of
course,
could
consider.
One
is
the
planning
approvals
which
in
some
cases
you
know,
go
nine
months,
then
there's
a
building
permit
process
which
might
have
three
rounds
of
comments
and
go
for
six
to
nine
months,
and
then
I
guess
the
next
step
would
be
breaking
ground
and
what
would
be
the
period
for
breaking
ground
and
from
there
the
developer
can
say,
or
there
can
be
an
agreement
on
an
additional
two
years.
A
E
C
A
Well
again
and
we're
talking
there's
kind
of
two
tracks
here
right.
There
is
there's
the
you're
talking
specifically
about
a
project
that
needs
to
come
out
of
the
dirt,
and
then
this
this
program
is
also
meant
to
serve
existing
properties
and
in
those
cases.
So
maybe
it
needs
to
have
kind
of
two
arms
one
for
existing
properties
that
are
just
trying
to
lease
space
and
they
have
a
shorter
hold
period
because
they're,
it's
just
their
marketing,
that
they
need
to
get
going.
And
then
the
development
side
might
need
a
little
longer
runway.
D
C
A
And
downtown,
I
can't
answer
that
it's
all
dependent
on
who
comes
to
the
table.
I
mean
there's
quite
a
few.
Existing
properties
that
have
permits
in
just
the
individual
tenants
are
holding
and
they
may
wish
to
kind
of
own
their
own
destiny.
If
you
will
and
buy
permits
and
then
allocate
to
their
tenant
base
and
then
there's
proposed
projects
that
may
be
eligible
in
some
capacity,
some
may
not,
if
they're
proposing
to
build
their
own
parking
on
site
the
2000
permit
number
was.
B
C
A
The
hardest
one
for
some
folks
to
to
grasp
in
san
jose,
if
somebody
told
you
you
could
park
within
three
four
blocks
of
your
building
in
san
francisco,
nobody
would
bat
an
eye,
but
in
san
jose
I
know
we're
we're
challenged
from
a
perception
standpoint,
but
we're
effectively
telling
you
you
would
have
a
parking
spot
in
downtown
in
one
of
really
four
core
garages
and
I
think
very
quickly.
Folks
would
start
to
naturally
go
to
the
spot
where
they
know
they
could
get
a
parking
space.
A
If
you
show
up
at
you
know
eight
o'clock
in
the
morning,
I'm
pretty
sure
you're
going
to
kind
of
get
your
preferred
site
if
you
show
up
at
11
well,
might
get
a
little
dicey.
Admittedly,
we
have
some
ways
to
go
in
order
to
make
this
a
perfect
reality
in
terms
of
messaging
through
our
dynamic
signage
boards
throughout
downtown,
there's
13
of
them
that
we're
replacing.
So
we
will
be
able
to
articulate
what
sites
have
spaces.
F
B
Do
you
ever
put
into
the
fold
the
other
two
city
garages
that
you
guys
have
that
are
not
public
garages
but
they're
for
employees,
I'm
assuming
right
now
those
garages
are
massively
underparked
and
so
they're,
not
necessarily
needed
in
the
community,
because
everything
else
is
on
the
park.
But
if
there
is
a
work
from
home
or
future
of
work,
discussion
at
the
city
do
those
garages
ever
come
into
play.
B
A
Would
I
mean
I
can't
see
you
because
my
screen
is
down,
but
I
would
say
you
know
aryan
calling
parking
guy
wants
to
maximize
the
usage
of
all
of
our
sites.
So
I
would
say
yes,
there's
a
hurdle,
admittedly
with
you
know,
just
like
I'm
sure
you're
you
deal
with
at
san
jose
state
and
all
of
the
union
requirements
and
everything
else
to
to
get
through
on
the
employee
parking
side
of
things.
A
If
they
show
up
and
that
garage
is
full,
they
have
to
go
to
another
garage
through
a
third
street
garage
which
is
what
two
blocks
over.
So
that
already
happens
today,
and
it's
happened
for
several
years
and
folks
start
to
learn
that
at
certain
peak
times
that
garage
fills
up
and
they
they
go
to
the
overflow.
B
Yeah
because,
obviously
we
deal
with
this
at
san
jose
state
all
the
time
and
both
of
us
have
a
predominant
nine
to
five.
You
know
parking
crunch.
You
know
you
can
debate
the
hour
or
two
on
either
side
of
that,
but
you
know
evenings
there's
no
one
in
our
spots
and
just
figuring
out
how
to
better
utilize
those
spaces.
Well,.
B
C
Sure
happy
too,
thank
you
and
I'll
try
to
keep
it
in
that
two-minute
range.
We
have
a
lot
of
thoughts
on
it,
but
I'll
try
to
be,
as
you
know,
concise
as
I
can
so
really.
Three
three
topics
here:
one
is
the
global
access,
the
whole
period
and
the
lease
period
and,
by
the
way,
I'm
appreciative
of
the
challenge
that
the
city
has
to
try
to
strike
a
balance
here
between
a
lot
of
different
users.
C
Folks,
who
would
you
know
want
to
potentially
utilize
it
I'll
put
forward
our
position
for
the
global
access?
That's
the
topic
you
were
just
touching
on.
I
don't
think
employees
generally
would
be
open
to
the
idea
of
having
to
park
at
any
one
of
four
places.
I
realize
over
time.
The
city
employees,
for
example,
have
found
some
balance
there,
but
when
you're
doing
that
across
multiple
potential
employers
downtown-
I
I
don't.
C
I
think
employees
would
find
that
very
challenging
unpredictable
distances,
along
with
certain
public
safety
issues,
depending
on
which
lot
they
would
be
required
to
park
in
so
by
extension,
employers
would
be
less
likely
to
lease
downtown
as
a
result,
and
what
that
does
is
that's
going
to
prevent
developers.
I
don't
think
I
could
convince
investors
or
bankers
to
sign
up
for
this
program,
so
it
would.
C
I
think
it
would
have
a
pretty
severe
effect
on
the
on
new
development.
The
hold
period
as
board
member
gord
mentioned
two
years
would
really
be
unworkable
for
development
and
again
the
suggestion
that
was
made
to
split
it
between
existing
versus
development
projects.
That
makes
good
sense,
and
it's
probably
worth
unpacking
that,
and
we
would
have
specific
thoughts
on
that.
C
If
anyone
was
interested
and
then
the
lease
period,
the
moxie
lease
period
with
the
10
and
extensions
again
on
development
deals,
that's
that
would
be
fairly
critical,
given
what
commercial
lease
is,
if
it's
primarily
focused
on
commercial
leases
and
trying
to
drive
office
into
downtown
something
beyond.
That
would
probably
be
requisite.
C
C
They
had
a
five-year
hold
10-year
lease
and
then
some
extensions-
and
I
guess
I
would
put
to
you
that-
had
this
program
been
in
place
for
that
hotel
application-
and
I
think
it's
analogous
enough
to
the
office-
they
would
probably
not
have
been
able
to
get
entitlement
and
proceed.
I
don't
think
it
would
have
worked
for
them
so,
and
it
certainly
would
eliminate
what
we
currently
have
going
through
entitlement.
C
If
we
were
required
to
proceed
on
this,
which
is
why
we're
so
interested
it
would
essentially
take
the
project
we're
proposing
near
city
hall,
the
new
one
off
the
table.
We
would
have
to
go
back
and
redesign.
We
had
designed
around
the
moxie
precedent
and
some
conversations
we'd
had
with
the
city
over
a
year
ago.
So
that's
essentially
it.
F
F
A
I
don't
want
to
say
no,
but
we
haven't
fully.
You
know
vetted,
I
think.
What's
gonna
we're
gonna
end
up
having
options,
and
it
very
well
may
spread
to
these
agreements
in
some
way.
Based
on
pricing,
you
may
have
an
option
to
just
park
at
one
garage.
It's
going
to
be
likely
some
premium
above
and
beyond
something
else,
but
we
would
like
to
see
a
larger
number
of
people
have
global
access,
which
provides
us
flexibility,
but
I,
I
would
always
have
some
ability,
I
think
for
folks
to
which
we
have
right
now
there.
A
A
F
A
A
F
I've
never
seen
the
action
do
have
we
ever
seen
the
actual
moxie
terms,
I'm
not
sure
I've,
I'm
sure
they're
in
the
public
arena
somewhere.
I've
never
seen
them,
I'm
just
I
mean
supposedly
they
have
35
years
or
something
like
that,
total
and-
and
I
don't
know
how
many
spaces
or
how
long
or
anything
else
or
I
don't
know
how
to
resolve
I'd,
be.
F
C
A
F
F
A
At
every
facility
is
where
is
the
equilibrium
of
being
able
to
accommodate
our
visitors,
because
they
are
equally
as
important
to
us
to
be
able
to
accommodate,
and
that's
the
challenge
in
the
game
that
we're
always
playing
on.
How
many
can
we
facilitate?
I
mean
we
know
historically,
how
many
visitors
are
in
our
garage
at
any
given
time,
based
on
the
hourly
metrics
that
we
have,
and
so
we
we
take
that
into
consideration
when
we
develop.
How
many
permits
can
we
issue.
F
So
I
I
don't
have
any
other
comments
other
than
you
know
again
I'll
go
back
to
the
beginning,
which
is,
I
think,
you've
done
a
great
job
of
crafting
something
here.
I
don't
know
how
the
development
community
gets
financing
unless
they
have
certainty
about
getting
being
able
to
deliver
the
the
certainty
of
their
financing
entity
and
whatever
you
have
to
do
to
do
that.
Otherwise,
the
program
isn't
really
going
to
do
anything,
but
I
don't
is
it?
F
A
B
A
A
F
C
C
A
A
B
So
I'm
having
a
hard
time
threading
this
one,
because
you
know
I
understand
henry's
concern
that
he
wants
to
make
sure
and
I
think
all
of
us
he
speaks
for
all
of
us
on
that.
You
know
what
we
talked
about
here
or
what
we
approve
here.
If
that's
what's
going
to
the
council,
then
we're,
obviously
if
we
approve
that
we're
okay
with
it,
but
if
something's
going
to
the
council
that
we
haven't
yet
seen
and
it's
being
attributed
to
this
board,
that's
a
mess.
H
How
about
this?
How
about
I
suggest
in
your
recommendation,
you,
you
outline
those
those
couple
things
that
we
just
talked
about:
the
up
to
2000
permits
the
staff
moving
forward
with
segregating
out
existing
development
or
existing
properties
and
development
and
two
tracks
for
hold
periods,
term
lengths,
etc.
H
And
then
you
put
those
into
your
recommendation
and
you
are
in
support.
You
approve
or
put
your
support
behind
the
memo
and
then,
if
we
in
drafting
our
memo
come
up
and
against
anything
that
is
a
substantial
change,
then
we
bring
it
back
to
the
board
for
further
discussion
if
it
stays
with.
If
this
memo
stays
within
the
kind
of
current
guidelines
that
are
established-
and
there
is
no
major
change-
we
move
forward
with
going
to
council
with
your
support
for
the
permit
program.
H
E
H
That
means
we
wouldn't
get
to
council
until
probably
next
fiscal
year
I
mean
it
would
be,
it
would
push
it
too
hot
too
far
and
too
far.
I
know
that
there
are
other.
There
are
developers
and
there
are
customers
that
are
looking
for
agreements
and
we
won't
ink
a
deal
until
we've
got
this
ironed
out.
So
we
don't
want
to
start
kind
of
backing
that
process
up
as
well.
So
would
you
be
comfortable
henry
with
that
approach?.
B
H
F
A
F
J
J
It's
not
meant
for
developers,
it's
not
meant
for
just
customers,
it's
not
meant
for
employees,
it's
meant
for
everybody
that
is
in
need
of
parking
in
the
downtown
core
and,
as
aryan
just
stated-
and
this
was
my
concern
with
the
hotel
project-
we
as
the
city
are
not
and
should
not
be,
the
backstop
of
parking
for
new
development.
New
development
has
many
different
opportunities:
number
one
being
developed
on
site
number
two.
There
are
other
parking
garages
and
opportunities
that
people
can
actually
tap
into
if
they
wanted
to
private
resources.
J
At
number,
three
is
changing,
obviously,
they're,
you
know
they're
their
understanding
of
how
many
parking
they
may
need,
and
then
we
are
also
an
option
which
would
be
city-owned
garages,
but
we
are
not
the
backstop,
and
this
is
not
the
program
for
that.
This
is
actually
the
opposite
again.
I
think
that
that
hotel
project
was
the
the
impetus
for
me
to
try
and
really
get
something
that
was
much
more
equitable.
J
G
Yeah,
I
don't
I
mean
I,
I
see
all
sides
of
the
argument
right
and
I
agree
with
and
understand
what
raul
is
saying.
I
think
that
you're
not
there's
not
a
one-size-fits-all
right,
there's
always
going
to
be
extenuating
extenuating
circumstances,
they're
always
going
to
be
a
difference
in
development,
time
frame
and
entitlement
time
frame.
So
what
you
have
to
try
to
do,
I
think,
which
is
the
tough
job
that
aryan
has,
is
try
to
get
something
that's
going
to
help
the
largest
number
of
people
in
a
reasonable
way.
E
Thank
you.
Aryan
has
got
a
really
tough
job
here
to
try
to
balance
all
of
this
out,
and
I
just
want
to
remind
the
board
that
we
have
a
number
of
b
and
c
buildings
that
have
no
parking
at
all.
And
every
single
surface
parking
lot
in
the
downtown
is
a
development
site,
and
I'm
just
I
just
keep
thinking
about
bart
proposal
on
on
the
victory
parking
lot
in
the
325
spaces
that
there's
no
accommodation
at
all
for
any
other
public
parking.
There.
E
When,
when
that
gets
taken
down
for
the
bark
construction
and
and
we're
going
to
be
in
the
queue
for
parking
at
the
market
street
garage
and
there's
no
room
at
the
end,
what
happens
to
the
viability
of
these
buildings?
So
I
just
want
to
add
that
on
is
another,
more
difficult
layer
as
we're
wrestling.
This
issue
to
the
ground.
F
F
A
B
B
A
H
H
I
will
keep
my
comments
very
brief
and
just
hit
the
highlights,
so
we
can
make
sure
we
have
some
ample
time
for
discussion
here,
because
I
really
want
to
hear
from
the
board
on
this.
So,
as
you
may
recall,
that
part
of
our
work
plan
for
this
year
is
to
re
review
reserves
and
take
steps
to
discuss
potential
options
to
modify
either
the
existing
or
move
to
a
new
reserve
structure.
H
They're,
focusing
we're
gonna
focus
the
conversation
on
the
existing
meter,
reserve
setup
and
potential
modifications.
We
could
make
enhancements
to
that
and
then
a
new
proposed,
which
we
are
calling
micro
reserves,
which
would
put
divide
up
into
the
various
meter
areas,
individual
or
very
small
reserves
for
each
of
those
areas
to
do
with
specific
projects
back
into
those
meter
areas
so
very
quickly.
The
existing
parking
meter
district
area
reserve
is
currently
structured
to
pool
portions
of
the
net
revenues
from
both
the
downtown
core
and
all
the
exterior
areas.
H
This
is
beneficial
because
there's
a
larger
amount
of
revenue,
that's
then
available
to
disseminate
for
projects
can
potentially
have
more
meaningful
projects
because
there's
more
money
available,
it's
a
larger
accumulation
of
those
funds
and
therefore
more
substantial
investment
could
be
made
in
the
various
meter
district
areas.
In
addition,
it's
important
to
note
that
the
current
reserve
is
being
managed
and
is
handled
administratively
by
parking
staff,
and
we
have
that
capability.
H
There's
always
the
potential
that
if
we
make
changes
to
this
reserve
depending
on
what
that
additional
workload
might
be
on
staff,
we
might
not
be
able
to
cover
it
with
existing
staff.
So
it's
just
something
we
need
to
be
mindful
of
as
we're
having
these
discussions
and
moving
forward.
Major
changes
that
could
burden
administratively
could
be
make
things
more
complicated
for
us.
So
what
we
were
talk,
what
we've
talked
about
internally
is
for
potentials
to
modify.
The
existing
reserve
could
be
things
to
better
understand
and
offer
more
transparency
into
the
reserve.
H
We
would
suggest,
maybe
out
outlying
and
identifying
what
the
specific
meter
reserve
should
be
sent
on
and
then
identifying
specific
guidelines
for
project
types
and
scopes
and
eligibility,
and
then
outline
a
specific
process
for
recommending
identifying,
reviewing
and
prioritizing
those
projects,
so
better
understanding,
the
okay,
here's
the
money,
it's
our
setup
and
the
reserves
right
now.
But
how
are
we
going
to
use
it?
H
H
Multi-Modal
investments
within
these
meter
district
areas,
so
possible
uses
of
funds
could
be
to
prioritize
and
support
improvements
in
the
pedestrian
environment.
Things
like
trees
park,
benches
art
installations,
also
to
enhance
pedestrian
and
bicycle
circulation
and
safety
within
each
district,
and
then
we
need
to
kind
of
consider
should
the
funds
be
used
to
offset
or
pay
for
expenses
that
are
the
responsibility
currently
of
private
property
or
business
owners.
If
the
fund
ends
up
like
we
are
now
kind
of
in
this
situation
that
we're
in
the
red
or
there's
a
loss.
H
These
resorts
we
need
to
keep
in
mind.
They
would
remain
eligible
discretion
of
city
council
as
an
option
to
cover
operating
sense
expenses
of
the
entire
parking
system.
So
we
need
to
keep
that
in
mind
that
you
know
I
never
thought
this
day
would
come
where
the
parking
fund
would
be
operating
in
the
red,
but
we're
right
we're
there
now.
H
If
we
can't
meet
those
target
historical
base
revenues
should
the
parking
fund
be
made
whole
moving
forward.
So
do
we
chisel
away
at
that
kind
of
red
ink
year
after
year
before
and
then
hit
a
zero
and
then
start
accumulating
money
in
the
reserves?
Again
things
to
consider
additional
points
we
kind
of
went
over.
I
went
over
this
a
little
bit
that
the
current
kind
of
pooling
of
reserve
allows
for
larger,
combined
resources.
H
So
that's
kind
of
our
proposal
or,
in
a
nutshell,
our
option
for
keeping
the
reserve,
but
as
it
is,
but
current,
but
adding
modifications.
So
this
is
I'll
move
on
real
quickly
to
the
multiple
individual
or
micro
reserves.
So
all
of
those
items
we
kind
of
just
mentioned
would
probably
feed
into
the
micro
reserves
as
well.
H
It
would,
however,
change
the
structure,
so
we'd
have
multiple
mini
reserves:
micro
reserves,
as
opposed
to
one
cooling
reserve,
so
the
specific
money
made
in
each
individual
district
area
so
from
that
chart
that
elias
had
shown
you
would
would
flow
into
these
individual
reserves.
That
money,
then,
would
be
potentially
available
for
each
of
those
meter
district
areas
to
decide
what
it
would
be
spent
on
in
their
specific
area.
H
H
H
We
would
need
to
outline
those
that,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
same
sort
of
questions
around
who
gets
paid
first
and
what
gets
made
whole
before
money
goes
into
those
reserves
with
the
micro
reserves.
It's
going
to
be
quite
a
bit
smaller
pots
of
money,
and
the
question
then
comes
into
play
if
there
is
a
specific
area
that
doesn't
necessarily
make
enough
money
to
cover
its
expenses
and
doesn't
therefore
get
money
put
into
their
reserves.
H
H
H
H
G
Oh
one
of
the
things
that
I
appreciate
about
the
the
micro
reserve
concept
is
that,
geographically,
you
know
japan,
town
old,
civic,
center,
sofa
and
east
santa
clara
commuter
districts
are
so
different.
You
know
they're
geographically
different
they're
they're
different
in
terms
of
what
they
service,
whether
it's
a
retail
district
office
district.
G
You
know,
I
think,
giving
these
areas
their
own
way
of
stipulating
how
they
want
to
use
their
funds
is
important.
You
know,
because
I
know
that
our
needs
in
japan
town
are
probably
a
lot
different
than
those
of
the
old
civic
center,
and
perhaps
you
know
the
allocation
at
old
civic
center
can
be
used
to
assist
the
the
micro
houses
and
the
homeless
issues
they're
dealing
with
over
there
versus
you
know.
G
I
know
that
east
santa
clara
business
district
has
reached
out
to
me
and
they
need
help
with
marketing
you
know,
and
so,
if
their
allocation
is
used
specifically
for
something
I
think
being
able
to
tailor,
the
micro
reserves
for
disc
to
the
per
district
would
be
in
my
opinion.
For
us
it
would
be
helpful.
H
So
I
think
we
would
like
to
have
the
board
weigh
in
on
kind
of
which
direction
you
would
like
us
to
pursue,
because
the
next
our
next
meeting
we
want
to
be
able
to
so
these.
These
kind
of
talking
points
that
were
proposed
today
have
they've
not
been
vetted
and
there's
a
lot
of
work
that
needs
to
go
on
behind
the
scenes,
with
making
sure
that
some
of
the
things
that
we've
put
in
here
are
completely
feasible
legal
purchase.
I
mean
all
the
gamuts
of
the
different
areas
of
city
process.
H
We
need
to
check
in
with
so
what
we'd
like
that
board
to
weigh
in
on
is.
Are
you
wanting
us
to
pursue
the
kind
of
changes
or
modern
potential
modifications
to
the
current
reserve
and
the
pooled
pooled
reserve?
Or
would
you
like
us
to
pursue
and
flesh
out
the
micro
reserve
option,
so
we
can
frame
our
next
presentation
to
you
and
have
have
those
internal
city
chats.
H
G
A
In
the
last
couple
of
minutes
of
the
meeting,
we
can
briefly
touch
on
item
six
c.
There
was
a
letter
submitted
to
the
council
member
of
paralysis
office
just
before
the
september
meeting,
so
we
couldn't
agendize
it.
I
think
it
was
circulated
within
the
the
board
members
request
from
the
sofa
committee
within
the
downtown
association
to
activate
the
convention
center
garage
to
allow
for
90
minutes
of
free
parking.
A
We
looked
at
that.
We
are
not
in
support
of
that.
As
a
as
a
department
of
division,
I've
talked
to
the
convention
center
in
team
san
jose.
They
are
also
not
supportive
of
that.
The
garage
needs
to
be
preserved
for
event
parking
for
the
convention
center
for
the
area
theaters.
Although
it
does
provide
some
area
parking,
it
is
not
intended
as
a
primary
destination.
We
have
the
second
in
san
carlos
garage
which
which
services
that
area
and
also
provides
the
90
minute
for
free
parking.
A
I
don't
have
any
updates
or
information
for
for
7a.
I
think
that's
a
placeholder
more
than
anything
work
does
continue.
Folks
are
continuing
to
work
on
land
acquisition
and
conceptual
designs
for
the
two
sites,
the
lotte
and
the
milligan
site.
There's
a
lot
of
work
that
still
needs
to
happen
to
bring
those
sites
online
as
as
as
parking
sites
I'll,
certainly
keep
the
board
apprised,
as
as
the
city
makes
more
headway
on
that
downtown
promotions
and
marketing.
A
A
A
Hopefully
it
gets
busy
downtown
with
the
shark
season
starting.
We
have
not
seen
the
activity
that
we've
seen
in
years
past,
driven
to
the
market
street
garage
area.
Just
from
that
one
thing,
but
hopefully
with
christmas
in
the
park
and
some
of
the
other
theaters
getting
more
active,
we
can
see
some
more
activity
there.
B
Very
good
I've
been
waiting
for
the
public
art
item
that
I
never
saw
on
the
agenda
that
paul
wanted
to
comment
on,
but
it
doesn't
appear
that
paul
is
still
with
us.
So
just
for
the
record,
since
this
is
being
recorded,
you
know
I
wanted
to
give
paul
the
chance
to
speak
on
the
public
art
component.
He
was
wanting
to
speak
on
so
does
anybody
see
that
that
I'm
missing
in
no
there's
no
agenda
item.
C
B
C
B
C
B
A
It's
a
it's
an
expenditure
by
the
city's
public
art
office
of
cultural
affairs
for
every
project
that
the
city
undertakes
in
a
capital
site
so
long
as
it's
a
large
enough
and
a
permanent
capital
improvement.
If
we're
going
to
replace
a
a
camera
or
a
pay
station
or
re-stripe
that
doesn't
rise
to
the
level
of
a
true
new
infrastructure
project,
anything
that
does
gets
tapped
with
a
small
public
art
component.