►
From YouTube: 2022 The Year of The DAO w/DXdao
Description
DeFi Slate Fam:
In the past few months, we’ve seen a proliferation of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations or DAOs for various purposes. However, DAO governance especially in DeFi is still in its infancy stages. Today we got to talk with DXDAO, a DAO that since launching in May of 2019 has developed, governed and grown its suite of DeFi products to over $13.5M in Total Value Locked (TVL).
Thanks to Keenan Luke, the Communications & Marketing Lead and Sky, the Business Development and Partnerships Head at DXDAO, we got a look at what has been going on at DXDAO for the past few years, their accomplishments and the products that they have been developing. We also dove into the current state of community governance and how DXDAO’s transition to a reputation-based governance model has allowed them to continue building open-source and trustless systems as a DAO while also spearheading Governance 2.0.
With the current pitfalls of governance models, the future of governance will certainly include a balance between equity ownership and reputation, and DXDAO will be at the forefront of all this.
Cheers,
Wassie Capital
🙏🏽 Subscribe to DeFi Slate to get our latest updates & newsletter: https://defislate.substack.com/
🌐 Check Us Out On Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/defislate
🚀 Join the community on Discord to get our free V.1 Yield Farming Guide: https://discord.com/invite/eX5Z8pb3Fr
#DAO #DXdao #DeFi
B
C
What's
going
on,
y'all
welcome
back
to
the
d5
slate
youtube
channel
and
excited
today
to
talk
about
what's
going
on
over
there
at
dxdow
and
the
open
source,
you
know
just
the
overall
nature
of
d5
and
kind
of
how
we're
able
to
build
this
open
source,
transparent,
trustless
system.
There's
a
lot
of
parts
to
this.
You
know
they
call
it
the
the
money.
C
Legos
there's
a
lot
of
parts
to
this,
so
we're
excited
to
kind
of
break
it
down,
for
you
guys,
explain
a
bit
about
what's
what
dx
dab
is
doing,
how
y'all
can
get
involved
and
where
we're
at
with
d5
currently,
so
here,
of
course,
with
rob
and
keenan
and
skye
so
keenan
and
skye
excited
to
hear
from
you
guys
start
off
with
keenan.
How
are
you
doing
today
and
a
brief
intro
would
be
great.
A
Yeah
I'm
doing
fantastic.
My
name
is
keenan.
I've
been
with
dx
style
for
a
little
over
a
year
now,
nowadays
handling
our
dx
voice,
kind
of
leading
and
organizing
those
initiatives
over
there.
We
kind
of
deal
with
the
communications
marketing
related
things,
so
not
much
more
to
add
to
that
sky.
If
you
want
to
give
a
quick
intro.
D
Yeah
hi,
I'm
skye.
I've
been
in
the
ethereum's
ecosystem
for
a
few
years
now
and
yeah
a
core
contributor
to
dxdow,
along
with
a
few
other
dows
in
the
space
and
at
dxdow.
I
focus
mainly
on
what
we
call
bx
dx
biz,
which
is
kind
of
business,
development
and
partnerships
and
opportunities
and
taking
advantage
of
those
but
then
work
alongside
keenan
on
dx
voice
and
communications
and
then
obviously,
overall
governance.
C
Sweet
awesome,
yeah
governance
is
it's
governance.
I
I
think,
we'll
see
a
actually
a
slight
downturn
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
governance
that
protocols
will
be
giving
to
their
community
holders.
What
do
you
guys
think
about
this?
Is
this?
Is
this
wrong
or
or
what
are
your
thoughts
on
the
outlook
of
community
governance.
A
C
Less
missions,
and
also
like,
I
think
I
think,
the
the
governance
kind
of
aspect
of
governance
sequence
was
kind
of
overhauled
in
terms
of
like
the
community
makes
every
choice.
I
think
a
lot
of
protocols
have
kind
of
seemed
like
oh
okay,
maybe
not
the
best,
but
also
it
contributes
to
the
ethos
of
decentralization.
A
Yeah,
maybe
I
can
kick
that
off
not
to
get
right
into
shilling,
but
we
are
actually
looking
to
kind
of
rectify
that
problem.
We
do
identify
it
as
definitely
a
problem,
equity
ownership
versus
governance,
etc.
We're
kind
of
transitioning
to
a
system
we're
dubbing
governance
2.0.
I
know
2.0
meme.
This
was
before
the
whole
d5
2.0
thing,
so
maybe
we
front
run
that
a
little
bit,
but
currently
dx
style
uses
reputation-based
governance.
So
there's
no
token.
A
For
example,
dxd
does
not
have
any
voting
power
currently
on
the
actual
dows
on
chain
transactions
and
we're
looking
to
kind
of
merge
to
a
hybrid
system
that
utilizes.
I
guess
you
call
a
threshold.
So
if
you
have
a
certain
amount
of
reputation,
for
example,
you
need
to
back
that
up
with
the
liquid
financial
token
that
is
dxd
and
vice
versa.
D
That
is
a
governance.
Token,
might
own
ownership
of
the
protocol,
and,
actually,
you
know,
has
say,
but
in
in
general,
it's
getting
participation
from
those
token
holders
and
whether
it's
distributed
and
how
active
they
are
is
like
always
a
question,
and
if
you
have
a
lot
of
capital,
you
can
also
buy
your
way
in
and
you
know,
earn
a
big
voice
and
influence
things
we
haven't
seen.
I
don't
think
we've
seen
like
an
economic
attack
really
on
on
liquid
token
governance.
It's
mainly
the
problem
is
projects
that
aren't
distributed
in
the
beginning.
D
They
start
giving
out
their
token,
and
then
they
have
a
hard
time
actually
getting
distributed
or
decentralized
governance,
and
so
the
unique
thing
about
dxdow
was
about
a
little
over
two
years
ago.
Now
it
was
actually
like
they
had
this
mechanism
to
distribute
non-transferable
voting
power,
which
is
this
unit
of
account
this
this
reputation
unit
and
it
was
distributed
to
about
400,
different
people,
and
so
you
had
this
like
dao
that
had
distributed
governance
and
was
using
dallas
tax
governance
platform,
but
actually
didn't
have
any
products
or
anything.
D
And
so
you
had
the
opposite
of
what
most
things
are
today,
where
you
actually
had
a
dow
that
was
that
could
do
distributed
decentralized
governance,
but
didn't
have
a
product,
and
then
it
started
figuring
out
what
products
to
work
on
it
got
gifted
a
couple
products
from
gnosis.
Actually
it
it
was
owning
those
products
and
it
was
working
and
building
those
products,
and
so
you
started
taking
this
governance
system
well,
and
the
reason
this
was
created
was
actually
because
gnosis
and
daostack
originally
had
a
like
a
vision,
very
early
on
that.
D
Otherwise,
it's
not
a
decentralized
product
right,
it's
not
a
dap
right,
and
so
they
create
this
dow
without
having
any
products
yet
because
they
knew
that
eventually,
you'd
have
to
have
a
decentralized
governing
mechanism
to
own
a
decentralized
product,
and
so
that's
kind
of
how
dx
doubt
evolved
differently
than
most
of
the
projects
in
the
space
which
start
as
like
tech
startups,
launching
a
product
and
then
trying
to
then
moving
towards
progressive,
decentralization
and
so
yeah.
So
the
the
in
kenyan
keenan
mentioned
governance,
2.0
governance.
D
2.0,
we
think,
is
the
answer,
because
there's
this
like
reputational
based
governance,
which
you
can't
buy
your
way
into,
but
then
people
that
provide
capital
by
buying
like
a
a
financial
token.
They
they
also
deserve
some
say,
and
so
some
balance
between
the
two
mechanisms,
we
think
is
the
future
of
governance
and
there's
no
system
currently
today.
That
does
that,
and
so
we
are
working
on
that
and
building
it
in
stages,
but
hopefully
that
actually
solves
a
lot
of
the
issues
with
yeah
what
you
are
describing
with
your
initial
question,
I
think
yeah.
C
I
think
some
of
the
reputation
that
I
that
comes
to
mind
is,
like
you
know,
activity
and
discord,
for
example
and
stuff.
Like
this,
you
know
overall
contributions
to
the
protocol,
but
could
you
maybe
highlight
a
few
more
of
criteria
or
kind
of
what?
What
in
in
y'all's,
mind,
composes
a
reputation
able
to
be
a
voice
of
governance,
yeah
or
what's
the
scale?
If
you
will
yeah.
D
Well,
we
do
it
in
like
percentages
of
the
total
reputation
that
exists,
because
it's
an
inflationary
unit,
basically
so
over
time
as
more
people
earn
it
other
people
who
are
less
active,
their
their
say
kind
of
goes
down,
and
so
either
being
a
contributor
like
on
a
work
like
a
worker
for
the
dow
or
a
team
that
does
like
a
one-off
project
to
create
something
for
the
dao.
They
could
also
earn
reputation
and
all
reputation
is
only
given
through
an
on-chain
proposal
that
the
actual
dao
votes
on
right.
D
D
Otherwise,
you,
basically
someone
has
to
kind
of
prove
value
that
they've
created
for
dx,
dao
or
contribution
that
they've
done,
and
they
do
an
on-chain
proposal
to
ask
for
a
certain
amount
of
reputation,
and
we
have
guidelines
around
that.
We
have
guidelines
for
like
pay
for
workers
and
also
reputation
just
so
that
people
are
not
coming
up
with
some
random
number
of
like
how
much
voting
say
they
should
get
in
the
dow.
So
there's
there's
like
kind
of
historical
precedence
and
then
guidelines
to
help
people
figure
that
out.
C
And
the
way
you
kind
of
speak
about
the
yeah
keenan,
perhaps
you
can
answer
this
one
as
well
or
respond
the
way
you
kind
of
speak
about
the
the
desire
to
have
reputation
so
that
you
can
earn
the
right
to
vote
and
to
have
a
larger
say.
You
know
it
it's
starting.
It
reminds
me
of
kind
of
okay-
let's,
let's
buy
curve,
let's
lock
up
v
curve
and
let's
vote
for
our
our
gauges
to
have
the
most
yield.
C
A
Yeah,
I
want
to
actually
quickly
give
some
extra
context
to
the
last
question.
If
you
don't
mind,
if
it
wasn't
clear
by
what
sky
was
kind
of
articulating
reputation,
as
you
kind
of
mentioned
is
not
really
defined,
we
obviously
we
have
guidelines,
but
anything
could
technically
be.
You
know
a
reputation
gaining
event.
You
know,
hypothetically,
you
guys
that
defy
slate
could
propose
to
the
doubt.
A
A
C
Yeah,
I
think
you
know
in
in
some
mechanisms
in
d5
today,
you
you're
able
to
use
your
voting
power
to
give
yourself
more
yield.
The
question
is:
why
would
one
want
to
have
voting
power
in
dxdow
and
then
also
on
top
of
just
getting
more
yield?
Why
would
one
want
to
be
a
you
know,
a
protocol
politician
in
d5.
A
Yeah,
so
I
think
for
for
dx
dow
it's
a
bit
different
than
just
the
amm
kind
of
like
curve.
We
are
a
dow
that
has
a
treasury
and
really
reputation
has
kind
of
control
of
that
treasury
and
dxtel
assets.
So
really
one
want
of
owning
reputation
is
to
have
a
say
or
help
control
that
treasury
basket
of
assets.
You
know
we
also
own
ens,
as
we
own
front
ends
which
we'll
get
into
in
a
bit
later,
so
I
think
that's
kind
of
the
primary
thing
here.
D
Yeah,
like
in
general,
you
called
it
a
defy
politician.
I
think
you
called
it
yeah
a
protocol
politician
yeah,
exactly
politician,
so
curve
is
obviously
the
most
popular
one
curve
wars,
all
that
kind
of
like
and
it
gets
very
complicated
very
quickly
and
that
is
to
like
drive
that's
protocols
trying
to
earn
power
in
like
another
protocol
to
like
drive
benefits
to
your
own
protocol.
D
That
is
a
little
bit
different,
like
as
keenan
described
where
this
the
dx
dow
is
like
ownership
of
a
treasury
ownership
of
products
and
ownership
of
like
governing
those
products.
And
so
it's
really,
you
know
it
kind
of
operates
as
a
collective
of
people
that
you
are
you're
comfortable
with
the
people
making.
D
I
think
it
will
get
more
like
diversified
you'll
have
we
already
have
kind
of
like
the
overall
like
dow,
but
then
we
have
different
bases
on
different
chains,
and
then
we
have
squads
like
dx
voice
and
swapper
squad
that
kind
of
operate
almost
as
sub
dows,
and
so
you
get
delegation
of
funds
and
delegation
of
decision
making
power
to
teams
to
focus
on
the
different
initiatives.
And
so
you
have
this
like
this
pretty
awesome
graph
of
or
like
web
of
different
squads
within
dxdow,
and
I
guess
that
does
happen
in
other
d5
projects.
D
But
like
the
curve,
wars
like
it
seems
like
a
very
high
level
protocol
level
thing
that
is
quite
a
bit
different
than
like
this
community
of
people
that
are
trying
to
achieve
a
mission
together
and
if
you
believe
in
the
values
of
the
tao
of
dx
dao,
then
you
basically
want
to
participate
in
that,
and
you
have
a
desire
to
earn
voting
power
because
you
want
to
be
a
part
of
it
versus
like
protocol
like
like
non-emotional
protocol
level
things.
So
it's
kind
of
yeah.
It's
a
good
question,
though
it's.
C
Definitely
different
yeah,
I
mean
I,
I
was
just
kind
of
trying
to
get
into
the
incentives
and
I
think
this
question
will-
and
I'm
sure
rob
has
some
questions
too-
should
I'll
shut
up
after
this
one.
But
what
what's
the
mechanism
from
going
for,
like
outsider,
to
like
I'm
a
full-time
paid
contributor
in
dxdow
or
again
in
broader
dows,
like
like
what
what's
the
financial
incentive
for
somebody
to
come
in
and
the
way
that
my
mental
model
kind
of
works
out
is
I
come
in?
I
contribute
a
bunch
basically
up
front.
C
I
you
know
I
I
put
a
proposal
to
you
know
to
give
myself
some
rep
some
some
ownership,
and
then
I
just
do
that
over
and
over
and
then
eventually
I
put,
I
put
a
proposal
up
where
I'm
like
all
right.
I
want
to
do
this
full
time.
You
know
I'm
requesting
this
salary
or
this
amount
over
this
period
of
time.
This
is
what
I'm
going
to
do.
This
is
what
I've
been
doing.
A
Yeah,
I
think
you
described
the
ideal
kind
of
dow
onboarding
there
kind
of,
like
you
know,
showing
your
aligned
first
participating
in
things,
identifying
problems
and
then
offering
or
participating
in
solutions.
I
think
that's
kind
of
the
ideal
pipeline
and
everything
moves
from
there.
We
do
have
a
dx,
dow
contributor
guidelines,
so
we
do
have
kind
of
a
soft
system
in
place
that
is
passed
on
chain.
A
We
do
bi-monthly,
basically
contractual
kind
of
payments,
half
up
front
half
after
the
fact,
so
that's
kind
of
like
when
you
get
established
with
the
extau.
But
for
us
we
have
a
trial
period,
which
is
essentially
a
reduced
rate
kind
of
deeper.
I
guess
monitored
kind
of
time
frame
operating
so
you'll
be
a
bit
more
clear
on
what
your
deliverables
will
be.
D
Just
to
add
to
that,
as
you
mentioned,
all
dows
are
different,
but
most
dows,
oh,
oh
yeah,
pretty
much!
All
dowels
are
very
flat
like
from
a
hierarchy
perspective
right
and
so
just
like
you
mentioned
the
like
someone
comes
into
community.
They
start
spending
time
there.
They
they
had
some
interest
that
draws
them
there.
You
basically
have
to
spend
some
time
there
figuring
out
like
what's
happening.
D
You
basically
have
to
figure
out
what
you
can
contribute,
giving
your
skills
to
the
dao
that
you
are
interested
in
and
then
you
start
to
either
do
that
for
free,
and
then
you
can
ask
for
a
reward
later
or
you
ask
like
if
I
can
do
this
for
the
dao
like
do
dao
hold
like
dao
members.
Want
me
to
do
this
and
then
they
can.
You
can
do
a
proposal,
but
it's
really
yeah.
D
E
Yeah,
the
the
no
one,
like
you
said
it's
flat.
No
one
is
working
for
anyone.
Everyone
is
working
with
each
other
and
and
that
kind
of
made
hr
a
meme
like
in
the
early
days
of
dao's,
because
you
know
you
don't
really
need
a
lot
of
of
hiring
material,
no
one's
really
like
checking
a
resume
or
doing
any
of
that
stuff,
but
the
onboarding
experience
still
needs
to
be
facilitated
through
the
guidelines
that
you're
talking
about,
and
if
you
know,
there's
a
dedicated
person
there
working
on
it.
E
A
Funny
that
you
mentioned
that,
I
actually
do
believe
we've
seen
several
dows
adopt
dxdo's
kind
of
previous
framework,
won't
name
any
names
unsure.
If
that
is
something
that
we
want
to
call
attention
to
directly,
but
it's
definitely
a
system
that
we're
comfortable
with.
We
are
kind
of
expanding
upon
it
here,
just
transitioning
into
the
the
new
guidelines
as
we're
calling
them.
As
of
the
last
couple
of
weeks
introducing
a
couple
more
levels:
it's
a
level-based
system,
kind
of
more
definition
of
ownership
and
coordination.
A
C
Yeah
and
the
thing
is
everybody
wants,
everybody
wants
to
be
governed
and
organized
in
the
most
efficient
way
possible.
It's
just
how
to
coordinate.
That
is
right.
That's
that's
the
ultimate
question,
because
you
know
everybody
wants
it
to
grow
as
big
as
it
possibly
can
and
be
a
part
of
it
to
the
to
the
largest
extent.
But
it's
it's
like.
How
do
you
get
everybody
to
agree
on
that
right?
You
know
it
comes
down
to
these
assets.
You
know
that
you
you
guys
had
mentioned
the
treasury.
C
The
front
ends
the
enses
that
you
guys
kind
of
govern
over.
You
know
the
way
that
I'm
thinking
about
these
front
ends
is
kind
of
like
you
know
when,
when
I
use
a
liquidy
protocol,
you
can
go
on
liquidy
and
you
know
they
have
like
10
front
ends.
You
can
choose
from
and
there's
certain
levels
of,
like.
I
guess
on
like
up
time
that
they
have.
You
know
like
there's
like
a
99.9
uptime
one.
Then
you
could
use
like
the
one.
C
That's
on
amazon,
that's
like
always
up
and
you
can
use
like
the
one.
That's
on
like
some
sketchy
like
some
indian
server
or
something
that's
like
you
know,
half
and
half
like
you
just
never
know
but
like
you're,
always
pushing
like
the
levels
of
decentralization.
So
I'm
curious
kind
of
what
you
guys
mean
by
your
your
front.
End
assets,
and
you
know
if,
if
it's
something
that
you
guys
are
trying
to
grow
and
yeah.
D
D
But
I
believe
I
have
to
go
look,
but
a
lot
of
those
platforms
are
still
owned
and
operated
by
like
a
central
entity
or
person
or
company,
and
so
that
one
way
to
do
that
is
like
you
said,
if
one
looks
sketchy
and
could
be,
they
could
be
like
you
know,
manipulating
their
front
end
or
someone
else
could
be.
You
could
not
use
that
one.
You
could
use
one
that
looks
more
trusted
and
so
having
options
of
different
front
ends
to
access
a
protocol
is
one
way
to
decentralize.
D
And
so
it's
another.
It's
like
you
see
the
two
differences,
one
is
have
lots
of
front
ends
some
trusted
some,
not
some
centralized.
Some
may
be
ipfs.
I
don't
know
to
access
a
protocol
or
actually
have
the
trusted
place.
Swapper.Eth,
that
is
actually
owned,
not
by
a
single
person
but
by
an
entire
dow,
and
then
that's
also
decentralized,
and
so
the
only
way
to
change
it
is
to
get
the
approval
of
the
decentralized
dao,
and
so
it's
too
really.
You
like
both
are
good
but
they're
different,
the
other
deferring
approaches.
I
think.
A
Yeah
and
just
to
support
that,
I
think
there's
been
a
lot
of
focus,
particularly
in
like
the
the
security
aspect
of
d5
a
lot
on
the
contracts.
Obviously,
there's
a
lot
of
liability
and
issues
with
the
contracts,
but
we've
seen
a
lot
more
recently.
Attacks
on
front
ends,
and
I
think
that
kind
of
how
we're
doing
handling
our
front
end
ownership
dns,
is
super
super
important.
A
C
D
I'm
kidding
so
I
mentioned
so
you
know
so
there's.
Actually
I
think
the
dow
itself,
I
don't
know,
maybe
we
can
look,
but
it
owns
something
like
20
different
enses
and
some
are
just
you
know,
enss
that
could
be
used
in
the
future
or
related,
and
then
there
are
like
maybe
five,
six,
seven
enses,
which
via
proposal
are
actually
pointing
to
front
ends,
and
so
one
would
be
dx
docs
where,
where
the
documentation
for
almost
everything
dx
dial
sits,
that's
that's
also
owned
and
and
governed
and
deployed
using
ens.
D
We
have
swapper,
we
have
omen,
we
have
carrot,
and
these
are
all
yeah.
These
are
all
dot,
eat
names
owned
by
the
actual
dow,
but
there's
actually
a
a
larger
portfolio.
You
know,
I
think
we
yeah,
we
have
other
ones
that
are
that
we're
holding
on
to
for
certain.
You
know
reasons
like
at
one
point:
we
had.
We
still
have
mix.eth
and
mix.eth
you
could
you
could
imagine
it
could
be.
You
know
one
point.
D
I
think
it
was
like
tornado
cash
mixed
with
like
like
smashed
together
with
zapper,
and
that
would
that
was
going
to
be
mixed.east,
but
that
product
is
not
is
not
a
priority
right
now,
so
we
have
like
yeah
it's
kind
of
a
portfolio,
but
no
not
that
we're
squatting
on
enos
names.
But
it's
there's
such
a
core
part
of
dxdow
that
that
there
is
a
portfolio
owned
by
dxdow.
A
And
again,
just
to
support
that
particularly
related
to
the
documentation.
You
can
imagine
why
you'd
want
the
dow
to
directly
control
documentation,
especially
since
we
plan
on
holding
you
know.
This
is
all
our
contract
addresses.
This
is
where
you
know
where
you
can
find
x,
y
and
z,
and
you
don't
want
to
point
anyone
to
or
you
don't
want
the
liability
risk
of
pointing
anyone
to
to
something
that
may
be
malicious,
so
it
does
protect.
Obviously,
the
community
at
large
as
well.
D
And
and
just
on
the
ens
point
you
know,
obviously
there
was
the
ens
token
airdrop
and
there
were
actually
grants
that
went
to
a
number
like
a
whole
bunch
of
people
and
projects
that
have
contributed
to
the
ens
ecosystem
over
the
past
four
years
of
it
being
built
and
stuff
and
also
users.
And
so
you
know,
metamask,
you
know,
uses
ens
names
in
metamask,
where
you
could
like
send
money
to
like
an
ens
name.
E
Yeah,
how
can
other
other
projects
start
to
become
more
familiar
with
the
setup
that
that
you
guys
have
implored
at
dxdow
like
I
noticed
all
the
the
urls?
Are
you
know
it's
dx
style.eth.link,
and
it
has
that
dot
ether
in
the
middle?
What
kind
of
functionality
should
other
protocols
and
dows
start
to
understand,
and
then
at
the
individual
level?
How?
How
can
individuals
start
to
use
this
technology
and
become
involved
with
with
dx
staff.
D
Yeah,
so
there's
articles
and
documentation
around
how
dx
dao
is
doing
it,
but
there's
not
many
other
people
doing
it,
and
so
you
can
check
that
out
on
our
medium
and
in
our
documentation,
the
you
mention
dot
link.
So
there
are
some
still
centralization
points
within
this
echo
system.
So
if
you
have
meta
mask
on
your
browser,
which
most
people
do
you
can
actually
just
go
to,
swapper.eth
and
metamask
will
resolve.
D
Like
you
know,
metamask
will
look
at
ens
on
chains
like
see
what
ipfs
that
ens
is
pointing
to,
and
it
will
resolve
you
your
webs,
your
browser
to
the
actual
ipfs
hash.
That
is,
there
is
a
shortcut
which
the
ens
team
has
helped
implement
over
the
last
couple
years
and
then
there's
also
some
alternatives
where
ethe.link
is
more
of
like
a
centralized
mechanism
that
helps
resolve
it.
If
you
don't
have
metamask,
for
example,
there's
also
ethe.limo,
so
eat.limo's
goal
is
to
be
like
a
decentralized
version
of
ethe.link,
and
so
these
are
still
like.
D
It's
still
very
technical.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
in
the
long
run,
we're
gonna
want
browsers
to
be
able
to
like
the
browser
itself.
Can
resolve
a
dot
name,
and
so
you
could
have
you
know
rob.e
and
you
could
have
your
site
hosted
there
and
you
really
want
the
browser
to
like
resolve
that
for
you,
and
I
think
probably
brave
and
stuff
will
start
doing
that
at
some
point.
And
so
that's
like
yeah,
that's
there's,
that's
the
technical
part.
A
A
You
know
setting
your
content,
hash,
etc,
but
kind
of
below
that
people
that
don't
know
have
any
reason
to
own
their
name,
just
kind
of
owning
your
ens
name,
setting
it
as
your
primary
resolver,
not
done
obviously
she'll
ens
too
much
here,
but
just
kind
of
getting
involved
with
the
ecosystem
and
using
those
names
alongside
your
address
is
super
important.
I
think.
E
Yeah
it'll
be
super
interesting
and
potentially
profitable
to
see
the
kind
of
tokenomics
that
flow
back
to
ens,
like
the
technology
is
so
for,
like
it
permeates
into
quite
a
few
different
aspects
and
it's
very
functional,
but
the
tokenomics
are
still
a
bit
unknown.
So
I
guess
I
guess
we'll
wait
and
find
out.
C
A
Yeah,
maybe
just
a
quick
thought
from
here:
I'm
not
sure
if
you
guys
or
any
of
your
community
will
be
but
we'll
be
attending
eat.
Denver
coming
up
here
in
february,
got
maybe
a
plan
for
an
event
that
is
dx
sponsored
otherwise
you'll
see
us
around.
You
know
the
primary
events
and
whatnot.
So
anyone
you
see
donning
at
dx.t-shirt,
we're
happy
to
you
know,
give
you
some
swag
and
you
know
tell
us,
tell
you
a
bit
more
about
us,
I'm
not
sure
skye.
D
We
we
we'll
have
we're
a
sponsor,
and
so
we'll
have
a
booth,
and
we
also
are
sponsoring
the
hackathon,
which
is
like
the
main
eat
denver
event
during
the
weekend,
but
in
general
yeah.
Anyone
that's
interested
in
what
we've
been
talking
about,
or
what
I
kind
of
consider
one
of
the
more
decentralization
forward
or
true
or
proper
daos,
like
most
of
the
government
yeah
all
pretty
much.
All
the
governance
is
on
chain.
It's
quite
different
than
you
know,
snapshot
multi-sig
dows
that
are
out
there.
D
It's
obviously
a
little
different
than
liquid
token
governance
and
you
as
a
contributor
like
as
a
new
person
or
a
contributor.
You
can
like
bring
any
idea
to
dx
dow.
We
have
a
sizable
treasury.
We
want
to
fund
things
that
that
are
helping
dows
that
help
dx
dial.
If
it
helps
dx
dow,
it
probably
helps
other
dows
as
well.
We
think
daos
are
the
future,
and
so
we
give
grants.
D
We
give
investments
also,
and
then
you
can
also
like
bring
a
project
and
be
part
of
the
dxdow
umbrella
and
like
almost
incubate
it
with
under
dx
dial,
if
it's
like,
it
aligns
with
the
mission
and
the
the
goals
of
the
x
dial
but
yeah
so
happy
to
yeah.
Thanks
for
having
us
and
you
can
check
out
dxdow.eath,
you
can
check
out
our
discord
or
come
to
our
key
base
as
well.