►
Description
Sky Minert, the contributor of DXdao-the first super scalable collective, will picture the future of DAO and explain how will it impact the coordination model in Web3.
A
A
A
As
the
podcast
you
get
about
to
listen,
I'm
pretty
sure
people
are
facing
all
sort
of
time
coordination
issue
when
they're
trying
to
build
up
a
project
during
web3.
We
would
like
to
hear
more
about
your
story
as
well
feel
free
to
reach
us
out
and
comment
on
our
twitter
or
discord
about
your
story.
We
start
this
conversation
at
a
really
crucial
time
when
the
public
need
to
know
the
potential
of
now
and
how
it
will
empower
the
future
economic
coordination
model
in
upcoming
web
3.
A
B
Hi
ashin
it's
sky
here,
it's
great
to
be
here
on
your
podcast
in
a
decentralized
manner.
I
contribute
to
a
bunch
of
dows
in
the
ethereum
ecosystem
and
I'm
happy
to
be
here
representing
dx
dao.
To
give
some
background,
dx
dow
is
a
pretty
decentralization
forward.
Dow
that's
been
around
for
over
a
couple
years:
building
products,
mainly
in
the
d5
space
and
also
in
the
governance
space.
B
A
B
B
A
B
As
you
mentioned,
dowse
and
recently
dows
raising
large
amounts
of
money
for
certain
initiatives,
whether
it's
buying
nfts
or
buying
the
cons,
a
copy
of
the
constitution,
or
things
like
that.
Yet
those
have
gotten
quite
a
bit
of
attention.
Those
are,
you
know,
very
quickly,
form
communities
that
you
know,
people
kind
of
you
know
throw
or
commit
capital
into.
It's
not
clear
whether
or
not
you
as
a
contributor
have
an
actual
say.
B
If
you're,
you
know
putting
your
money
in
thinking
almost
as
if
it's
a
donation
and
there's
a
small
team
of
people
that
are
trying
to
execute
the
the
mission
of
that
community,
and
so
you
know,
as
I
said
before,
dao's
come
on
on
a
spectrum
of
thousands,
some
dows
all
contributors
actually
have
like
a
stake
and
a
say
in
decision
making
and
in
other
scenarios
you
may
count
on
a
smaller
set
of
people
in
dxdow's
case.
It's
you
know
it's
its
governance
is
all
on
chain
has
been
unchanged
since
the
start.
B
It
can
be
issued
and
slashed
only
by
the
dao
via
proposal,
and
so
it's
quite
a
bit
different
of
a
take
than
most
of
the
kind
of
liquid
token
governance,
dows
that
are
out
there,
no
matter
what
amount
of
capital
you
have,
you
cannot
buy
your
buy
a
voice
or
buy
or
say
in
in
the
votes
that
are
happening
in
india,
extil
and
as
for
what
types
of
contributors
we're
looking
for.
Basically
we
have.
You
know
we
have
a
dx
down
manifesto.
B
A
B
A
A
There
are
governors,
enabled
ema,
swapper
and
omen
for
market
prediction,
dx
garf,
which
is
a
governance
tool
and
also
mesa
for
batch
auction
decks.
I
wish
to
know
why
did
the
xl
come
to
play
in
the
form
of
dao
to
empower
d5
at
the
first
place
and
what
did
the
excel
achieve
so
far
with
the
implementation
of
all
those
governance
tools.
B
The
only
way
that
dxdow's
products
can
be
upgraded
or
controlled
is
by
like
full
dial
proposal.
The
products
are
hosted
on
ipfs
and
pointed
to
by
ens
ens
names
that
are
owned
by
the
actual
dow.
So
all
upgrades
all
changes
have
to
go
through
on
chain
proposal,
which
is
true
decentralized,
ownership
of
a
by
a
community
of
the
actual
products
that
the
the
dao
is
building.
A
The
governance
token
is
also
a
proof
of
loyalty
and
proof
of
contribution
here
and
could
serve
many
other
functions
in
the
future
as
the
development
of
the
ex-star.
So
what
did
the
ark
start
do
differently?
To
maintain
such
a
great
on-chain
governor's
record
to
keep
all
its
participants
active?
How
did
they
rule
out
of
governance?
2.0
go
so
far.
B
Here
you
raise
another
very
yeah
again,
a
very
important
part
or
piece
of
what
dick,
what
makes
up
dx
dao,
and
that
is
reputational
based
governance
and
reputational
based
governance-
is
kind
of
a
different
take
than
what
liquid
token
governance
is.
The
only
way
you
can
earn
governance
power
in
dx
style
currently
is
via
contribution
to
dx
dow,
and
you
can
earn
reputation.
B
B
There
so
at
the
same
time,
there
is
a
dxd
token,
which
is
kind
of
the
financial
token
of
dx
dao,
and
you
know,
buyers
and
owners
of
that
token
contributed
capital
to
dx
dow.
There
is
a
plan
in
place
to
what
to
eventually
get
to
what
we
call
governance,
2.0
and
governance.
2.0
is
a
future
governance
plan
where
the
system
is
governed
by
reputational
based
governance,
plus
liquid
token
governance,
combined
and
so
by
requiring
both
parts
of
of
this
kind
of
equation.
B
We
think
that
that
is
one
of
the
most
important
ways
to
govern
an
actual
community,
and
so
there
are
plans
for
that.
We
are
moving
ahead.
We
are
starting
with
dx
vote,
which
is
the
first
steps
towards
that,
but
eventually,
governance
2.0,
once
it's
achieved,
will
be
this
kind
of
what
we
think
is
the
the
the
optimal
solution
for
distributed
decentralized,
governance.
B
B
Some
projects
are,
you
know,
self-funded
and
bootstrapped,
but
many
of
these
projects
in
the
d5
space
are
often
you
know
initially
a
small
team.
Now
they
can
issue
a
token
and
that
the
distribution
of
that
token
can
go
out.
In
some
cases.
That's
you
know
largely
controlled
by
some
of
the
original
team
and
investors.
B
B
Most
projects
have
a
goal,
and
they
what
they
say
is
they
are
moving
towards
progressive,
decentralization
and
so
progressive,
decentralization,
progressive
decentralization
is
great
if
you
can
actually
achieve
it,
and
there
are
very,
very
few
projects
that
have
moved
from
a
small
team
to
a
fully
distributed
and
decentralized
community
that
is
owning
and
controlling
the
actual
product
and
protocol.
There
are
some
examples
and
there
are
some
that
have
done
it
from
the
start.
B
Yeah,
it's
great.
You
brought
up
malek
dao,
so
there's
the
original
malek
dao
created
by
amin
and
then
there's
the
molok
dao
framework
and
there's
a
few
different
versions
of
it,
which
have
spread
across
the
space
and
dao
house
is
a
a
front-end
platform
that
makes
it
very
easy
for
communities
in
taos
to
use
malik
daos
and
the
interesting
about
interesting
thing
about
malik.
Dao
is
for
me-
and
I
am
also
a
I've-
been
a
member
of
the
metacartel
ecosystem
for
a
while.
B
But
you
cannot
actually
just
buy
your
way
into
or
buy
voting
say
in
malik
towers.
They,
it
has
to
be
approved
by
the
the
dao
and
the
dao
is
made
up
of
the
existing
members
of
the
dao
and
so
molok.
Daos
are
another
example
of
I
think,
like
dows,
that
are
kind
of
a
different
take
than
liquid
token
governance.
A
A
B
Yes,
it's
it's
a
really
interesting
idea.
I
think
it
definitely
becomes
more
inclusive
rather
than
exclusive,
because
everyone
has
ownership
and
feels
like
they
are
a
part
of
it
or
is
a
part
of
it
and
can
actually
have
say.
And
so,
if
you
are
interested
in
taking
that
step,
feel
free
to
reach
out,
we
can.
We
can
talk
about
it
and
happy
to
happy
to
help.
A
So,
with
many
newly
launched
adults
now,
there's
some
numerous
ideal
events
happening
every
day.
So
I've
been
seeing
the
term
of
a
doll
pretty
much
everywhere
and
a
while
ago
the
sql
capital
chant
their
trader
profile,
saying
they
would
help
the
daring
to
build
legendary
dolls
from
idea
to
token
airdrop.
A
B
There's,
there's
what's
cool
is
there's
more.
You
know
at
all
the
ethereum
events
that
are
happening
around
the
world.
There's
often
like
separate
dow
focus
events
that
are
also
happening.
There's
the
taoist,
there's
m-con,
which
happened
in
denver
so
like
daos,
are
becoming
a
conversational
topic
of
conversation
that
that
people
want
to
learn
about.
People
are
starting
them.
Anyone
can
start
them
just
like
anyone
can
launch
a
token.
B
Anyone
can
start
a
dao,
and
so,
if
you
understand
the
power
of
taos
and
and
how
ownership
of
a
community
and
giving
everyone
say
and
rights
to
controlling
capital
in,
like
that's,
collectively
managed
it's
very,
very
powerful
and
if
executed
it's
still
very
early
days.
But
if
it
executed
correctly,
it
can
become
very
scalable
and
become
probably
more
powerful
than
some
of
the
old
institutional
types
of
organization
that
that
exists.
Today.
B
Yash-
and
this
last
question
is
very
interesting
and
very
high
level,
but
yeah,
it's
very
interesting
that
you
know
with
with
people.
Anyone
in
the
world
can
be
a
creator
these
days,
and
so
the
powerful
thing
is.
These
creators
can
can
create
their
own
communities
using
tokens
using
econo
token
economic
incentives
and
and
these
communities
can
become
dows
and
so
creators.
B
Now,
rather
than
just
work
for
like
one
company
or
one
company,
their
whole
life.
They
can
actually
contribute
to
lots
of
different
communities
and
earn
value
in
those
communities
and
contribute
value
and
get
paid
and
earn
a
living
contributing
to
many
different
communities,
rather
than
just
one
company
who
doesn't
allow
you
to
then
contribute
to
other
communities.
A
Thank
you
skye
for
your
amazing
input
about
decentralization
and
doubt
movement.
We
would
like
to
see
more
innovation
happening
in
the
space,
so
feel
free
to
share
our
your
thoughts
about
our
podcast
and
also
you
can
let
us
know
what
kind
of
topic
you
would
like
to
hear.
Thank
you.
Everyone
for
listening
I'll,
see
you
next
time.