►
From YouTube: Spec'ing out the Hatch models: TEC Params work sesh
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
It's
funny,
you
know
this
praise
thing
came
from
bernie
man,
my
burn
fan
camp
many
times.
We'd
have
a
round
of
praise
and
shame.
We
actually
had
shame
as
well:
oh
wow
yeah.
We
have
crazy
game
at
least
the
first
year.
We
wouldn't
change
people,
we
would
shame
actions
or
results,
but
we
would.
C
I'm
getting
a
puppy
soon,
so
I
might
implement
this
praise
and
shame
system
to
train
my
puppy.
It's.
D
B
C
Yeah
interesting
decision
to
drop
the
whole
shame
component
from
the
common
stack
cultural
deploy.
D
B
Good
idea,
so
we
have
yeah,
we
have
some
of
these
first,
so
we
start
with
dandelion
voting.
I
think
that's
cool.
Maybe
we
can
just
like
copy
these.
Well,
I
guess
we
could
work
in
this,
but
like
support
required,
you
know
what
do
we
do
to
visualize
support
required.
C
Okay,
yeah
yeah,
so
I'm
going
to
kind
of
reference
this
I'm
going
to
take
a
screenshot
and
just
paste
it
in
notion
here.
F
B
And
tonga,
if
you
can
make
sure
the
screen
is
only
showing
I
mean
none
of
us
have
our
videos
on.
So
if
it's
only
showing
his
shared
screen,
that's
cool.
F
B
Yeah,
like
within
discord,
you
can
make
it
show
just
like
his
screen.
C
Okay,
so
support
required
goes
from
zero
to
one
okay.
So
how
do
you
guys
think
we
should
visualize
this?
So,
let's
think
about
a
couple
options
here.
I
might
bring
up
hp
plot
gallery.
This
might
help
here
we
go
so
could
do
something
like
this.
C
C
If
we
want
sixty
percent,
there
could
just
be
a
red
line
here
and
then
we
could
well,
as
you
move
that
slider,
it's
just
just
gonna
move
that
red
line
up
and
down
between
zero
and
one
and
then,
if
we,
if
we
do
use
some
cad
cad
models
for
this,
which
we
might
do
so
that's
one
thing
we
can
do
on.
This
call
is
sort
of
think
about
to
what
extent
we
want
to
do
a
cad
cad
model,
because
this
stuff
isn't
very
complex.
C
I
mean
some
of
these
parameters
are
kind
of
like
deterministic,
like
we
could
just
so
like.
If
we
use
this
equation
right,
then
we
just
get.
Oh,
let
me
run
this,
so
we
can
see
what
we're
working
with
here.
E
H
B
C
Required
in
quora
so
something
I
think,
a
tool
we
might
want
to
use
to
visualize
is
it
could
almost
be
like.
You
see
a
lot
in
the
cad
cat
stuff,
the
supplied
pools
or,
let's
see
it's
in
the
cat
in
the
stock
and
flow
diagrams.
It's
the
stocks
and
they're
typically
a
cylinder,
so
we
could
basically
represent
that
with
a
simple
like
okay.
C
So
imagine
this
one,
but
it's
just
a
flat
line,
so
it
like
it's
blue
up
to
here
and
as
you
move
that
slider
it
just
moves
that
sort
of
from
it
moves
the
blue
line
and
the
area
under
it.
That's
blue
from
zero
up
to
one.
So
it
shows
you
this
sort
of
threshold
pool
that
needs
to
be
filled.
So
it's
very
simple.
It's
actually
just
like
you
said
griff,
it's
just
visualizing
the
variable
itself,
but
it
gives
this
idea
of
fill
like
like
from
zero
to
one.
C
So
that
we
can
do
in
here
I'll
fix
this
bug
thing
don't
worry
about
that
so,
but
this
is
good.
The
bounds
as
we
go
through
as
we
go
through.
These
bounds
are
really
important,
so
we
were
talking
about
support
required
so
yeah
any
sort
of
anytime.
We
can
constrain
these
bounds.
That's
going
to
help
a.
B
Lot
yeah,
I
mean
I
can't
imagine
that
we
would
want
it
wouldn't
make
sense
to
be
less
than
50.,
but
but
so
for
this,
it's
just
a
simple
visualization
of
the
results.
B
I
think
there
might
be
some
sort
of
interaction
with
maine
acceptance
quorum
like
we
could
visualize
like
how
many
people
something
along
the
lines
of
like
okay,
if
we
have
a
like
a
percentage
of
token
like
there
could
be
a
graph
or
something
that
puts
quorum
and
support
required
together,
yeah
because
like
if
this
many
people
vote
yes,
this
many
people
don't
know,
does
it
pass.
You
know.
E
E
Exactly
so
for
for
anyone
normal
that,
you
know
because
for
the
normie,
for
instance,
you
know
because
the
token
engineering
you
know
yeah
we're
hanging
on
the
trusted
seat,
but
for
anyone
else
that
jumps
into
this
for
later,
on,
whatever
you're,
creating
a
model
that
is
easy
to
exemplify.
So
that's
that's
a
big
deal
so
yeah.
B
E
B
So
it's
weird
because
in
a
lot
of
places
in
a
lot
of
the
early
nows,
it
was
better
to
not
vote
because
then
you
would
like
disqualify
it
from
the
quorum
and
then
you'd
wait
till
the
end
to
see
if
it
would
hit
quorum
and
then
then
that's
if
you
wanted
to
vote.
No.
That
would
be
the
time
you
wouldn't
want
to
vote
no
at
the
beginning.
E
C
So
for
each,
let
me
get
this
straight.
So,
given
a
vote,
there's
like,
is
there
four
quadrants?
So
it's
like?
Okay,
oh
no,
maybe
only
three
so
there's
people
who
haven't
voted
and
then
there's
people
who
have
voted
and
they've
either
said
no
or
yes,
so
everyone's
gonna
be
in
one
of
those
three
categories:
right,
yep
cool,
because
I'm
thinking
I
might
be
able
to
visualize
that
as
well.
C
Somehow
I
mean
just
imagine
like
three:
if,
if
there
was
just
three
quadrants
and
we
kind
of
how
this
is
on
a
color
gradient,
so
for
an
individual
proposal,
we
could
visualize
the
voting
using
a
color
scale
on
how
many
people
are
in
each
category.
How
many
people
have
not
voted
or
it
could
be
a
pie?
It
could
be
a
three-way
pie.
This
many
people
have
not
voted.
E
I
like
the
color
gradient,
because
it's
more
technical
and
it's
more
defined,
but
unfortunately
for
most
people.
I
B
Yeah,
it's
a
it's
a
it's
definitely
a
weird
visualization
requirement
and
I
would
say
this
is
a
nice
to
have
honestly
just
saying
just
saying:
support
requirement,
acceptance,
form
and
what
the
numbers
were
are
like
or
or
what
it
could
be
simplified,
as
is
percentage
of
people
that
have
to
vote.
Yes,
you
know
for
something
to
pass.
C
B
B
B
Of
the
people
who
vote
and
that's
basically
the
inverse
of
support
required
and
because
I
feel
like
okay
support
required,
basically
says
who,
how
many
people
does
it
take
of
the
voters
to
block
you
know,
that's
like
the
really
important
piece
of
support
blocking
the
vote
or
blocking
the
and
then
minimum
acceptance.
Clowns
is
good
on
its
own.
F
B
Yeah
I
mean,
but
I
hear
you,
it
sounds
that
actually
sounds
like
a
a
pretty
nice.
A
pretty
nice
thing.
It's
when
we,
when
we
upgrade
to
a
commons,
it
sounds
like
celeste
is
gonna,
be
ready,
so
we'll
have
disputable
voting,
which
can
basically
say,
like
anyone
can
block
a
boat
and
then
honey
token
holders
would
say
whether
or
not
it
goes
through
whether
or
not
the
vote
is
legal.
B
What
do
you
think
ytg
on
that
on
this
paragraph
that
you
just
wrote
out
like?
Do
you
feel
like
that?
Pretty
much
sums
it
up
or
yeah.
C
E
Will
you
will
you
make
sure
and
link
me
to
this.
C
Oh
yeah,
I
just
posted
in
the
one
hive,
one
time,
perfect,
perfect.
Okay,
thank
you.
B
Can
just
be
whatever
it
is
right,
and
it
should
just
be
written
in
words,
as
opposed
to
told
the
word
b
can
just
be
how
much
it
costs
to
make
a
proposal.
E
C
Let's
see,
there
is
something
that
I
haven't
used
here,
so
this
param
these
cramps
have,
I
think,
like
doc,
you
can
add
a
dock
and
I
forget
what
it
does
exactly.
Let
me
check.
C
It
doesn't,
I
don't,
it
doesn't,
render
it,
but
there
might
be
some
way
to
get
it
rendered
with
that
extra
parameter.
B
Yeah,
I
mean
the
debate
around
like
do
we
just
use
our
words
or
do
we
just
explain
the
concept
I'm
open,
I'm
open
to
either
to
either
answer
I'm
leaning
more
towards
for
the
metrics
and
visualizations
we
just
dumb
it
down,
so
anyone
can
understand
without
doing
dynamics
for
research.
E
C
G
B
And
then
for
the
the
time
ones,
I
think
it's
just
like
time
it
takes
to
pass
for
a
proposal
time
and
time
it
takes
for
a
proposal
to
pass,
and
then
you
just
add
all.
B
B
E
I
honestly
think
that
some
of
these
that
we
can
use
the
forum
for
we
don't
need
actual
models,
for
I
think
we
can
just
put
it
to
a
vote
and
I
don't
think
that'll
be
too
much
of
a
problem.
B
E
And,
like
you
know,
okay
yeah,
absolutely
yeah,
we
do
so.
We
have
a
whole
group
of
parameters
already
set
that
we're
going
to
have
a
model
for
basically
and
then
they
vote
for
it
and
then
each
one
of
those
individuals
with
those
certain
parameters
should
have
a
post
for
explaining
why
they
have
those
parameters.
B
Yeah,
so,
what's
even
better
is
when
they
propose
the
parameters.
All
of
this
will
just
happen
automatically
for
them.
They
will.
They
will
literally
go
forth
some
numbers
and
then
they'll
just
be
a
printout
right.
E
B
C
Yeah
so
they'd
come
here,
they'd
make
a
new
issue
and
there's
a
way
to
actually
reference.
Actually,
if
we
go
to
code
and
we
so
everyone
would
just
copy
this
notebook
and
they
could
just
call
it
by
their
discord,
tag
or
telegram
tag
dot.
C
I
pi
and
so
just
be
copying
it
opening
it
locally
in
in
a
jupiter
environment
and
we'll
have
very
clear
instructions
on
how
to
do
that,
and
then
it
gets
posted
to
discord
so
okay,
so
unfortunately
this
the
widgets,
it
seems
don't
render
on
github,
but
the
outputs
should.
I
would
imagine
if
we
had
a
chart
in
here,
it
should
actually
render
so
we
can.
We
can
clean
this
up,
so
it
works
real
well
and
then
there's
a
way
to
like.
H
B
B
We
just
have
like
three
three
or
four.
I
guess
four
sentences
is
the
mvp
output
like
yeah?
Basically,
how
many
people
does
it
take
to
blow
block
minimum
percent
people
that
have
to
say
yes
time
it
takes
for
a
proposal
to
be
executed.
B
C
And
the
first
two
are
like
kind
of
the
blocking
is
important
right.
So
it's
like
percentage
of,
let's
see
percentage
of
people
that
have
to
vote
no
to
block
a
proposal
of
the
people
who
vote.
F
B
Yeah
so
like
percentage
of
people
who
vote
no
over
a
percentage
of
people
who
vote
like
a
little
graph.
F
B
C
Yeah
that
one's
pretty
cool
so
I'll
play
with
that
one
in
the
in
the
meantime.
So
the
idea
I
think
is
to
I
like
the
way
we're
going
with
all
this
and
it's
kind
of
a
it's
a
map
for
the
lab.
Basically,
so
from
now,
until
next
week's
lab,
I'm
gonna
like
go
through
all
this
and
play
around
with
it
and
then
in
the
lab.
It
should
all
be
we
should
we
should
have
clean,
visualization
or
like
we
should
have
outputs
ready
by
the
end
of
the
lab.
C
We
should
have
the
notebook
ready
to
copy
people
can
copy
it,
and
I
like
what
you
did
here.
Griff
is
kind
of
mvp
right,
so
it's
like
yeah,
that's
that's.
One
way
to
have
the
output
is
just
like
there's
only
four
things
here,
so
people
can
just
explain
why
they
picked
them
and
then
I'll
also
for
each
of
our
notes.
C
I'm
gonna
go
through
and
whip
up
a
graph
like
in
like
in
prep
before
the
lab
and
just
see
if
it
makes
sense
see
if
it
works
and
I'm
sure
a
lot
of
them
will
work.
So
then,
we'll
have
a
good
we'll
have
a
good
set
of
visualizations
ready
to
accompany,
even
if
the
final
output
is
something
so
simple
like
this,
like
just
simply
write
a
paragraph
explaining
you
know
why
well.
B
C
That's
awesome,
so
I
I
got
three
here
so
I
was
missing
one
at
the
beginning,
so
I
got
percentage
of
people
that
have
to
vote
no
to
block
her
proposal.
C
The
first
one
is
probably
minimum
percentage
of
total
tokens
that
have
to
vote.
Yes,.
I
M
B
B
B
And
these
might
change,
but
I
think
these
are
a
good
first
crack
at
it
and
it
might
just
be
voting
time
and
vote
execution.
Delay
like
it
might
even
just
be
those
two
variables,
because
the
total
time
it
takes
for
a
proposal
to
pass
is
that
even
important.
E
B
B
That's
basically
the
vote
execution
delay
because
that's
where
it
matters
right
like
if
someone's
like,
I
don't
like
the
primers
of
this
economy.
I
think
it's
gonna
suck
I'm
out
as
long
as
they
voted
no
or
they
didn't
vote
at
all.
E
B
B
B
Okay,
so
I
feel
like
these
five
outputs,
just
as
simple
sentences
that
are
like
you
know,
formatted
to
be
loud.
That
would
be
enough
and
then,
if
we
have
that,
then
we
can
be
like.
Oh
and
here's,
some
pretty
graphs.
You
know
yeah.
E
Because
those
pretty
graphs
are
going
to
incorporate,
excuse
me
those
pretty
graphs
are
going
to
be
on
top
of
token
log.
So
that's
a
lot,
and
we
also
got
to
remember
him
because
we're
working
on
some
other
things
there
too,
and
this
all
works
for
both
of
your
individual
proposals.
But
we
don't
listen.
I
want
to
have
everything
we
need
to
have,
but
we
also
can't
have
too
much
yeah.
C
Well,
the
graphs,
the
graphs
shouldn't
shouldn't,
complicate
things
at
all,
because
whether
you're
voting
on
simple
parameter
selections,
and
then
you
throw
the
graphs
in
it's
the
same.
It's
gonna
be
the
same
process
for
token
log
because
it's
all
gonna
be
referencing
per
file
by
by
an
issue.
So
so
it
doesn't
matter
what's
in
the
file,
it
can
be
graphs.
I
mean
that's
the
thing
about
jupiter
notebooks,
it's
a
single
file,
but
it
can
have
graphs
and
everything,
and
so
it
doesn't
add
any
complexity.
B
That
maps
to
just
vote
duration
straight
okay,
awesome
and
then
we
and
then
time
hatchers
have
to
exit.
That's
just
vote
execution,
delay,
okay
and
we're
not
even
going
to
show
vote
buffer
box
with
that.
With
these
two
questions,
unless
we
want
to
add
a
third
or
something
like
total
time,
it
takes-
or
I
honestly
I
I
don't
both
buffer
blocks.
M
I
C
So
I
guess
that's
what
you're
saying
jake
these
can
fall
back
to
the
forum
posts
if
they
don't
really.
You
know,
because
there's
already
a
forum
post
on
this
parameter
right,
so
that
can
be
we
we
can
just
it
just
has
to
be
acknowledged
somewhere
to
the
community.
That
says,
you
know,
even
if
it's
just
in
the
fine
print
or
whatever,
by
the
way
we
left
out
this
one
parameter
and
see
the
forum
post.
B
For
it
you're
right,
it
doesn't
make
sense.
E
Yeah
we're
going
to
have
to
have
answers
for
all
of
it
one
way
or
another
I
mean
no,
I
mean
we
want
to
make
it
as
simple
as
possible,
but
we
also
have
to
be
very
clear
about
what
what
we're
doing,
because
we're
just
trying
to
automate
this
voting
process,
we're
trying
to
make
it
as
simple
as
possible,
so
we're
going
to
need
everybody
on
board,
even
though
we're
moving
ahead
here
and
we're
doing
something,
that's
kind
of
technocratic,
but
we're
doing
it
for
a
purpose
of
everyone.
I
hope
that
makes
sense.
B
B
I'm
not
I'm
not
like
I'm
like
83
sure
that
that's
what
that
means.
But
honestly
we
need
to
talk
to
one
of
the
one
hive
devs
to
confirm
oh
yeah,
but
I'm
pretty
sure
from
what
I
could
read
on
the
code
and
what
and
what
tamara
got
out
of
it.
We
we
kind
of
worked
through
to
that,
but
yeah
well,
we'd
have
to
confirm,
because
some
kind
of
thought
it
meant
something
different.
B
B
I
I
like
the
idea,
though,
maybe
maybe
this
could
be
a
good
house-
hi
mishko.
B
D
G
B
Yeah-
and
I
mean
you
know,
this
is
first
draft
in
the
end.
Why
do
you
change
things
if
you're
like
this
is
I
you
know
I
want
to
just
have
decisions
made,
so
sometimes
I
just
make
them,
but
you
know
in
the
end,
these
are
your
calls,
so
you
can
just
be
like
yeah.
You
know
that
was
a
cool
idea
bro,
but
now
that
I'm
in
the
thick
of
it,
I
see
that
this
isn't
the
right
question
or.
C
Yeah,
I
think
we're
going
in
a
stellar
direction
and
but
but
it'll
all
reveal
itself
in
time
right
as
it
gets
built
out
exactly
yeah.
E
B
We
should
just
schedule
another
time
jake
to
work
on
this.
To
start
the
spec.
I
need
to
do
a
little
bit
of
research
and
see
what
we
can
start
as
a
first
draft,
but
I've
seen
these
dow
specked
out
in
very
nice
ways.
Yeah
and
in
a
dream
world.
We
will
have
two
independent
flows:
the
the
spec
in
a
google
doc
and
ygg's
models,
and
then
we
find
a
way.
E
B
Yeah
and
you
can
make
it
presentable,
and
then
someone
will
just
fork
that
change
those
numbers
and
in
a
dream,
world
they'd
be
pulled
out
of
their
individual's
tech
and
into
all
these
visualizations
or
like
somehow
I
mean
how
cool
would
it
be
if
we
could
create
a
code
base?
That
would
be
like
write
your
own
white
paper
for
the
tec,
just
change
these
six
numbers.
B
It's
like
exactly
it's
like
that.
Here's,
the
executive
summary,
here's
some
appendix
crafts,
you
know-
and
all
you
have
to
do-
is
change
these
numbers
and
then
everyone
makes
their
own
white
paper.
I
mean
that
that's
that's
the
dream.
I
don't
know
if
that's
achievable,
but
we're
going
to
go
for
it.
C
Well-
and
it
really
is
a
it-
would
be
a
nice
piece
on
the
common
stack,
because
it's
like
this
output
factory,
where
it's
like:
okay,
here's,
here's
all
the
the
tools
that
you're
working
with
dandelion
dowels
and
things
like
that
and
then
here's
the
actual.
Like
printing
press.
You
know
the
output,
you
get
your
white
paper,
it's
like
your
certificate
for
your
towel.
B
Yeah
yeah,
exactly
it's
going
to
be
really
it's
going
to
be
really
crazy
for
the
bonding
curve
and
conviction
voting.
But
for
this
it
really
shouldn't
be
that
bad
and
again
that's
a
stretch
goal
it
doesn't
have
to
be
like
that.
Doesn't
have
to
be
done.
Stop
that
shouldn't
stop
us
from
launching.
You
know
yeah
icing
on
cake,
okay.
So
what
what
half
parameters
are
we
dividing
into.
B
This,
oh
yeah,
this
is
a
really
oh
man,
oh
god
y2d!
This
is
so
nice.
It
really
is
because
you
know
I
forget
about
the
assumptions
we're
making
that
we
have
to
make
sometimes
like
we
have
to
make
assumptions
in
the
hatch
right,
like
number
of
number
of
c
stack
tokens.
B
M
B
C
I
B
B
The
oracle
itself
the
oracle
will
be
set,
so
everyone
will
put
pay
the
same
price
for
tec
tokens
during
the
hash,
no
matter
where
the
price
is
yeah,
there's
just
one
price.
It's
like
the
real
question
is
how
many
can
you
buy,
which
is
the
hatch
oracle,
so
the
exchange
rate
is
like
guess
what
ten
thousand
tec
hash
tokens
for
one
graphics
tag,
but
if,
in
the
end
it
doesn't
really
matter
that
exchange,
it's
just
a
scalar
factor,
it
could
be
one
and
it'd
be
fine.
C
B
C
B
Yeah-
and
you
know,
voting
is
funny
like
that
right,
like
a
lot
of
the
time,
you
just
have
one
issue
that
you
care
about,
or
that's
really
important
or
a
blocker
like
someone
might
make
the
best
like
parameters
ever
and
then
someone
else
is
just
like
yeah,
but
I
think
we
should
go
to
wi-fi
route
and
say
that
this
is
like
super
valuable
and
they
just
fork
the
proposal
and
then,
instead
of
it
making
the
hash
exchange
rate
high,
they
make
it
low
and
that's
the
one
that
wins.
You
know.
M
B
So,
but
either
way
so
for
these
assumptions.
B
C
Yeah
so
so
people
are
to
engage
with
the
hatch.
People
have
to
use
wrapped
x
dye
right.
Oh
yeah,
oh
yeah,
right
here.
This
is
what
I
was
thinking.
Yeah.
B
Yeah,
I
think
you
must
have
sent
it
to
me
here
psychologically,
telepathically.
B
E
E
Listen,
I
don't
know
if
the
usd
the
wrapped
x-type
price
is
actually
a
concern
or
not,
because
the
fact
is
dye
is
always
fluctuating
because
of
maker
doubt
we
know
that,
but
even
compared
to
the
us
dollar,
it's
it's
a
constant
constant
change
and
the
only
reason
that's
going
to
fluctuate
and
matter
to
get
them
involved
is,
if
they're,
an
actual
whale,
because
that's
the
only
one
making
any
difference
on
it
at
all.
Anyone
and
everyone
else
that
that
that
very
little
difference
means
nothing
it
it.
B
E
B
B
Some
great
pretty
crazy,
technical
stuff
that
we
want
to
make
it
really
easy
to
explain
to
people.
So
it's
it's
going
to
be
pretty
high
levels.
So
just
a
warning,
I
hope
that's
cool
man.
I
don't.
I
don't
know
how
much
you'll.
B
E
I
I
I
just
want
to
jump
in.
Yes,
everyone
has
to
be
the
same
right
here
for
this
initial
part
of
the
hatch,
because
we're
just
trying
to
get
this
started,
we
we
need
less
friction.
We
need
the
least
amount
of
friction
possible.
We
want
this
to
just
work.
We
want
everything
to
just
go
and
we
need
something
successful.
C
Yeah,
so
I
like
that
jake
one
step
up
from
there
is:
are
these
grif?
These
are
the
models
you
made
so
it
could.
People
could
have
a
choice
like
a
binary
choice
of
how
they
think
the
impact
hours
are
going
to
go
like
this
is
the
predicted,
and
this
is
the
optimistic.
So
it
could
be
just
like
a
drop
down
and
we
could
actually
render
this
chart
and
it
could
switch
between
depending
on
which
toggle
they
choose.
C
C
If
it's
a
slider,
you
could
actually
see
this
chart
work
like
bend
between
these
two
outcomes.
M
B
C
To
implement
and
it'll
be
almost
the
same
as
having
a
fixed
value
and
but
it'll
add
some
some
fun
cool
like
an
interactive
interactivity
to
it.
B
So
how
would
you
list
those
default
assumptions
and
like
what
do
you
say.
H
C
B
C
Yep,
I
would,
I
would
doc
like
I
would
have
it
what
I
would
have
it
look
like.
Is
I
like
these
terms,
like
predicted
or
sort
of
current?
You
know,
I
would
name
these
outcomes,
so
I
would
say,
like
yeah
predicted,
based
on
current
trajectory
or
optimistic
trajectory,
and
maybe
some
explaining
as
to
I
think
this
is
optimistic,
because
we
don't
want
to
sort
of
grow.
Our
impact
hours
exponentially
like
like
this
yeah.
I
B
Is
it
six
four
four?
Okay,
so
you're
only
saying
optimistic
and
predicted
not
pessimistic?
B
C
Yeah
we
could
do
pessimistic
yeah.
B
E
Yeah,
I
I
very
much
with
that
predicted
we're
either
gonna
follow
that
bottom
line,
or
just
a
bit
above.
We
have
to
be
careful
about
gaining
traction
too
soon.
You
know
what
I
mean.
We
don't
want
anything.
E
We
want
everybody
to
have
something:
stable
is
what
I'm
getting
at.
You
know.
The
stability
is
far
better
than
anything.
What
would
be
what
by
sorry
a
parabolic
yeah?
We
want
something
stable.
C
Yep,
so
that
makes
so.
This
is
basically
optimistic,
and
this
is
basically
pessimistic
and
what
you
said
jake
is
the
explanation.
We
don't
want
to
our
impact
ours
exploding
exponentially,
because
that
literally
means
the
die
per
impact
hour
is
going
to
be
decreasing.
Exponent,
like
you
know,
decreasing
by
that
same
order
of
magnitude,
so
a
linea.
I
think
this
like
linear
growth
is
just
seems
intuitively,
like
a
stable
growth
rather
than
this
exponential.
C
B
Yeah
and
it's
the
during
christmas,
we
have
very
few
impact
hours,
those
two
weeks
so
that
set
us
on
the
optimistic
path
yay,
but
we
will
see
in
this
next
round.
If
that
continues,
work
is
definitely
kicking
back
up.
So.
B
E
I
I
think
I
honestly,
like
the
optimistic,
pessimistic
and
I
think
for
number
three
right
there.
We
should
do
predicted
and
calculated
or
something
like
that.
Well,
we
won't
have
any
calculated,
but
we
can
definitely.
B
B
I
yeah
that
I,
I
think,
that's
easier
honestly,
because
it
it's
like
the
number
of
sea
stack
has
very
little
impact
on
the
on
the
on
it.
You
know
because
it's
like
what
percentage
of
people
with
c-stack
are
going
to
buy.
It
basically
just
says
what
the
maximum
possible
is,
which
wouldn't
have
which
doesn't
even
matter,
because
it's
never
going
to
happen
like
everyone
with
all
their
c
stack
by
as
much
as
they
can
yeah.
It's
sort
of
irrelevant.
C
E
E
C
This
so
my
understanding
of
this
hatch,
oracle
ratio
or
c
stack
ratio
is
like.
If
you
have
one
c
stack
token,
then
you're
allowed
to
buy
this
many
tech
tokens,
but
I
don't
see,
I
don't
think
that's
right.
B
One,
it
is
because
we
we
said
we
don't
want
to
raise
too
much
money
for
the
test.
Okay,
so
so,
like
you
had
to
have
200
x,
die
or
200
c
stack
to
send
one
rap
next
time,
because
because
yeah
on
purpose.
O
B
I
do
think
it's
valuable
to
like
test
our.
You
know
our
outputs
here
against
what
really
happened
in
the
hatch
in
this
test
hatch.
So
using
the
test.
Hash
numbers
gives
us
like
a
test
case,
but
it's
kind
of
a
silly
test.
E
C
Yeah
yeah,
it's
gonna,
get
everyone
thinking,
it's
gonna
get
everyone
engaged
and
it
might
even
reveal
like
there's
more
benefits
than
just
trying
to
find
the
best
parameters
to
go
with
like
it
might
even
reveal
confusion
if
everyone
sort
of
messes
up
one
parameter
and
puts
it
like
way
off
the
charts,
then
maybe
we'll
realize.
Oh
this
wasn't
you
know
this
wasn't
explained
or
people
have
the
wrong
idea.
E
When
more
people
actually
understand
a
bonding
curve
and
they
see
what
can
actually
be
done,
if
we
have
a
actual
hatch,
that's
successful
like
we
got
to
be
really
careful
with
people
like
not
getting
carried
away,
you
know
they
need
to
understand
how
these
things
actually
work.
It's
it's.
You
know,
that's
why
I
mean
it's
way
better,
to
have
three
to
five
percent
increase
all
the
time
compared
to
75
in
the
next
two
days.
Yeah.
You
know
what
I'm
saying
and
we
need
people
to
actually
understand
why
that's
important
for
the
for
the
long
term.
C
B
Yeah
yeah,
I'm
sure
it
will
be.
I
I
would
imagine
I
wouldn't
well.
I
imagine
it
will
be
like.
I
think
the
easiest
answer
is
right,
but
every
stack
token
you
have,
you
can
send
one
rap
dex
dying
into
it
right
and
I
think
we're
gonna
gravitate
towards
something
close
to
that
yeah,
because
right
now,
there's
700
c
stack.
If
we
have
1.5
million
c
stack
by
the
end
of
it,
you
know,
then
that
would
basically
be
a
cap
of
1.5
mil,
but
and
maybe
people
are
like,
no,
you
know
for
every
c
stack.
B
B
C
Yeah,
so
I
know
this
one
keeps
coming
up
as
a
ideal
sort
of
visualization
and
so
that,
let's
because
we
haven't-
we
visualized
this
in
the
lab
like
last
month,
but
we
just
made
this
simple.
It
didn't
really
mean
anything.
We
made
a
direct
line
from
mingle
to
max
school,
which
is
like
almost
approaching
something
that
would
make
sense,
but
we
might
be
able
to
do
something.
A
lot
more
interesting
here.
C
C
Do
we
want
like
an
effectiveness
of
our
impact
hours,
that
we
see
in
the
curve
that
you
and
sem
came
up
with
like
this
raise,
raise
per
impact
hours
and
how
that
relates
to
min
goal,
or
what's
the
sort
of
justification
that
we
want
to
invoke
in
people
when
they're,
when
they're
thinking
about
this
mingle
parameter.
B
I
think
the
main
goal
you
know
the
real
question
I
love.
I
I'm
starting
to
fall
in
love
with
this
idea
of
like
answering
what
questions
are
we
answering
right
like,
and
I
think
the
main
goal
will
have
an
effect
on
a
lot
of
things
like
if
we
hit
our
main
goal.
What
is
the
you
know?
What
is
the
minimum
number
of
impact
hours?
What's
the
minimum
impact
hourly
possible?
B
What's
the
maximum
cultural
build
tribute
possible?
What
happens
if
we
raise
a
million
x
die
right?
Well,
if
the
mingle
is
above
a
million,
we
fail
yeah,
you
know
and
like
having
these
scenarios.
E
Can
we
stop
being
so
like
extrapolating
in
results?
Let's
you
know
like
what
do
we
do?
Listen
if
we
have
three
proposals
that
are
successful
out
of
seven.
E
E
Does
that
all
still
apply?
You
know
like
how
to
impact
hours.
You
know
I
mean,
are
we
are?
Is
it
each
individual
proposal
or
is
it?
Is
it
the
whole
thing
during
the
month
or
is
it
you
know
like?
That
is
an
answer.
So,
when
remember
impact
hours
actually
impact
is
it?
Is
it
for
that
set
series
of
proposals
during
that
time
period,
but
we
don't
have
anything
about
okay.
This
next
month
you
can
have
proposals,
and
this
line
of
proposals
will
be
affected
by
this
line
of
impact
hours.
B
I
don't
understand
what
you
mean,
okay,
what
do
you
mean?
Can
you
can
you
define
your
proposed.
C
B
And
then
there
will
be
in
when
the
dude,
when
you
do
the.
B
B
Can
redeem
and
there's?
Actually,
I
actually
have
really
a
really
nice
formula
for
this
that
I
checked
with
sam,
because
I
wasn't
sure
exactly
how
those
two
would
interact
like
the
cultural
build
tribute
and
let
me
just
grab
the.
E
E
B
Sorry,
man,
no,
I
I
wasn't
sure
what
you
meant
by
proposals,
because
there's
also
like
the
dandelion
down
proposals.
You
know
there's
like
yeah.
E
C
But
so
don't
proposals
start
going
through
after
the
hatch.
B
The
proposals,
the
only
proposal
that
will
happen
after
the
half.
Well,
I
mean
technically
you
can
do
any
proposal.
The
dow
could
do
any
proposal,
but
the
hatch
we're
launching
in
two
parts.
So
the
the
first
part
is,
you
know
we
decided
the
primers
for
the
hatch.
The
second
part
is
that
hatch,
the
people
who
participate
gets
a
vote
to
upgrade
to
conviction,
voting
and
bonding
curves,
and
then
then
proposals
actually
can
start
passing
off
for
funding
public
goods.
B
E
Bonding
curve
at
all,
okay,
I'm
really
sorry!
I
I
shouldn't
ask
anything:
we
need
to
get
back
on
track
here.
Okay,
so
we're
working
with
parameters
and
we're
trying
to
clarify
specifics.
So
we
can
work
towards
you
building
models
and
us
individually
building
text
back.
Okay,
sorry.
C
B
Okay,
what
parameter
are
we
working
on?
Oh,
so
we
were
talking
about
minhash
and
max
yes,
yes
and
impact
hours,
and
all
these
things,
I
think
I
think
we
should
have
I
kind
of
put
a
list
up
there
of
like
scenarios
cool
and
it's
like
for
each
of
these
scenarios.
We
kind
of
would
ask
a
question
like
if
we
raise
100k
what
happens.
Oh,
the
funds
are
returned.
You
know
because
it
doesn't
pass
the
main
hatch,
cool
and
or
like
this
here's
the
impact
hour
rate.
B
B
B
B
What
would
we
say
it's
like
okay,
so
I
want
to
just
I
I
pasted
something
at
the
bottom
here
that
kind
of
explains
the
details
around
the
experience
of
a
hatcher
so
like
if
the
hatcher
you
know,
if
we
don't
meet
our
main
goal,
then
the
hatcher
gets
all
their
money
back.
But
that's
that's
scenario,
one
and
then
scenario
two
is
it's
not
really
a
scenario?
It's
the
hatch
tribute
I
will
or
the
like.
B
Yeah
it
can
this.
This
is
money,
that's
set
aside,
that
they
can't
redeem
and
then
the
cultural
build
tribute
is
an
experienced
tribute
from
dilution
of
the
issuance
of
impact
hours
and
then
the
final
result
is:
let's
say
that
the
hash
tribute
is
five
percent
the
cultural
attributes.
Ten
percent
and
the
hatcher
put
this
in
a
hundred
x.
Wrapped
x
die
here's
the
equation
and
here's
what
they'll
actually
get.
C
So
that
could
be
kind
of
a
bonus
thing
like
people
are
picking
their
all
their
parameters,
they're
setting
up
the
hatch
and
then
at
the
very
end
we
could
basically
have
one
more
set
of
these.
That's
like
now.
What
do
you
choose
to
do?
How
much
are
you
investing,
and
you
know,
maybe
a
couple
of
subjective
parameters,
and
then
it
gives
the
what
they
would
experience
from
that.
B
B
E
So
maybe
I'm
just
I'm
just
being
existential
here,
but
anything
we
can
do
to
just
make
this
as
separate
as
possible.
Is
beneficially
awesome
two
satoshis,
not
two
satoshis.
C
Yeah,
so
this
is
important
to
consider
is
that
the
trajectory
is
this
two
stage
patch,
and
so
this
initial
hatch
is.
The
purpose
of
this
is
not
to
raise
all
the
funds
right.
The
purpose
of
this
is
just
to
create,
essentially
create
the
dandelion.
Now.
B
It
does
raise
all
the
funds,
at
least
the
starting
funds,
not
forever
right.
After
that,
then
we
have
the
exit
trip.
That
brings
funds,
but
after
the
upgrade
this,
like
the
hatch,
tribute,
is
sort
of
expected
to
be
like
a
pretty
big
funding
stream.
B
E
C
C
B
C
C
So
it's
possible
that
we
let's
say
we
raise
500
000
dollars
from
this
from
this
hatch,
and
then
we
initiate
the
bonding
curve,
it's
possible
that
if
people
consume
that
token,
so
people
are
buying
the
tech
token
off
of
the
bonding
curve,
then
that's
putting
it
more.
It's
possible.
We
raised
another
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
or
another,
even
ten
million
dollars
or
so
from
the
bonding
curve.
Oh.
B
Absolutely,
but
that
and
and
a
per
and
it
will
just
experience
a
different
tax
level
right,
like
a
different
tribute
level
so
like
the
attribute
is
generally
like,
maybe
it'll
be
like
30,
because
what's
cool
when,
when
you
initialize
the
bonding
curve,
the
slippage
is
so
intense
that
you
can
play
with
what
I
call
a
market
cap,
illusion
where,
like
there's,
let's
say
we
raise
half
a
million
dollars
right
and,
let's
just
say,
we
have
the
most
basic
funding
curve
ever
where
every
token
is
worth
one
penny
more
than
the
last
token.
B
E
B
B
E
Oh,
my
god
did
griff
green,
actually
patent
another
market
cap
illusion
I
I
saw
that
video
too.
Did
he
do
that.
C
You
know:
well,
that's
the
way
you're.
Describing
is
exactly
why
there's
giant
market
crashes,
because
that
it's
reality,
people
have
to
face
the
reality
at
some
point,
and
everyone
thinks
that
they
have
a
billion
dollars
and
they
can
cash
it
out
anytime.
But
it's
absolutely
not
that,
because
if
you
put
slippage
into
the
equation,
then
it
would
be
a
fraction
of
that,
and
so
everyone.
E
C
C
E
B
But
we
can
use
this
for
charity
so
now
we
have
this
bonding
curve.
We
have
this
money
in
the
hash
dial.
Let's
say
that
we
have
a
million
dollars
in
the
hashtag
and
we
put
50
50..
We
just
split
it.
50
50.
500k
goes
to
the
bonding
curve
and
500k
goes
to
conviction,
voting
well
that
500k
and
the
bonding
curve.
B
Because
of
the
market
cap,
illusion,
let's
say
that
it's
actually
the
price
because
and
the
number
of
times
the
number
of
tokens
is
like
2.5
million,
so
they
put
in
a
million
dollars
and
they
got
they.
They
two
two
and
a
half
x
their
money
on
paper
right,
and
so
it's
really
easy
to
have
a
nice
fat
hatch
tribute
that
puts
a
ton
of
money
in
the
conviction,
voting
pool
because
of
that
huge
slippage.
B
But
then,
after
that,
the
funding
strategy
is
entry
and
exit
tributes,
and
if
you
have
high
entry
and
exit
trades
people,
that's
a
straight
up
tax
that
people
experience.
You
know
on
paper
so
like.
If
we
have
a
two
percent
entry
tax
and
a
15
exit
tax
exit,
tribute
excuse
me,
then
we
all
of
a
sudden.
You
know
it's
like
you
put
in
a
dollar
in
your
your
automatically
lose
17.
B
C
B
Okay,
let's
say
we
hatch
right
and
then
we
upgrade
to
the
commons,
and
now
we
have
a
bonding
curve
with
half
a
million
conviction.
Voting
with
500k
right
and
everybody's
tokens
are
vested
well.
Speculators
are
going
to
come
in
and
they'll
be
like
oh
wow,
so
no
one
can
sell
the
tokens
for
three
months.
This
is
super
cool.
I'm
gonna
buy
some
tokens,
so
how
much
do
I
buy?
Well,
you
know
this.
E
E
D
E
C
B
J
E
B
But
so
this
this
hash
tribute
basically
says
this.
This
amount
is
slotted
for
the
the
funding
pool,
even
though
it
doesn't
exist
yet,
and
then
the
commons
upgrade
tribute
will
be
like
okay,
we're
not
only
going
to
give
we're
going
to
give
that
five
percent
that
we
had
in
the
hash
tribute
and
we're
going
to
give
even
more
to
the
country.
N
B
A
B
E
B
You
know
what
open
date
just
doesn't
matter.
It's
probably
not
a
primer.
B
E
B
C
Yep,
that's
it!
Then
we
just
had
we
just
brought
the
impact
hours
in
here.
Oh,
oh,
there's,
just
the
equation
for
the
impact
hours
that.
C
C
Exactly
what
it
is
but
like
we'll
have
the
number
so
we'll
have
the
number
of
impact
hours
we'll
have
the
and
then
we'll
have
these
two
parameters.
So
essentially
we
could
multiply
the
number
of
impact
hours
by
the
expected
raise
per
impact
hour
to
give
us
our
expected
raise.
C
And
we
literally
have
the
data,
so
we
have
impact
our
data
there's
another
one.
C
B
E
That's
awesome:
that's
actually
really
really
awesome,
because
it
creates
incentive.
It
creates
a
reason
for
people
to
push
forward.
This
is
actually
really
really
cool.
This
is
actually
something
we
would
utilize
in
the
oil
industry
as
well
for
safety
points
instead
of
individuals,
we
would
need
actual
drilling
rigs
themselves
because
each
individual
represented
that
rig
are
the
group
of
them
so
you're,
actually
using
each
person
in
the
same
manner.
E
So
that's
actually
really
really
cool,
because
I
saw
firsthand
that
one
it
worked
when
we
were
on
whatever
guy
was
only
as
the
same
mechanism.
We
competed
we
all
competed
because
it
was
extra
money
and
everybody
wants
more
money.
That
was
that
was
that's,
actually
really
really
cool
to
actually
show
it
like
that
in
a
manner.
That's
not
how
to
say
a
popularity
contest
but
legitimate.
That's
that's
awesome.
C
C
B
Yeah
yeah
I
mean
I
have
so
I
kind
of
ran
off
on
this
on
the
hatch
rams
min
mvp,
outputs.
E
Yeah
you
did.
I
would
really
really
like
to
write
a
little
paper
pill
on
besides
what
we've
done
today,
but
some
more
clear
specifics.
So
we
have
something
more.
Besides
everything
we've
already
covered
today,
then
we'll
move
forward
on
on
these
actual
individual
grams,
but
just
the
small
amount
that
we
need
for
the
first
hatch.
E
If
you,
you
know
what
I'm
saying,
if
you
give
them
something
along
those
lines,
so
I
could
get
back
in
touch
with
them
in
the
next.
Let's
say
two
weeks,
because
the
next
week
I'm
going
to
get
back
with
wes
and
if
I
could
get
back
with
him
and
two
about
all
of
this,
and
we
move
forward
from
there
on
having
actual
mock
done.
That
would
be
really
really
cool.
C
Yeah
yeah
that
sounds
good
to
me:
jake,
I'm
planning
on
iterating
this
having
basically
a
next
version
of
this
notebook
that
integrates
these
things
and
sort
of
a
rough
draft
for
next
friday
and
then
in
the
lab.
We
will
bring
all
this
to
first
fruition,
so
we'll
have
the
by
the
end
of
the
lab
on
friday.
We
should
have
all
of
this
as
a
template
that
people
can
go
through
and
and
maybe
it'll
need
a
just
a
few
touch-ups
after
that,
but
but
basically
by
the
following
week.
C
I
imagine
that
it
should
be
ready
for
us
to
make
sort
of
an
announcement
that
people
can
engage
with.
Do
you
think
that's
gonna
work.
B
Yeah
yeah,
I
think
so
I
I
I
would
be
could
maybe
why
did
you?
Could
you
just
go
through
the
mvp
outputs
for
the
params
and
make
sure
that
I'm
not
that
we're
on
the
same
page
for
for
them.
E
Yeah
yeah
absolutely
what
time
were.
D
E
I
know
because
you
got
you
know
your
lab
the
next
day
and
we
got
the
common
simulator
that
same
day.
But
what
what's
going
to
work
for
you?
Let's
always.
C
Let's
do
thursday,
oh
okay,
if
this
works
so
either
wednesday
afternoon
or
like
in
this,
like,
like
around
mid-afternoon,
like
around
noon
or
thursday,.
B
Evening
go
ahead,
I
can
definitely
do
after
circles.
Ubi
poker
thursday
night
night
gets
a
little
late
for
me.
I'm
like
an
old
person
these
days.
E
Let's
do
samples,
let's
do
circles,
ubi,
that
that's
what
works
for
him
and
personal
time
for
you.
That
sounds
great
to
me.
So,
let's
do
wednesday
at
about.
We
can
do
one
or
two
how
about
we
do
two
that
gives
us
an
hour
from
four
excuse
me,
fourteen
to
fifteen,
maybe
two
for
two
to
three
on
personal
time
on
wednesday,
yeah.
B
O
O
Do
okay,
let's
do
it,
let's,
let's
do
it,
and
and
let's.
E
Let's
go
1400
to
50
to
1500.
how
about
that
yeah
online.
I
E
B
I
guess
yeah
no
well
then
magically.
I
wasn't
even
looking
at
the
time,
but
I
guess
we
are
on
time.
Yeah.
C
Stuff
guys,
so
I
think
this
is
going
really
good.
I
feel
very
like
whole
about
all
this.
I
feel
like
I've
got
the
whole
picture,
at
least
in
the
scope
of
what
is
required
for
this
params
templating
adventure,
yeah
yeah.
N
B
Basically,
okay
cool!
Well
then,
the
other
thing
ygg
is
that
I
owe
you
some
money.
We
gotta
make
a
giveth
milestone.
Oh.
E
Yeah
this
is
this
is
behind.
This
is
actually
an
issue.
That's
behind,
so
you
two
gotta
hook
up
on
this
and
get
on
so
I'd
love
to
see
this
done,
because
I
don't
like
seeing
issues
stuck
behind.